富有机质泥页岩高压生烃模拟与孔隙演化特征

doi:10.7623/syxb201602003

石油学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 172-181.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201602003

富有机质泥页岩高压生烃模拟与孔隙演化特征

吉利明¹, 吴远东^1,2, 贺聪^1,2, 苏龙¹

1. 甘肃省油气资源研究重点实验室中国科学院油气资源研究重点实验室甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院大学地球科学学院北京 100049

收稿日期:2015-07-28 修回日期:2015-12-11 出版日期:2016-02-25 发布日期:2016-03-11
通讯作者: 吉利明,男,1963年1月生,1984年获武汉地质学院学士学位,2005年获中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位,现为中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所兰州油气资源研究中心研究员,主要从事石油地质研究工作。Email:jilimin@lzb.ac.cn
作者简介:吉利明,男,1963年1月生,1984年获武汉地质学院学士学位,2005年获中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位,现为中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所兰州油气资源研究中心研究员,主要从事石油地质研究工作。Email:jilimin@lzb.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2012CB214704-02)、国家重大科技专项(2011ZX05008-002-22)和甘肃省重点实验室专项(1309RTSA041)资助。

High-pressure hydrocarbon-generation simulation and pore evolution characteristics of organic-rich mudstone and shale

Ji Liming¹, Wu Yuandong^1,2, He Cong^1,2, Su Long¹

1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources of Gansu Province & Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. College of Earth Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2015-07-28 Revised:2015-12-11 Online:2016-02-25 Published:2016-03-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对深层高演化气页岩储层勘探和潜力评价的需求,通过高温高压模拟实验探讨了泥页岩在深层高演化阶段的成烃规律和孔隙演化。研究表明,高压条件下富有机质泥页岩中的纳米级微孔隙随温度和压力的升高不断增加,增加高峰与气态及液态烃产率高峰相一致,并导致页岩孔隙率升高,但进入高-过成熟阶段后页岩孔隙率将随模拟条件的进一步升高而降低。与微孔隙相反,页岩中的微米级毛细孔和巨孔随模拟温度或压力的升高不断减少,指示深层条件不利于游离气的储存,而该阶段微孔隙和表面积的显著增加,可弥补随温度和压力升高吸附能力下降引起的页岩吸附态天然气的减少,从而使深层页岩仍然具有较高的页岩气潜力。模拟样品黄铁矿、白云石等组分中发现大量次生微孔隙,证明页岩碎屑及矿物基质在深层演化阶段也能形成丰富的次生微孔隙,作为烃源岩页岩在演化过程中能形成大量酸性流体,有利于次生孔隙的发育。

关键词: 孔隙演化, 页岩储层, 生烃模拟, 高演化, 富有机质源岩

Abstract:

Aiming at the demand of exploration and potential evaluation of deep high-evolution gas shale reservoirs, high temperature and high pressure simulation experiments were carried out to explore the hydrocarbon generation laws and pore evolution of shale in the deep high-evolution stage. The results show that nano-scale micro-pores in organic-rich mudstone and shale increase with temperature and pressure rising under high pressure conditions, and the peak is consistent with the yield peak of gaseous and liquid hydrocarbons, leading to the increment of shale porosity. However, shale porosity is decreased with further enhanced simulation conditions in high and over-maturity stages. Contrary to micro-pores, micron pores and giant pores are reduced with the simulation temperature or pressure rising, indicating that deep conditions are not conducive to free gas storage. However, micro-pores and surface area are significantly increased in this stage, which can make up for the reduction of adsorbed natural gas in shale caused by the decrease of adsorption capability with temperature and pressure rising, so that deep shale still has a high potential of shale gas. A large number of secondary micro-pores are found in pyrite, dolomite and other components in simulation samples, proving that abundant secondary micro-pores can also be formed in shale debris and mineral matrix during the deep evolution stage. A large number of acidic fluids can be generated in the shale as source rocks during the evolution, favorable to the development of secondary pores.

Key words: pore evolution, shale reservoirs, hydrocarbon generation simulation, high evolution, organic-rich source rocks

中图分类号:

TE122.1

吉利明, 吴远东, 贺聪, 苏龙. 富有机质泥页岩高压生烃模拟与孔隙演化特征[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 172-181.

Ji Liming, Wu Yuandong, He Cong, Su Long. High-pressure hydrocarbon-generation simulation and pore evolution characteristics of organic-rich mudstone and shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(2): 172-181.

参考文献

[1] 张建坤,何生,易积正,等.岩石热声发射和盆模技术研究中扬子区西部下古生界海相页岩最高古地温和热成熟史[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):58-67.
Zhang Jiankun,He Sheng,Yi Jizheng,et al.Rock thermo-acoustic emission and basin modeling technologies applied to the study of maximum paleotemperatures and termal maturity histories of Lower Paleozoic marine shales in the western middle Yangtze area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):58-67.
[2] 林拓,张金川,李博,等.湘西北常页1井下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气聚集条件及含气特征[J].石油学报,2014,35(5):839-846.
Lin Tuo,Zhang Jinchuan,Li Bo,et al.Shale gas accumulation conditions and gas-bearing properties of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formaiton in Well Changye 1,northwestern Hunan[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(5):839-846.
[3] Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas system[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
[4] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the lower Jurassic gordondale member,Northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):51-75.
[5] 蒲泊伶,蒋有录,王毅,等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析[J].石油学报,2010,31(2):225-230.
Pu Boling,Jiang Youlu,Wang Yi,et al.Reservoir-forming conditions and favorable exploration zones of shale gas in lower silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):225-230.
[6] Lu Xiaochun,Li Fanchang,Watson A T.Adsorption measurements in Devonian shales[J].Fuel,1995,74(4):599-603.
[7] Chalmers G R,Bustin R M,Powers I.A pore by any other name would be as small:the importance of meso-and microporosity in shale gas capacity[R].Denver,USA:AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition,2009.
[8] 李传亮,朱苏阳.页岩气其实是自由气[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(1):1-3.
Li Chuanliang,Zhu Suyang.Shale gas is free gas underground[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(1):1-3.
[9] 王飞宇,关晶,冯伟平,等.过成熟海相页岩孔隙度演化特征和游离气量[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):764-768.
Wang Feiyu,Guan Jing,Feng Weiping,et al.Evolution of overmature marine shale porosity and implication to the free gas volume[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):764-768.
[10] Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett shale of North-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[11] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian-Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary Basin:application of an integrated Formation evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,2008,92(1):87-125.
[12] Cander H.Sweet spots in shale gas and liquids plays:prediction of fluid composition and reservoir pressure[R].Search and Discovery Article 40936,2012.
[13] 吉利明,邱军利,夏燕青,等.常见黏土矿物电镜扫描微孔隙特征与甲烷吸附性[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):249-256.
Ji Liming,Qiu Junli,Xia Yanqing,et al.Micro-pore characteristics and methane adsorption properties of common clay minerals by electron microscope scanning[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):249-256.
[14] 梁兴,张廷山,杨洋,等.滇黔北地区筇竹寺组高演化页岩气储层微观孔隙特征及其控制因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(2):18-26.
Liang Xing,Zhang Tingshan,Yang Yang,et al.Microscopic pore structure and its controlling factors of overmature shale in the lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Fm,northern Yunnan and Guizhou provinces of China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(2):18-26.
[15] Athy L F.Density,porosity,and compaction of sedimentary rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin, 1930,14(1):1-24.
[16] King H M,Rubey W W.Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,1959,70(2):115-116.
[17] Selley R C.Porosity gradients in North Sea oil-bearing sandstones[J].Journal of the Geological Society, 1978,135(1):119-132.
[18] Baldwin B,Butler C O.Compaction curves[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(4):622-626.
[19] 姚秀云,张凤莲,赵鸿儒.岩石物性综合测定——砂、泥岩孔隙度与深度及渗透率关系的定量研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,1989,24(5):533-541.
Yao Xiuyun,Zhang Fenglian,Zhao Hongru.Comprehensive determination of physical properties of rock Formations——the quantitative analysis of the relation between porosity and depth(or permeability)for sandstone(or mudstone)[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,1989,24(5):533-541.
[20] 郭秋麟,陈晓明,宋焕琪,等.泥页岩埋藏过程孔隙度演化与预测模型探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):439-449.
Guo Qiulin,Cheng Xiaoming,Song Huanqi,et al.Evolution and models of shale porosity during burial process[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):439-449.
[21] 庞雄奇.地质过程定量模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:101-111.
Pang Xiongqi.Modeling of geologic processes[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003:101-111.
[22] 李明诚.石油与天然气运移[M].第三版.北京:石油工业出版社,2004:50-57.
Li Mingcheng.Oil and gas migration[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:50-57.
[23] Hao Fang,Zou Huayao,Gong Zaisheng,et al.Hierarchies of overpressure retardation of organic matter maturation:case studies from petroleum Basins in China[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(10):1467-1498.
[24] Surdam R C,Boese S W,Crossey L J.The chemistry of secondary porosity:Part 2.Aspects of porosity modification[G].AAPG Memoir,37,1984:127-149.
[25] 梅博文,杨文宽.储层地球化学(译文集)[C].西安:西北大学出版社,1991.
Mei Bowen,Yang Wenkuan.Reservoir Geochemistry(Translations)[C].Xi'an:Northwestern University Press,1991.
[26] 黄思静,武文慧,刘洁,等.大气水在碎屑岩次生孔隙形成中的作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组为例[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2003,28(4):419-424.
Huang Sijing,Wu Wenhui,Liu Jie,et al.Generation of secondary porosity by meteoric water during time of subaerial exposure:an example from Yanchang Formation sandstone of Triassic of Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2003,28(4):419-424.
[27] 王勇,钟建华,陈昊,等.东濮凹陷古近系深层次生孔隙垂向分布特征及成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(5):576-580.
Wang Yong,Zhong Jianhua,Chen Hao,et al.Vertical distribution and genesis of the secondary pore in deep Formation of Paleogene at Dongpu sag[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(5):576-580.
[28] Milliken K L,Rudnicki M,Awwiller D N,et al.Organic matter-hosted pore system,Marcellus Formation(Devonian),Pennsylvania[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(2):177-200.

富有机质泥页岩高压生烃模拟与孔隙演化特征

High-pressure hydrocarbon-generation simulation and pore evolution characteristics of organic-rich mudstone and shale

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[2]	魏兵, 王怡文, 赵金洲, Kadet Valeriy, 蒲万芬. 固液界面特征对致密/页岩储层渗吸行为的影响——以延长组7段+8段致密储层和龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1683-1692.
[3]	聂海宽, 张光荣, 李沛, 丁江辉, 党伟, 孙川翔, 张培先, 王进, 杨超, 李鹏, 王鹏威, 苏海琨. 页岩有机孔研究现状和展望[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1770-1787.
[4]	胡松, 王敏, 刘伟男, 王兵. 页岩水平井声波时差各向异性校正方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 58-66.
[5]	庞小军, 牛成民, 杜晓峰, 王清斌, 代黎明. 渤海海域石臼坨凸起东北缘沙河街组一段+二段砂砾岩储层差异定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1073-1088.
[6]	姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 姜涛, 常佳琦, 宁传祥, 苏思远, 陈委涛. 沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1587-1600.
[7]	蒋裕强, 刘雄伟, 付永红, 陈虎, 张海杰, 燕军, 陈超, 谷一凡. 渝西地区海相页岩储层孔隙有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1233-1243.
[8]	张顺, 刘惠民, 王敏, 傅爱兵, 包友书, 王伟庆, 滕建彬, 方正伟. 东营凹陷页岩油储层孔隙演化[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 754-766.
[9]	王强, 彭平安, 张文正, 刘金钟, 于赤灵. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段页岩全组分定量生烃模拟及原油可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 541-553.
[10]	刘文平, 张成林, 高贵冬, 罗超, 吴伟, 石学文, 张鉴, 李武广, 邓晓航, 胡晓华. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩孔隙度控制因素及演化规律[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 175-184.
[11]	刘忠宝, 高波, 胡宗全, 杜伟, 聂海宽, 姜涛. 高演化富有机质页岩储层特征及孔隙形成演化——以黔南地区下寒武统九门冲组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(12): 1381-1389.
[12]	张顺, 刘惠民, 宋国奇, 王永诗, 陈世悦, 张守鹏. 东营凹陷页岩油储集空间成因及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(12): 1495-1507,1527.
[13]	叶素娟, 李嵘, 杨克明, 朱宏权, 张庄. 川西坳陷叠覆型致密砂岩气区储层特征及定量预测评价[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(12): 1484-1494.
[14]	胡海燕. 富有机质Woodford页岩孔隙演化的热模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 820-825.
[15]	骆　杨赵彦超吕新华. 东濮凹陷柳屯洼陷沙河街组三段上亚段盐间泥页岩储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(2): 293-300.