Risk-based optimization method for long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline route

doi:10.7623/syxb201403021

ACTA PETROLEI SINICA ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 570-576.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201403021

• Petroleum Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles

Risk-based optimization method for long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline route

Zhang Shengzhu, Wu Zongzhi

China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2013-12-10 Revised:2014-03-31 Online:2014-05-25 Published:2014-04-11

基于风险的长输油气管道选线优化方法

张圣柱, 吴宗之

中国安全生产科学研究院北京 100012

通讯作者: 吴宗之，男，1963年3月生，1983年获华南理工大学学士学位，1989年获中国矿业大学（北京）博士学位，现任中国安全生产科学研究院院长、研究员，主要从事危险化学品安全技术、重大危险源辨识与控制、应急管理等方面的研究。Email：ncs@chinasafety.ac.cn
作者简介:张圣柱，男，1983年8月生，2006年获山东科技大学学士学位，2012年获中国矿业大学（北京）博士学位，现为中国安全生产科学研究院工程师，主要从事油气管道及危险化学品安全技术研究。Email：zhangsz@chinasafety.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目“油罐区重大燃爆事故防范关键技术”（2012BAK03B03）资助。

Abstract

Abstract:

Selection of the route of long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline is a complicated multi-target problem. Accident risk control and construction cost reduction are two major targets for such selection. By applying multi-target decision theoretical approach and with the route of acceptable risk and lower construction cost as optimization target, this paper puts forward an optimization method for selection of the route of long-distance oil and gas pipeline. By investigating the computation method for the optimized target, the paper analyzes the constraint conditions of such selection, determines the precision and range of grid division, and establishes the route selection optimization model. Subsequently, the model is solved by dynamic programming algorithm and a case study is demonstrated. The results show that, the risk-based route selection optimization method is feasible, individual risk criteria of long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline and relocation of villages or buildings (structures) can serve as the constraint conditions for the selection. Defining the local topography and landform around special region helps to control individual risk. The weighting distribution of the two optimized targets needs adjustment according to actual conditions.

Key words: long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline, risk analysis, safety planning, multi-objective optimization, route selection method

摘要：

长输油气管道选线是复杂的多目标决策问题，控制事故风险、降低建设成本是选线的两个主要目标。应用多目标决策理论，以选择风险可接受且建设成本较低的路线为优化目标，提出了长输油气管道选线优化方法。通过研究优化目标的计算方法，分析选线的约束条件，确定网格划分的精度及范围，建立了选线优化模型，运用动态规划算法求解该模型并进行了实例应用。结果表明，基于风险的选线优化方法是可行的，长输油气管道个人风险标准和村庄或建（构）筑物的搬迁情况可作为选线的约束条件，定义特殊区域周边局部范围的地形地貌类型有助于控制个人风险，两个优化目标的权重分配需要根据实际情况进行调整。

关键词: 长输油气管道, 风险分析, 安全规划, 多目标优化, 选线方法

CLC Number:

TE88

Zhang Shengzhu, Wu Zongzhi. Risk-based optimization method for long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline route[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2014, 35(3): 570-576.

张圣柱, 吴宗之. 基于风险的长输油气管道选线优化方法[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(3): 570-576.

References

[1] 康勇.油气管道工程[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2008.
Kang Yong.Oil and gas pipeline project[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2008.
[2] 石油商报.中国石油"十二五"油气管道建设里程将翻番[EB/OL].[2011-11-25].http://www.phnews.com.cn/system/2011/11/25/001357033.shtml.
Oil Daily.The oil and gas pipeline construction mileage of ChinaNational Petroleum Corporation will be doubled by the end of the Twelfth Five-Year[EB/OL].[2011-11-25].http://www.phnews.com.cn/system/2011/11/25/001357033.shtml.
[3] 张圣柱.油气长输管道事故风险分析与选线方法研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2012.
Zhang Shengzhu.Accident risk analysis and route selection method of long-distance oil and gas transportation pipeline[D].Beijing:China University of Mining & Technology,2012.
[4] 张圣柱,吴宗之,张健,等.油气管道选线和风险评价相关法规与方法[J].油气储运,2012,31(9):663-669.
Zhang Shengzhu,Wu Zongzhi,Zhang Jian,et al.Relevant regulations and methods for route selection of oil and gas pipeline and risk assessment[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(9):663-669.
[5] ASME B31.8 S 2001.Supplement to B31.8 on management system of gas pipeline[S].ASME B31.8-2001.New York,2001.
[6] Muhlbauer W K.Pipeline risk management manual[M].3rd ed.New York:Gulf Publishing Company,2004.
[7] 杨筱蘅.油气管道安全工程[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2010.
Yang Xiaoheng.Oil and gas pipeline safety engineering[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2010.
[8] European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group.7th EGIG-report 1970-2007:Gas Pipeline Incidents[R/OL].[2013-01-08].http://www.egig.eu/uploads/bestanden/d1244d38-8194-46e8-89f4-6b6258d05f3a.
[9] Davis P M,Dubois J,Gambardella F,et al. Performance of european cross-country oil pipelines:statistical summary of reported spillages in 2009 and since 1971[R].Brussels,Conservation of Clean Air and Water in Europe,2011.
[10] Jo Y D,Ahn B J.Analysis of hazard areas associated with high-pressure natural-gas pipelines[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2002,15(3):179-188.
[11] 翁永基.油气管道泄漏事故的定量风险评价[J].石油学报,2004,25(5):108-112.
Weng Yongji.Quantitative risk assessment for failure of oil and gas pipelines[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(5):108-112.
[12] 徐涛龙,姚安林,蒋宏业,等.油气管道第三方破坏风险评估关键性技术研究[J].石油天然气学报,2011,33(2):150-154.
Xu Taolong,Yao Anlin,Jiang Hongye,et al.Key techniques of risk assessment of oil and gas pipelines damaged by third party[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2011,33(2):150-154.
[13] Dziubinski M,Fratczak M,Markowski A S.Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failures of fuel pipelines[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2006,19(5):399-408.
[14] Wu Zongzhi,Zhang Shengzhu.Research progress on risk acceptance criteria of Long-distance oil and gas transportation pipeline[J].Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response,2012,2(3):188-194.
[15] Chen Yuhwen,Wang Chihwang,Lin Sainju.A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport[J].The International Journal of Management Science,2008,36(3):363-372.
[16] Zhu G Y,Henson M A,Megan L.Dynamic modeling and linear model predictive control of gas pipeline networks[J].Journal of Process Control,2001,11(2):129-148.
[17] 中国石油化工股份有限公司青岛安全工程研究院.石化装置定量风险评估指南[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2007.
SINOPEC Safety Engineering Institute.A guide for quantitative risk assessment of petrochemical plant[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2007.
[18] Sitarz S.Dynamic programming with ordered structures:Theory,examples and applications[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2010,161(20):2623-2641.
[19] Abo-Sinna M A,Amer A H,El Sayed H H.An interactive algorithm for decomposing the parametric space in fuzzy multiobjective dynamic programming problem[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,174(1):684-699.

Risk-based optimization method for long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline route

基于风险的长输油气管道选线优化方法

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Song Daiwen, Han Bin, Song Sinuo. The application of S-curve non-deterministic economic evaluation method in petroleum project investment decision-making [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(3): 443-452.
[2]	Ren Shaoran, Li Dexiang, Zhang Liang, Huang Haidong. Leakage pathways and risk analysis of carbon dioxide in geological storage [J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2014, 35(3): 591-601.
[3]	Niu Yanliang, Wu Wei. Optimized selection and evaluation method for nonproducing reserves [J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2006, 27(S1): 115-118.
[4]	Zheng Junde, Gao Chaoyang, Shi Chengfan, Liu Bo. Numerical simulation of watered-out mechanism in horizontal well [J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2006, 27(5): 99-102,107.
[5]	Jiang Tingxue, Ding Yunhong, Wang Yongli, Shan Wenwen, Wang Xin. Hydraulic fracturing expert system for low-permeability and undeveloped oil-bearing reservoirs [J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2006, 27(5): 79-82.
[6]	YONG Qi-dong. RISK ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS FOR EXTENDED REACH DRILLING TECHNIQUE [J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2002, 23(1): 83-87.
[7]	Lü Minggang, Zhu Xiangdong, Hu Suyun, Bao Shijie. GEOLOGICAL RISK ANALYSIS OF TRAP AND PLAY [J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 1997, 18(2): 49-53.