黔西北龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构及储气特征

doi:10.7623/syxb201502002

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 138-149,173.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201502002

黔西北龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构及储气特征

薛冰^1,2, 张金川^1,2, 唐玄^1,2, 杨超^1,2, 陈前^1,2, 满向杰¹, 党伟^1,2

1. 中国地质大学能源学院北京 100083;
2. 国土资源部页岩气资源战略评价重点实验室北京 100083

收稿日期:2014-08-26 修回日期:2014-12-16 出版日期:2015-02-25 发布日期:2015-02-05
通讯作者: 薛冰,男,1987年9月生,2012年获中国地质大学(北京)学士学位,现为中国地质大学(北京)能源学院硕士研究生,主要从事非常规天然气地质研究。Email:xuebingru@yeah.net
作者简介:薛冰,男,1987年9月生,2012年获中国地质大学(北京)学士学位,现为中国地质大学(北京)能源学院硕士研究生,主要从事非常规天然气地质研究。Email:xuebingru@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.41102088)和贵州省国土资源厅项目(2012GYYQ-001)资助。

Characteristics of microscopic pore and gas accumulation on shale in Longmaxi Formation,northwest Guizhou

Xue Bing^1,2, Zhang Jinchuan^1,2, Tang Xuan^1,2, Yang Chao^1,2, Chen Qian^1,2, Man Xiangjie¹, Dang Wei^1,2

1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration and Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2014-08-26 Revised:2014-12-16 Online:2015-02-25 Published:2015-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了深入研究黔西北地区海相页岩储层微观孔隙特征,选取下志留统龙马溪组页岩进行了氩离子抛光-场发射扫描电子显微镜、氮气吸/脱附实验、微孔特征分析以及相关地球化学分析等实验,探讨了微观孔隙对页岩储气特征的影响。实验结果表明:黔西北龙马溪组页岩存在粒间孔、粒内孔、晶间孔、溶蚀孔、化石孔、有机孔、微裂缝7种孔隙类型,其中粒间孔和有机孔最为发育;孔隙结构类型可根据氮气吸/脱附曲线分为3种,即以两端开口的圆筒孔、狭窄的平行板孔和四面开口的锥形平板孔等开放型孔隙为主;微观孔隙孔径分布范围为2~64 nm,峰值集中于2~6 nm。微孔(小于2 nm)孔径分布范围为0.4~1.8 nm,0.4~1.0 nm的微孔对微孔孔容贡献最大。孔容中以中孔(2~50 nm)为主,所占比例为83.1%,微孔和中孔贡献了主要的孔比表面积,微、中孔所占比例分别为20.1% 和79.3% 。有机碳含量是纳米孔隙发育的主控因素。不同孔隙类型具有不同的气体赋存特点和运移特征,说明纳米孔隙为页岩中气体的赋存和微观运移提供了有利条件。

关键词: 黔西北, 龙马溪组, 下志留统, 氩离子抛光-扫描电镜, 氮气吸/脱附, 孔隙结构

Abstract:

To deeply study micro-pore characteristics of shale reservoirs in Longmaxi Formation, northwest Guizhou, the shale in Longmaxi Formation was selected for experiments including the Argon Ion milling-Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy, nitrogen sorption-desorption experiment, micro-pore characteristic analysis and related geochemical experiments. Meanwhile, the influences of micro-pores on shale gas accumulation characteristics were discussed. The experimental results show that there are seven kinds of shale micro-pore types in Longmaxi Formation, northwest Guizhou, i.e., inter-granular pore, intra-granular pore, intra-crystalline pore, dissolved pore, fossiliferous pore, organic pore and micro-cracks, of which inter-granular pore and organic pore are most developed. The pore structures can be divided into three types according to nitrogen sorption-desorption curves, i.e., cylindrical pore with both ends open, narrow parallel-plate pore and conical plate pore with four sides open. The micro-pore diameters are generally ranged in 2-64 nm, and the peak is distributed in 2-6 nm. The diameters of micro-pore (<2 nm) are ranged in 0.4-1.8 nm, which the 0.4-1.0 nm of micropore diameters dominate the mostly micropore specific surface. The pore volume is mostly occupied by meso-pores (2-50 nm) with the proportion of 83.1%. The micro-pores and meso-pores make a major contribution to pore specific surface area with the proportion of 20.1% and 79.3% respectively. The content of organic carbon is the main controlling factor of nano-pore development. Different pore types have different characteristics of gas occurrence and migration, proving that nano-pore provides favorable conditions for the occurrence and micro-migration of shale gas.

Key words: northwest Guizhou, Longmaxi Formation, Lower Silurian, argoniron milling-scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen adorption/desorption, pore structure

中图分类号:

TE132.2

薛冰, 张金川, 唐玄, 杨超, 陈前, 满向杰, 党伟. 黔西北龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构及储气特征[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(2): 138-149,173.

Xue Bing, Zhang Jinchuan, Tang Xuan, Yang Chao, Chen Qian, Man Xiangjie, Dang Wei. Characteristics of microscopic pore and gas accumulation on shale in Longmaxi Formation,northwest Guizhou[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 138-149,173.

参考文献

[1] 聂海宽,张金川.页岩气储层类型和特征研究——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(3):219-225.
Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchuan.Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:a case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2011,33(3):219-225.
[2] Guo Tonglou,Zhang Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):28-36.
[3] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.非常规油气地质学重要理论问题[J].石油学报,2014,35 (1):1-10.
Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Four important theoretical issues of unconventional petroleum geology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35 (1):1-10.
[4] 杨超,张金川,李婉君,等.辽河坳陷沙三、沙四段泥页岩微观孔隙特征及其成藏意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2014,35(2):286-294.
Yang Chao,Zhang Jinchuan,Li Wanjun,et al.Microscopic pore characteristic of Sha-3 and Sha-4 shale and their accumulation significance in Liaohe depression[J].Oil ＆ Gas Geology,2014,35(2):286-294.
[5] 杨超,张金川,唐玄.鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩微观孔隙类型及对页岩气储渗的影响[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):240-250.
Yang Chao,Zhang Jinchuan,Tang Xuan.Microscopic pore types and its influence on storage and permeability of continental shale gas,Ordos Basin [J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):240-250.
[6] 陈一鸣,魏秀丽,徐欢.北美页岩气储层孔隙类型研究的启示[J].复杂油气藏,2012,5(4):19-22.
Chen Yiming,Wei Xiuli,Xu Huan.Suggestions from the research of pore types of shale gas reservoir in North America[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2012,5(4):19-22.
[7] 于炳松.页岩气储层孔隙分类与表征[J].地学前缘, 2013,20(4):211-220.
Yu Bingsong.Classification and characterization of gas shale pore system[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):211-220.
[8] Loucks R G,Ruppel S C.Mississippian Barnett Shale:lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):579-601.
[9] Chalmers G R,Bustin R M,Power I M.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry,pycnometry,surface area,and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:examples from the Barnett,Woodford,Haynesville,Marcellus,and Doig units[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1099-1119.
[10] Slatt R M,O’Neal N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shale:contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[11] 肖加飞,何熙琦,王尚彦,等.黔中隆起及外围南华—留纪层序地层特征[J].贵州地质,2005,22(2):90-97.
Xiao Jiafei,He Xiqi,Wang Shangyan,et al.The study on the Nanhuan-Silurian sequence stratigraphy in central Guizhou[J].Guizhou Geology,2005,22(2):90-97.
[12] 严继民,张启元.吸附与凝聚:固体的表面与孔[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.
Yan Jimin,Zhang Qiyuan.Adsorption and condensation:the surface and pore of solid[M].Beijing:Science Press,1979.
[13] Brunauer S,Emmett P H,Teller E.Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1938,60(2):309-319.
[14] Nelson P H.Pore-throat sizes in sandstones,tight siltstones,and shale[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(3):329-340.
[15] Rouquerol J,Avnir D,Fairbridge C W,et al.Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry,1994,66(8):1739-1758.
[16] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member,northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):5l-75.
[17] Bennett R H,O’Brien N R,Hulbert M H.Determinants of clay and shale microfabric signatures:processes and mechanisms[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1991:5-32.
[18] Lee J O,Kang I M,Cho W J.Smectite alteration and its influence on the barrier properties of smectite clay for a repository[J].Applied Clay Science,2010,47 (1/2):99-104.
[19] Dow W G.Kerogen studies and geological interpretations[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1977,7:79-99.
[20] Bowker K A.Barnett Shale gas production,Fort Worth Basin:issues and discussion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):523-533.
[21] 黄振凯,陈建平,王义军,等.松辽盆地白垩系青山口组泥岩微观孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):30-36.
Huang Zhenkai,Chen Jianping,Wang Yijun,et al.Characteristics of micropores in mudstones of the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1): 30-36.
[22] 高小跃,刘洛夫,尚晓庆,等.塔里木盆地侏罗系泥页岩储层特征与页岩气成藏地质背景[J].石油学报,2013,34 (4):647-659.
Gao Xiaoyue,Liu Luofu,Shang Xiaoqing,et al.Characterization of Jurassic shale reservoirs and the geological background of shale gas accumulations in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34 (4):647-659.
[23] 郭少斌,王义刚.鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):445-452.
Guo Shaobin,Wang Yigang.Shale gas accumulation conditions and exploration potential of Carboniferous Benxi Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(3):445-452.
[24] Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[25] 陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):438-444.
Chen Shangbin,Zhu Yanming,Wang Hongyan,et al.Structure characteristics and accumulation significance of nanopores in Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(3):438-444.
[26] 杨峰,宁正福,张世栋,等.基于氮气吸附实验的页岩孔隙结构表征[J].天然气工业,2013,33(4):135-140.
Yang Feng,Nin Zhengfu,Zhang Shidong,et al.Charaterization of pore structures in shales through nitrogen adsorption experiment[J].Nature Gas Industry,2013,33(4):135-140.
[27] [JP3]薛华庆,王红岩,刘洪林,等.页岩吸附性能及孔隙结构特征——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例[J].石油学报,[JP]2013,34 (5):826-832.
Xue Huaqing,Wang Hongyan,Liu Honglin,et al.Adsorption capability and aperture distribution characteristics of shales:taking the Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin as an example[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34 (5):826-832.
[28] Ross D J K,Marc B R.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
[29] [JP2]Kennedy M J,Pevear D R,Hill R J.Mineral surface control of organic carbon in black shale[J].Science[JP],2002,295(5555):657-660.
[30] 吉利明,邱军利,夏燕青,等.常见黏土矿物电镜扫描微孔隙特征与甲烷吸附性[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):249-256.
Ji Liming,Qiu Junli,Xia Yanqing,et al.Micro-pore characteristics and methane adsorption properties of common clay minerals by electron microscope scanning[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):249-256.
[31] Krishna R.Describing the diffusion of guest molecules inside porous structures[J].The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,2009,113(46):19756-19781.
[32] 韩双彪,张金川,杨超,等.渝东南下寒武页岩纳米级孔隙特征及其储气性能[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(6):1038-1043.
Han Shuangbiao,Zhang Jinchuan,Yang Chao,et al.The characteristics of nanoscale pore and its gas storage capability in the Lower Cambrian shale of southeast Chongqing[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(6):1038-1043.

黔西北龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构及储气特征

Characteristics of microscopic pore and gas accumulation on shale in Longmaxi Formation,northwest Guizhou

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴建发, 赵圣贤, 范存辉, 夏自强, 季春海, 张成林, 曹埒焰. 川南长宁地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩裂缝发育特征及其与含气性的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 428-446.
[2]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张介辉, 张朝, 李兆丰, 蒋佩, 蒋立伟, 朱斗星, 刘臣. 浅层页岩气高效勘探开发关键技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳背斜区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048.
[3]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[4]	王安民, 曹代勇, 聂敬, 秦荣芳. 巨厚煤储层孔隙结构的垂向非均质性特征——以青海聚乎更矿区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 691-701.
[5]	单长安, 张廷山, 梁兴, 胡冉冉, 赵卫卫. 富镜质组和富惰质组高阶煤纳米孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 723-736.
[6]	罗文彬, 马中良, 郑伦举, 谭静强, 王张虎, 宁传祥. 海相页岩成岩-成烃过程中孔隙结构的演变——来自热模拟实验的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 540-552.
[7]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 蒋廷学, 王濡岳, 张钰莹, 张光荣, 卢志远. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391.
[8]	聂海宽, 李东晖, 姜涛, 颜彩娜, 杜伟, 张光荣. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 273-283.
[9]	郭建春, 陶亮, 陈迟, 李鸣, 赵志红. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 216-225.
[10]	郭彤楼, 何希鹏, 曾萍, 高玉巧, 张培先, 何贵松. 复杂构造区页岩气藏地质特征与效益开发建议——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1490-1500.
[11]	宋岩, 高凤琳, 唐相路, 陈磊, 王幸蒙. 海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.
[12]	姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 姜涛, 常佳琦, 宁传祥, 苏思远, 陈委涛. 沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1587-1600.
[13]	邱楠生, 冯乾乾, 腾格尔, 申宝剑, 马中良, 俞凌杰, 曹爱强. 川东南丁山地区燕山期—喜马拉雅期差异构造-热演化与页岩气保存[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1610-1622.
[14]	王玉满, 王红岩, 沈均均, 拜文华, 董大忠, 邱振, 李新景, 王灿辉. 川北—鄂西地区下志留统龙马溪组上段厚层斑脱岩的新发现及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1309-1323.
[15]	何晶, 何生, 刘早学, 翟刚毅, 王亿, 韩元佳, 万阔, 魏思乐. 鄂西黄陵背斜南翼下寒武统水井沱组页岩孔隙结构与吸附能力[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 27-42.