准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质特征与分级评价

doi:10.7623/syxb202207002

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 899-911.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202207002

准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质特征与分级评价

姜福杰^1,2, 黄任达^1,2, 胡涛^1,2, 吕佳豪^1,2, 黄立良³, 姜振学^1,2, 胡美玲^1,2, 张晨曦^1,2, 吴冠昀^1,2, 吴育平^1,2

1. 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院北京 102249;
3. 中国石油新疆油田公司勘探开发研究院新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2022-04-05 修回日期:2022-05-23 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-01
通讯作者: 姜福杰,男,1979年12月生,2008年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事油气成藏机理与分布规律研究。
作者简介:姜福杰,男,1979年12月生,2008年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事油气成藏机理与分布规律研究。Email:jiangfj@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（No.41872128）和中国石油天然气集团公司—中国石油大学（北京）战略合作科技专项（ZLZX2020-01-05）资助。

Geological characteristics and classification evaluation of shale oil in Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin

Jiang Fujie^1,2, Huang Renda^1,2, Hu Tao^1,2, Lü Jiahao^1,2, Huang Liliang³, Jiang Zhenxue^1,2, Hu Meiling^1,2, Zhang Chenxi^1,2, Wu Guanyun^1,2, Wu Yuping^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, Beijing 102249, China;
2. School of Earth Science, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Karamay 834000, China

Received:2022-04-05 Revised:2022-05-23 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油资源丰富，但勘探程度较低，对页岩油资源的潜力评价和资源禀赋差异缺少系统研究，制约着勘探部署和有利区优选。以玛页1井为例，综合钻井、测井、岩心和岩石矿物组成、有机地球化学特征、储集物性、含油性等地质资料，系统分析了风城组页岩油地质特征，探讨了页岩油甜点评价标准。结果表明，风城组页岩主要由长英质和碳酸盐矿物组成，黄铁矿发育，黏土矿物较少。风城组页岩主要发育Ⅱ₂型干酪根，总有机碳（TOC）含量分布在0.08%~2.33%，多处于成熟阶段。页岩储集空间类型主要为狭缝状孔隙，孔隙分选性较好；总体上，宏孔较发育，孔隙体积分布在0.001~0.008 cm³/g，平均为0.003 cm³/g。风城组页岩内部烃类聚集，游离烃含量为0.52~13.31 mg/g，吸附烃含量为0.16~5.17 mg/g。明确了页岩岩相、微观孔隙特征、页岩油赋存形式是风城组页岩含油性的主控因素，在此基础上建立了风城组页岩油甜点的划分标准，在玛页1井风城组优选出8个最有利的页岩油勘探层段，有利储集岩相以长英质页岩为主。

关键词: 页岩油, 含油性, 甜点, 分级评价, 风城组, 玛湖凹陷

Abstract: There are abundant shale oil resources in Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin. However, due to the low degree of exploration, the potential evaluation and resource endowment differences of shale oil resources have not been systematically studied, thus restricting the exploration deployment and favorable zone optimization. This paper is a case study of Well Maye1. Based on the geological data of drilling, logging, core and rock mineral composition, organic geochemical characteristics, reservoir properties, and oil-bearing properties, the paper systematically analyzes the geological characteristics of shale oil in Fengcheng Formation, and discusses the sweet spots evaluation standard of shale oil. The results show that the Fengcheng Formation shale is mainly composed of quartz, feldspar and carbonate minerals, in which pyrites are well developed and few clay minerals can be found. The shale in Fengcheng Formation is dominated by typeⅡ₂ kerogen, with the TOC content ranging from 0.08% to 2.33%, mostly in the mature stage. The reservoir space is dominated by slit-like pores, characterized by good pore sorting. On the whole, macropores are well developed, and the pore volume is distributed in the range of 0.001 to 0.008 cm³/g, with an average of 0.003 cm³/g. The content of free hydrocarbon and absorbed hydrocarbon is in the range of 0.52 to 13.31 mg/g and 0.16 to 5.17 mg/g, respectively, indicating that Fengcheng Formation shale is rich in hydrocarbons. It is clear that shale lithofacies, microscopic pore characteristics, and shale oil occurrence state are the main controlling factors for the oil-bearing properties of shale in Fengcheng Formation. On the basis, the paper establishes the classification criteria for shale oil sweet spots, and selects 8 most favorable exploration zones of shale oil in Fengcheng Formation of Well Maye1. The reservoir rock facies are mainly shown as felsic shale.

Key words: shale oil, oil-bearing property, sweet spot, classification evaluation, Fengcheng Formation, Mahu sag

中图分类号:

TE122

姜福杰, 黄任达, 胡涛, 吕佳豪, 黄立良, 姜振学, 胡美玲, 张晨曦, 吴冠昀, 吴育平. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质特征与分级评价[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 899-911.

Jiang Fujie, Huang Renda, Hu Tao, Lü Jiahao, Huang Liliang, Jiang Zhenxue, Hu Meiling, Zhang Chenxi, Wu Guanyun, Wu Yuping. Geological characteristics and classification evaluation of shale oil in Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 899-911.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al.Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[2] 金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等.中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):451-458.
JIN Zhijun, BAI Zhenrui, GAO Bo, et al.Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):451-458.
[3] 周庆凡, 金之钧, 杨国丰, 等.美国页岩油勘探开发现状与前景展望[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):469-477.
ZHOU Qingfan, JIN Zhijun, YANG Guofeng, et al.Shale oil exploration and production in the U.S.:status and outlook[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):469-477.
[4] 白国平, 邱海华, 邓舟舟, 等.美国页岩油资源分布特征与主控因素研究[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):524-532.
BAI Guoping, QIU Haihua, DENG Zhouzhou, et al.Distribution and main controls for shale oil resources in USA[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4):524-532.
[5] 邹才能, 赵群, 王红岩, 等.非常规油气勘探开发理论技术助力我国油气增储上产[J].石油科技论坛, 2021, 40(3):72-79.
ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, WANG Hongyan, et al.Theory and technology of unconventional oil and gas exploration and development helps China increase oil and gas reserves and production[J].Oil Forum, 2021, 40(3):72-79.
[6] HU Suyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, HOU Lianhua, et al.Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4):877-887.
[7] 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136.
JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):129-136.
[8] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Shejiao, et al.Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[9] HU Tao, PANG Xiongqi, JIANG Fujie, et al.Movable oil content evaluation of lacustrine organic-rich shales:methods and a novel quantitative evaluation model[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 214:103545.
[10] 黎茂稳, 金之钧, 董明哲, 等.陆相页岩形成演化与页岩油富集机理研究进展[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):489-505.
LI Maowen, JIN Zhijun, DONG Mingzhe, et al.Advances in the basic study of lacustrine shale evolution and shale oil accumulation[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4):489-505.
[11] 张抗, 张立勤, 刘冬梅.近年中国油气勘探开发形势及发展建议[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(1):15-28.
Z HANG Kang, ZHANG Liqin, LIU Dongmei.Situation of China's oil and gas exploration and development in recent years and relevant suggestions[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(1):15-28.
[12] 杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等.中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):560-568.
DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al.The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):560-568.
[13] ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al.Orderly coexistence and accumulation models of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons in Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation, Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1):43-59.
[14] 支东明, 宋永, 何文军, 等.准噶尔盆地中-下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4):389-401.
ZHI Dongming, SONG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al.Geological characteristics, resource potential and exploration direction of shale oil in Middle-Lower Permian, Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4):389-401.
[15] 支东明, 唐勇, 郑孟林, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油藏地质特征与成藏控制因素[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):615-623.
ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, ZHENG Menglin, et al.Geological characteristics and accumulation controlling factors of shale reservoirs in Fengcheng Formation, Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):615-623.
[16] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等.准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6):657-667.
KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al.Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock, Junggar Basin, NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):657-667.
[17] 雷德文, 陈刚强, 刘海磊, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷大油(气)区形成条件与勘探方向研究[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(7):1604-1619.
LEI Dewen, CHEN Gangqiang, LIU Hailei, et al.Study on the forming conditions and exploration fields of the Mahu giant oil (gas)province, Junggar basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(7):1604-1619.
[18] 何文军, 钱永新, 赵毅, 等.玛湖凹陷风城组全油气系统勘探启示[J].新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(6):641-655.
HE Wenjun, QIAN Yongxin, ZHAO Yi, et al.Exploration implications of total petroleum system in Fengcheng Formation, Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(6):641-655.
[19] 支东明, 曹剑, 向宝力, 等.玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩生烃机理及资源量新认识[J].新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(5):499-506.
ZHI Dongming, CAO Jian, XIANG Baoli, et al.Fengcheng alkaline lacustrine source rocks of Lower Permian in Mahu sag in Junggar Basin:hydrocarbon generation mechanism and petroleum resources reestimation[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(5):499-506.
[20] 张志杰, 袁选俊, 汪梦诗, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖沉积特征与古环境演化[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6):972-984.
ZHANG Zhijie, YUAN Xuanjun, WANG Mengshi, et al.Alkaline-lacustrine deposition and paleoenvironmental evolution in Permian Fengcheng Formation at the Mahu sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6):972-984.
[21] 许琳, 常秋生, 冯玲丽, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及控制因素[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):649-660.
XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, FENG Lingli, et al.The reservoir characteristics and control factors of shale oil in Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):649-660.
[22] 余宽宏, 操应长, 邱隆伟, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组含碱层段韵律特征及成因[J].古地理学报, 2016, 18(6):1012-1029.
YU Kuanhong, CAO Yingchang, QIU Longwei, et al.Characteristics of alkaline layer cycles and origin of the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography, 2016, 18(6):1012-1029.
[23] 秦志军, 陈丽华, 李玉文, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组碱湖古沉积背景[J].新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(1):1-6.
QIN Zhijun, CHEN Lihua, LI Yuwen, et al.Paleo-sedimentary setting of the Lower Permian Fengcheng Alkali lake in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(1):1-6.
[24] 卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):249-256.
LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al.Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:discussion and application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):249-256.
[25] HU Tao, PANG Xiongqi, JIANG Shu, et al.Oil content evaluation of lacustrine organic-rich shale with strong heterogeneity:a case study of the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J].Fuel, 2018, 221:196-205.
[26] LIU Chenglin, WANG Ziling, GUO Zeqing, et al.Enrichment and distribution of shale oil in the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation, Songliao Basin, Northeast China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 86:751-770.
[27] 何文渊, 蒙启安, 张金友.松辽盆地古龙页岩油富集主控因素及分类评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5):1-12.
HE Wenyuan, MENG Qi'an, ZHANG Jinyou.Controlling factors and their classification-evaluation of Gulong shale oil enrichment in Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(5):1-12.
[28] 王璟明, 肖佃师, 卢双舫, 等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩储层物性分级评价[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1):172-183.
WANG Jingming, XIAO Dianshi, LU Shuangfang, et al.Classification evaluation of shale oil reservoir physical properties in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar sag[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1):172-183.
[29] 魏永波, 李俊乾, 卢双舫, 等.湖相页岩油甜点综合评价方法及应用——以饶阳凹陷沙一下亚段页岩油为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(5):813-824.
WEI Yongbo, LI Junqian, LU Shuangfang, et al.Comprehensive evaluation method of sweet spot zone in lacustrine shale oil reservoir and its application:a case study of shale oil in Lower 1st Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Raoyang sag[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2021, 50(5):813-824.
[30] CAO Jian, XIA Liuwen, WANG Tingting, et al.An alkaline lake in the Late Paleozoic Ice Age (LPIA):a review and new insights into paleoenvironment and petroleum geology[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 202:103091.
[31] 张元元, 李威, 唐文斌.玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩发育的构造背景和形成环境[J].新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):48-54.
ZHANG Yuanyuan, LI Wei, TANG Wenbin.Tectonic setting and environment of alkaline lacustrine source rocks in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):48-54.
[32] 曹剑, 雷德文, 李玉文, 等.古老碱湖优质烃源岩:准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(7):781-790.
CAO Jian, LEI Dewen, LI Yuwen, et al.Ancient high-quality alkaline lacustrine source rocks discovered in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation, Junggar Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7):781-790.
[33] 刘惠民, 张顺, 包友书, 等.东营凹陷页岩油储集地质特征与有效性[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):512-523.
LIU Huimin, ZHANG Shun, BAO Youshu, et al.Geological characteristics and effectiveness of the shale oil reservoir in Dongying sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):512-523.
[34] 王民, 马睿, 李进步, 等.济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组湖相页岩油赋存机理[J].石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):789-802.
WANG Min, MA Rui, LI Jinbu, et al.Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4):789-802.
[35] 孙中良, 王芙蓉, 韩元佳, 等.江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组盐间可动页岩油赋存空间多尺度表征[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):586-595.
SUN Zhongliang, WANG Furong, HAN Yuanjia, et al.Multi-scale characterization of the spatial distribution of movable hydrocarbon in intersalt shale of Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang sag, Jianghan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4):586-595.
[36] 聂海宽, 张培先, 边瑞康, 等.中国陆相页岩油富集特征[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):55-62.
NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Peixian, BIAN Ruikang, et al.Oil accumulation characteristics of China continental shale[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2):55-62.
[37] 金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 等.中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(7):821-835.
JIN Zhijun, WANG Guanping, LIU Guangxiang, et al.Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):821-835.
[38] JIANG Fujie, CHEN Di, CHEN Jian, et al.Fractal analysis of shale pore structure of continental gas shale reservoir in the Ordos Basin, NW China[J].Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(6):4676-4689.
[39] 姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 等.沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(12):1587-1600.
JIANG Zhenxue, LI Tingwei, GONG Houjian, et al.Characteristics of low-mature shale reservoirs in Zhanhua sag and their influence on the mobility of shale oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12):1587-1600.
[40] 蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等.不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J].石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6):842-849.
JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al.Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6):842-849.
[41] 钱门辉, 蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 等.湖相页岩不同赋存状态的可溶有机质定量表征[J].石油实验地质, 2017, 39(2):278-286.
QIAN Menhui, JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, et al.Quantitative characterization of extractable organic matter in lacustrine shale with different occurrences[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(2):278-286.
[42] 徐田武, 张洪安, 李继东, 等.渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷盐湖相成烃成藏特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2):248-261.
XU Tianwu, ZHANG Hong'an, LI Jidong, et al.Characters of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of salt-lake facies in Dongpu sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2):248-261.
[43] 卢双舫, 马延伶, 曹瑞成, 等.优质烃源岩评价标准及其应用:以海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷为例[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2012, 37(3):535-544.
LU Shuangfang, MA Yanling, CAO Ruicheng, et al.Evaluation criteria of high-quality source rocks and its applications:taking the Wuerxun sag in Hailaer Basin as an example[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2012, 37(3):535-544.
[44] HU Tao, PANG Xiongqi, JIANG Fujie, et al.Key factors controlling shale oil enrichment in saline lacustrine rift basin:implications from two shale oil wells in Dongpu depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Science, 2021, 18(3):687-711.
[45] TISSOT B P, WELTE D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence[M].Berlin:Springer, 1984.
[46] 马晓潇, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 等.陆相页岩含油性的化学动力学定量评价方法[J].油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1):137-152.
MA Xiaoxiao, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, et al.Chemical kinetic model for quantitative evaluation on oil-bearing property of lacustrine shale[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1):137-152.
[47] 张振苓, 邬立言, 舒念祖.烃源岩热解分析参数T_max异常的原因[J].石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(1):72-75.
ZHANG Zhenling, WU Liyan, SHU Nianzu.Cause analysis of abnormal T_max values on Rock-Eval pyrolysis[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(1):72-75.
[48] 张振苓, 邬立言, 脱奇, 等.烃源岩热解分析参数T_max异常值的还原[J].石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(5):580-584.
ZHANG Zhenling, WU Liyan, TUO Qi, et al.Abnormal value recovery of maturity parameter T_max for Rock-Eval[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(5):580-584.
[49] THOMMES M, KANEKO K, NEIMARK A V, et al.Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2015, 87(9/10):1051-1069.
[50] 邓远, 蒲秀刚, 陈世悦, 等.细粒混积岩储层特征与主控因素分析——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(6):1301-1316.
DENG Yuan, PU Xiugang, CHEN Shiyue, et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks reservoir:a case study of the 2nd Member of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(6):1301-1316.
[51] 陈吉, 肖贤明.南方古生界3套富有机质页岩矿物组成与脆性分析[J].煤炭学报, 2013, 38(5):822-826.
CHEN Ji, XIAO Xianming.Mineral composition and brittleness of three sets of Paleozoic organic-rich shales in China south area[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(5):822-826.
[52] JARVIE D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas:Part 2, Shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A.Shale Reservoirs-Giant Resources for the 21st Century.AAPG Memoir, 2012:89-119.
[53] 何涛华, 李文浩, 谭昭昭, 等.南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组页岩油富集机制[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6):1259-1269.
HE Taohua, LI Wenhao, TAN Zhaozhao, et al.Mechanism of shale oil accumulation in the Hetaoyuan Formation from the Biyang depression, Nanxiang Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6):1259-1269.

准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质特征与分级评价

Geological characteristics and classification evaluation of shale oil in Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙龙德, 赵文智, 刘合, 朱如凯, 白斌, 康缘, 张婧雅, 吴松涛. 页岩油“甜点”概念及其应用讨论[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 1-13.
[2]	李宁, 冯周, 武宏亮, 田瀚, 刘鹏, 刘英明, 刘忠华, 王克文, 徐彬森. 中国陆相页岩油测井评价技术方法新进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 28-44.
[3]	姜在兴, 张建国, 孔祥鑫, 谢环羽, 程浩, 王力. 中国陆相页岩油气沉积储层研究进展及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 45-71.
[4]	侯连华, 吴松涛, 姜晓华, 田华, 于志超, 李亚锋, 廖凤蓉, 王婵菲, 沈月, 李梦莹, 华柑霖, 周川闽, 李华. 页岩油地质评价实验方法现状、挑战与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 72-90.
[5]	朱国文, 王小军, 张金友, 刘召, 白云风, 赵莹, 付秀丽, 曾花森. 松辽盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 110-124.
[6]	唐勇, 何文军, 姜懿洋, 费李莹, 单祥, 赵毅, 郑孟林, 曹剑, 秦志军, 杨森, 王然, 朱涛, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相页岩油气富集条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 125-143.
[7]	李国欣, 伍坤宇, 朱如凯, 张永庶, 吴松涛, 陈琰, 申颖浩, 张静, 邢浩婷, 李亚锋, 陈晓冬, 张闯, 张斌, 刘畅, 鲜成钢, 刘合. 巨厚高原山地式页岩油藏的富集模式与高效动用方式——以柴达木盆地英雄岭页岩油藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 144-157.
[8]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 金凤鸣, 陈长伟, 时战楠, 柴公权, 韩文中, 姜文亚, 官全胜, 张伟, 解德录, 董姜畅. 黄骅坳陷页岩型页岩油富集规律及勘探有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 158-175.
[9]	钟俊杰, 王曾定, 孙志刚, 姚军, 杨永飞, 孙海, 张磊, 张凯. 基于纳米流控技术的页岩储层微观流体特征研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 207-222.
[10]	张宸嘉, 曹剑, 王俞策, 支东明, 向宝力, 李二庭. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油富集规律[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1253-1268.
[11]	王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 余朝丰, 徐振平, 周露, 王珂, 张亮. 库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.
[12]	何文渊, 白雪峰, 蒙启安, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智. 四川盆地陆相页岩油成藏地质特征与重大发现[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 885-898.
[13]	姚东华, 周立宏, 王文革, 韩国猛, 蒲秀刚, 宋延杰, 许承武. 页岩油综合甜点测井评价——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 912-924.
[14]	付金华, 牛小兵, 李明瑞, 刘新社, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 周新平, 刘江艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段页岩油风险勘探突破与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 760-769,787.
[15]	田雨, 刘可禹, 蒲秀刚, 赵建华, 陈国辉, 张雅琦, 翟坤, 宋雅雅. 荧光光谱技术在页岩油地质评价中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 816-828.