黄骅坳陷新近系古河道恢复及油气地质意义

doi:10.7623/syxb201802004

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 163-171.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201802004

黄骅坳陷新近系古河道恢复及油气地质意义

蒲秀刚¹, 赵贤正¹, 李勇², 陈蓉², 周立宏¹, 颜照坤², 肖敦清¹

1. 中国石油大港油田公司天津 300280;
2. 成都理工大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室四川成都 610059

收稿日期:2017-05-11 修回日期:2017-10-30 出版日期:2018-02-25 发布日期:2018-03-09
通讯作者: 蒲秀刚,男,1968年12月生,1990年获长春地质学院学士学位,2004年获中国矿业大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探领域中的地质研究与管理工作。Email:puxgang@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:蒲秀刚,男,1968年12月生,1990年获长春地质学院学士学位,2004年获中国矿业大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探领域中的地质研究与管理工作。Email:puxgang@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油大港油田公司科技项目和油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室自主研究课题（SK-0801）资助。

Paleochannel restoration and petroleum geological significance of Neogene in Huanghua depression

Pu Xiugang¹, Zhao Xianzheng¹, Li Yong², Chen Rong², Zhou Lihong¹, Yan Zhaokun², Xiao Dunqing¹

1. PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Sichuan Chengdu 610059, China

Received:2017-05-11 Revised:2017-10-30 Online:2018-02-25 Published:2018-03-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷新近系河流相砂体是重要的浅层油气聚集单元，利用测、录井资料和古河道水文参数计算方法，对黄骅坳陷新近系河流相古河道单砂体厚度、古河道砂体宽度和古河型进行了判别和定量预测。研究结果表明：黄骅坳陷新近纪河流的演化规律具有由低弯度河（辫状河）转变为高弯度蛇曲河，再演化为低弯度河的变化趋势；黄骅坳陷新近系河道砂体规模具有向上逐渐减小的趋势；在空间上，坳陷北部的燕山隆起水系河道砂体最为发育，其次为西部的沧县隆起水系，盆地西南部水系和埕宁隆起水系砂体发育相对较差；黄骅坳陷北部和西部新近系馆陶组河道砂体更发育，并且靠近下伏古近系烃源岩，具有良好的油气勘探前景。

关键词: 河流相, 黄骅坳陷, 新近系, 古河道砂体, 定量估算

Abstract: The Neogene fluvial facies sand bodies in Huanghua depression of Bohai Bay Basin are an important shallow hydrocarbon accumulation unit. The well-logging data and computational methods of paleochannel hydrologic parameters are used for the discrimination and quantitative estimation on paleochannel single sand body thickness, the paleochannel sand body width and paleo-river types of Neogene fluvial facies in Huanghua depression. The research results show that the evolution laws of Neogene rivers in Huanghua depression show a change trend from low sinuosity river (braided river) to high sinuosity river, then to low sinuosity river again; the sand body scale of Neogene channel in Huanghua depression possesses a trend of gradually decreasing upwards; in space, the channel sand bodies of Yanshan uplift rivers in the northern depression are the most developed, followed by the Cangxian uplift rivers in the west, while the sand bodies of rivers in the southwest basin and Chengning uplift are less developed; the channel sand bodies of Neogene Guantao Formation in the northern and western Huanghua depression are better developed, adjacent to the underlying Paleogene source rocks, presenting a favorable hydrocarbon exploration prospect.

Key words: fluvial facies, Huanghua depression, Neogene, paleochannel sand bodies, quantitative estimation

中图分类号:

TE121

蒲秀刚, 赵贤正, 李勇, 陈蓉, 周立宏, 颜照坤, 肖敦清. 黄骅坳陷新近系古河道恢复及油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(2): 163-171.

Pu Xiugang, Zhao Xianzheng, Li Yong, Chen Rong, Zhou Lihong, Yan Zhaokun, Xiao Dunqing. Paleochannel restoration and petroleum geological significance of Neogene in Huanghua depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(2): 163-171.

参考文献

[1] 邓运华,薛永安,于水,等.浅层油气运聚理论与渤海大油田群的发现[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):1-8.
DENG Yunhua,XUE Yong'an,YU Shui,et al.Shallow hydrocarbon migration and accumulation theory and discovery of giant oilfield group in Bohai Sea[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017,38(1):1-8.
[2] SCHUMM S A.The effect of sediment type on the shape and stratification of some modern fluvial deposits[J].American Journal of Science,1960,258(3):177-184.
[3] SCHUMM S A.Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the great plains[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,1963,74(9):1089-1100.
[4] SCHUMM S A.Review:climate and landform[J].Science, 1968,161(3844):876-877.
[5] BRIDGE J S,MACKEY S D.A theoretical study of fluvial sandstone body dimensions[M]//FLINT S S,BRYANT I D.Geological modeling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and outcrop analogues.Utrecht,Netherlands:International Association of Sedimentologists,1993:213-236.
[6] BRIDGE J S,TYE R S.Interpreting the dimensions of ancient fluvial channel bars,channels,and channel belts from wireline-logs and cores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000,84(8):1205-1228.
[7] RUBIN Y,LUNT I A,BRIDGE J S.Spatial variability in river sediments and its link with river channel geometry[J].Water Resources Research,2006,42(6):650-664.
[8] LORENZ J C,HEINZE D M,CLARK J A,et al.Determination of widths of meander-belt sandstone reservoirs from vertical downhole data,Mesaverde group,Piceance Creek Basin,Colorado[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(5):710-721.
[9] FAISAL A A.Quantitative analysis of fluvial sandbodies of the Toolachee Formation,Cooper Basin,Australia[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2015,8(11):10003-10014.
[10] KHAN Z A,TEWARI R C.Paleochannel and paleohydrology of a middle Siwalik (Pliocene)fluvial system,northern India[J].Journal of Earth System Science,2011,120(3):531-543.
[11] KOYKKA J.The sedimentation and paleohydrology of the Mesoproterozoic stream deposits in a strike-slip basin (Svinsaga Formation),Telemark,southern Norway[J].Sedimentary Geology,2011,236(3/4):239-255.
[12] 张周良.河流相地层的层序地层学与河流类型[J].地质论评,1996,42(3):188-193.
ZHANG Zhouliang.Fluvial sequence stratigraphy and river types[J].Geology Review,1996,42(3):188-193.
[13] 高志勇.河流相沉积中准层序与短期基准面旋回对比研究——以四川中部须家河组为例[J].地质学报,2007,81(1):109-118.
GAO Zhiyong.Correlation of parasequence and short-term base level cycles in river facies:a case of the Xujiahe Formation in central Sichuan[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2007,81(1):109-118.
[14] 寇养琦,杜德莉.南海北部陆架第四纪古河道的沉积特征[J].地质学报,1994,68(3):268-277.
KOU Yangqi,DU Deli.Sedimentary features of shallow ancient river channels on the northern shelf of the south China Sea[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,1994,68(3):268-277.
[15] 刘丽薇,郝兴国,赵伟,等.多属性分析技术在薄互层条件下识别古河道的应用[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(4):4-6.
LIU Liwei,HAO Xingguo,ZHAO Wei,et al.Application of multi-attribute analysis to the identification of river palaeochannel in the thin interbeded reservoir[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2006,30(4):4-6.
[16] 李清仁,陈守田,张财,等.海拉尔盆地的古河道砂体识别方法[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(4):402-404.
LI Qingren,CHEN Shoutian,ZHANG Cai,et al.Identified approach of palaeochannel sand body in Haila'er Basin[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2006,41(4):402-404.
[17] 宁松华,张厚福.古河道解释及在油气勘探中的意义[J].沉积学报,1997,15(3):33-36.
NING Songhua,ZHANG Houfu.Palaeochannle interpretation and significance in oil & gas expleration[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1997,15(3):33-36.
[18] 刘振夏,BERNE S,L'ATALANTE科学考察组.东海陆架的古河道和古三角洲[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2000,20(1):9-14.
LIU Zhenxia,BERNE S,L'ATALANTE Scientific Party.Paleochannels and paleodeltas in the continental shelf of the east China Sea[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2000,20(1):9-14.
[19] 张赓,庹先国,葛宝,等.地震映像法在古河道探测中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2011,38(1):38-41.
ZHANG Geng,TUO Xianguo,GE Bao,et al.Application of seismic imaging method to exploration of old channels[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2011,38(1):38-41.
[20] 单敬福,张吉,赵忠军,等.地下曲流河点坝砂体沉积演化过程分析——以吉林油田杨大城子油层第23小层为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(7):809-819.
SHAN Jingfu,ZHANG Ji,ZHAO Zhongjun,et al.Analysis of sedimentary and evolution process for underground meandering river point bar:a case study from No.23 thin layer of Yangdachengzi oil reservoir in Jilin oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(7):809-819.
[21] 吴胜和,岳大力,刘建民,等.地下古河道储层构型的层次建模研究[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008,38(增刊1):111-121.
WU Shenghe,YUE Dali,LIU Jianmin,et al.Hierarchy modeling of subsurface palaeochannel reservoir architecture[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,2008,51(S2):126-137.
[22] LEEDER M R.Fluviatile fining upwards cycles and the magnitude of paleochannels[J].Geological Magazine,1973,110(3):265-276.
[23] 赵霞飞,丁贵明,王衡鉴,等.松辽盆地扶扬油层古河流分析[J].石油学报,1995,16(4):32-39.
ZHAO Xiafei,DING Guiming,WANG Hengjian,et al.An analysis of paleochannel of Quantou Formation in Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1995,16(4):32-39.
[24] 刘奎,庄振业,刘东雁,等.舟山群岛和长江口邻近海域埋藏古河道水文环境特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,201040(1):140-147.
LIU Kui,ZHUANG Zhenye,LIU Dongyan,et al.Hydrology environment characteristics of buried ancient channels near Zhoushan islands and Yangtze river estuary[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2010,40(1):140-147.
[25] 胡耀军,陈昭年,刘伟兴,等.大港滩海区沙一段下部重力流水道沉积特征分析[J].断块油气田,2002,9(1):18-22.
HU Yaojun,CHEN Zhaonian,LIU Weixing,et al.Analyses of sedimentary features of gravity flow channel sand body in seabeach of Dagang oilfield[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2002,9(1):18-22.
[26] 武汉地质学院北京研究生院石油地质研究室岩相组,大港油田石油勘探开发研究院勘探室岩相组.黄骅坳陷第三系沉积相及沉积环境[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
Lithofacies Group of Petroleum Geology Laboratory Beijing Graduate School of Wuhan Geological College,Lithofacies Group of Exploration Room,Institute of Exploration and Development,Dagang OilField.Sedimentary facies and sedimentary environment of Tertiary in Huanghua depression[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1987.
[27] 李勇,廖前进,肖敦清,等.河流相层序地层学——以黄骅拗陷新近系为例[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
LI Yong,LIAO Qianjin,XIAO Dunqing,et al.Sequence srtatigraphy of fluvia facies:a case study of Neogene in Huanghua depression[M].Beijing:Science Press,2014.
[28] 陈蓉,李勇,丘东洲,等.埕宁隆起北坡新近系层序地层格架与层序主控因素分析[J].地层学杂志,2010,34(2):179-186.
CHEN Rong,LI Yong,QIU Dongzhou,et al.Sequence stratigraphy of Neogene in the northern slope of the Chengning uplift[J].Journal of Stratigraphy,2010,34(2):179-186.
[29] HACK J T.Studies of longitudinal stream profile in Virginia and Maryland[J].Journal of Research of the US Geological Survey,1957,294(B):45-95.
[30] LEOPOLD L B,WOLMAN M G.River meanders[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,1960,71(6):769-794.
[31] ALLEN JR L.The classification of cross-stratified units.With notes on their origin[J].Sedimentology,1963,2(2):93-114.
[32] 陈蓉,李勇,丘东洲,等.埕宁隆起北坡新近纪沉积特征及发育模式[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2009,29(2):8-14.
CHEN Rong,LI Yong,QIU Dongzhou,et al.Sedimentary facies types and models for the Neogene deposits on the northern slope of the Chengning uplift[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2009,29(2):8-14.
[33] 孙小霞,李勇,丘东洲,等.黄骅坳陷新近系馆陶组重矿物特征及物源区意义[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2006,26(3):61-66.
SUN Xiaoxia,LI Yong,QIU Dongzhou,et al.The heavy minerals and provenances of the Neogene Guantao Formation in the Huanghua depression[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2006,26(3):61-66.
[34] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,王家豪,等.断陷盆地缓坡区控砂控藏机制与勘探发现——以歧口凹陷歧北缓坡带为例[J].石油学报, 2017,38(7):729-739.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,WANG Jiahao,et al.Sand and reservoir controlling mechanism and exploration discovery in the gentle slope of fault basin:a case study of Qibei slope in Qikou sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(7):729-739.
[35] 赵贤正,周立宏,肖敦清,等.歧口凹陷斜坡区油气成藏与勘探实践[J].石油学报,2016,37(增刊2):1-9.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,XIAO Dunqing,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration practice of slope area in Qikou sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(S2):1-9.
[36] 李廷辉,梁惠兰,胡永军,等.渤海湾埕北断阶区油气二次运移模式及其对勘探的作用[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2004,19(1):19-23.
LI Tinghui,LIANG Huilan,HU Yongjun,et al.Hydrocarbon secondary migration modes in Chengbei ladder fault zone in Bohai Gulf and their effects on exploration[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition,2004,19(1):19-23.
[37] 刘伟兴,谭守强,袁淑琴,等.歧口凹陷中浅层油气富集因素及成藏模式[J].中国海上油气:地质,2002,16(3):183-188.
LIU Weixing,TAN Shouqiang,YUAN Shuqin,et al.Hydrocarbon enrichment factors and accumulation models in the middle-shallow formation of Qikou sag[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2002,16(3):183-188.
[38] 邓运华.张-扭断裂与油气运移分析——以渤海油区为例[J].中国石油勘探,2004,9(2):33-37.
DENG Yunhua.Tensional-shear faults and analysis of oil and gas migration-taking Bohai oil province for example[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2004,9(2):33-37.

黄骅坳陷新近系古河道恢复及油气地质意义

Paleochannel restoration and petroleum geological significance of Neogene in Huanghua depression

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王德英, 张宏国, 官大勇, 任健, 刘朋波, 程燕君. 环渤中地区新近系控藏模式与高丰度油藏勘探实践[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 273-282.
[2]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 金凤鸣, 韩国猛, 时战楠, 韩文中, 丁娱娇, 张伟, 王国娜, 刘学伟, 汪虎. 深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 143-162.
[3]	杨海风, 王德英, 高雁飞, 王军, 李正宇, 钱赓. 渤海湾盆地盆缘洼陷新近系天然气成因与油气差异富集机理——以黄河口凹陷东洼为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 509-518.
[4]	庞礴, 董月霞, 陈迪, 庞雄奇. 含油气盆地砂岩目的层油气富集主控因素与基本模式——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新近系砂岩油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 519-531.
[5]	薛永安. 渤海海域油气运移“汇聚脊”模式及其对新近系油气成藏的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 963-970,1005.
[6]	张运龙, 丁峰, 尹成, 胡光义, 范廷恩, 张显文. 基于地震波形结构属性识别河流相砂体叠置区[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 792-801.
[7]	国建英, 付立新, 肖鑫, 王东良, 李剑, 张璐, 肖敦清, 谢增业, 柳晓萱, 王金友. 黄骅坳陷大港探区高含H₂S天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(S2): 31-38.
[8]	商晓飞, 侯加根, 孙福亭, 唐力, 刘钰铭, 李永强, 李燕. 砂质滩坝储集层内部结构特征及构型模式——以黄骅坳陷板桥油田古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(6): 1160-1171.
[9]	国建英, 李剑, 于学敏, 王东良, 付立新, 郝爱胜, 崔会英. 黄骅坳陷大港探区深层天然气成因类型与分布规律[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(增刊一): 112-119.
[10]	刘华蒋有录徐昊清张永丰. 冀中坳陷新近系油气成藏机理与成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(6): 928-936.
[11]	蒋有录卢浩刘华杨德相范炳达. 渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷新近系油气富集特点与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 791-796.
[12]	王家豪王华任建业肖敦清蒲秀刚. 黄骅坳陷中区大型斜向变换带及其油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 355-360.
[13]	王家豪王华任建业肖敦清蒲秀刚. 黄骅坳陷中区大型斜向变换带及其油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 355-360.
[14]	何文祥;许雅;刘军锋郭玮. 马岭油田北三区河流相储层构型综合地质研究[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(2): 274-279.
[15]	许浩张君峰汤达祯尹微张文忠陈晓智. 柴达木盆地花土沟油田新近系油藏成藏特征[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1): 31-35.