陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法

doi:10.7623/syxb202111001

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1405-1416.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202111001

• 地质勘探 • 下一篇

陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法

李国欣^1,2, 刘国强¹, 侯雨庭³, 赵先然⁴, 吴金龙⁴, 李伸专⁴, 鲜成刚², 刘合⁵

1. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探与生产分公司北京 100007;
2. 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249;
3. 中国石油长庆油田公司陕西西安 710018;
4. 斯伦贝谢科技服务(北京)有限公司北京 100015;
5. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-09-14 修回日期:2021-08-12 出版日期:2021-11-25 发布日期:2021-12-01
通讯作者: 刘国强,男,1964年5月生,1984年获中国矿业大学学士学位,1993年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探生产分公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气测井解释评价工作。Email:lgqi@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:李国欣,男,1971年9月生,1995年获石油大学学士学位,现为中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探与生产分公司副总经理、教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探开发研究与管理工作。Email:guoxinli@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973）项目（2015CB2509）和国家自然科学基金重大项目（No.5149065）资助。

Optimization method of favorable lithofacies and fracturing parameter for continental shale oil

Li Guoxin^1,2, Liu Guoqiang¹, Hou Yuting³, Zhao Xianran⁴, Wu Jinlong⁴, Li Shenzhuan⁴, Xian Chenggang², Liu He⁵

1. PetroChina Exploration and Producation Company, Beijing 100007, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China;
3. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Shaanxi Xi'an 710018, China;
4. Schlumberger China S. A., Beijing 100015, China;
5. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-09-14 Revised:2021-08-12 Online:2021-11-25 Published:2021-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 综合高精度岩石物理实验、数字岩心以及测井新技术资料，系统描述了鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段陆相页岩油的页岩岩相特征及其识别方法，根据每类页岩岩相的内幕特征确定了"油气甜点"有利岩相分布层段与平面展布规律。研究认为，高TOC含量页岩岩相是陆相页岩油的源岩基础，但不是产量的主控因素；孔隙结构良好和储集空间发育的页岩岩相是"油气甜点"的有利岩相；有利页岩岩相的可压性与脆性矿物的粒度、分布形式及其与柔性矿物间的接触关系密切相关；有利岩相以及良好的源-储配置关系是陆相页岩油产量的主控因素；基于储层品质、源岩品质和完井品质（"三品质"）的评价结果可优化压裂分级与射孔簇布置。研究成果与认识有效地支持了鄂尔多斯盆地C80井区2口水平井的风险勘探部署，并为其获得重大突破提供了有效的技术支撑。

关键词: 陆相页岩油, 岩相, 储层品质, 油气甜点, 压裂参数

Abstract: Based on the new technical data of high-precision petrophysical experiment, digital core and logging, this paper systematically describes the shale lithofacies characteristics of continental shale oil from the submember 3 of Member 7 of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, as well as its identification method. The favorable lithofacies interval and distribution of "oil and gas sweet spots" were determined according to the internal characteristics of each category of shale lithofacies. The research suggests that the shale lithofacies with high TOC content are foundational for the development of source rock of continental shale oil, but not the main controlling factor for the production. The shale lithofacies with good pore structure and developed reservoir space is deemed as favorable lithofacies for "oil and gas sweet spots". The compressibility of favorable shale lithofacies is closely related to the particle size and distribution pattern of brittle minerals, as well as its contact relation with flexible minerals. Favorable lithofacies and good source-reservoir configuration are the main controlling factors of continental shale oil production. Fracturing classification and perforation cluster layout can be optimized based on the evaluation results of the reservoir quality, source quality and engineering quality ("three qualities"). The research results and understandings effectively supports the risk exploration and deployment of two horizontal wells in C80 well area of Ordos Basin, and provides effective technical support for making significant breakthroughs.

Key words: continental shale oil, lithofacies, reservoir quality, oil and gas sweet spots, fracturing parameter

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李国欣, 刘国强, 侯雨庭, 赵先然, 吴金龙, 李伸专, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1405-1416.

Li Guoxin, Liu Guoqiang, Hou Yuting, Zhao Xianran, Wu Jinlong, Li Shenzhuan, Xian Chenggang, Liu He. Optimization method of favorable lithofacies and fracturing parameter for continental shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(11): 1405-1416.

参考文献

[1] 李国欣,朱如凯.中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(2):1-13.
LI Guoxin,ZHU Rukai.Progress,challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(2):1-13.
[2] 杜金虎,何海清,杨涛,等.中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(1):1-9.
DU Jinhu,HE Haiqing,YANG Tao,et al.Progress in China's tight oil exploration and challenges[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(1):1-9.
[3] 付金华,牛小兵,淡卫东,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):601-614.
FU Jinhua,NIU Xiaobing,DAN Weidong,et al.The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):601-614.
[4] 付锁堂,付金华,牛小兵,等.庆城油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2020,41(7):777-795.
FU Suotang,FU Jinhua,NIU Xiaobing,et al.Accumulation conditions and key exploration and development technologies in Qingcheng oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(7):777-795.
[5] 霍进,支东明,郑孟林,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油藏特征与形成主控因素[J].石油实验地质,2020,42(4):506-512.
HUO Jin,ZHI Dongming,ZHENG Menglin,et al.Characteristics and main controls of shale oil reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar sag,Junggar Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2020,42(4):506-512.
[6] 支东明,唐勇,郑孟林,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油藏地质特征与成藏控制因素[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):615-623.
ZHI Dongming,TANG Yong,ZHENG Menglin,et al.Geological characteristics and accumulation controlling factors of shale reservoirs in Fengcheng Formation,Mahu sag,Junggar Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):615-623.
[7] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
[8] 孙龙德.古龙页岩油(代序)[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2020,39(3):1-7.
SUN Longde.Gulong shale oil (preface)[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2020,39(3):1-7.
[9] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,HOU Lianhua,et al.Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):1-10.
[10] 杜金虎,胡素云,庞正炼,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):560-568.
DU Jinhu,HU Suyun,PANG Zhenglian,et al.The types,potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):560-568.
[11] 宋岩,高凤琳,唐相路,等.海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1501-1512.
SONG Yan,GAO Fenglin,TANG Xianglu,et al.Influencing factors of pore structure differences between marine and terrestrial shale reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(12):1501-1512.
[12] 高辉,何梦卿,赵鹏云,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油与北美地区典型页岩油地质特征对比[J].石油地质与实验.2018,40(2):133-140.
GAO Hui,HE Mengqing,ZHAO Pengyun,et al.Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(2):133-140.
[13] 胡素云,赵文智,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):819-828.
HU Suyun,ZHAO Wenzhi,HOU Lianhua,et al.Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):819-828.
[14] 杜金虎,李建忠,郭彬程,等.中国陆相致密油[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2016:1-201.
DU Jinhu,LI Jianzhong,GUO Bincheng,et al.Continental tight oil in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2016:1-201.
[15] 刘国强,李长喜.陆相致密油岩石物理特征与测井评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2019.
LIU Guoqiang,LI Changxi.Petrophysical characteristics and logging evaluation method of continental tight oil[M].Beijing:Science Press,2019.
[16] 邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26.
ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,CUI Jingwei,et al.Formation mechanism,geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):14-26.
[17] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,周立宏,等.深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J].石油学报,2021,42(2):143-162.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Enrichment theory,exploration technology and prospects of shale oil in lacustrine facies zone of deep basin:a case study of the Paleogene in Huanghua depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(2):143-162.
[18] HICKEY J H,HENK B.Lithofacies summary of the mississippian Barnett shale,Mitchell 2 T.P.Sims well,Wise County,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):437-443.
[19] 耳闯,罗安湘,赵靖舟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区三叠系延长组长7段富有机质页岩岩相特征[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):108-117.
ER Chuang,LUO Anxiang,ZHAO Jingzhou,et al.Lithofacies features of organic-rich shale of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Huachi area,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):108-117.
[20] 杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11.
YANG Hua,LI Shixiang,LIU Xianyang.Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):1-11.
[21] 郭凯.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段有效烃源岩及生排烃研究[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(1):15-23.
GUO Kai.Active source rocks of Chang 7 member and hydrocarbon generation and expulsion characteristics in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2017,39(1):15-23.
[22] 董明哲,李亚军,桑茜,等.页岩油流动的储层条件和机理[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):636-644.
DONG Mingzhe,LI Yajun,SANG Qian,et al.Reservoir conditions and mechanism of shale oil flow[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):636-644.
[23] 熊周海,操应长,王冠民,等.湖相细粒沉积岩纹层结构差异对可压裂性的影响[J].石油学报,2019,40(1):74-85.
XIONG Zhouhai,CAO Yingchang,WANG Guangmin,et al.Influence of laminar structure differences on the fracability of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(1):74-85.
[24] 刘合,匡立春,李国欣,等.中国陆相页岩油完井方式优选的思考与建议[J].石油学报,2020,41(4):489-496.
LIU He,KUANG Lichun,LI Guoxin,et al.Considerations and suggestions on optimizing completion methods of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(4):489-496.
[25] 樊建明,王冲,屈雪峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油水平井注水吞吐开发实践——以延长组长7油层组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(6):, 706-715.
FAN Jianming,WANG Chong,QU Xuefeng,et al.Development and practice of water flooding huff-puff in tight oil horizontal well,Ordos Basin:a case study of Yanchang Formation Chang 7 oil layer[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(6):706-715.

陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法

Optimization method of favorable lithofacies and fracturing parameter for continental shale oil

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 高波, 刘全有, 王红亮, 梁新平, 王濡岳. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 821-835.
[2]	李国欣, 吴志宇, 李桢, 陈强, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相源内非常规石油甜点优选与水平井立体开发技术实践 ——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 736-750.
[3]	李宁, 徐彬森, 武宏亮, 冯周, 李雨生, 王克文, 刘鹏. 人工智能在测井地层评价中的应用现状及前景[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 508-522.
[4]	张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 袁方, 冯路尧, 李长昇. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.
[5]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[6]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[7]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 高金亮, 杨智, 吴松涛, 赵群. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
[8]	王曦蒙, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 盛悦, 郑珊珊, 罗泽华. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1192-1201.
[9]	王超, 张柏桥, 陆永潮, 舒志国, 陆亚秋, 包汉勇, 孟志勇, 陈雷. 焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相展布特征及发育主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 631-644.
[10]	李国欣, 赵太平, 石玉江, 胡琮, 陈阵, 凡雪纯, 李栋, 赖锦. 鄂尔多斯盆地马家沟组碳酸盐岩储层成岩相测井识别评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1141-1154.
[11]	王越, 陈世悦, 张关龙, 张奎华, 林会喜, 梁绘媛, 汪誉新, 李佳. 咸化湖盆混积岩分类与混积相带沉积相特征——以准噶尔盆地南缘芦草沟组与吐哈盆地西北缘塔尔朗组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1021-1035,1065.
[12]	穆龙新, 张铭, 夏朝辉, 曲良超, 蒋平. 加拿大白桦地致密气储层定量表征技术[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 363-374.
[13]	贾承造, 张杰, 沈安江, 姜林. 非暖水碳酸盐岩:沉积学进展与油气勘探新领域[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(3): 241-254.
[14]	贾进华, 申银民. 塔里木盆地东河砂岩段准层序组特征及岩相古地理与砂体分布[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 135-149.
[15]	宁方兴, 王学军, 郝雪峰, 杨万芹, 银燕, 丁桔红, 朱德燕, 朱德顺, 朱家俊. 济阳坳陷不同岩相页岩油赋存机理[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 185-195.