歧口凹陷北大港构造带奥陶系潜山储层特征、主控因素及发育模式

doi:10.7623/syxb201811004

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1241-1252.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201811004

歧口凹陷北大港构造带奥陶系潜山储层特征、主控因素及发育模式

崔宇¹, 李宏军¹, 付立新¹, 肖飞², 王辉¹, 段润梅¹, 张津宁¹, 冯建园¹, 杨子玉¹, 赵宗举³

1. 中国石油大港油田公司勘探开发研究院天津 300280;
2. 中国地质大学能源学院北京 100083;
3. 中国石油学会北京 100724

收稿日期:2018-04-19 修回日期:2018-09-18 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-12-10
通讯作者: 崔宇,男,1988年7月生,2010年获中国石油大学(北京)地质工程专业学士学位,2014年获中国石油大学(北京)地质学专业硕士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事石油天然气地质综合研究工作。Email:dg_cuiyu@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:崔宇,男,1988年7月生,2010年获中国石油大学(北京)地质工程专业学士学位,2014年获中国石油大学(北京)地质学专业硕士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事石油天然气地质综合研究工作。Email:dg_cuiyu@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项（2018E-11-02）资助。

Characteristics,main controlling factors and development model of Ordovician buried-hill reservoir in Beidagang structural belt, Q ikou sag

Cui Yu¹, Li Hongjun¹, Fu Lixin¹, Xiao Fei², Wang Hui¹, Duan Runmei¹, Zhang Jinning¹, Feng Jianyuan¹, Yang Ziyu¹, Zhao Zongju³

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China;
2. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Chinese Petroleum Society, Beijing 100724, China

Received:2018-04-19 Revised:2018-09-18 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

奥陶系碳酸盐岩潜山是歧口凹陷重要的油气勘探对象，由于其储层的非均质性强，勘探进展缓慢。在分析宏观构造背景、钻井、录井、常规测井、成像测井、试油和地震等资料的基础上，明确了北大港构造带奥陶系潜山的储层特征和储层主控因素，提出了多期次岩溶发育模式。北大港构造带潜山储层的岩性主要为白云岩和膏溶角砾岩，储集空间以溶洞、粒间溶孔、晶间孔和裂缝为主，储层发育主要受控于岩性组合，以及晚加里东期-早海西期、印支期-燕山期和喜马拉雅期3期古岩溶的综合改造。基于恢复的岩溶古地貌、试油表现、溶洞充填物和构造背景，建立了3期古岩溶改造模式，即晚加里东期-早海西期的准平原化岩溶残丘-斜坡-洼地改造模式、印支期-燕山期总体岩溶斜坡背景下的次级残丘-洼地模式、喜马拉雅期的断裂岩溶改造模式。其中，晚加里东期-早海西期是北大港构造带最重要的储层改造阶段，印支期-燕山期古岩溶储层的改造作用仅在千米桥潜山带较明显，而喜马拉雅期的古岩溶改造仅发育于古近系凹陷的边界断裂带，改造了晚加里东期-早海西期的古岩溶地层。

关键词: 潜山储层, 主控因素, 岩溶发育模式, 奥陶系, 北大港构造带

Abstract:

Ordovician carbonate buried hill is an important hydrocarbon exploration target in Qikou sag where the strong heterogeneity of reservoir leads to the exploration in slow progress. Based on the systematic analysis of macro-structural background, drilling and logging, conventional logging, imaging logging, oil testing, seismic and other geological data, the characteristics and main controlling factors of Ordovician buried-hill reservoirs in Beidagang structural belt are identified to propose a multi-stage karst development model. The lithology of buried-hill reservoir in Beidagang structural belt is dominated by dolomite and gypsum-karst breccia. The reserving spaces mainly include karst caves, intergranular dissolution pores, intergranular pores and fractures. The reservoir development is primarily controlled by lithologic assemblage and the comprehensive reformation of Late Caledonian-Early Hercynian, Indosinian-Yanshanian and Himalayan stages. On the basis of the restored karst paleogeomorphology, oil test performance, filling materials of karst caves and tectonic settings, the models for three stages of paleo-karst transformation are established, i.e., the Late Caledonian-Early Hercynian peneplain karst residual hill-slope-sag transformation model, and the Indosinian-Yanshanian secondary residual hill-sag model under the whole background of karst slope, and the Himalaya fault karst transformation model. Among them, the Late Caledonian-Early Hercynian period is the most important stage of reservoir reformation in Beidagang structural belt. The Indosinian-Yanshanian paleo-karst reservoir transformation only had obvious effects in the Qianmiqiao buried-hill zone, while the Himalayan paleo-karst transformation only occurred in the boundary fault zone of the Paleogene sag, leading to the transformation of the Late Caledonian-Early Hercynian paleo-karst reservoirs.

Key words: buried-hill reservoir, main controlling factors, karst development pattern, Ordovician, Beidagang structural belt

中图分类号:

TE122.3

崔宇, 李宏军, 付立新, 肖飞, 王辉, 段润梅, 张津宁, 冯建园, 杨子玉, 赵宗举. 歧口凹陷北大港构造带奥陶系潜山储层特征、主控因素及发育模式[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(11): 1241-1252.

Cui Yu, Li Hongjun, Fu Lixin, Xiao Fei, Wang Hui, Duan Runmei, Zhang Jinning, Feng Jianyuan, Yang Ziyu, Zhao Zongju. Characteristics,main controlling factors and development model of Ordovician buried-hill reservoir in Beidagang structural belt, Q ikou sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(11): 1241-1252.

参考文献

[1] 白国平.世界碳酸盐岩大油气田分布特征[J].古地理学报,2006,8(2):241-250.
BAI Guoping.Distribution patterns of giant carbonate fields in the world[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(2):241-250.
[2] 费宝生,汪建红.中国海相油气田勘探实例之三:渤海湾盆地任丘古潜山大油田的发现与勘探[J].海相油气地质,2005,10(3):43-50.
FEI Baosheng,WANG Jianhong.Cases of discovery and exploration of marine fields in China (part 3):Renqiu buried-hill oilfield,Bohaiwan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2015,10(3):43-50.
[3] 吴永平,杨池银,付立新,等.中国海相油气田勘探实例之九:渤海湾盆地千米桥凝析油气田的勘探与发现[J].海相油气地质,2007,12(3):44-52.
WU Yongping,YANG Chiyin,FU Lixin,et al.Case of discovery and exploration of marine fields in China (part 9):Qianmiqiao Ordovician condensate field in Bohaiwan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2007,12(3):44-52.
[4] 赵贤正,王权,金凤鸣,等.冀中坳陷隐蔽型潜山油气藏主控因素与勘探实践[J].石油学报,2012,33(S1):71-79.
ZHAO Xianzheng,WANG Quan,JIN Fengming,et al.Main controlling factors and exploration practice of subtle buried-hill hydrocarbon reservoir in Jizhong depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S1):71-79.
[5] 赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,等.渤海湾盆地牛东1超深潜山高温油气藏的发现及其意义[J].石油学报,2011,32(6):915-927.
ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,WANG Quan,et al.Niudong 1 ultra-deep and ultra-high temperature subtle buried hill field in Bohai Bay Basin:discovery and significance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):915-927.
[6] 金振奎,邹元荣,蒋春雷,等.大港探区奥陶系岩溶储层发育分布控制因素[J].沉积学报,2001,19(4):530-535.
JIN Zhenkui,ZOU Yuanrong,JIANG Chunlei,et al.Distribution and controlling factors of Ordovician karst reservoirs in Dagang region[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica.2001,19(4):530-535.
[7] 付立新,吴雪松,赵敏,等.歧口凹陷埕海潜山地质构造及奥陶系天然气成藏特点[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(5):63-72.
FU Lixin,WU Xuesong,ZHAO Min,et al.Structural geology and gas accumulation in Ordovician reservoir in Chenghai buried-hill in Qikou sag[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(5):63-72.
[8] 张希明,杨坚,杨秋来,等.塔河缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏描述及储量评估技术[J].石油学报,2004,25(1):13-18.
ZHANG Ximing,YANG Jian,YANG Qiulai,et al.Reservoir description and reserves estimation technique for fracture-cave type carbonate reservoir in Tahe oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(1):13-18.
[9] 王光付.碳酸盐岩溶洞型储层综合识别及预测方法[J].石油学报,2008,29(1):47-51.
WANG Guangfu.Integrative identification and prediction methods for carbonate rock cave reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(1):47-51.
[10] 张繁昌,李灿灿,徐旺林.改进Stockwell变换法识别碳酸盐岩溶洞——以鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系溶洞发育段为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(2):182-187.
ZHANG Fanchang,LI Cancan,XU Wanglin.Identification of carbonate karst caves using modified Stockwell transform method:a case study of Ordovician karst caves in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):182-187.
[11] 程昌茹,郑琳,李长洪,等.千米桥古潜山岩溶岩及其地球化学特征[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(6):816-820.
CHENG Changru,ZHENG Lin,LI Changhong,et al.Ancient buried hill karst rock and its geochemistry characteristics in Qianmiqiao area[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(6):816-820.
[12] 于学敏,苏俊青,王振升.千米桥潜山油气藏基本地质特征[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(6):7-9.
YU Xuemin,SUN Junqing,WANG Zhensheng.Basic geological characteristics of Qianmiqiao buried hill oil/gas reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1999,26(6):7-9.
[13] 齐振琴,程昌茹,孙秀会,等.千米桥古潜山岩溶地貌演化及古岩溶洞穴发育特征[J].海相油气地质,2008,13(4):37-43.
QI Zhenqin,CHENG Changru,SUN Xiuhui,et al.Evolution of karst paleogeomorphology and development features of paleokarstic caves in the Qianmiqiao buried hill in Huabei oil fields[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2008,13(4):37-43.
[14] 洪海涛,杨雨,刘鑫,等.四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩储层特征及控制因素[J].石油学报,2012,33(S2):64-73.
HONG Haitao,YANG Yu,LIU Xin,et al.The characteristics and development law of marine carbonate reservoirs in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S2):64-73.
[15] 赵宗举,王招明,吴兴宁,等.塔里木盆地塔中地区奥陶系储层成因类型及分布预测[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):40-46.
ZHAO Zongju,WANG Zhaoming,WU Xingning,et al.Genetic types and distribution forecast of available carbonate reservoirs in Ordovician in the central area of Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2007,29(1):40-46.
[16] 付立新,楼达,冯建元,等.歧口凹陷中位序、低位序潜山地质特征及油气勘探潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(4):559-565.
FU Lixin,LOU Da,FENG Jianyuan,et al.Geologic features and hydrocarbon exploration potential of middle-and low-buried hill in Qikou sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(4):559-565.
[17] 冯增昭.华北地台早古生代岩相古地理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
FENG Zengzhao.Lithofacies palaeogeography of Early Paleozoic of North China platform[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994.
[18] 大港油田石油地质编辑委员会.中国石油地质志(卷四):大港油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991.
Editorial Board of Petroleum Geology of Dagang Oilfield.Petroleum geology of China (Vol.4):Dagang oilfield[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1991.
[19] 谢增业,魏国齐,李剑,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩大气田成藏特征与模式[J].石油学报,2013,34(S1):29-40.
XIE Zengye,WEI Guoqi,LI Jian,et al.Reservoir characteristics and accumulation modes of large carbonate gas fields in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(S1):29-40.
[20] 单秀琴,张静,张宝民,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组白云岩岩溶储层特征及溶蚀作用证据[J].石油学报,2016,37(1):17-29.
SHAN Xiuqin,ZHANG Jing,ZHANG Baomin,et al.Dolomite karst reservoir characteristics and dissolution evidences of Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):17-29.
[21] 杨华,付金华,魏新善,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩天然气勘探领域[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):733-740.
YANG Hua,FU Jinhua,WEI Xinshan,et al.Natural gas exploration domains in Ordovician marine carbonates,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(5):733-740.
[22] 李阳,金强,钟建华,等.塔河油田奥陶系岩溶分带及缝洞结构特征[J].石油学报,2016,37(3):289-297.
LI Yang,JIN Qiang,ZHONG Jianhua,et al.Karst zonings and fracture-cave structure characteristics of Ordovician reservoirs in Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(3):289-297.
[23] 魏新善,任军峰,赵俊兴,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳古地貌特征嬗变及地质意义[J].石油学报,2017,38(9):999-1009.
WEI Xinshan,REN Junfeng,ZHAO Junxing,et al.Paleo-geomorphologic characteristic evolution and geological significance of the Ordovician weathering crust in eastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(9):999-1009.
[24] 倪新锋,王招明,杨海军,等.塔北地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层岩溶作用[J].油气地质与采收率,2010,17(5):11-16.
NI Xinfeng,WANG Zhaoming,YANG Haijun,et al.Formation mechanism of Ordovician carbonate karst reservoir in the Northern Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2010,17(5):11-16.
[25] CONLIFFE J,AZMY K,GREENE M.Dolomitization of the lower Ordovician Catoche Formation:implications for hydrocarbon exploration in western Newfoundland[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,30(1):161-173.
[26] 王招明,张丽娟,孙崇浩.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶分类、期次及勘探思路[J].古地理学报,2015,17(5):635-644.
WANG Zhaoming,ZHANG Lijuan,SUN Chonghao.Classification,period and exploration for carbonate karst in the Ordovician,Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2015,17(5):635-644.
[27] 董月霞,赵宗举,曹中宏,等.南堡凹陷奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶残丘圈闭勘探潜力及意义[J].石油学报,2015,36(6):653-663.
DONG Yuexia,ZHAO Zongju,CAO Zhonghong,et al.Exploration potential and significance of Ordovician carbonate karst monadnock traps in Nanpu sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(6):653-663.
[28] 赵文智,沈安江,潘文庆,等.碳酸盐岩岩溶储层类型研究及对勘探的指导意义——以塔里木盆地岩溶储层为例[J].岩石学报,2013,29(9):3213-3222.
ZHAO Wenzhi,SHEN Anjiang,PAN Wenqing,et al.A research on carbonate karst reservoirs classification and its implication on hydrocarbon exploration:cases studies from Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(9):3213-3222.
[29] 陈景山,李忠,王振宇,等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶作用与储层分布[J].沉积学报,2007,25(6):858-868.
CHEN Jingshan,LI Zhong,WANG Zhenyu,et al.Paleokarstification and reservoir distribution of Ordovician carbonates in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2007,25(6):858-868.
[30] 许化政,周新科,高金慧.华北盆地中南部早古生代沉积特征及油气成藏条件[J].石油学报,2005,26(5):10-16,23.
XU Huazheng,ZHOU Xinke,GAO Jinhui.Sedimentary characteristics and petroliferous condition of Lower Paleozoic inland sea in south-middle North China Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(5):10-16,23.
[31] 付立新,楼达,李宏军,等.印支-燕山运动对大港探区古潜山形成的控制作用[J].石油学报,2016,37(S2):19-30.
FU Lixin,LOU Da,LI Hongjun,et al.Control effect of Indosinian-Yanshan movement on the formation of buried hill in Dagang exploration area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(S2):19-30.
[32] 贾承造.中国喜马拉雅构造运动的陆内变形特征与油气矿藏富集[J].地学前缘,2007,14(4):96-104.
JIA Chengzao.The characteristics of intra-continental deformation and hydrocarbon distribution controlled by the Himalayan tectonic movements in China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2007,14(4):96-104.
[33] 刘显凤,蔡忠贤.塔河油田溶洞充填物的元素地球化学特征及环境意义[J].地质科技情报,2009,28(3):53-57.
LIU Xianfeng,CAI Zhongxian.Element geochemistry characteristics of karstic cave deposit in Tahe Oilfield and its environmental significance[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2009,28(3):53-57.

歧口凹陷北大港构造带奥陶系潜山储层特征、主控因素及发育模式

Characteristics,main controlling factors and development model of Ordovician buried-hill reservoir in Beidagang structural belt, Q ikou sag

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭秋麟, 黄少英, 卢玉红, 王建, 吴晓智, 陈宁生. 塔里木盆地台盆区下古生界油气系统模拟及资源分布预测[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1459-1471.
[2]	李斌, 姜潇俊, 赵星星, 邬光辉, 韩剑发, 刘强, 汪如军. 塔里木盆地台盆过渡带多相态油气藏成因及差异富集模式——以玉科地区奥陶系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(5): 794-808.
[3]	马安来, 林会喜, 云露, 邱楠生, 朱秀香, 吴鲜. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区奥陶系原油中乙基桥键金刚烷系列的检出及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 788-803.
[4]	党伟, 张金川, 聂海宽, 王凤琴, 唐玄, 蒋恕, 魏晓亮, 刘秋波, 李沛, 李菲, 孙江涛. 页岩油微观赋存特征及其主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区延长组7段3亚段陆相页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 507-523.
[5]	唐勇, 宋永, 郭旭光, 赵靖舟, 吴涛, 黄立良, 何文军, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷源上致密砾岩油富集的主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 192-206.
[6]	吴小力, 徐旺林, 李荣西, 李宁熙, 刘齐, 赵迪, 赵帮胜, 覃小丽, 白莹. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部奥陶系马家沟组硫化氢成因——来自流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 250-261.
[7]	刘翰林, 邹才能, 邱振, 潘松圻, 张文正, 荆振华, 郝记华, 尹帅, 吴松涛, 李士祥, 郭秋雷. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段异常高有机质沉积富集因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1520-1541.
[8]	刘凯旋, 陈践发, 付娆, 汪华, 罗冰, 戴鑫, 师肖飞, 董勍伟. 富氦天然气藏成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1652-1663.
[9]	吴建发, 赵圣贤, 范存辉, 夏自强, 季春海, 张成林, 曹埒焰. 川南长宁地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩裂缝发育特征及其与含气性的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 428-446.
[10]	刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 陈戈, 苏洲, 高乔. 远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 307-318.
[11]	赵贤正, 李宏军, 付立新, 崔宇, 韩国猛, 楼达, 蒲秀刚, 刘国全, 姜文亚, 董雄英, 邹磊落. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古生界煤成凝析气藏特征、主控因素与发育模式[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(12): 1592-1604.
[12]	李峰, 朱光有, 吕修祥, 张志遥, 吴郑辉, 薛楠, 贺涛, 汪瑞. 塔里木盆地古生界海相油气来源争议与寒武系主力烃源岩的确定[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1417-1436.
[13]	冯林杰, 蒋裕强, 刘菲, 谷一凡, 王占磊, 钟克修, 廖义沙. 川东地区开江—梁平海槽南段飞仙关组鲕滩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1287-1298.
[14]	宁超众, 孙龙德, 胡素云, 徐怀民, 潘文庆, 李勇, 赵宽志. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘油田奥陶系缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层岩溶类型及特征[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 15-32.
[15]	代一丁, 牛子铖, 汪旭东, 王小龙, 肖张波, 张凯迪, 赵璇. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷古近系与新近系油气富集规律的差异及其主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 41-52.