库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义

doi:10.7623/syxb202208002

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 1049-1064.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202208002

库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义

王清华¹, 张荣虎², 杨宪彰¹, 余朝丰², 徐振平¹, 周露¹, 王珂², 张亮¹

1. 中国石油塔里木油田公司新疆库尔勒 841000;
2. 中国石油杭州地质研究院浙江杭州 310023

收稿日期:2022-07-09 修回日期:2022-07-27 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-09-05
通讯作者: 张荣虎,男,1976年9月生,2013年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,主要从事碎屑岩沉积储层、成藏与天然气地质综合研究工作。Email:zrh_hz@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:王清华,男,1968年8月生,2007年获浙江大学博士学位,现为中国石油塔里木油田公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探研究工作。Email:wqh-tlm@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项"深层-超深层油气成藏过程与勘探新领域"(2017ZX05008-004)和中国石油天然气集团有限公司"十四五"上游领域前瞻性基础性项目(2021DJ0302)资助。

Major breakthrough and geological significance of tight sandstone gas exploration in Jurassic Ahe Formation in Dibei area,eastern Kuqa depression

Wang Qinghua¹, Zhang Ronghu², Yang Xianzhang¹, Yu Chaofeng², Xu Zhenping¹, Zhou Lu¹, Wang Ke², Zhang Liang¹

1. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China;
2. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2022-07-09 Revised:2022-07-27 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-09-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 库车坳陷东部迪北地区下侏罗统阿合组致密气资源潜力巨大,是塔里木盆地天然气增储上产的重要接替领域。受制于地质条件复杂,该地区的油气富集规律认识不清、储层甜点预测难度大,制约了致密气的有效勘探与开发。基于构造演化、烃源岩、沉积储层、生-储-盖组合及勘探实践的系统分析,探讨了阿合组天然气成藏新模式。迪北地区发育多条4级高角度逆冲断裂,其中Ⅲ、Ⅳ级断裂的伴生裂缝发育,构造整体表现为自南向北阶梯式抬升,局部发育断背斜和断鼻构造,主要形成于中新世-第四纪逆冲推覆期;阿合组储层以辫状河三角洲平原亚相辫状河道巨厚层状(含砾)粗砂岩为主,多尺度、多成因的微裂缝可有效沟通微孔隙和长石粒内溶孔等储集空间,有利于规模储层甜点的发育。阿合组致密气藏的生-储-盖组合表现为"三明治"式,其中,三叠系暗色泥岩和煤层是致密气藏的主力烃源岩。阿合组致密气成藏演化具有"先致密后成藏"的特征,早期注入油、减孔致密,喜马拉雅晚期(18~1 Ma)断裂和构造缝发育,利于天然气沿断裂-裂缝带充注成藏。迪北5井采用常规钻井工程和常规压裂工艺实现了阿合组超深层致密油气效益勘探突破,证实了迪北地区整体含气,以烃源岩发育区、优势储层分布区、Ⅲ-Ⅳ级断裂-裂缝带的油气最为富集。重新刻画了效益勘探有利区的面积为1 030 km²、天然气资源量为7 210×10⁸m³、石油资源量为3 090×10⁴t。

关键词: 侏罗系, 致密砂岩气, 储层甜点, 迪北气藏, 库车坳陷

Abstract: The Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in Dibei area,eastern Kuqa depression has a great potential of tight gas resource,which is an important replacement field for increasing natural gas reserves and production in Tarim Basin.Limited by the complex geological conditions,the hydrocarbon enrichment law in this area is still unknown,and it is difficult to predict reservoir sweet spots,thus restricting the effective exploration and development of tight gas.Based on the systematic analysis of tectonic evolution,source rock,sedimentary reservoir,source-reservoir-cap rock association and exploration practice,this paper explores the new gas accumulation mode of Ahe Formation.Several four-grade high-angle thrust faults are developed in Dibei area,of which grade III-IV faults are developed and associated with fractures.On the whole,the tectonic structure show a stepped uplift from south to north,and fault anticline and fault nose-shaped structure are developed in regional areas,mainly formed in the Miocene-Quaternary thrust-nappe period;the reservoirs of Ahe Formation are mainly composed of ultra-thick layered (gravel-bearing) coarse sandstone in the braided channels of the braided delta plain subfacies.The multi-scale and polygenetic microfractures can effectively communicate the reservoir spaces such as micropores and the intragranular dissolved pores of feldspar,which is conducive to the development of large-scale reservoir sweet spots.The source-reservoir-cap rock association of the tight gas reservoir in Ahe Formation presents a sandwich pattern,in which the Triassic dark mudstone and coal seam are the main source rocks of the tight gas reservoir.The accumulation evolution of tight gas in Ahe Formation is characterized by "first compaction and then accumulation".Both injecting oil and reducing pores for compaction in the early stage as well as the development of Himalayan faults and tectonic fractures in the late stage are conducive to the charging and accumulation of gas along the fault-fracture zone.A breakthrough in the exploration of ultra-deep tight oil and gas in Ahe Formation was made in Well Dibei 5 by conventional drilling engineering and fracturing technique,based on which it is confirmed that the overall Dibei area has gas resource and the oil and gas are most enriched in the source rock development area,the dominant reservoir area and the zone of grade III-IV faults and fractures.The favorable exploration area is re-determined as 1 030 km²,the amount of natural gas resource and oil resource is 7 210×10⁸m³ and 3 090×10⁴t,respectively.

Key words: Jurassic system, tight sandstone gas, reservoir sweet spot, Dibei gas reservoir, Kuqa depression

中图分类号:

TE132

王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 余朝丰, 徐振平, 周露, 王珂, 张亮. 库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.

Wang Qinghua, Zhang Ronghu, Yang Xianzhang, Yu Chaofeng, Xu Zhenping, Zhou Lu, Wang Ke, Zhang Liang. Major breakthrough and geological significance of tight sandstone gas exploration in Jurassic Ahe Formation in Dibei area,eastern Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.

参考文献

[1] 曾联波,刘国平,朱如凯,等.库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1601-1609.
ZENG Lianbo,LIU Guoping,ZHU Rukai,et al.A quantitative evaluation method of structural diagenetic strength of deep tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa foreland basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(12):1601-1609.
[2] 鲁雪松,柳少波,李伟,等.低勘探程度致密砂岩气区地质和资源潜力评价——以库车东部侏罗系致密砂岩气为例[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):178-184.
LU Xuesong,LIU Shaobo,LI Wei,et al.Geological and resource evaluation in tight sandstone gas plays of low exploration degree:a case of Jurassic tight sandstone gas in east Kuqa Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):178-184.
[3] 贾承造,顾家裕,张光亚.库车拗陷大中型气田形成的地质条件[J].科学通报,2002,47(S1):49-55.
JIA Chengzao,GU Jiayu,ZHANG Guangya.Geological constraints of giant and medium-sized gas fields in Kuqa depression[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2002,47(S1):47-54.
[4] 李伟,王雪柯,张本健,等.中国中西部砂岩天然气大规模聚集机制与成藏效应[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):668-678.
LI Wei,WANG Xueke,ZHANG Benjian,et al.Large-scale gas accumulation mechanisms and reservoir-forming geological effects in sandstones of central and western China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):668-678.
[5] 刘志宏,卢华复,贾承造,等.库车再生前陆盆地的构造与油气[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(4):297-303.
LIU Zhihong,LU Huafu,JIA Chengzao,et al.Structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in Kuqa rejuvenated foreland basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2001,22(4):297-303.
[6] 陈发景,汪新文,张光亚,等.新疆塔里木盆地北部构造演化与油气关系[M].北京:地质出版社,1996.
CHEN Fajing,WANG Xinwen,ZHANG Guangya,et al.The tectonic evolution related with oil and gas in the northern Tarim Basin in Xinjiang[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1996.
[7] 顾家裕,朱筱敏,贾进华,等.塔里木盆地沉积与储层[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004.
GU Jiayu,ZHU Xiaomin,JIA Jinghua,et al.Sedimentation and reservoir in the Tarim Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004.
[8] 唐雁刚,杨宪彰,谢会文,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷侏罗系阿合组致密气藏特征与勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2021,26(4):113-124.
TANG Yangang,YANG Xianzhang,XIE Huiwen,et al.Tight gas reservoir characteristics and exploration potential of Jurassic Ahe Formation in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2021,26(4):113-124.
[9] 张荣虎,曾庆鲁,王珂,等.储层构造动力成岩作用理论技术新进展与超深层油气地质意义[J].石油学报,2020,41(10):1278-1292.
ZHANG Ronghu,ZENG Qinglu,WANG Ke,et al.New progress in the theory and technology of tectonic diagenesis on reservoir and the geological significance of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(10):1278-1292.
[10] 邢恩袁,庞雄奇,肖中尧,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷依南2气藏类型的判别[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(6):21-27.
XING Enyuan,PANG Xiongqi,XIAO Zhongyao,et al.Type discrimination of Yinan 2 gas reservoir in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2011,35(6):21-27.
[11] 王鹏威,庞雄奇,姜振学,等.库车坳陷依南2"连续型" 致密砂岩气藏成藏临界物性条件[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2014,39(10):1481-1490.
WANG Pengwei,PANG Xiongqi,JIANG Zhenxue,et al.Critical phyisical conditions for accumulation of Yinan 2 "continuous" tight sandstone gas reservoir,Kuqa depression[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2014,39(10):1481-1490.
[12] 琚岩,孙雄伟,刘立炜,等.库车坳陷迪北致密砂岩气藏特征[J].新疆石油地质,2014,35(3):264-267.
JU Yan,SUN Xiongwei,LIU Liwei,et al.Characteristics of Jurassic tight sandstone gas reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(3):264-267.
[13] 寿建峰,斯春松,朱国华,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷下侏罗统砂岩储层性质的控制因素[J].地质论评,2001,47(3):272-277.
SHOU Jianfeng,SI Chunsong,ZHU Guohua,et al.Control factors of the properties of the Lower Jurassic sandstone reservoirs in the Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Geological Review,2001,47(3):272-277.
[14] 寿建峰,斯春松,张达.库车坳陷下侏罗统岩石古应力场与砂岩储层性质[J].地球学报,2004,25(4):447-452.
SHOU Jianfeng,SI Chunsong,ZHANG Da.Factors controlling properties of Lower Jurassic sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2004,25(4):447-452.
[15] 张妮妮,刘洛夫,苏天喜,等.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J].沉积学报,2015,33(1):160-169.
ZHANG Nini,LIU Luofu,SU Tianxi,et al.Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the Lower Jurassic tight sandstone in eastern Kuqa depression[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(1):160-169.
[16] 杨帆,邸宏利,王少依,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系储层特征及成因[J].古地理学报,2002,4(2):46-55.
YANG Fan,DI Hongli,WANG Shaoyi,et al.Reservoir characteristics and genesis of the Jurassic in Yiqikelike tectonic zone of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2002,4(2):46-55.
[17] 刘云田,陈子炓,施泽进,等.库车坳陷下侏罗统阿合组高分辨率层序地层特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(1):40-45.
LIU Yuntian,CHEN Ziliao,SHI Zejin,et al.High-resolution sequence stratigraphy in Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in Kuqa depression[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2004,31(1):40-45.
[18] 易士威,李德江,杨海军,等.裂缝对阳霞凹陷迪北阿合组致密砂岩气藏形成的作用[J].新疆石油地质,2014,35(1):49-51.
YI Shiwei,LI Dejiang,YANG Haijun,et al.Effect of fractures on forming Dibei tight sandstone gas reservoir of Ahe Formation in Yangxia sag of Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(1):49-51.
[19] 魏红兴,谢亚妮,莫涛,等.迪北气藏致密砂岩储集层裂缝发育特征及其对成藏的控制作用[J].新疆石油地质,2015,36(6):702-707.
WEI Hongxing,XIE Yani,MO Tao,et al.Fracture characteristic and its contribution to hydrocarbon accumulation in tight sandstone reservoir in Dibei gas pool in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2015,36(6):702-707.
[20] 李峰,姜振学,李卓,等.库车坳陷迪北地区下侏罗统天然气富集机制[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2015,40(9):1538-1548.
LI Feng,JIANG Zhenxue,LI Zhuo,et al.Enriched mechanism of natural gas of Lower Jurassic in Dibei area,Kuqa depression[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2015,40(9):1538-1548.
[21] 魏红兴,黄梧桓,罗海宁,等.库车坳陷东部断裂特征与构造演化[J].地球科学,2016,41(6):1074-1080.
WEI Hongxing,HUANG Wuhuan,LUO Haining,et al.Faults characteristics and evolution in the eastern Kuqa depression[J].Earth Science,2016,41(6):1074-1080.
[22] 张玮,徐振平,赵凤全,等.库车坳陷东部构造变形样式及演化特征[J].新疆石油地质,2019,40(1):48-53.
ZHANG Wei,XU Zhenping,ZHAO Fengquan,et al.Structural deformation styles and tectonic evolution characteristics in eastern Kuqa depression [J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2019,40(1):48-53.
[23] 王珂,杨海军,李勇,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带地质特征与勘探潜力[J].石油学报,2021,42(7):885-905.
WANG Ke,YANG Haijun,LI Yong,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration potential of the northern tectonic belt of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(7):885-905.
[24] 张荣虎,杨海军,魏红兴,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带中东段中下侏罗统砂体特征及油气勘探意义[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(9):1243-1252.
ZHANG Ronghu,YANG Haijun,WEI Hongxing,et al.The sandstone characteristics and hydrocarbon exploration signification of Lower Jurassic in middle east section of northern tectonic belt in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(9):1243-1252.
[25] 李谨,王超,李剑,等.库车坳陷北部迪北段致密油气来源与勘探方向[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(4):485-497.
LI Jin,WANG Chao,LI Jian,et al.Source and exploration direction of tight oil and gas in the Dibei section of northern Kuqa depression[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(4):485-497.
[26] 史超群,许安明,魏红兴,等.构造挤压对碎屑岩储层破坏程度的定量表征——以库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系阿合组为例[J].石油学报,2020,41(2):205-215.
SHI Chaoqun,XU Anming,WEI Hongxing,et al.Quantitative characterization on the clastic reservoir destruction by tectonic compression:a case study of the Jurassic Ahe Formation in Yiqikelike structural belt,Kuqa depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(2):205-215.
[27] 姜振学,李峰,杨海军,等.库车坳陷迪北地区侏罗系致密储层裂缝发育特征及控藏模式[J].石油学报,2015,36(S2):102-111.
JIANG Zhenxue,LI Feng,YANG Haijun,et al.Development characteristics of fractures in Jurassic tight reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression and its reservoir-controlling mode[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(S2):102-111.
[28] 魏国齐,张荣虎,智凤琴,等.库车坳陷东部中生界构造—岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向[J].石油学报,2021,42(9):1113-1125.
WEI Guoqi,ZHANG Ronghu,ZHI Fengqin,et al.Formation conditions and exploration directions of Mesozoic structural-lithologic stratigraphic reservoirs in the eastern Kuqa depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(9):1113-1125.

库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义

Major breakthrough and geological significance of tight sandstone gas exploration in Jurassic Ahe Formation in Dibei area,eastern Kuqa depression

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭旭升, 魏志红, 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 陈超, 王道军. 四川盆地侏罗系陆相页岩油气富集条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 14-27.
[2]	王冰, 邱楠生, 王祥, 张海祖, 刘一锋, 常健, 朱传庆. 库车坳陷克拉苏-依奇克里克构造带构造挤压型超压识别与计算[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1107-1121.
[3]	王珂, 张荣虎, 唐永, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 唐雁刚, 周露. 库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.
[4]	魏国齐, 张荣虎, 智凤琴, 王珂, 余朝丰, 董才源. 库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1113-1125.
[5]	侯连华, 杨帆, 杨春, 杨海军, 李勇. 常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1126-1141.
[6]	赵玉龙, 刘香禺, 张烈辉, 吴婷婷, 单保超. 粗糙孔壁对微/纳米尺度下致密砂岩气流动的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 641-653.
[7]	刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 陈戈, 苏洲, 高乔. 远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 307-318.
[8]	胡勇, 李熙喆, 徐轩, 梅青燕, 陈颖莉, 王继平, 焦春艳, 郭长敏, 贾玉泽. 含水致密砂岩气藏可动用储量评价新方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 332-340.
[9]	冯建伟, 赵力彬, 王焰东. 库车坳陷克深气田超深层致密储层产能控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 478-488.
[10]	张月, 韩登林, 杨铖晔, 袁瑞, 王晨晨, 张娟. 超深层碎屑岩储层裂缝充填流体迁移规律——以库车坳陷克深井区白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 292-300.
[11]	史超群, 许安明, 魏红兴, 胡春雷, 张星, 张文, 莫涛, 张慧芳, 周露, 史玲玲, 朱文慧, 陈维力. 构造挤压对碎屑岩储层破坏程度的定量表征——以库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系阿合组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 205-215.
[12]	刘刚, 卫延召, 陈棡, 贾开富, 龚德瑜, 王峰, 孙靖, 朱峰, 麻伟娇. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系-白垩系次生油气藏形成机制及分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 914-927.
[13]	刘刚, 卫延召, 罗鸿成, 陈棡, 龚德瑜, 王峰, 孙靖, 贾开富. 准噶尔盆地陆西地区石南13井区侏罗系三工河组砂体结构及控藏作用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1006-1018.
[14]	张荣虎, 邹伟宏, 陈戈, 赵继龙, 张惠良, 伍劲, 李娴静. 塔里木盆地北部下白垩统大型湖相砂坝特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(8): 845-857.
[15]	高志勇, 王晓琦, 李建明, 崔京钢, 金旭, 周川闽, 冯佳睿, 石雨昕. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层孔喉组合类型定量表征与展布[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 645-659.