Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of shale gas in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin

doi:10.7623/syxb201508004

Acta Petrolei Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 926-939,953.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201508004

• Petroleum Exploration • Previous Articles Next Articles

Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of shale gas in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin

Zhang Xiaoming¹, Shi Wanzhong^1,2, Xu Qinghai¹, Wang Ren¹, Xu Zhuang¹, Wang Jian¹, Wang Chao¹, Yuan Qi¹

1. Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Hubei Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Wuhan 430074, China

Online:2015-08-25 Published:2015-08-06

四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层特征及控制因素

张晓明¹, 石万忠^1,2, 徐清海¹, 王任¹, 徐壮¹, 王健¹, 王超¹, 袁琪¹

1. 中国地质大学资源学院湖北武汉 430074;
2. 构造和油气资源教育部重点实验室湖北武汉 430074

通讯作者: 石万忠,男,1973年1月生,1996年获中国地质大学(武汉)学士学位,2006年获中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位,现为中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事层序地层学、成藏动力学及页岩气研究。Email:shiwz@cug.edu.cn
作者简介:张晓明,男,1989年9月生,2013年获中国地质大学(武汉)学士学位,现为中国地质大学(武汉)硕士研究生,主要从事页岩气研究。Email:313477907@qq.com
基金资助:
中国地质调查局"中国南方页岩气综合评价参数优选及地球物理表征方法"项目(12120114055801)资助。

Abstract

Abstract:

The generation and accumulation of shale gas has unique laws different from conventional hydrocarbon reservoirs. The study on shale gas reservoirs is a key issue in the exploration and development of shale gas. At present, the knowledge of shale gas reservoirs is relatively limited in Jiaoshiba area, for which a further study is required. Based on massive laboratory test data, the statistical analysis shows that the total organic carbon of Wufeng Formation, Upper Ordovician and Longmaxi Formation, Lower Silurian is ranged in 0.55 % ~5.89 % and has an average of 2.54 % in the target intervals, presenting a gradual increase trend from top to bottom. Based on whole-rock X-ray diffraction method, the content of shale clay mineral is ranged in 16.6 % ~62.8 % and 40.9 % on average, gradually reduced from top to bottom. The content of brittle mineral gradually increased from top to bottom, ranged in 37.2 % ~83.4 % and with an average of 59.1 % . The helium injection method was used to test the porosity of target interval. The measured helium porosity is ranged in 1.17 % ~7.98 % and 4.61 % on average, characterized by trichotomy of a low value between two high values. Based on steady-state method, the measured horizontal permeability is ranged in 0.002~335.209 mD and 23.785 mD on average. The reservoir pore structure has been studied using high pressure mercury injection method. Massive test data show that meso-pores are developed and provide the main specific surface area, while meso-pores and macro-pores make major contributions to permeability. The pore types were observed using SEM in combination with argon-ion milling technology. It is mainly shown that the organic pores increase while inorganic pores are reduced from top to bottom. Measured by desorption method, the total gas content is ranged in 0.44~5.19 m³/t and 1.97 m³/t on average, showing a gradual increase trend from top to bottom. Research results indicate that the development of marine shale gas reservoir in Well Jiaoye 1 is controlled by mineral compositions and the development characteristics of organic matters. The total organic carbon is not only a major factor to control the lower reservoir member, but also an important material to provide the storage space to shale gas. In the late diagenetic stage, the clay mineral assemblage was changed from montmorillonite to illite, so as to form new micro-pores, leading to an increase in reservoir porosity and great influences on upper reservoir members. The content of brittle mineral is more than 50 %, facilitating the development of fractures, so that the permeability performance of reservoirs will be significantly enhanced. In general, Wufeng Formation and the bottom of Longmaxi Formation are high-quality reservoirs as primary pay zones.

Key words: shale gas reservoir, porosity, pore structure, pore type, controlling factor, Upper Ordovician, Lower Silurian, Jiaoshiba area

摘要：

页岩气的生成和聚集具有不同于常规油气藏的独特规律,页岩气储层的研究是页岩气勘探与开发的核心问题。目前,对焦石坝地区页岩气储层的认识是相对有限的,需要对本区页岩气储层做进一步研究。基于大量实验室测试数据的统计分析显示:上奥陶统五峰组和下志留统龙马溪组目的层段总有机碳(TOC)含量介于0.55 % ~5.89 %,平均为2.54 %,且具有自上而下有机碳含量逐渐增加的趋势;基于全岩X-射线衍射分析方法,页岩中黏土矿物含量介于16.6 % ~62.8 %,平均为40.9 %,自上而下逐渐减少,脆性矿物含量自上而下逐渐增加,总量介于37.2 % ~83.4 %,平均为59.1 % ;基于氦气注入法检测了目的层段的孔隙度,实测氦气孔隙度介于1.17 % ~7.98 %,平均为4.61 %,目的层段孔隙度呈现出"两高夹一低"的三分性特征;稳态法水平渗透率介于0.002~335.209 mD,平均为23.785 mD;通过高压压汞法对储层孔隙结构进行了研究,大量的测试数据表明,介孔级别的孔隙发育,且介孔提供了主要的孔比表面积,而介孔和大孔对渗透率起主要的贡献;将氩离子剖光技术和扫描电镜(SEM)相结合对储层的孔隙类型进行了观察,总体表现为自上而下有机孔隙增加、无机孔隙减少;由解吸法测得总含气量介于0.44~5.19 m³/t,平均为1.97 m³/t,从上到下呈现出逐渐增大的趋势。研究表明,焦页1井海相页岩气储层发育的控制因素有矿物组成和有机质发育特征等。TOC是控制下部储层段的主要内在因素,也是提供页岩气储存空间的重要物质;成岩阶段晚期,黏土矿物组合发生变化,蒙脱石向伊利石转变,形成新的微孔隙,增加了储层的孔隙度,对上部储层段有较大影响;脆性矿物含量大于50 %,易于形成裂缝,可造成地层渗透性能的显著增强。总体来看,五峰组和龙马溪组的底部层段是优质储层,也是主要的产气层段。

关键词: 页岩气储层, 孔隙度, 孔隙结构, 孔隙类型, 控制因素, 上奥陶统, 下志留统, 焦石坝

CLC Number:

TE112.2

Zhang Xiaoming, Shi Wanzhong, Xu Qinghai, Wang Ren, Xu Zhuang, Wang Jian, Wang Chao, Yuan Qi. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of shale gas in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 926-939,953.

张晓明, 石万忠, 徐清海, 王任, 徐壮, 王健, 王超, 袁琪. 四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层特征及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 926-939,953.

References

[1] 聂海宽,张金川.页岩气聚集条件及含气量计算—以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J].地质学报,2012,86(2):349-361.
Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchuan.Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Gas Content Calculation:A Case Study of Sichuan Basin and Its Periphery in the Lower Paleozoic[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(2):349-361.
[2] Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[3] Pollastro R M.Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation,Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):551-578.
[4] Kotarba M J,Curtis J B,Lewan M D.Comparison of natural gases accumulated in Oligocene strata with hydrous pyrolysis gases from Menilite Shales of the Polish Outer Carpathians[J].Organic Geochemistry,2009,40(7):769-783.
[5] 王阳,陈洁,胡琳,等.沉积环境对页岩气储层的控制作用——以中下扬子区下寒武统筇竹寺组为例[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(5):845-850.
Wang Yang,Chen Jie,Hu Lin,et al.Sedimentary environment control on shale gas reservoir:A case study of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Middle Lower Yangtze area[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):845-850.
[6] Bowker K A.Recent developments of the Barnett Shale play,Fort Worth Basin[J].West Texas Geological Society Bulletin,2003,42(6):4-11.
[7] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian-Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary basin:Application of an integrated formation evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,2008,92(1):87-125.
[8] 陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.四川盆地南缘下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层矿物成分特征及意义[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):775-782.
Chen Shangbin,Zhu Yanming,Wang Hongyan,et al.Characteristics and significance of mineral compositions of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoir in the southern margin of Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(5):775-782.
[9] 王亮,陈云燕,刘玉霞.川东南彭水地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(5):80-88.
Wang Liang,Chen Yunyan,Liu Yuxia.Shale Porous Structural Characteristics of Longmaxi Formation in Pengshui Area of Southeast Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(5):80-88.
[10] Slatt R M,O'Brien N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[11] Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[12] Curtis M E,Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,et al.Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(4):665-677.
[13] 陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):438-444.
Chen Shangbin,Zhu Yanming,Wang Hongyan,et al.Structure characteristics and accumulation significance of nanopores in Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(3):438-444.
[14] Mastalerz M,Schimmelmann A,Drobniak A,et al.Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany Shale across a maturation gradient:Insights from organic petrology,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(10):1621-1643.
[15] Milliken K L,Rudnicki M,Awwiller D N,et al.Organic matter-hosted pore system,Marcellus Formation (Devonian),Pennsylvania[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(2):177-200.
[16] 蒲泊伶,蒋有录,王毅,等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析[J].石油学报,2010,31(2):225-230.
Pu Boling,Jiang Youlu,Wang Yi,et al.Reservoir-forming conditions and favorable exploration zones of shale gas in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):225-230.
[17] 王玉满,董大忠,李建忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):551-561.
Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,Li Jianzhong,et al.Reservoir characteristics of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,southern Sichuan[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):551-561.
[18] 黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南志留系龙马溪组页岩气形成条件与有利区分析[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(5):782-787.
Huang Jinliang,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Shale gas accumulation conditions and favorable zones of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in south Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(5):782-787.
[19] 梁超,姜在兴,杨镱婷,等.四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩岩相及储集空间特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):691-698.
Liang Chao,Jiang Zaixing,Yang Yiting,et al.Characteristics of shale lithofacies and reservoir space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):691-698.
[20] 龙鹏宇,张金川,姜文利,等.渝页 1 井储层孔隙发育特征及其影响因素分析[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,43(10):3954-3963.
Long Pengyu,Zhang Jinchuan,Jiang Wenli,et al.Analysis on pores forming features and its influence factors of reservoir well Yuye-1[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2012,43(10):3954-3963.
[21] 郭旭升,胡东风,文治东,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素—以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].中国地质,2014,41(3):893-901.
Guo Xusheng,Hu Dongfeng,Wen Zhidong,et al.Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery:A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area[J].Geology in China,2014,41(3):893-901.
[22] 郭旭升.南方海相页岩气"二元富集规律"—四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J].地质学报,2014,88(7):1209-1218.
Guo Xusheng.Rules of Two-Factor Enrichiment for Marine Shale Gas in Southern China-Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas in Sichuan Basin and Its Surrounding Area[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(7):1209-1218.
[23] 郭彤楼,张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36.
Guo Tonglou,Zhang Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):28-36.
[24] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 19145-2003 沉积岩中总有机碳的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China.GB/T 19145-2003 Determination of total organic carbon in sedimentary rock[S].Beijing:China Standards Press,2003.
[25] 中国石油天然气总公司.SY/T 5124-1995 沉积岩中镜质组反射率测定方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
China National Petroleum Corporation.SY/T 5124-1995 Determination of vitrinite reflectance in sediment rocks[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1996.
[26] 中国石油天然气总公司.SY/T 5125-1996 透射光-荧光干酪跟显微组分鉴定及类型划分方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
China National Petroleum Corporation.SY/T 5125-1996 Transmitted light-fluorescence kerogen maceral identification and type division method[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997.
[27] 中国石油天然气总公司.SY/T 6210-1996 沉积岩中粘土矿物总量和常见非粘土矿物X射线衍射定量分析方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
China National Petroleum Corporation.SY/T 6210-1996 Quantitative analysis of total contents of clay minerals and common non-clay minerals in sedimentary rocks by x-ray diffraction[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997.
[28] 中国石油天然气总公司.SY/T 5163-1995 沉积岩粘土矿物相对含量X射线衍射分析方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
China National Petroleum Corporation.SY/T 5163-1995 Analytical method for relative contents of clay minerals in sedimentary rock by x-ray diffraction[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1996.
[29] 罗小平,李奕霏,吴昌荣,等.湘东南拗陷龙潭组泥页岩储层特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(5):588-594.
Luo Xiaoping,Li Yifei,Wu Changrong,et al.Characteristics of mud shale reservoirs in Upper Permian Longtan Formation of Southeast Hunan depression,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(5):588-594.
[30] 丰国秀,陈盛吉.岩石中沥青反射率与镜质体反射率之间的关系[J].天然气工业,1988,8(3):20-25.
Feng Guoxiu,Chen Shengji.Relationship between the Reflectance of Bitumen and Vitrinite in Rock[J].Natural Gas Industry,1988,8(3):20-25.
[31] Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,Genesis,and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
[32] 关小旭,伊向艺,杨火海.中美页岩气储层条件对比[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,36(5):33–39.
Guan Xiaoxu,Yi Xiangyi,Yang Huohai.Contrast of Shale Gas Reservoir Conditions in China and the United States[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2014,36(5):33–39.
[33] 蒋裕强,董大忠,漆麟,等.页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J].天然气工业,2010,30(10):7-12.
Jiang Yuqiang,Dong Dazhong,Qi Lin,et al.Basic features and evaluation of shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(10):7-12.
[34] 黄振凯,陈建平,薛海涛,等.松辽盆地白垩系青山口组泥页岩孔隙结构特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):58-65.
Huang Zhenkai,Chen Jianping,Xue Haitao,et al.Microstructural characteristics of the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation shale,Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):58-65.
[35] 张士万,李忠平,龙胜祥,等.江汉专著——气藏地质特征[M].(中国石油化工股份有限公司内部资料)
[36] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member,northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):51-75.
[37] Robert R,Loucks R.Imaging Nanoscale Pores in the Mississippian Barnett Shale of the Northern Fort Worth Basin[C].AAPG Annual Convention Abstracts,California,2007,16:115.
[38] Curtis M E,Cardott B J,Sondergeld C H,et al.Development of organic porosity in the Woodford Shale with increasing thermal maturity[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,103:26-31.
[39] 陈文玲,周文,罗平,等.四川盆地长芯1井下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征研究[J].岩石学报,2013,29(3):1073-1086.
Chen Wenling,Zhou Wen,Luo Ping,et al.Analysis of the shale gas reservoir in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Changxin 1 well,Southeast Sichuan Basin,China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(3):1073-1086.
[40] 聂海宽,张金川.页岩气储层类型和特征研究—以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(3):219-225.
Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchuan.Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:A case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2011,33(3):219-225.
[41] 黄磊,申维.页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及主控因素分析:以上扬子地区龙马溪组为例[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2015,22(1):374-385.
Huang Lei,Shen Wei.Characteristics and controlling factors of the formation of pores of a shale gas reservoir:A case study from Longmaxi Formation of the Upper Yangtze region,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers(China University of Geosciences(Beijing);Peking University),2015,22(1):374-385.
[42] Bowker K A.Barnett Shale gas production,Fort Worth Basin:Issues and discussion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):523-533.
[43] 郭旭升,李宇平,刘若冰,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):9-16.
Guo Xusheng,Li Yuping,Liu Ruobing,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Shale Play in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):9-16.
[44] 王道富,王玉满,董大忠,等.川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩储集空间定量表征[J].天然气工业,2013,33(7):1-10.
Wang Daofu,Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,et al.Quantitative characterization of reservoir space in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Shale,Southern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(7):1-10.

Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of shale gas in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin

四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层特征及控制因素

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Hui Shasha, Pang Xiongqi, Chen Zhuoheng, Wang Chenxi, Shi Kanyuan, Hu Tao, Hu Yao, Li Min, Mei Shuxing, Li Maowen. Quantitative characterization of the contribution of pore types to pore space of marine shale in Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[2]	Li Le, Hu Yuanqing, Peng Xiaogui, Wang Wei, Yu Haoyu, Cui Yasheng. Research progress of hydrogen sulfide genesis in shale gas reservoirs [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 461-476.
[3]	Chen Yilin, Qin Yong, Zhang Bo, Yang Tianyu, Liu Jing, Wang Lanhua, Hong Yong. Differential influence of sample particle size on the pore structure of coal with different metamorphic degree [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(8): 1313-1332.
[4]	Ding Qian, Gan Lideng, Wei Lele, Zhang Yusheng, Yang Hao, Jiang Xiaoyu, Wang Yaojun. The dual pore structure factors and its application in seismic prediction of reservoir permeability [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2): 339-347.
[5]	Tang Shuling, Tang Dazhen, Yang Jiaosheng, Deng Ze, Li Song, Chen Shida, Feng Peng, Huang Chen, Li Zhanwei. Pore structure characteristics and gas storage potential of deep coal reservoirs in Daning-Jixian block of Ordos Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.
[6]	Zhang Lei, Bian Liheng, Hou Wei, Li Yongzhou, Li Yongchen, Wu Peng, Li Weijing, Li Xiang, Li Chunhu. Pore structure characteristics and exploration significance of deep coal reservoirs: a case study of Daning-Jixian block in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1867-1878.
[7]	Yang Jiaosheng, Feng Peng, Tang Shuling, Tang Dazhen, Wang Meizhu, Li Song, Zhao Yang, Li Zhanwei. Phase control factors and content prediction model of deep coalbed methane in Daning-Jixian block [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1879-1891.
[8]	Fang Zheng, Pu Xiugang, Chen Shiyue, Yan Jihua, Chen Xingran, Cui Qimeng. Effect of shale high frequency sequence in deep water areas of continental lacustrine basin on reservoir development: a case study of the Member 2 of Kongdian Formation shale of Cangdong sag in Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(10): 1663-1682.
[9]	Wang Ke, Zhang Ronghu, Tang Yong, Yu Chaofeng, Yang Zhao, Tang Yang'gang, Zhou Lu. Structural diagenesis and reservoir prediction of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.
[10]	Jin Guowen, Wang Tangyu, Liu Zhonghua, Xie Ranhong, Shao Liang, Li Boyu. Classification and productivity prediction of glutenite reservoirs based on NMR logging [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(5): 648-657.
[11]	Dang Wei, Zhang Jinchuan, Nie Haikuan, Wang Fengqin, Tang Xuan, Jiang Shu, Wei Xiaoliang, Liu Qiubo, Li Pei, Li Fei, Sun Jiangtao. Microscopic occurrence characteristics of shale oil and their main controlling factors: a case study of the 3rd submember continental shale of Member 7 of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(4): 507-523.
[12]	Sun Jianmeng, Su Hesong, Guo Ning, Wang Deqiang, Zeng Xin, Yuan Weiguo, Feng Minggang, Yan Wei, Zhou Xianbin. Determination method of biogenic silicon and its application in the fracturing ability evaluation of shale gas reservoir [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(4): 548-557.
[13]	Tang Yong, Song Yong, Guo Xuguang, Zhao Jingzhou, Wu Tao, Huang Liliang, He Wenjun, Wu Weitao, Wu Heyuan. Main controlling factors of tight conglomerate oil enrichment above source kitchen in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(2): 192-206.
[14]	Liu Hanlin, Zou Caineng, Qiu Zhen, Pan Songqi, Zhang Wenzheng, Jing Zhenhua, Hao Jihua, Yin Shuai, Wu Songtao, Li Shixiang, Guo Qiulei. Sedimentary enrichment factors of extraordinarily high organic matter in the sub-member 3 of Member 7 of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 1520-1541.
[15]	Liu Kaixuan, Chen Jianfa, Fu Rao, Wang Hua, Luo Bing, Dai Xin, Shi Xiaofei, Dong Qingwei. Accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors of helium-rich gas reservoirs [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 1652-1663.