稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐防砂完井产能评价新方法

doi:10.7623/syxb202001007

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 80-87.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202001007

稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐防砂完井产能评价新方法

王杰祥¹, 刘晓¹, 牛成成², 吴建平³, 白祥维¹

1. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院山东青岛 266580;
2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油工程技术研究院北京 100101;
3. 中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司石油工程技术研究院山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2019-08-26 修回日期:2019-11-05 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-02-06
通讯作者: 刘晓,女,1994年9月生,2017年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业硕士研究生,主要从事油田开发及提高采收率方面的研究工作。Email:liuxiao_target@163.com
作者简介:王杰祥,男,1963年9月生,1986年获华东石油学院学士学位,2001年获石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院教授,主要从事油田开发及提高采收率方面的研究工作。Email:jiexiangwang@upc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项"海上钻完井关键技术适应性快速评价技术"（2016ZX05033-004-001）资助。

A new productivity evaluation method of sand control completion for steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoirs

Wang Jiexiang¹, Liu Xiao¹, Niu Chengcheng², Wu Jianping³, Bai Xiangwei¹

1. School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China;
2. Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Beijing 100101, China;
3. Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Shandong Dongying 257000, China

Received:2019-08-26 Revised:2019-11-05 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在优选防砂完井方式时，当量产能比为目前主要的产能评价指标。但对于稠油蒸汽吞吐而言，产能预测模型缺乏考虑防砂的影响，加上蒸汽的降黏增产作用，使得传统评价方法对吞吐井防砂、注汽的适应性较差。通过提出复合产能比和最终产能比两个新概念，表征了防砂前后蒸汽吞吐井产能的变化，使用最终产能比作为新评价指标的计算结果更直观、更便于应用。为计算最终产能比，建立了防砂完井产能新模型，该模型针对防砂和蒸汽吞吐的特点，根据非等温分布加热半径计算公式和达西定律，考虑了高温蒸汽对原油黏度的影响，引入防砂表皮系数，从而实现了防砂和蒸汽吞吐的耦合。应用结果表明，防砂措施对蒸汽吞吐井产能的影响更加明显，表现为各防砂方式的最终产能比均低于当量产能比。其中，压裂充填防砂具有增产作用，但相较于常规开采井，该方式对蒸汽吞吐井的增产效果有所降低。从油井流入动态的角度进行验证的结果表明，新指标对稠油蒸汽吞吐井的产能评价更具意义，且预测误差在允许范围内。

关键词: 蒸汽吞吐, 防砂, 产能评价指标, 产能比, 非等温模型, 防砂表皮系数

Abstract:

At present, the equivalent productivity ratio is the main productivity evaluation index for selecting the optimal sand control completion method. However, the direct impact of sand control on productivity in heavy oil steam stimulation wells is seldom considered; additionally, the injected steam can reduce oil viscosity and increase well productivity. Thus, conventional methods are less applicable to sand control and steam injection in steam stimulation wells. This paper proposes the composite productivity ratio and final productivity ratio for characterizing the change of productivity before and after sand control in steam stimulation wells; the final production ratio is used as a new productivity evaluation index, making the results more visual, characterized with more applicability. The calculation of the new index depends on the new productivity model under sand control completion. Based on the characteristics of sand control and steam stimulation, as well as the calculation formula of non-isothermal heating radius and Darcy's law, this model achieves the coupling of sand control and steam stimulation by considering the influences of high-temperature steam on crude oil viscosity and introducing sand control skin factor. The application practice shows that the final productivity ratio under each sand control method is lower than the equivalent productivity ratio, indicating that the same sand control measures have a more obvious impact on the productivity of steam stimulation wells. Among those measures, fracturing packing sand control can increase well productivity; this method has less effect on increasing the productivity of steam stimulation wells as compared with the conventional production wells. As verified in terms of well inflow performance, it is indicated that the new index is of great significance for evaluating the productivity of heavy oil steam stimulation wells, and the error in productivity prediction is within the allowable range. Therefore, this new method can provide a more direct reference for selecting the optimal sand control completion method applied to heavy-oil steam stimulation wells.

Key words: steam stimulation, sand control, productivity evaluation index, productivity ratio, non-isothermal model, sand control skin factor

中图分类号:

TE345

王杰祥, 刘晓, 牛成成, 吴建平, 白祥维. 稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐防砂完井产能评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 80-87.

Wang Jiexiang, Liu Xiao, Niu Chengcheng, Wu Jianping, Bai Xiangwei. A new productivity evaluation method of sand control completion for steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 80-87.

参考文献

[1] 周大胜,胡新正,孟强,等. 杜229块超稠油油藏二次开发潜力研究及认识[J].特种油气藏,2007,14(6):35-39.
ZHOU Dasheng,HU Xinzheng,MENG Qiang,et al.Study and understanding of secondary development potential in Du229 ultra-heavy oil reservoir[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2007,14(6):35-39.
[2] 关文龙,张霞林,席长丰,等.稠油老区直井火驱驱替特征与井网模式选择[J].石油学报,2017,38(8):935-946,972.
GUAN Wenlong,ZHANG Xialin,XI Changfeng,et al.Displacement characteristics and well pattern selection of vertical-well fire flooding in heavy oil reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(8):935-946,972.
[3] 王胜,曲岩涛,韩春萍.稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐后转蒸汽驱驱油效率影响因素——以孤岛油田中二北稠油油藏为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(1):48-50.
WANG Sheng,QU Yantao,HAN Chunping.Influencing factors study on oil displacement efficiency after steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(1):48-50.
[4] 曹嫣镔,刘冬青,王善堂,等.中深层稠油油藏化学辅助蒸汽驱三维物理模拟与应用[J].石油学报,2014,35(4):739-744.
CAO Yanbin,LIU Dongqing,WANG Shantang,et al.Three-dimensional physical simulation and application of chemistry assistant steam flooding on middle and deep heavy oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(4):739-744.
[5] 李成军,邵先杰,胡景双,等.浅层稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐出砂机理及影响因素分析[J].特种油气藏,2008,15(4):90-93.
LI Chengjun,SHAO Xianjie,Hu Jingshuang,et al.Analysis of sand production mechanism and influence factors of steam stimulation in shallow heavy oil reservoirs[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2008,15(4):90-93.
[6] 张得军,姚诚,白晨辰,等.坨82特稠油区块出砂原因及防砂措施[J].断块油气田,2012,19(S1):96-99.
ZHANG Dejun,YAO Cheng,BAI Chenchen,et al.Reason and control measure of sand production on Tuo82 extra-heavy oil block[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2012,19(S1):96-99.
[7] 杨春梅,陆大卫,张方礼,等.蒸汽吞吐后期近井地带储层的变化及其对油田开发效果的影响[J].石油学报,2005,26(3):74-77.
YANG Chunmei,LU Dawei,ZHANG Fangli,et al.Reservoir characteristics in the near region of thermal recovery wells and their effects on development of oilfield in the later period of steam stimulation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(3):74-77.
[8] 马道祥,石晓渠,郭晓芳,等.井楼油田出砂机理及防砂对策研究[J].河南石油,2004,18(6):60-62.
MA Daoxiang,SHI Xiaoqu,GUO Xiaofang,et al.Sand production mechanism and control measures in Jinglou oilfield[J].Henan Petroleum,2004,18(6):60-62.
[9] PANG Z X,LIU H Q,LIU X L.Characteristics of formation damage and variations of reservoir properties during steam injection in heavy oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Science and Technology,2010,28(5):477-493.
[10] 司连收,李自安,张健.砾石充填防砂对稠油井产能影响研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(5):135-140.
SI Lianshou,LI Zi'an,ZHANG Jian.Influence of gravel packing sand control on the productivity of heavy oil well[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2013,35(5):135-140.
[11] 张丽娜,郑伟林,黄春,等.孤东油田防砂井产能预测研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):104-106.
ZHANG Li'na,ZHENG Weilin,HUANG Chun,et al.An integrated model for sand control well productivity prediction in the Gudong oilfield[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(5):104-106.
[12] 何聪鸽,穆龙新,许安著,等.稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐加热半径及产能预测新模型[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1564-1570.
HE Congge,MU Longxin,XU Anzhu,et al.A new model of steam soaking heating radius and productivity prediction for heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(12):1564-1570.
[13] 杨戬,李相方,陈掌星,等.考虑稠油非牛顿性质的蒸汽吞吐产能预测模型[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):84-90.
YANG Jian,LI Xiangfang,CHEN Zhangxing,et al.A productivity prediction model for cyclic steam stimulation in consideration of non-Newtonian characteristics of heavy oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):84-90.
[14] WILLMAN B T,VALLEROY V V,RUNBERG G W,et al.Laboratory studies of oil recovery by steam injection[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1961,13(7):681-690.
[15] 马奎前,刘东.稠油油藏水平井热采吞吐产能预测新模型[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2018,40(1):114-121.
MA Kuiqian,LIU Dong.Model for capacity forecasting of thermal soaking recovery in horizontal wells in heavy oil reservoirs[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2018,40(1):114-121.
[16] HOU Jian,WEI Bei,DU Qingjun,et al.Production prediction of cyclic multi-thermal fluid stimulation in a horizontal well[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,146:949-958.
[17] 董长银,李怀文.油气井防砂技术[M].2版.北京:中国石化出版社,2017:239-264.
DONG Changyin,LI Huaiwen.Oil and gas well sand control technology[M].2nd ed.Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2017:239-264.
[18] 曲占庆,张琪,董长银,等.压裂充填防砂井产能预测方法[J].石油钻采工艺,2003,25(5):51-53.
QU Zhanqing,ZHANG Qi,DONG Changyin,et al.New model for frac-packed well productivity prediction[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2003,25(5):51-53.
[19] 时贤,李兆敏,刘成文,等.稠油油藏多轮次蒸汽吞吐防砂后产能预测模型[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(4):56-58.
SHI Xian,LI Zhaomin,LIU Chengwen,et al.New productivity prediction model for sand control wells by cyclic steam stimulation[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(4):56-58.
[20] 曹建,蒲万芬,赵金洲,等.蒸气吞吐井产能预测方法[J].天然气工业,2006,26(3):98-99.
CAO Jian,PU Wanfen,ZHAO Jinzhou,et al.Prediction of deliverability of huff and puff well[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(3):98-99.
[21] OYENEYIN M B,PEDEN J M.A new gravel-sizing computer package for effective sand control design and evaluation[R].SPE 26219,1993.
[22] 熊鸿翔,邓明坚.八面河油田热采井化学防砂技术应用效果分析[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,2011,24(1):22-26,37.
XIONG Hongxiang,DENG Mingjian.Effect analysis of practice of chemical sand prevent technology in thermal production wells in Bamianhe oilfield[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers,2011,24(1):22-26,37.
[23] 董长银,张琪,李志芬,等.筛管砾石充填油井产能预测研究(II)-复杂条件下的修正[J].石油钻探技术,2001,29(2):54-55.
DONG Changyin,ZHANG Qi,LI Zhifen,et al.Study on productivity forecast for gravel-packed wells (II)-modifications under intricate conditions[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2001,29(2):54-55.
[24] KARAKAS M,TARIQ S M.Semianalytical productivity models for perforated completions[R].SPE 18247,1991.
[25] 董长银,张琪,曲占庆,等.筛套环空砾石层压降的简化计算模型[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2001,25(2):28-30.
DONG Changyin,ZHANG Qi,QU Zhanqing,et al.A simplified method for predicting pressure drop across gravel pack[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China:Edition of Natural Science,2001,25(2):28-30.
[26] 陈会娟,李明忠,狄勤丰,等.多点注汽水平井井筒出流规律数值模拟[J].石油学报,2017,38(6):696-704.
CHEN Huijuan,LI Mingzhong,DI Qinfeng,et al.Numerical simulation of the outflow performance for horizontal wells with multiple steam injection valves[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(6):696-704.
[27] 贾曦雨,王树山,马峰,等.射孔冲击相变对射孔套管抗挤性能的影响[J].石油学报,2017,38(3):348-355.
JIA Xiyu,WANG Shushan,MA Feng,et al.Influence of perforation shock-induced phase transformation on the collapsing strength of perforated casing[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(3):348-355.
[28] 张红玲,曲占庆,张琪,等.油井防砂方法优选技术及经济综合评价模型[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2001,25(4):44-46.
ZHANG Hongling,QU Zhanqing,ZHANG Qi,et al.Optimum selecting technology for sand control method and economic assessment model[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China:Edition of Natural Science,2001,25(4):44-46.

稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐防砂完井产能评价新方法

A new productivity evaluation method of sand control completion for steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoirs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李晓光. 辽河坳陷欢喜岭油田稠油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 541-560.
[2]	孙宝江, 彭玉丹, 张伟国, 赵艳玲, 陈济颖, 付光明. 筛管压溃强度计算公式及适用性[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 363-371.
[3]	董长银, 宋洋, 周玉刚, 徐鸿志, 王剑, 刘亚宾, 王力智. 天然气水合物储层泥质细粉砂挡砂介质堵塞规律与微观挡砂机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1248-1258.
[4]	杨戬, 李相方, 陈掌星, 田冀, 黄亮, 刘新光. 考虑稠油非牛顿性质的蒸汽吞吐产能预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 84-90.
[5]	李怀文, 孙涛, 王超, 刘伟, 曹庆平, 许泽涟. 超低温新型树脂涂敷砂及人工井壁防砂技术[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(S2): 112-116,149.
[6]	李萍, 刘志龙, 邹剑, 刘海英, 于继飞, 范永涛. 渤海旅大27-2油田蒸汽吞吐先导试验注采工程[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 242-247.
[7]	何聪鸽, 穆龙新, 许安著, 方思冬. 稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐加热半径及产能预测新模型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(12): 1564-1570.
[8]	董长银, 隆佳佳, 王登庆, 吴建平, 张忠禄, 张晓斌. 防砂水平井旋转水射流解堵工艺参数优化实验[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 759-764.
[9]	邓金根　李　萍　周建良　何保生　陈胜宏　王利华. 中国海上疏松砂岩适度出砂井防砂方式优选[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(4): 676-680.
[10]	刘尚奇, 杨双虎, 高永荣, 沈德煌, 鲍君刚. CO₂辅助直井与水平井组合蒸汽驱技术研究[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(3): 414-417,412.
[11]	刘春泽, 程林松, 刘洋, 庞占喜. 水平井蒸汽吞吐加热半径和地层参数计算模型[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(1): 101-105.
[12]	张红玲, 刘慧卿, 王晗, 王书林, 包术成. 蒸汽吞吐汽窜调剖参数优化设计研究[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(2): 105-108.
[13]	张小波. 蒸汽-二氧化碳-助剂吞吐开采技术研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(2): 80-84.
[14]	袁士义, 冉启全, 胡永乐, 任宝生, 王毅忠. 火成岩裂缝性稠油油藏有效开发方式[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(4): 63-68.
[15]	田红, 邓金根, 孟艳山, 曾祥林, 孙福街. 渤海稠油油藏出砂规律室内模拟实验研究[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(4): 85-87,92.