四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制

doi:10.7623/syxb201909005

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1069-1084.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201909005

四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制

兰才俊^1,2, 徐哲航^1,2, 马肖琳^1,2, 胡超^1,2, 陈浩如³, 邹华耀^1,2

1. 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院北京 102249;
3. 中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2019-04-08 修回日期:2019-06-19 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-10-15
通讯作者: 邹华耀,男,1963年12月生,1985年获江汉石油学院学士学位,2002年获中国地质大学(武汉)矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事油气成藏机理与富集规律教学与科研工作。Email:huayaozou@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:兰才俊,男,1995年5月生,2016年获中国石油大学(北京)地质工程专业学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事四川盆地碳酸盐岩沉积与储层研究。Email:lonedaniel@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.U1663210）、中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（XDA14010306）和中国石油化工股份有限公司项目（P16108）资助。

Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs

Lan Caijun^1,2, Xu Zhehang^1,2, Ma Xiaolin^1,2, Hu Chao^1,2, Chen Haoru³, Zou Huayao^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China;
2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Hubei Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2019-04-08 Revised:2019-06-19 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地震旦系灯影组储层主要发育于微生物丘滩体中，但不同成因类型丘滩体对储层的影响尚不明确。通过钻井岩心和野外露头观测、岩石薄片分析和物性测试等手段，将丘滩体划分为丘基、丘核、丘翼和丘坪4种微相，并根据微相的组合划分出台缘并进型丘滩体、台缘追补型丘滩体和台内饥饿型丘滩体3种丘滩体类型。台缘并进型丘滩体的生长速率快，与可容空间的增加速率相同步，其微相组合以"丘基+丘核"垂向加积为主，在海平面升降过程中易暴露于大气淡水环境，造成海水胶结作用弱、淡水溶蚀作用强，形成以格架溶蚀孔洞为主的储集空间，储层物性好，储集性能最优。台缘追补型丘滩体的生长速率次之，其早期的生长速率滞后于可容空间增长速率但后期逐渐同步，呈现出"丘基+丘核+丘翼/丘坪"侧向加积的微相组合；由于暴露于大气淡水环境的几率减小，其海水胶结作用强，淡水溶蚀作用减弱，储集性能稍差。台内饥饿型丘滩体的生长速率最慢，严重滞后于可容空间的增长速率，呈"云坪（丘基）+丘核+丘坪"微相组合，难以暴露于大气淡水环境，淡水溶蚀作用最弱，储集性能也最差。台缘带古地貌对丘滩体的生长速率影响较大，可控制丘滩体的沉积样式。陡坡台缘带有利于台缘并进型丘滩体发育，缓坡台缘带主要发育台缘追补型丘滩体，台内高地中发育台内饥饿型丘滩体。胡家坝-阆中-安岳地区一带的震旦系灯影组四段发育于典型的陡坡台缘带，是储层发育的最有利相带。

关键词: 丘滩体, 台缘带, 发育机理, 灯影组, 四川盆地

Abstract:

The reservoirs of the Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin are mainly developed in the microbial mound-shoal complex, but the influence from the complex of different genetic types on reservoirs remains unclear. By means of drilling core and field outcrop observation, thin-section analysis and physical property test, the mound-shoal complex is divided into the mound-base, mound-core, mound-flank and mound-flat microfacies; based on the microfacies assemblage, three types of mound-shoal complexes can be identified as below:platform-margin keep-up mound-shoal, platform-margin catch-up mound-shoal and intra-platform give-up mound-shoal. The growth rate of platform-margin keep-up mound-shoal is fast, synchronous with the growth rate of the accommodation space. The microfacies assemblage of platform-margin keep-up mound-shoal is mainly shown as the vertical accretion of "mound-base+mound-core", which is easy to be exposed to the meteoric fresh water during sea level eustacy, resulting in weak seawater cementation and strong freshwater dissolution, and forming reservoir space dominated by lattice dissolution pores, with good physical property and optimal reservoir performance. The platform-margin catch-up mound-shoal has the second fastest growth rate that lagged behind but gradually synchronized with the rate of accommodation space and presents laterally aggradation of "mound-base + mound-core+mound-flank/mound-flat" in microfacies assemblage. Due to the reduced probability of exposure to meteoric fresh water, the reservoir performance in platform-margin catch-up mound-shoal is quite poor as the result of strong seawater cementation and weakening fresh water dissolution. The intra-platform give-up mound-shoal shows the slowest growth rate, seriously lagging behind that of the accommodation space. Its microfacies assemblage is "dolomitic flat (mound-base)+mound-core+mound-flat", which is difficult to be exposed to the meteoric freshwater, with the weakest freshwater dissolution and the poorest reservoir performance. The paleo-geomorphology of the platform margin has a great influence on the growth rate and controls sedimentary pattern of the mound-shoal complex. The platform margin of steep slope is conducive to the development of platform-margin keep-up mound-shoal, platform-margin catch-up mound-shoal and intra-platform give-up mound-shoal are mainly developed in the platform margin of gentle slope and the highland within the platform, respectively. The Member 4 of Sinian Dengying Formation in the Hujiaba-Langzhong-An'yue area is developed in the platform margin of typical steep slope and is the most favorable facies belt for reservoir development.

Key words: mound-shoal complex, platform margin, development mechanism, Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

兰才俊, 徐哲航, 马肖琳, 胡超, 陈浩如, 邹华耀. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1069-1084.

Lan Caijun, Xu Zhehang, Ma Xiaolin, Hu Chao, Chen Haoru, Zou Huayao. Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1069-1084.

参考文献

[1] 杜金虎,汪泽成,邹才能,等.古老碳酸盐岩大气田地质理论与勘探实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2015.
DU Jinhu,WANG Zecheng,ZOU Caineng,et al.Geologic theory and exploration practice of ancient large carbonates gas field[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2015.
[2] 刘树根,马永生,黄文明,等.四川盆地上震旦统灯影组储集层致密化过程研究[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(4):485-496.
LIU Shugen,MA Yongsheng,HUANG Wenming,et al.Densification process of Upper Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(4):485-496.
[3] 陈娅娜,沈安江,潘立银,等.微生物白云岩储集层特征、成因和分布——以四川盆地震旦系灯影组四段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(5):704-715.
CHEN Ya'na,SHEN Anjiang,PAN Liyin,et al.Features,origin and distribution of microbial dolomite reservoirs:a case study of 4th Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(5):704-715.
[4] 单秀琴,张静,张宝民,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组白云岩岩溶储层特征及溶蚀作用证据[J].石油学报,2016,37(1):17-29.
SHAN Xiuqin,ZHANG Jing,ZHANG Baomin,et al.Dolomite karst reservoir characteristics and dissolution evidences of Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):17-29.
[5] 罗冰,杨跃明,罗文军,等.川中古隆起灯影组储层发育控制因素及展布[J].石油学报,2015,36(4):416-426.
LUO Bing,YANG Yueming,LUO Wenjun,et al.Controlling factors and distribution of reservoir development in Dengying Formation of paleo-uplift in central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(4):416-426.
[6] 朱东亚,张殿伟,张荣强,等.中国南方地区灯影组白云岩储层流体溶蚀改造机制[J].石油学报,2015,36(10):1188-1198.
ZHU Dongya,ZHANG Dianwei,ZHANG Rongqiang,et al.Fluid alteration mechanism of dolomite reservoirs in Dengying Formation,South China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(10):1188-1198.
[7] 冯明友,强子同,沈平,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区震旦系灯影组热液白云岩证据[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):587-598.
FENG Mingyou,QIANG Zitong,SHEN Ping,et al.Evidences for hydrothermal dolomite of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):587-598.
[8] 罗贝维,贾承造,魏国齐,等.四川盆地上震旦统灯影组风化壳古岩溶特征及模式分析[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(3):8-19.
LUO Beiwei,JIA Chengzao,WEI Guoqi,et al.Characteristics and models of weathering paleo-karst in Upper Sinian,Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2015,39(3):8-19.
[9] 杨威,魏国齐,赵蓉蓉,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组岩溶储层特征及展布[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):55-60.
YANG Wei,WEI Guoqi,ZHAO Rongrong,et al.Characteristics and distribution of karst reservoirs in the Sinian Dengying Fm,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):55-60.
[10] 朱东亚,金之钧,孙冬胜,等.南方震旦系灯影组热液白云岩化及其对储层形成的影响研究——以黔中隆起为例[J].地质科学,2014,49(1):161-175.
ZHU Dongya,JIN Zhijun,SUN Dongsheng,et al.Hydrothermally dolomitized reservoir bed in Sinian Dengying Formation,northern China:an example from central Guizhou uplift[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2014,49(1):161-175.
[11] 宋光永,刘树根,黄文明,等.川东南丁山-林滩场构造灯影组热液白云岩特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,36(6):706-715.
SONG Guangyong,LIU Shugen,HUANG Wenming,et al.Characteristics of hydrothermal dolomite of Upper Sinian Dengying Formation in the Dingshan-Lintanchang structural zone,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2009,36(6):706-715.
[12] 施泽进,王勇,田亚铭,等.四川盆地东南部震旦系灯影组藻云岩胶结作用及其成岩流体分析[J].中国科学:地球科学,2013,43(2):317-328.
SHI Zejin,WANG Yong,TIAN Yaming,et al.Cementation and diagenetic fluid of algal dolomites in the Sinian Dengying Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Science China Earth Science,2013,56(2):192-202.
[13] 周进高,姚根顺,杨光,等.四川盆地安岳大气田震旦系-寒武系储层的发育机制[J].天然气工业,2015,35(1):36-44.
ZHOU Jingao,YAO Genshun,YANG Guang,et al.Genesis mechanism of the Sinian-Cambrian reservoirs in the Anyue gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(1):36-44.
[14] 杨雨,黄先平,张健,等.四川盆地寒武系沉积前震旦系顶界岩溶地貌特征及其地质意义[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):38-43.
YANG Yu,HUANG Xianping,ZHANG Jian,et al.Features and geologic significances of the top Sinian karst landform before the Cambrian deposition in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):38-43.
[15] 杜金虎,汪泽成,邹才能,等.上扬子克拉通内裂陷的发现及对安岳特大型气田形成的控制作用[J].石油学报,2016,37(1):1-16.
DU Jinhu,WANG Zecheng,ZOU Caineng,et al.Discovery of intra-cratonic rift in the Upper Yangtze and its coutrol effect on the formation of Anyue giant gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):1-16.
[16] 邹才能,杜金虎,徐春春,等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):278-293.
ZOU Caineng,DU Jinhu,XU Chunchun,et al.Formation,distribution,resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):278-293.
[17] 郭旭升,胡东风,段金宝,等.四川盆地北部宁强胡家坝灯影组四段岩石特征及沉积环境分析[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(6):749-756.
GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,DUAN Jinbao,et al.Rock features and sedimentary environment of the fourth Member of Dengying Formation in Hujiaba section of Ningqiang,northern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2018,40(6):749-756.
[18] 周进高,张建勇,邓红婴,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组岩相古地理与沉积模式[J].天然气工业,2017,37(1):24-31.
ZHOU Jingao,ZHANG Jianyong,DENG Hongying,et al.Lithofacies paleogeography and sedimentary model of Sinian Dengying Fm in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(1):24-31.
[19] BURNE R V,MOORE LI S.Microbialites; organosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial communities[J].Palaios,1987,2(3):241-254.
[20] RIDING R.Classification of microbial carbonates[M]//RIDING R.Calcareous algae and stromatolites.Berlin:Springer Science & Business Media,1991.
[21] RIDING R.Microbialites,stromatolites,and thrombolites[M]//REITNER J,THIEL V.Encyclopedia of geobiology.Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands,2011:635-654.
[22] 刘静江,李伟,张宝民,等.上扬子地区震旦纪沉积古地理[J].古地理学报,2015,17(6):735-753.
LIU Jingjiang,LI Wei,ZHANG Baomin,et al.Sedimentary palaeogeography of the Sinian in Upper Yangtze region[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2015,17(6):735-753.
[23] HU Mingyi,GAO Da,WEI Guoqi,et al.Sequence stratigraphy and facies architecture of a mound-shoal-dominated dolomite reservoir in the Late Ediacaran Dengying Formation,central Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Geological Journal,2019,54(3):1653-1671.
[24] 徐哲航,兰才俊,杨伟强,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组微生物丘沉积演化特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2018,37(2):15-25.
XU Zhehang,LAN Caijun,YANG Weiqiang,et al.Sedimentary and evolutionary characteristics of Sinian Dengying-Formation microbial mound in Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2018,37(2):15-25.
[25] 李凌,谭秀成,曾伟,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组灰泥丘发育特征及储集意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):666-673.
LI Ling,TAN Xiucheng,ZENG Wei,et al.Development and reservoir significance of mud mounds in Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):666-673.
[26] 宋金民,罗平,刘树根,等.四川盆地西部震旦系灯影组沉积储层特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2018,45(1):27-44.
SONG Jinmin,LUO Ping,LIU Shugen,et al.The deposition and reservoir characteristics of Dengying Formation in western Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2018,45(1):27-44.
[27] 何登发,李德生,张国伟,等.四川多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J].地质科学,2011,46(3):589-606.
HE Dengfa,LI Desheng,ZHANG Guowei,et al.Formation and evolution of multi-cycle superposed Sichuan Basin,China[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2011,46(3):589-606.
[28] 余谦,牟传龙,张海全,等.上扬子北缘震旦纪-早古生代沉积演化与储层分布特征[J].岩石学报,2011,27(3):672-680.
YU Qian,MU Chuanlong,ZHANG Haiquan,et al.Sedimentary evolution and reservoir distribution of northern Upper Yangtze plate in Sinian-Early Paleozoic[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(3):672-680.
[29] 武赛军,魏国齐,杨威,等.四川盆地桐湾运动及其油气地质意义[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(1):60-70.
WU Saijun,WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,et al.Tongwan movement and its geologic significances in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(1):60-70.
[30] 魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等.四川盆地震旦纪-早寒武世克拉通内裂陷地质特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(1):24-35.
WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,DU Jinhu,et al.Geological characteristics of the Sinian-Early Cambrian intracratonic rift,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(1):24-35.
[31] 周进高,沈安江,张建勇,等.四川盆地德阳-安岳台内裂陷与震旦系勘探方向[J].海相油气地质,2018,23(2):1-9.
ZHOU Jingao,SHEN Anjiang,ZHANG Jianyong,et al.Deyang-Anyue interplatform rift in Sichuan Basin and its direction of exploration in Sinian[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2018,23(2):1-9.
[32] 黄擎宇,胡素云,潘文庆,等.台内微生物丘沉积特征及其对储层发育的控制——以塔里木盆地柯坪-巴楚地区下寒武统肖尔布拉克组为例[J].天然气工业,2016,36(6):21-29.
HUANG Qingyu,HU Suyun,PAN Wenqing,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of intra-platform microbial mounds and their controlling effects on the development of reservoirs:a case study of the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Fm in the Keping-Bachu area,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(6):21-29.
[33] DUNHAM R J.Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures[G]//HAM W E.Classification of carbonate rocks:a symposium.Tulsa:AAPG Memoir,1962:108-121.
[34] 刘静江,张宝民,周慧,等.灰泥丘系统分类及石油地质特征[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2016.
LIU Jingjiang,ZHANG Baomin,ZHOU Hui,et al.Mud mound systems classification and petroleum geological features[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2016.
[35] KRAUSE F F,SCOTESE C R,NIETO C,et al.Paleozoic stromatactis and zebra carbonate mud-mounds:global abundance and paleogeographic distribution[J].Geology,2004,32(3):181-184.
[36] 张荫本.粘结岩分类及应用[J].石油勘探与开发,1993,20(增刊):194-198.
ZHANG Yinben.A study on the classification of Boundstones and its application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1993,20(S):194-198.
[37] KENDALL C G S C,BOWEN B,ALSHARHAN A,et al.Eustatic controls on carbonate facies in reservoirs,and seals associated with Mesozoic hydrocaron fields of the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Mexico[J].Marine Geology,1991,102(1/4):215-238.
[38] SOREGHAN G S,DICKINSON W R.Generic types of stratigraphic cycles controlled by eustasy[J].Geology,1994,22(8):759-761.
[39] 邢凤存,陆永潮,郭彤楼,等.碳酸盐岩台地边缘沉积结构差异及其油气勘探意义——以川东北早三叠世飞仙关期台地边缘带为例[J].岩石学报,2017,33(4):1305-1316.
XING Fengcun,LU Yongchao,GUO Tonglou,et al.Sedimentary texture diversity of different carbonate platform margins and it its significance for petroleum exploration:a case study of carbonate platform margins in Feixianguan period of the Early Triassic,NE Sichuan Basin,China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2017,33(4):1305-1316.
[40] 强深涛,沈平,张健,等.四川盆地川中地区震旦系灯影组碳酸盐沉积物成岩作用与孔隙流体演化[J].沉积学报,2017,35(4):797-811.
QIANG Shentao,SHEN Ping,ZHANG Jian,et al.The evolution of carbonate sediment diagenesis and pore fluid in Dengying Formation,central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2017,35(4):797-811.
[41] 黄思静.碳酸盐岩的成岩作用[M].北京:地质出版社,2010.
HUANG Sijing.Carbonate diagenesis[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2010.
[42] 朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2000.
ZHU Xiaomin.Sequence stratigraphy[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2000.
[43] MOORE C H,WADE W J.Carbonate reservoirs:Porosity and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework[M].2nd ed.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2013.
[44] 郝毅,王宇峰,杨迅,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组白云岩成岩作用研究[J].四川地质学报,2016,36(3):367-371.
HAO Yi,WANG Yufeng,YANG Xun,et al.On diagenesis of dolostone of the Sinian Dengying Formation,in the Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sichuan,2016,36(3):367-371.
[45] HARWOOD C L,SUMNER D Y.Microbialites of the neoproterozoic beck spring dolomite,Southern California[J].Sedimentology,2011,58(6):1648-1673.
[46] KAHLE C F.Biosedimentology of a Silurian thrombolite reef with meter-scale growth framework cavities[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2001, 71(3):410-422.
[47] 王文之,杨跃明,文龙,等.微生物碳酸盐岩沉积特征研究——以四川盆地高磨地区灯影组为例[J].中国地质,2016,43(1):306-318.
WANG Wenzhi,YANG Yueming,WEN Long,et al.A study of sedimentary characteristics of microbial carbonate:a case study of the Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaomo area,Sichuan Basin[J].Geology in China,2016,43(1):306-318.
[48] 秦章晋,刘志毅,周吉羚.川中安岳-磨溪地区灯影组储层特征及控制因素[J].东北石油大学学报,2015,39(6):87-94.
QIN Zhangjin,LIU Zhiyi,ZHOU Jiling.Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Dengying Formation in the Anyue-Moxi area of the central of Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2015,39(6):87-94.
[49] 周正,王兴志,谢林,等.川中地区震旦系灯影组储层特征及物性影响因素[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(5):701-708.
ZHOU Zheng,WANG Xingzhi,XIE Ling,et al.Reservoir features and physical influences of the Sinian Dengying Formation (Sinian) in central Sichuan,China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(5):701-708.
[50] 崔永谦,汪建国,田建章,等.华北地台中北部寒武系-奥陶系白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J].石油学报,2018,39(8):890-901.
CUI Yongqian,WANG Jianguo,TIAN Jianzhang,et al.Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Cambrian-Ordovician dolomite in the north central part of North China platform[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(8):890-901.
[51] 刘建强,郑浩夫,刘波,等.川中地区中二叠统茅口组白云岩特征及成因机理[J].石油学报,2017,38(4):386-398.
LIU Jianqiang,ZHENG Haofu,LIU Bo,et al.Characteristics and genetic mechanism of the dolomite in the middle Permian Maokou Formation,central Sichuan area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(4):386-398.
[52] 赵文智,沈安江,周进高,等.礁滩储集层类型、特征、成因及勘探意义——以塔里木和四川盆地为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):257-267.
ZHAO Wenzhi,SHEN Anjiang,ZHOU Jingao,et al.Types,characteristics,origin and exploration significance of reef-shoal reservoirs:a case study of Tarim Basin,NW China and Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):257-267.
[53] 马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银,等.达县-宣汉地区长兴组-飞仙关组礁滩相特征及其对储层的制约[J].地学前缘,2007,14(1):182-192.
MA Yongsheng,MOU Chuanlong,TAN Qinyin,et al.Reef-bank features of Permian Changxing Formation and Triassic Feixianguan Formation in the Daxian-Xuanhan area,Sichuan province,South China and constraint for the reservoirs of natural gas[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2007,14(1):182-192.
[54] 魏国齐,杨威,谢武仁,等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系天然气成藏模式与勘探领域[J].石油学报,2018,39(12):1317-1327.
WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,XIE Wuren,et al.Accumulation modes and exploration domains of Sinian-Cambrian natural gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(12):1317-1327.
[55] 郭彤楼.川东北地区台地边缘礁、滩气藏沉积与储层特征[J].地学前缘,2011,18(4):201-211.
GUO Tonglou.The characteristics of sedimentation and reservoirs of reef-beach gas fields in carbonate platform margins,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2011,18(4):201-211.
[56] 管树巍,吴林,任荣,等.中国主要克拉通前寒武纪裂谷分布与油气勘探前景[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):9-22.
GUAN Shuwei,WU Lin,REN Rong,et al.Distribution and petroleum prospect of Precambrian rifts in the main cratons,China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):9-22.
[57] 谷志东,汪泽成.四川盆地川中地块新元古代伸展构造的发现及其在天然气勘探中的意义[J].中国科学:地球科学,2014,44(10):2210-2220.
GU Zhidong,WANG Zecheng.The discovery of Neoproterozoic extensional structures and its significance for gas exploration in the central Sichuan block,Sichuan Basin,South China[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2014,57(11):2758-2768.
[58] 钟勇,李亚林,张晓斌,等.四川盆地下组合张性构造特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(5):498-510.
ZHONG Yong,LI Yalin,ZHANG Xiaobin,et al.Features of extensional structures in pre-Sinian to Cambrian strata,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(5):498-510.
[59] 宋金民,刘树根,孙玮,等.兴凯地裂运动对四川盆地灯影组优质储层的控制作用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(6):658-670.
SONG Jinmin,LIU Shugen,SUN Wei,et al.Control of Xingkai taphrogenesis on Dengying Formation high quality reservoirs in Upper Sinian of Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(6):658-670.
[60] 曾富英,杨威,孙爱,等.四川盆地川中地区震旦系灯影组台地边缘相带地震识别及其分段特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(6):1079-1086.
ZENG Fuying,YANG Wei,SUN Ai,et al.Seismic recognition and zonation of the platform margin facies of the Sinian Dengying Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(6):1079-1086.
[61] 冯冲,邹华耀,郭彤楼,等.川东北地区二叠系-三叠系礁滩相储层发育机理[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):1-4.
FENG Chong,ZOU Huayao,GUO Tonglou,et al.Development mechanism of Permian-Triassic reef shoal reservoir in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):1-4.

四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制

Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	鲁雪松, 柳少波, 田华, 马行陟, 于志超, 范俊佳, 桂丽黎, 刘强. 深层背斜圈闭中泥岩盖层完整性评价方法及其应用——以四川盆地川中地区震旦系气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 415-427.
[2]	闫海军, 彭先, 夏钦禹, 徐伟, 罗文军, 李新豫, 张林, 朱秋影, 朱迅, 刘曦翔. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 658-670,752.
[3]	谷一凡, 周路, 蒋裕强, 倪佳, 李俊良, 朱讯, 付永红, 蒋增政. 四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 574-583.
[4]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 蒋廷学, 王濡岳, 张钰莹, 张光荣, 卢志远. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391.
[5]	杨威, 魏国齐, 谢武仁, 马石玉, 金惠, 苏楠, 孙爱, 沈珏红, 郝翠果, 武赛军. 川中地区龙王庙组优质储层发育的主控因素及成因机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 421-432.
[6]	高国辉, 曹剑, 罗冰, 肖笛, 张亚, 陈聪. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统海相混合型烃源岩的证据及对双鱼石大气藏的成藏贡献[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 433-445.
[7]	聂海宽, 李东晖, 姜涛, 颜彩娜, 杜伟, 张光荣. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 273-283.
[8]	郭建春, 陶亮, 陈迟, 李鸣, 赵志红. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 216-225.
[9]	王玉满, 王红岩, 沈均均, 拜文华, 董大忠, 邱振, 李新景, 王灿辉. 川北—鄂西地区下志留统龙马溪组上段厚层斑脱岩的新发现及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1309-1323.
[10]	何昌龙, 吕龑, 黄天俊, 李益, 郗诚, 钟光海, 吴仕虎, 杨广广, 干大勇. 基于岩石物理分析的页岩气叠前预测方法在川南威远地区的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1209-1218.
[11]	肖富森, 黄东, 张本健, 唐大海, 冉崎, 唐青松, 尹宏. 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 568-576,586.
[12]	杨跃明, 杨雨, 杨光, 宋家荣, 文龙, 邓传光, 夏茂龙, 冉崎, 段国彬, 罗冰, 谢冰. 安岳气田震旦系、寒武系气藏成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 493-508.
[13]	聂海宽, 汪虎, 何治亮, 王濡岳, 张培先, 彭勇民. 常压页岩气形成机制、分布规律及勘探前景——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(2): 131-143,164.
[14]	王拥军, 童敏, 孙圆辉, 张元中, 袁大伟. 四川盆地大安寨段介壳灰岩致密油储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(1): 42-55.
[15]	戴晓峰, 刘卫东, 甘利灯, 徐右平, 孙夕平, 张明, 胡英. Radon变换压制层间多次波技术在高石梯-磨溪地区的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1028-1036.