川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制

doi:10.7623/syxb201910005

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 1192-1201.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201910005

川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制

王曦蒙, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 盛悦, 郑珊珊, 罗泽华

中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249

收稿日期:2019-03-01 修回日期:2019-05-26 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-11-09
通讯作者: 刘洛夫,男,1958年11月生,1982年获江汉石油学院学士学位,1992年获英国布里斯托大学博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)教授,主要从事石油地质及油气地球化学研究。Email:liulf@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:王曦蒙,男,1994年11月生,2017年获中国石油大学(北京)资源勘查工程专业学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)地质资源与地质工程专业硕士研究生,主要从事页岩储层特征及页岩气成藏机理研究。Email:913649441@qq.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05035-002-005）资助。

Control of lithofacies on pore space of shale from Longmaxi Formation, southern Sichuan Basin

Wang Ximeng, Liu Luofu, Wang Yang, Sheng Yue, Zheng Shanshan, Luo Zehua

College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum;State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2019-03-01 Revised:2019-05-26 Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-11-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩的孔隙类型、孔隙结构的定量化表征以及孔隙空间的控制因素是页岩储层研究的重要问题。川南地区龙马溪组的页岩岩相按矿物组分可分为硅质页岩、混合质页岩和黏土质页岩。利用扫描电镜矿物定量评价（QEMSCAN）技术、低温N₂和CO₂吸附实验以及高压压汞实验对川南地区龙马溪组不同页岩岩相的孔隙类型、结构特征及孔隙空间的控制因素开展了分析。研究结果表明，黏土质页岩多发育黏土矿物片状粒内孔且多被迁移有机质充填；混合质页岩多发育有机质孔和碳酸盐矿物溶蚀宏孔；硅质页岩多发育有机质孔。页岩的总面孔率主要由孔径为0~500 nm的孔隙提供，矿物（除碳酸盐矿物与长石外）及有机质中的孔隙均以粒内孔为主，有机质的面孔率高达32.37%，为矿物颗粒的8~16倍。页岩的中孔是孔体积的主要贡献者，微孔是孔比表面积的主要贡献者。混合质页岩的总面孔率、孔体积与孔比表面积的平均值与硅质页岩相近，具有良好的储集能力。高TOC含量的混合质页岩与硅质页岩的孔隙空间主要受有机质孔控制，TOC含量较低的黏土质页岩的孔隙空间则主要受有机质孔和伊利石相关孔隙共同控制。

关键词: 龙马溪组, 页岩岩相, 孔隙类型, 面孔率, 孔隙结构, 有机质孔

Abstract:

The pore types of shale, quantitative characterization of pore structures and control factors of pore spaces are important topics in research of shale reservoir. The shale lithofacies of Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin can be classified into siliceous shale, mixed shale and argillaceous shale according to the mineral composition. The pore types, structural characteristics and control factors of pore spaces of different shale lithofacies of Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin were analyzed by technologies of quantitative evaluation of minerals by scanning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN), low temperature N₂ and CO₂ adsorption and high pressure mercury intrusion experiments. The results show that the argillaceous shale is mostly characterized by the sheet-like intragranular pores of clay minerals and filled with the migrated organic matters; the mixed shale is rich in organic matter pores and carbonate dissolved macropores; siliceous shale is rich in organic matter pores. The total surface porosities of shale is mainly provided by the pores with the diameter of 0-500 nm. The surface porosity of minerals (except carbonate and feldspar)and organic matters are mainly contributed by intragranular pores. The surface porosity of organic matter is up to 32.37%, 8 to 16 times higher than that of mineral particles. The mesopores of shale are the main contributors to the pore volume, while micropores make a major contribution to the specific surface area of pores. The average surface porosity, pore volume and pore specific surface area of mixed shale are similar to those of siliceous shale, which means the mixed shale has potential storage capacity. The pore space of mixed shale and siliceous shale with high TOC content is mainly controlled by organic matter pores, but the pore space of argillaceous shale with lower TOC content is mainly controlled by organic matter pores and illite mineral related pores.

Key words: Longmaxi Formation, shale lithofacies, pore type, surface porosity, pore structure, organic matter pore

中图分类号:

TE122.2

王曦蒙, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 盛悦, 郑珊珊, 罗泽华. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1192-1201.

Wang Ximeng, Liu Luofu, Wang Yang, Sheng Yue, Zheng Shanshan, Luo Zehua. Control of lithofacies on pore space of shale from Longmaxi Formation, southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(10): 1192-1201.

参考文献

[1] 郭彤楼,张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36.
GUO Tonglou,ZHANG Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):28-36.
[2] 熊健,刘向君,梁利喜.四川盆地富有机质页岩孔隙分形特征[J].断块油气田,2017,24(2):184-189.
XIONG Jian,LIU Xiangjun,LIANG Lixi.Fractal characteristics of organic rich shale pore in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2017,24(2):184-189.
[3] 姜振学,唐相路,李卓,等.川东南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构全孔径表征及其对含气性的控制[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):126-134.
JIANG Zhenxue,TANG Xianglu,LI Zhuo,et al.The whole-aperture pore structure characteristics and its effect on gas content of the Longmaxi Formation shale in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):126-134.
[4] 王宏语,杨润泽,张峰,等.富含有机质泥页岩岩相表征的研究现状与趋势[J].地质科技情报,2018,37(2):141-148.
WANG Hongyu,YANG Runzei,ZHANG Feng,et al.Research progress and trend of organic-rich shale lithofacies characterization[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2018,37(2):141-148.
[5] ZHAO Jianhua,JIN Zhijun,JIN Zhenkui,et al.Applying sedimentary geochemical proxies for paleoenvironment interpretation of organic-rich shale deposition in the Sichuan Basin,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,163:52-71.
[6] 王超,张柏桥,陆永潮,等.焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组一段页岩岩相展布特征及发育主控因素[J].石油学报,2018,39(6):631-644.
WANG Chao,ZHANG Baiqiao,LU Yongchao,et al.Lithofacies distribution characteristics and main development controlling factors of shale in Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(6):631-644.
[7] 聂海宽,金之钧,马鑫,等.四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组底部笔石带及沉积特征[J].石油学报,2017,38(2):160-174.
NIE Haikuan,JIN Zhijun,MA Xin,et al.Graptolites zone and sedimentary characteristics of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(2):160-174.
[8] 王玉满,董大忠,李新景,等.四川盆地及其周缘下志留统龙马溪组层序与沉积特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(3)12-21.
WANG Yuman,DONG Dazhong,LI Xinjing,et al.Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary characteristics of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its peripheral areas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(3)12-21.
[9] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2015,96(6):1071-1098.
[10] 王玉满,董大忠,李建忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):551-561.
WANG Yuman,DONG Dazhong,LI Jianzhong,et al.Reservoir characteristics of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,southern Sichuan[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):551-561.
[11] 吴蓝宇,胡东风,陆永潮,等.四川盆地涪陵气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩优势岩相[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):189-197.
WU Lanyu,HU Dongfeng,LU Yongchao,et al.Advantageous shale lithofacies of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling gas field of Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):189-197.
[12] MILLIKEN K L,RUDNICKI M,AWWILLER D N,et al.Organic matter-hosted pore system,Marcellus Formation (Devonian),Pennsylvania[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(2):177-200.
[13] 刘忠宝,高波,胡宗全,等.高演化富有机质页岩储层特征及孔隙形成演化——以黔南地区下寒武统九门冲组为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(12):1381-1389.
LIU Zhongbao,GAO Bo,HU Zongquan,et al.Reservoir characteristics and pores formation and evolution of high maturated organic rich shale:a case study of Lower Cambrian Jiumenchong Formation,southern Guizhou area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(12):1381-1389.
[14] 马中良,郑伦举,徐旭辉,等.富有机质页岩有机孔隙形成与演化的热模拟实验[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):23-30.
MA Zhongliang,ZHENG Lunju,XU Xuhui,et al.Thermal simulation experiment on the formation and evolution of organic pores in organic-rich shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):23-30.
[15] SHI Mao,YU Bingsong,ZHANG Jinchuan,et al.Microstructural characterization of pores in marine shales of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation,southeastern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,94:166-178.
[16] TANG Xianglu,JIANG Zhenxue,JIANG Shu,et al.Heterogeneous nanoporosity of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin using the QEMSCAN,FIB-SEM,and nano-CT methods[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,78:99-109.
[17] HU Haiyan,HAO Fang,GUO Xusheng,et al.Investigation of methane sorption of overmature Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in the Jiaoshiba area,eastern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,91:251-261.
[18] ZHOU Shangwen,XUE Huaqing,YANG Ning,et al.Experimental study of supercritical methane adsorption in Longmaxi shale:insights into the density of adsorbed methane[J].Fuel,2018,211:140-148.
[19] 耿一凯,金振奎,赵建华,等.页岩储层孔隙类型控制因素研究——以川东焦石坝地区龙马溪组为例[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(1):71-78.
GENG Yikai,JIN Zhenkui,ZHAO Jianhua,et al.Controlling factors of pore types in shale reservoirs:a case study from the Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2017,39(1):71-78.
[20] 武瑾,梁峰,吝文,等.渝东北地区龙马溪组页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2016,43(3):308-319.
WU Jin,LIANG Feng,LIN Wen,et al.Characteristics of micropore structure of Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoirs in northeast district of Chongqing,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2016,43(3):308-319.
[21] SHI Mao,YU Bingsong,XUE Zhipeng,et al.Pore characteristics of organic-rich shales with high thermal maturity:a case study of the Longmaxi gas shale reservoirs from well Yuye-1 in southeastern Chongqing,China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,26:948-959.
[22] LI Fulai,WANG Maozhen,LIU Shaobo,et al.Pore characteristics and influencing fators of different types of shales[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,102:391-401.
[23] 赵佩,李贤庆,田兴旺,等.川南地区龙马溪组页岩气储层微孔隙结构特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(6):947-956.
ZHAO Pei,LI Xianqing,TIAN Xingwang,et al.Study on micropore structure characteristics of Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoirs in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(6):947-956.
[24] 赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):572-586.
ZHAO Jianhua,JIN Zhijun,JIN Zhenkui,et al.Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):572-586.

川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制

Control of lithofacies on pore space of shale from Longmaxi Formation, southern Sichuan Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴建发, 赵圣贤, 范存辉, 夏自强, 季春海, 张成林, 曹埒焰. 川南长宁地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩裂缝发育特征及其与含气性的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 428-446.
[2]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张介辉, 张朝, 李兆丰, 蒋佩, 蒋立伟, 朱斗星, 刘臣. 浅层页岩气高效勘探开发关键技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳背斜区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048.
[3]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[4]	王安民, 曹代勇, 聂敬, 秦荣芳. 巨厚煤储层孔隙结构的垂向非均质性特征——以青海聚乎更矿区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 691-701.
[5]	马中高, 朱立华, 张卫华, 刘厚裕, 王猛. 雷州半岛南部玄武岩岩石物理特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 702-710.
[6]	单长安, 张廷山, 梁兴, 胡冉冉, 赵卫卫. 富镜质组和富惰质组高阶煤纳米孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 723-736.
[7]	罗文彬, 马中良, 郑伦举, 谭静强, 王张虎, 宁传祥. 海相页岩成岩-成烃过程中孔隙结构的演变——来自热模拟实验的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 540-552.
[8]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 蒋廷学, 王濡岳, 张钰莹, 张光荣, 卢志远. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391.
[9]	聂海宽, 李东晖, 姜涛, 颜彩娜, 杜伟, 张光荣. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 273-283.
[10]	郭建春, 陶亮, 陈迟, 李鸣, 赵志红. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 216-225.
[11]	郭彤楼, 何希鹏, 曾萍, 高玉巧, 张培先, 何贵松. 复杂构造区页岩气藏地质特征与效益开发建议——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1490-1500.
[12]	宋岩, 高凤琳, 唐相路, 陈磊, 王幸蒙. 海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.
[13]	姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 姜涛, 常佳琦, 宁传祥, 苏思远, 陈委涛. 沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1587-1600.
[14]	邱楠生, 冯乾乾, 腾格尔, 申宝剑, 马中良, 俞凌杰, 曹爱强. 川东南丁山地区燕山期—喜马拉雅期差异构造-热演化与页岩气保存[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1610-1622.
[15]	王玉满, 王红岩, 沈均均, 拜文华, 董大忠, 邱振, 李新景, 王灿辉. 川北—鄂西地区下志留统龙马溪组上段厚层斑脱岩的新发现及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1309-1323.