万米特深碳酸盐岩储层改造技术研究和试验

doi:10.7623/syxb202602012

石油学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 466-481,490.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202602012

• 石油工程 • 上一篇

万米特深碳酸盐岩储层改造技术研究和试验

翁定为^1,2, 杨战伟^1,2, 彭建新³, 才博^1,2, 付海峰^1,2, 王丽伟^1,2, 刘举³, 高莹^1,2, 黄瑞^1,2, 徐敏杰^1,2, 张朝阳⁴

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 中国石油天然气集团有限公司油气藏改造重点实验室河北廊坊 065007;
3. 中国石油塔里木油田公司油气工艺研究院新疆库尔勒 841000;
4. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院北京 102249

收稿日期:2025-01-07 修回日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-03-13
通讯作者: 杨战伟,男,1982年11月生,2012年获中国石油勘探开发研究院硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事水力压裂技术研究工作。Email:yzw69@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:翁定为,男,1981年6月生,2013年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院压裂酸化技术中心主任、教授级高级工程师,主要从事压裂工艺技术方面的研究。Email:wendw69@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科研攻关项目“万米深层碳酸盐岩储层改造技术研究”(671023115001)和中国石油天然气集团有限公司科研项目“非常规储层体积压裂共性技术研究”(2023ZZ28YJ01)资助。

Research and experiment on reservoir stimulation technology for ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs at 10 000 meters depth

Weng Dingwei^1,2, Yang Zhanwei^1,2, Peng Jianxin³, Cai Bo^1,2, Fu Haifeng^1,2, Wang Liwei^1,2, Liu Ju³, Gao Ying^1,2, Huang Rui^1,2, Xu Minjie^1,2, Zhang Zhaoyang⁴

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Stimulation, Hebei Langfang 065007, China;
3. Oil & Gas Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China;
4. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2025-01-07 Revised:2025-12-25 Published:2026-03-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 万米以深碳酸盐岩储层改造面临超高地应力压开难度大、超高温酸蚀裂缝改造范围小距离短、对压裂液耐温要求高、低排量加砂难度大等难题。基于对该类油气储集层特点及部分井改造低产低效原因的分析,研究了低排量超高施工压力产生的原因及对改造效果的影响,从降低施工压力及实现体积改造出发,提出了主体改造技术及改造探索技术方向。理论及物理模拟实验分析超高地应力与钻完井形成的致密储层附加应力保护层是超高施工压力主要原因,高密度加重压裂配合地面超高压设备可有效解决该难题。酸压物理模拟证实可借助节理缝实现体积改造,改造形成主裂缝同时酸蚀侧向节理缝,高温酸蚀裂缝有效性分析得出近井易形成过渡溶蚀,远井带残酸形成的裂缝以无效缝为主。提出高密度加重+多级复合超远酸压的主体技术及探索加砂压裂和加砂与酸压的复合改造技术,支撑了中国首口万米井(深地塔科1井)顺利实施储层改造,也为国内外万米特深碳酸盐岩储层改造提供了借鉴。

关键词: 万米特深, 盐下白云岩, 超高应力, 高密度加重压裂, 超远酸压, 复合改造

Abstract: The stimulation of carbonate reservoirs at depths exceeding 10 000 meters encounter significant problems, including difficulties in fracturing under ultra-high stresses, limited stimulation scale due to short lengths of fractures acid-etched at ultra-high temperatures, stringent temperature resistance requirements for fracturing fluids, and challenges in proppant transport at low pumping rates. Based on an analysis of the characteristics of these oil and gas reservoirs and the causes for low productivity and inefficiency of certain wells after reservoir stimulation, this study investigates the origins of low pumping rates and ultra-high fracturing pressures and their effects on stimulation performance. Focusing on reducing fracturing pressure and achieving volumetric fracturing, the study proposes both key stimulation techniques and exploratory directions for further technological advancements. Theoretical and physical model experiments demonstrate that ultra-high stress and the additional stress protection layer formed during well drilling and completion in tight reservoirs are the primary reasons for ultra-high fracturing pressures. High-density weighted fracturing, combined with surface ultra-high pressure equipment, offers an effective solution to this problem. The acid fracturing physical simulation confirms that volumetric stimulation can be achieved using joint fractures, creating the primary fracture while etching the lateral joint fractures. Effectiveness analysis of high-temperature acid-etched fractures reveals that near-well zones tend to undergo transitional dissolution, and fractures generated by residual acid along the original wellbore are dominantly ineffective. The study proposes the main technology of high-density weighted fracturing combined with multi-stage composite ultra-far acid fracturing, as well as the exploration of combined sand fracturing and acid fracturing stimulation techniques. This has supported the successful reservoir stimulation of the first ten-thousand-meters well in China (Well Shendi Take 1) and provides valuable insights for the stimulation of ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs in international contexts.

Key words: ten-thousand-meters ultra-deep, subsalt dolomite, ultra-high stress, high-density weighted fracturing, ultra-far acid fracturing, composite stimulation

中图分类号:

TE357

翁定为, 杨战伟, 彭建新, 才博, 付海峰, 王丽伟, 刘举, 高莹, 黄瑞, 徐敏杰, 张朝阳. 万米特深碳酸盐岩储层改造技术研究和试验[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(2): 466-481,490.

Weng Dingwei, Yang Zhanwei, Peng Jianxin, Cai Bo, Fu Haifeng, Wang Liwei, Liu Ju, Gao Ying, Huang Rui, Xu Minjie, Zhang Zhaoyang. Research and experiment on reservoir stimulation technology for ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs at 10 000 meters depth[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2026, 47(2): 466-481,490.

参考文献

[1] 杨海军,陈永权,田军,等. 塔里木盆地轮探1井超深层油气勘探重大发现与意义[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(2):62-72.YANG Haijun,CHEN Yongquan,TIAN Jun,et al.Great discovery and its significance of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in well Luntan-1 of the Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(2):62-72.
[2] 杨海军,王春生,杨宪彰,等.深地塔科1井万米特深井钻探关键技术进展与科学意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2025,52(5):1180-1188. YANG Haijun,WANG Chunsheng,YANG Xianzhang,et al.Technological progress and scientific significance of the drilling of the ten-thousand-meter ultra-deep well TK1,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2025,52(5):1180-1188.
[3] 康婷婷,陈永权,赵凤全,等.塔里木盆地轮南—富满台缘带寒武系层序格架中生储盖组合特征及勘探意义[J].天然气地球科学,2024,35(1):72-83.KANG Tingting,CHEN Yongquan,ZHAO Fengquan,et al.Characteristics and exploration significance of source-reservoir-cap assemblage in Cambrian sequence framework of Lunnan-Fuman platform margin in Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(1):72-83.
[4] 王清华,徐振平,张荣虎,等.塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):15-32.WANG Qinghua,XU Zhenping,ZHANG Ronghu,et al.New fields,new types of hydrocarbon explorations and their resource potentials in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(1):15-32.
[5] 吴鲜,李丹,朱秀香,等.塔里木盆地顺北油气田地温场对奥陶系超深层油气的影响——以顺北5号走滑断裂带为例[J].石油实验地质,2022,44(3):402-412.WU Xian,LI Dan,ZHU Xiuxiang,et al.Influence of geothermal field on ultra-deep Ordovician oil and gas in Shunbei field,Tarim Basin:a case study of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2022,44(3):402-412.
[6] 闫磊,朱光有,王珊,等.塔里木盆地震旦系—寒武系万米超深层天然气成藏条件与有利区带优选[J].石油学报,2021,42(11):1446-1457.YAN Lei,ZHU Guangyou,WANG Shan,et al. Accumulation conditions and favorable areas for natural gas accumulation in the 10000 meters ultra-deep Sinian-Cambrian in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(11):1446-1457.
[7] 朱永进,郑剑锋,刘玲利,等.塔里木盆地下寒武统吾松格尔组沉积期岩相古地理与勘探意义[J].天然气地球科学,2022,33(1):1-12.ZHU Yongjin,ZHENG Jianfeng,LIU Lingli,et al.Lithofacies paleogeography and exploration significance of Lower Cambrian Wusonger Formation depositional stage,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2022,33(1):1-12.
[8] 雷群,胥云,杨战伟,等.超深油气储集层改造技术进展与发展方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(1):193-201.LEI Qun,XU Yun,YANG Zhanwei,et al.Progress and development directions of stimulation techniques for ultra-deep oil and gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(1):193-201.
[9] 刘洪涛,刘举,刘会锋,等.塔里木盆地超深层油气藏试油与储层改造技术进展及发展方向[J].天然气工业,2020,40(11):76-88.LIU Hongtao,LIU Ju,LIU Huifeng,et al.Progress and development direction of production test and reservoir stimulation technologies for ultra-deep oil and gas reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(11):76-88.
[10] 雷群,杨战伟,翁定为,等.超深裂缝性致密储集层提高缝控改造体积技术——以库车山前碎屑岩储集层为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(5):1012-1024.LEI Qun,YANG Zhanwei,WENG Dingwei,et al.Techniques for improving fracture-controlled stimulated reservoir volume in ultra-deep fractured tight reservoirs:a case study of Kuqa piedmont clastic reservoirs,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(5):1012-1024.
[11] AMORUSO J D,TEMPLETON-BARRETT E,HECKE M T,et al.Julia case history of the stimulation and lower completion to meet the 10kpsi drawdown tertiary challenge[R].SPE 191663,2018.
[12] 吴奇,胥云,王腾飞,等.增产改造理念的重大变革——体积改造技术概论[J].天然气工业,2011,31(4):7-12.WU Qi,XU Yun,WANG Tengfei,et al.The revolution of reservoir stimulation:an introduction of volume fracturing[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(4):7-12.
[13] 吴奇,胥云,王晓泉,等.非常规油气藏体积改造技术——内涵、优化设计与实现[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3):352-358.WU Qi,XU Yun,WANG Xiaoquan,et al.Volume fracturing technology of unconventional reservoirs:connotation,optimization design and implementation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):352-358.
[14] 胥云,雷群,陈铭,等.体积改造技术理论研究进展与发展方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(5):874-887.XU Yun,LEI Qun,CHEN Ming,et al.Progress and development of volume stimulation techniques[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(5):874-887.
[15] 雷群,翁定为,管保山,等.基于缝控压裂优化设计的致密油储集层改造方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(3):592-599.LEI Qun,WENG Dingwei,GUAN Baoshan,et al.A novel approach of tight oil reservoirs stimulation based on fracture controlling optimization and design[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(3):592-599.
[16] 雷群,胥云,蒋廷学,等.用于提高低-特低渗透油气藏改造效果的缝网压裂技术[J].石油学报,2009,30(2):237-241.LEI Qun,XU Yun,JIANG Tingxue,et al."Fracture network" fracturing technique for improving post-fracturing performance of low and ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(2):237-241.
[17] 焦方正.塔里木盆地深层碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏体积开发实践与认识[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(3):552-558.JIAO Fangzheng.Practice and knowledge of volumetric development of deep fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(3):552-558.
[18] XIAO Hui,TAO Hongsheng,QIAO Hongjun,et al.Study on influence of mud pollution on formation fracture pressure[J].MATEC Web of Conferences,2015,22:04022.
[19] 马永生,何治亮,赵培荣,等.深层—超深层碳酸盐岩储层形成机理新进展[J].石油学报,2019,40(12):1415-1425.MA Yongsheng,HE Zhiliang,ZHAO Peirong,et al.A new progress in formation mechanism of deep and ultra-deep carbonate reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(12):1415-1425.
[20] 张以明,才博,何春明,等.超高温超深非均质碳酸盐岩储层地质工程一体化体积改造技术[J].石油学报,2018,39(1):92-100.ZHANG Yiming,CAI Bo,HE Chunming,et al.Volume fracturing technology based on geo-engineering integration for ultra-high temperature and ultra-deep heterogeneous carbonate reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(1):92-100.
[21] 车明光,王永辉,彭建新,等.深层—超深层裂缝性致密砂岩气藏加砂压裂技术:以塔里木盆地大北、克深气藏为例[J].天然气工业,2018,38(8):63-68. CHE Mingguang,WANG Yonghui,PENG Jianxin,et al.Sand fracturing technologies for deep and ultra-deep fractured tight sandstone gas reservoirs:a case study of Dabei and Keshen gas reservoirs in the Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(8):63-68.
[22] 张倩,李年银,李长燕,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩储层酸化压裂改造技术现状及发展趋势[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(2):1-7.Z HANG Qian,LI Nianyin,LI Changyan,et al.Overview and trend of acid-fracturing technology for marine carbonate reservoirs in China[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(2):1-7.
[23] 王永辉,李永平,程兴生,等.高温深层碳酸盐岩储层酸化压裂改造技术[J].石油学报,2012,33(增刊2):166-173.WANG Yonghui,LI Yongping,CHENG Xingsheng,et al.A new acid fracturing technique for carbonate reservoirs with high-temperature and deep layer[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S2):166-173.
[24] 熊亮,董晓霞,熊鹰,等.川南地区二叠系茅口组一段致密碳酸盐岩储层类型及控制因素[J].石油学报,2025,46(10):1875-1891.XIONG Liang,DONG Xiaoxia,XIONG Ying,et al.Types and controlling factors of tight carbonate reservoirs in the Member 1 of Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2025,46(10):1875-1891.
[25] 胡宗全,林会喜,邓尚,等.断裂及裂缝对不同岩性储层的改造作用[J].石油学报,2025,46(8):1489-1501.HU Zongquan,LIN Huixi,DENG Shang,et al.Reformation effects of faults and fractures on various lithologic reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2025,46(8):1489-1501.
[26] S IERRA L.New high-density fracturing fluid to stimulate a high-pressure,high-temperature tight-gas sandstone producer formation in Saudi Arabia[R].SPE 130236,2010.
[27] RIVAS L,NAVAIRA G,BOURGEOIS B,et al.Development and use of high density fracturing fluid in deep water Gulf of Mexico frac and packs[R].SPE 116007,2008.
[28] 杨战伟,才博,胥云,等.库车山前超深巨厚储层缝网改造有效性评估[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(6):105-111. YANG Zhanwei,CAI Bo,XU Yun,et al.Effectiveness evaluation on network fracturing in ultra-deep and thick reservoirs in Kuqa piedmont[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(6):105-111.
[29] 韩秀玲,杨贤友,熊春明,等.超深裂缝性厚层改造效果影响因素分析与高效改造对策[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(8):1280-1286. HAN Xiuling,YANG Xianyou,XIONG Chunming,et al.Influencing factors and efficient reservoir stimulation countermeasures in thick and ultra-deep naturally fractured reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(8):1280-1286.
[30] 许莹莹,胡志明,石雨昕,等.页岩气藏高压压裂液侵入机理与流固耦合模拟[J].石油学报,2025,46(6):1168-1179.XU Yingying,HU Zhiming,SHI Yuxin,et al.Mechanism of high-pressure fracturing fluid invasion and coupled fluid-solid simulation in shale gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2025,46(6):1168-1179.
[31] 武晓光,龙腾达,黄中伟,等.页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J].石油学报,2024,45(3):559-573.WU Xiaoguang,LONG Tengda,HUANG Zhongwei,et al.Characteristics of fracture propagation in radial wellbores of shale oil reservoirs with multiple lithologic layers[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(3):559-573.
[32] 雷群,翁定为,才博,等.中国石油勘探压裂技术进展、关键问题及对策[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(5):15-27. LEI Qun,WENG Dingwei,CAI Bo,et al.Progress,key challenges and countermeasures of reservoir stimulation technology of PetroChina[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(5):15-27.
[33] 王丽伟,杨竞旭,高莹,等.深层油气用加重滑溜水压裂液体系[J].钻井液与完井液,2020,37(6):794-797.WANG Liwei,YANG Jingxu,GAO Ying,et al.Study on weighted slick water fracturing fluid for deep buried oil and gas[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2020,37(6):794-797.
[34] 周建平,杨战伟,徐敏杰,等.工业氯化钙加重胍胶压裂液体系研究与现场试验[J].石油钻探技术,2021,49(2):96-101.ZHOU Jianping,YANG Zhanwei,XU Minjie,et al.Research and field tests of weighted fracturing fluids with industrial calcium chloride and Guar gum[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2021,49(2):96-101.
[35] 单长安,梁兴,张卓,等.川南地区筠连复杂山地浅层改造区薄互煤层气勘探开发关键技术与创新实践[J].石油学报,2025,46(6): 1056-1073.SHAN Chang’an,LIANG Xing,ZHANG Zhuo,et al.Key technologies and innovative practices for exploration and development of thin interbedded coalbed methane in the shallow transformation zone of Junlian complex mountainous region,southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2025,46(6):1056-1073.
[36] 蒋廷学,周珺,贾文峰,等.顺北油气田超深碳酸盐岩储层深穿透酸压技术[J].石油钻探技术,2019,47(3):140-147.JIANG Tingxue,ZHOU Jun,JIA Wenfeng,et al.Deep penetration acid-fracturing technology for ultra-deep carbonate oil & gas reservoirs in the Shunbei oil and gas field[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2019,47(3):140-147.
[37] 修乃岭,严玉忠,胥云,等.基于非达西流动的自支撑剪切裂缝导流能力实验研究[J].岩土力学,2019,40(增刊1):135-142.XIU Nailing,YAN Yuzhong,XU Yun,et al.Experimental study on conductivity of self-supporting shear fractures based on non-Darcy flow[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(S1):135-142.
[38] 钟小军,张锐,吴刚,等.复杂非均质碳酸盐岩储层酸岩反应动力学特征及酸压对策研究[J].钻井液与完井液,2020,37(6):798-802. ZHONG Xiaojun,ZHANG Rui,WU Gang,et al.Study on dynamic characteristics of acid rock reaction and acid fracturing countermeasures in complex heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2020,37(6):798-802.
[39] 杨战伟,胥云,程兴生,等.水力喷射酸压技术在轮南碳酸盐岩水平井中的应用[J].钻采工艺,2012,35(1):49-51.YANG Zhanwei,XU Yun,CHENG Xingsheng,et al.Research and application of hydraulic jetting and acid fracturing technology in horizontal well of Lunnan carbonate formation[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2012,35(1):49-51.
[40] 国家能源局.水基压裂液技术要求:SY/T 7627—2021[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2021.National Energy Administration.Technical requirements of water-based fracturing fluid:SY/T 7627-2021[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2021.

万米特深碳酸盐岩储层改造技术研究和试验

Research and experiment on reservoir stimulation technology for ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs at 10 000 meters depth

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王香增, 杨红, 孙晓. 低渗透致密油藏CO₂压裂—驱油—封存一体化技术及矿场实践[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(1): 120-133.
[2]	吕伟峰, 闫玉同, 吕文峰, 俞宏伟. CO₂驱前缘表征方法及运移影响因素研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(1): 155-171.
[3]	刘月亮, 刘辰, 刘鑫磊. 致密油注CO₂提高采收率机理及技术研究现状与展望[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(1): 198-216.
[4]	郭二鹏, 毛晓鹏, 贺吉涛, 蒋旭, 张侃毅, 刘宗建, 任铄文, 王新伟. 非凝结气体掺混对蒸汽干度影响实验[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2332-2342,2426.
[5]	贾德利, 王治, 孙福超, 王全宾, 杨清海. 分层注水井筒通讯技术进展及展望[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2410-2426.
[6]	吕文雅, 刘艳祥, 曾联波, 安小平, 张昊文, 张皎生, 李超, 陈欢, 李德生. 致密砂岩储层复杂缝网系统三维地质建模方法——以姬塬油田L井区三叠系延长组8段1亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2115-2127.
[7]	张家麟, 盛茂, 司丽娟, 张彦军, 李杰, 李川, 田守嶒, 李根生. 基于泵注压力时频特征的压裂暂堵有效性评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2128-2140.
[8]	杨立强, 王飞, 柳明, 李彦超, 张显聪. 基于停泵压降监测数据的支撑缝网参数解释方法——以四川盆地威远页岩气田A井为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1928.
[9]	慕立俊, 齐银, 陈文斌, 徐荣利, 拜杰, 涂志勇, 叶凯. 庆城页岩油水力压裂试验场岩心裂缝及支撑剂分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(9): 1764-1775.
[10]	陈超, 张晶晨, 董海海, 向娟, 张文, 王晓光. 低渗透砾岩油藏CO₂驱孔隙和剩余油动用机理及驱替效率[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(7): 1434-1446.
[11]	李宾飞, 赵希芮, 郑磊, 李兆敏, 朱迪, 曹小朋. CO₂压驱高速注入对基质驱油特征的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(5): 926-937.
[12]	康志勤, 武致辉, 王磊, 杨栋, 赵静, 韩贺旭, 赵阳升. 油页岩无水、近/超临界水热解细观结构演变及宏观力学响应[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 801-815.
[13]	骆正山, 张景奇, 骆济豪, 王小完. 基于IMA-AmMLP模型的CO₂驱最小混相压力预测[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(10): 1522-1528.
[14]	赵明伟, 戴彩丽, 刘棚, 高明伟, 吴一宁, 袁彬. 压驱一体化双子表面活性剂滑溜水特性及高效渗吸排驱机制[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1409-1421.
[15]	王飞, 乔润伟, 祝健, 张士诚. 基于焖井压降曲线的页岩油井压裂缝网特征诊断[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1234-1243,1269.