石油学报 ›› 1990, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1): 32-39.DOI: 10.7623/syxb199001005

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

最大反应速率法在生油岩生烃率计算中的应用

吴肇亮, 王剑秋, 钱家麟   

  1. 石油大学北京研究生部
  • 收稿日期:1988-01-27 出版日期:1990-01-25 发布日期:2013-07-08

APPLICATION OF MAXIMUM REACTION RATE METHOD FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE QUANTITY OF HYDROCARBON EVOLUTION IN THE SOURCE ROCK

Wu Zhaoliang, Wang Jianqiu, Qian Jialin   

  1. Beijing Graduate School, Petroleum University
  • Received:1988-01-27 Online:1990-01-25 Published:2013-07-08

摘要: 本文利用岩石评价仪对东濮凹陷埋深1801m的未成熟生油岩进行不同升温速率(2、5、10、15、20℃/min)的热解动力学模拟试验,得到热解反应速率最大时的不同温度Tmax。根据这些温度值,用最大反应速率法模型进行回归,求得该生油岩的表观活化能E和指数前因子A分别为199.6KJ/mol,和2.803×1013sec-1。根据这两个热解动力学参数,及东濮凹陷的沉降速率(0.26mm/y)和地温梯度(0.03℃/m),算得该凹陷不同埋深生油岩的生烃率。如埋深为2768m时,生烃率为0.05(可视为生油上限);埋深为3571m时,生烃率为0.95(可视为生烃下限);最大热解速率时埋深为3337m(可视为生油高峰值)。所得生烃率计算,较符合实际情况,可以认为,最大反应速率法模型是一种较简单可行的模拟方法,岩石评价仪是一种适宜于进行生油岩热解动力学的仪器,所得不同埋深的生烃率的计算结果对于油气资源的评价和石油的勘探开发有较大的意义。

Abstract: In this paper, the pyrolysis kinetics of the hydrocarbon formation in the source rock was studied by using modified Rock-Eval Apparatus with constant heating up rates incressed (at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20℃/min). The immature soure rock samples were taken from Dongpu Depression at a burial depth of 1801 m. The different temperatures at maximum reaction rate (Tmax) were obtained from the experiments with different heating up rates. According to these Tmax, by regression with a model of maximum reaction rate equa-tion apparent activation energy and pre-exponential factor of this source rock sample were calculated, as 199.6KJ/mol and 2.803×1013sec-1 respecti- vely. Based on these two kinetic parameters, and the rate of subsidence(0.26mm/y)and the geothermal gradient(0.03℃/min)of Donapu Depression, the rate of hydrocarbon formation in the source rocks at different depth were calculated. For example, at a depth of 2768m, the rate of hydrocarbon formation is 0.05(upper threshold); at a depth of 3571m, thi:rate is 0.95(lower threshold). The variation of hydrocarbon generation rate with the burial depth was also obtained. The variation of hydrocarbon generation rate with the burial depth was also obtained. The burial depth was about 3337m where maximum reaction rate occured(hydrocarbon formation peak). The results calculated matches satisfactorily with the actual situation. The characteristics and the reliability of the model were discussed. It is shown that the maximum reaction rate model is a simple and applicable one, and the Rock-Eval Apparatus can be well used for pyrolysis kinetic study of source rocks. The results used in the calculation of hydrocarbon formation fractionof source rock at different burial depth is useful in the evaluation of oil and gas resources and in petroleum exploration as well.