气体钻井钻杆冲蚀规律研究

doi:10.7623/syxb201006025

石油学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 1013-1017.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201006025

气体钻井钻杆冲蚀规律研究

祝效华 1,2 刘少胡 2 童华 2

收稿日期:2010-03-08 修回日期:2010-06-02 出版日期:2010-11-25 发布日期:2011-01-20
通讯作者: 祝效华
作者简介:祝效华，男，1978年7月生，2005年获西南石油大学博士学位，现为该校副教授，主要从事杆管柱力学及井下工具等方面的科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.50804040）和“油气藏地质及开发工程”国家重点实验室开放基金项目（PLN0701）联合资助。

A study on the drill pipe erosion law in gas drilling

ZHU Xiaohua 1,2 LIU Shaohu 2 TONG Hua 2

Received:2010-03-08 Revised:2010-06-02 Online:2010-11-25 Published:2011-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对气体钻井岩屑造成钻柱严重冲蚀的问题，基于气固两相流和冲蚀理论，建立了环空岩屑运移模型。在Eulerian坐标系下求解气体连续相流场，在Lagrangian坐标系下对离散相岩屑粒子进行了碰撞求解，采用Grant和Tabakoff公式求解岩屑粒子冲蚀速率，借助实验数据验证了仿真模型。利用该模型研究了气体钻井中钻杆居中以及不同钻杆偏心率、井径扩大率、注气量和机械钻速下环空岩屑粒子运移规律和钻杆冲蚀特性。研究表明，岩屑对钻杆接头及下坡面本体的冲蚀比钻杆本体及接头上坡面严重；钻杆偏心和井径扩大都使局部冲蚀速率峰值增大，且偏心越严重，井径扩大越大，局部冲蚀速率峰值增速越大；机械钻速增大，导致钻杆局部冲蚀速率峰值近乎线性增加；在工程常用注气量范围内，注气量对冲蚀速率峰值和冲蚀速率平均值的影响很小。根据冲蚀规律提出如下建议：减小钻杆斜坡坡度可减少钻杆接头及下坡面的局部冲蚀；采用低转速的空气锤钻井工艺可减缓因偏心引起的局部冲蚀；井眼扩大较大时，增大注气量，通过改变岩屑粒子轨迹，可减少岩屑对钻杆本体的多次冲蚀。

关键词: 气体钻井, 气-固两相流, 岩屑运移, 冲蚀；钻杆, 计算流体动力学, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Erosion of drill strings by cuttings is very serious in gas drilling.Based on the gas and solid two-phase flow dynamics and erosion theory,the present paper established a transport model for annulus cuttings.A continuous gas phase flow field was solved under the Eulerian coordinate system,and the collision solution to discrete-phase cutting particles was obtained under the Lagrangian coordinates by applying the Grant and Tabakoff formulae to calculate the erosion rate of cutting particles and verifying the simulating model with the aid of experimental data.Then,this model was applied to study various problems encountered in gas drilling,such as the drill-pipe centralization,different eccentricity of drill pipes,enlargement of wellbore diameter,volume of gas injection,transport law of annulus cutting particles at the rate of penetration (ROP),and erosion features of drill pipes.The studies demonstrated that cuttings eroded the drill-pipe joint and its lower sloping surface more seriously than the drill-pipe body and the upper sloping surface of the joint.Both the drill-pipe eccentricity and the enlargement of wellbore diameter would increase the peak value of the local erosion rate,and the more the eccentricity and enlargement,the quicker the increase of the peak value of the local erosion rate.The increase of ROP led to an approximately linear increase in the peak value of the local erosion rate,and gas-injection volumes within the normal range of engineering influenced the peak and mean value of the erosion rate very little.The following recommendations were made according to the erosion law: the decrease in the sloping grade of drill pipes would reduce the local erosion of the drill-pipe joint and its lower sloping surface,the use of low-speed air-hammer drilling technics would reduce the local erosion caused by tool eccentricity,and the trajectory alteration of cutting particles could reduce frequent erosion of drill-pipe body as increasing volume of injection gas with more enlargement of wellbore.This study is of certain directive significance and applied value both in revealing the erosion law of drill pipes and in reducing the drill-pipe erosion.

Key words: gas drilling;gas and solid two-phase flow;transport of cuttings;erosion, drill pipe;CFD;numerical simulation

中图分类号:

null

祝效华刘少胡童华. 气体钻井钻杆冲蚀规律研究[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(6): 1013-1017.

ZHU Xiaohua LIU Shaohu TONG Hua. A study on the drill pipe erosion law in gas drilling[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2010, 31(6): 1013-1017.

参考文献

[1]艾惊涛，余锐，廖兵，等.四川油气田气体钻井技术现状及发展方向[J].天然气工业，2009，29（7）：39-41.

Ai Jingtao,Yu Rui,Liao Bing,et al.The status quo and future development of gas drilling technology in the Sichuan gas field

[J].Natural Gas Industry，2009，29（7）：39-41.

[2]万里平.气体钻井中钻具腐蚀与防护及其机理研究[D].成都：西南石油大学，2004.

Wan Liping.Study of corrosion and corrosion inhibition mechanism of drilling tool for air drilling[D].Chengdu：Southwest Petroleum University,2004.

[3]李国美，王跃社，孙虎，等.节流器内液-固两相流固体颗粒冲蚀数值模拟[J].石油学报，2009，30（1）：145-148.

Li Guomei,Wang Yueshe,Sun Hu,et al.Numerical simulation on solid particle erosion of solid-liquid two-phase fluid in flow controller[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(1):145-148.

[4]王治中，邓金根，孙福街，等.井筒砂粒运移规律室内模拟实验研究[J].石油学报，2006，27（4）：130-132.

Wang Zhizhong,Deng Jingen,Sun Fujie,et al.Experimental study on sand grain migration in wellbore[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(4):130-132.

[5]Edwards J K,Mclaury B S,Shirazi S A.Modeling solid particle erosion in elbows and plugged tees[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology,2001,123(4):277-284.

[6]Mazumder Q H,Siamack A S,Mclaury B S.Prediction of solid particle erosive wear of elbows in multiphase annular flow-model development and experiment validations[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology,2008,130(2):1-10.

[7]郭建华，佘朝毅，李黔，等.气体钻井井筒冲蚀作用定量分析及控制方法[J].石油学报，2007，28（6）：129-132.

Guo Jianhua,She Chaoyi,Li Qian,et al.Quantitative analysis and controlling method for pipe string erosion in gas drilling

[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):129-132.

[8]张晓东，贾国超，吴臣德.空气钻井钻具冲蚀磨损机理的分析[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版，2009，31（2）：139-142.

Zhang Xiaodong,Jia Guochao,Wu Chende.Mechanism analysis of BHA erosion wear in air drilling[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2009,31 (2):139-142.

[9]黄小兵.气体钻井钻具冲蚀磨损机理研究[D].成都：西南石油大学，2009.

Huang Xiaobing.Study of erosion mechanism of drilling tool for gas drillng[D].Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University,2009.

[10]Baxter L L,Smith P J.Turbulent dispersion of particles:The STP model [J].Energy Fuels,1993,7(6):852-859.

[11]Arefi B,Settari A,Angman P.Simulation of erosion in drilling tools for the oil and gas industry[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2006,45(11):34-40.

[1]	李祯, 郭奇, 卜亚辉, 胡慧芳. 基于深度学习的饱和度场样本库建立及预测[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 698-707.
[2]	王强, 赵金洲, 胡永全, 赵超能, 张祯祥. 岩心尺度静态自发渗吸的数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 860-870.
[3]	吴林, 朱明, 冯兴强, 冀冬生, 周磊, 刘圣鑫, 张林炎, 谭元隆, 钱竹良, 杨珍. 准噶尔盆地四棵树凹陷构造应力场与构造变形解析[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 494-506.
[4]	王文昌, 冯大君, 狄勤丰, 芮子翔, 陈锋, 朱卫平. 预弯钟摆BHA在不同钻井介质中的动力学特征及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1237-1246.
[5]	许林, 刘书杰, 许明标, 冯桓榰, 邢希金, 邓佳佳. 压差激活密封剂的微缺陷自适应修复行为及机理[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 686-694.
[6]	邹玮, 余一欣, 刘金水, 蒋一鸣, 唐贤君, 陈石, 余浪. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带发育主控因素及宁波背斜形成过程[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 176-185.
[7]	卢海龙, 尚世龙, 陈雪君, 秦绪文, 古利娟, 邱海峻. 天然气水合物开发数值模拟器研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1516-1530.
[8]	祝效华, 罗云旭, 刘伟吉, 高锐, 贾玉丹, 刘呈君. 等离子体电脉冲钻井破岩机理的电击穿实验与数值模拟方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1146-1162.
[9]	李文婧, 姜源, 单保东, 禹晓珊, 王超. 盐穴储气库注采运行时温效应对腔体稳定性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 762-776.
[10]	窦晓峰, 宁伏龙, 李彦龙, 刘昌岭, 孙嘉鑫, 李杨, 李晓东, 赵颖杰, 张凌, 刘乐乐. 基于连续-离散介质耦合的水合物储层出砂数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 629-642.
[11]	罗成波, 蒋祖军, 李皋, 何龙, 孟英峰, 欧彪, 肖国益, 严焱诚, 王希勇. QL1井井底突发性岩爆动力学机理及动态演化过程[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 244-252.
[12]	计秉玉. 对油气藏工程研究方法发展趋势的几点认识[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1774-1778.
[13]	郭建春, 任冀川, 王世彬, 苟波, 赵俊生, 伍林. 裂缝性致密碳酸盐岩储层酸压多场耦合数值模拟与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1219-1228.
[14]	韩强, 屈展, 叶正寅. 基于多尺度均匀化理论的页岩强度表征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(7): 858-865.
[15]	苏皓, 雷征东, 李俊超, 龚斌, 赵文琪, 鞠斌山, 张荻萩, 秦鹤. 储集层多尺度裂缝高效数值模拟模型[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 587-593,634.

气体钻井钻杆冲蚀规律研究

A study on the drill pipe erosion law in gas drilling

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价