四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式

doi:10.7623/syxb202005006

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 574-583.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202005006

四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式

谷一凡^1,2, 周路¹, 蒋裕强^1,2, 倪佳³, 李俊良⁴, 朱讯⁵, 付永红^1,2, 蒋增政⁶

1. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院四川成都 610500;
2. 中国石油天然气集团公司非常规油气重点实验室储层评价研究室四川成都 610500;
3. 中国石油西南油气田公司蜀南气矿四川泸州 646000;
4. 中国石油西南油气田公司川中油气矿四川遂宁 629000;
5. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院四川成都 610041;
6. 四川杰瑞泰克科技有限公司四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2019-03-11 修回日期:2020-04-02 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-06-08
通讯作者: 蒋裕强,男,1963年12月生,1985年获西南石油学院学士学位,1993年获西南石油学院硕士学位,现为西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事非常规油气地质、储层地质及油气藏开发地质等方面的研究工作。Email:xnsyjyq3055@126.com
作者简介:谷一凡,男,1990年10月生,2014年获西南石油大学矿产普查与勘探专业学士学位,现为西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院博士研究生,主要从事深层碳酸盐岩、致密油气方面的研究工作。Email:514468587@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.41430316）和国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05008-004-008）资助。

Reservoir types and gas well productivity models for Member 4 of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block, Sichuan Basin

Gu Yifan^1,2, Zhou Lu¹, Jiang Yuqiang^1,2, Ni Jia³, Li Junliang⁴, Zhu Xun⁵, Fu Yonghong^1,2, Jiang Zengzheng⁶

1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
2. Reservoir Evaluation Laboratory, CNPC Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil&Gas, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
3. Southern Sichuan Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil&Gasfield Company, Sichuan Luzhou 646000, China;
4. Central Sichuan Oil&Gas Field, PetroChina Southwest Oil&Gasfield Company, Sichuan Suining 629000, China;
5. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil&Gasfield Company, Sichuan Chengdu 610041, China;
6. Sichuan Geotech Science and Technology Ltd. Co., Sichuan Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2019-03-11 Revised:2020-04-02 Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-06-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段气藏以丘滩复合体沉积和表生岩溶作用为主控因素，具有多因素叠加成因，依据现有储层分类评价标准对灯影组四段进行储层表征存在一定局限。基于岩心观察、常规测井和成像测井资料分析，结合配套CT扫描和薄片鉴定，利用储渗空间的搭配关系可将高石梯区块内灯影组四段的岩溶储层划分为孔隙型、孔隙-溶洞型和裂缝-孔洞型3类。其中，裂缝-孔洞型和孔隙-溶洞型储层具有物性好、开采动用较容易、试采效果好的特点，为灯影组四段的优质储层类型。在单井储层类型精细划分的基础上，运用常规地震剖面的储层预测技术、"蚂蚁体"追踪技术，结合典型井的试井曲线、生产曲线和无阻流量等动态资料，建立高石梯区块灯影组四段气井产能划分方案，可将气井产能模式分为3类（Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ类）。其中，Ⅰ类井产能模式和Ⅱ类井产能模式的优质储层占比高，其地震剖面上显示灯影组四段上亚段呈宽波谷，"蚂蚁体"属性显示缝洞体较发育，具有较好的试采效果。

关键词: 储层类型, 气井产能模式, 气藏开发, 高石梯区块, 四川盆地, 震旦系, 灯影组

Abstract:

The Member 4 of Sinian Dengying Formation gas reservoir in Gaoshiti block of Sichuan Basin is mainly controlled by the deposition of mound-shoal complex and epigenic karstification. Due to the cause of multi-factor superposition, there are some limitations in reservoir characterization of Member 4 of Dengying Formation according to the existing reservoir classification and evaluation criterion. Based on core observations, conventional and imaging log data analyses, CT core scanning and thin section identification, the karst reservoirs of Member 4 of Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block can be divided into pore type, pore-vuggy type and fracture-vuggy type with matching reservoir spaces. Among them, the pore-vuggy and pore-vuggy reservoirs have the characteristics of good physical properties, easy exploitation and good pilot production, and are the high-quality reservoir type in Member 4 of Dengying Formation. In addition, on the basis of fine reservoir classification in single wells, application of conventional seismic reservoir prediction and ant tracking technology, as well as analyses of the dynamic data such as well test curves, production curves and open flow capacities of typical wells, the division scheme of gas well productivity can be established and the productivity models can be classified into three categories (Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ) for Member 4 of Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block. The high- quality reservoir has a high proportion in the productivity model Ⅰ and model Ⅱ, showing broad trough-shaped seismic reflection in the upper submember of Member 4 of Dengying Formation, well developed fracture-vuggy bodies in ant tracking attributes, and good effects during pilot production.

Key words: reservoir type, gas well productivity model, gas reservoir development, Gaoshiti block, Sichuan Basin, Sinian, Dengying Formation

中图分类号:

TE122.2

谷一凡, 周路, 蒋裕强, 倪佳, 李俊良, 朱讯, 付永红, 蒋增政. 四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 574-583.

Gu Yifan, Zhou Lu, Jiang Yuqiang, Ni Jia, Li Junliang, Zhu Xun, Fu Yonghong, Jiang Zengzheng. Reservoir types and gas well productivity models for Member 4 of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 574-583.

参考文献

[1] 马新华.四川盆地天然气发展进入黄金时代[J].天然气工业,2017,37(2):1-10.
MA Xinhua.A golden era for natural gas development in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(2):1-10.
[2] 任洪佳,郭秋麟,周刚,等.川东地区震旦系-寒武系天然气资源潜力分析[J].中国石油勘探,2018,23(4):21-29.
REN Hongjia,GUO Qiulin,ZHOU Gang,et al.Analysis of gas resource potential of Sinian and Cambrian in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2018,23(4):21-29.
[3] 汪泽成,赵文智,胡素云,等.克拉通盆地构造分异对大油气田形成的控制作用——以四川盆地震旦系-三叠系为例[J].天然气工业,2017,37(1):9-23.
WANG Zecheng,ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,et al.Control of tectonic differentiation on the formation of large oil and gas fields in craton basins:a case study of Sinian-Triassic of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(1):9-23.
[4] 魏国齐,李君,佘源琦,等.中国大型气田的分布规律及下一步勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2018,38(4):12-25.
WEI Guoqi,LI Jun,SHE Yuanqi,et al.Distribution laws of large gas fields and further exploration orientation and targets in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(4):12-25.
[5] 金民东,谭秀成,童明胜,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区灯四段岩溶古地貌恢复及地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):58-68.
JIN Mindong,TAN Xiucheng,TONG Mingsheng,et al.Karst paleogeomorphology of the fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area,Sichuan Basin,SW China:restoration and geological significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):58-68.
[6] 国家经济贸易委员会.碳酸盐岩气藏开发地质特征描述:SY/T 6110-2002[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
State Economic and Trade Commission.The description of exploitation geologic characteristics for carbonate gas reservoir:SY/T 6110-2002[S].Beijng:Petroleum Industry Press,2002.
[7] 肖富森,陈康,冉崎,等.四川盆地高石梯地区震旦系灯影组气藏高产井地震模式新认识[J].天然气工业,2018,38(2):8-15.
XIAO Fusen,CHEN Kang,RAN Qi,et al.New understandings of the seismic modes of high productivity wells in the Sinian Dengying Fm gas reservoirs in the Gaoshiti area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(2):8-15.
[8] 杨威,魏国齐,赵蓉蓉,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组岩溶储层特征及展布[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):55-60.
YANG Wei,WEI Guoqi,ZHAO Rongrong,et al.Characteristics and distribution of karst reservoirs in the Sinian Dengying Fm,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):55-60.
[9] 张林,万玉金,杨洪志,等.四川盆地高石梯构造灯影组四段溶蚀孔洞型储层类型及组合模式[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(8):1191-1198.
ZHANG Lin,WAN Yujin,YANG Hongzhi,et al.The type and combination pattern of karst vuggy reservoir in the fourth member of the Dengying Formation of Gaoshiti structure in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(8):1191-1198.
[10] 戴晓峰,刘卫东,甘利灯,等.Radon变换压制层间多次波技术在高石梯-磨溪地区的应用[J].石油学报,2018,39(9):1028-1036.
DAI Xiaofeng,LIU Weidong,GAN Lideng,et al.The application of Radon transform to suppress interbed multiples in Gaoshiti-Moxi region[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(9):1028-1036.
[11] 蒋裕强,陶艳忠,谷一凡,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区灯影组热液白云石化作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):51-60.
JIANG Yuqiang,TAO Yanzhong,GU Yifan,et al.Hydrothermal dolomitization in Sinian Dengying Formation, Gaoshiti-Moxi area,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(1):51-60.
[12] GU Yifan,ZHOU Lu,JIANG Yuqiang,et al.A model of hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies in Precambrian dolomite,Central Sichuan Basin,SW China and its geochemical characteristics[J].Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition),2019,93(1):130-145.
[13] 朱讯,谷一凡,蒋裕强,等.川中高石梯区块震旦系灯影组岩溶储层特征与储渗体分类评价[J].天然气工业,2019,39(3):38-46.
ZHU Xun,GU Yifan,JIANG Yuqiang,et al.Characteristics and reservoir body classification & evaluation of Sinian Dengying karst reservoirs in the Gaoshiti Block of central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2019,39(3):38-46
[14] 蒋裕强,谷一凡,朱讯,等.四川盆地川中地区震旦系灯影组热液白云岩储集相[J].天然气工业,2017,37(3):17-24.
JIANG Yuqiang,GU Yifan,ZHU Xun,et al.Hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies in the Sinian Dengying Fm,central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(3):17-24.
[15] 刘宏,罗思聪,谭秀成,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组古岩溶地貌恢复及意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):283-293.
LIU Hong,LUO Sicong,TAN Xiucheng,et al.Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin and its significance,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):283-293.
[16] 杨雨,黄先平,张健,等.四川盆地寒武系沉积前震旦系顶界岩溶地貌特征及其地质意义[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):38-43.
YANG Yu,HUANG Xianping,ZHANG Jian,et al.Features and geologic significances of the top Sinian karst landform before the Cambrian deposition in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):38-43.
[17] 文龙,王文之,张健,等.川中高石梯-磨溪地区震旦系灯影组碳酸盐岩岩石类型及分布规律[J].岩石学报,2017,33(4):1285-1294.
WEN Long,WANG Wenzhi,ZHANG Jian,et al.Classification of Sinian Dengying Formation and sedimentary evolution mechanism of Gaoshiti-Moxi area in central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2017,33(4):1285-1294.
[18] 陈娅娜,沈安江,潘立银,等.微生物白云岩储集层特征、成因和分布-以四川盆地震旦系灯影组四段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(5):704-715.
CHEN Yana,SHEN Anjiang,PAN Liyin,et al.Features,origin and distribution of microbial dolomite reservoirs:a case study of 4th Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(5):704-715.
[19] 朱东亚,张殿伟,张荣强,等.中国南方地区灯影组白云岩储层流体溶蚀改造机制[J].石油学报,2015,36(10):1188-1198.
ZHU Dongya,ZHANG Dianwei,ZHANG Rongqiang,et al.Fluid alteration mechanism of dolomite reservoirs in Dengying Formation,South China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(10):1188-1198.
[20] 杨跃明,杨雨,杨光,等.安岳气田震旦系、寒武系气藏成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):493-508.
YANG Yueming,YANG Yu,YANG Guang,et al.Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies of Sinian and Cambrian gas reservoirs in Anyue gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):493-508.
[21] 魏国齐,杨威,谢武仁,等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系天然气成藏模式与勘探领域[J].石油学报,2018,39(12):1317-1327.
WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,XIE Wuren,et al.Accumulation modes and exploration domains of Sinian-Cambrian natural gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(12):1317-1327.
[22] 兰才俊,徐哲航,马肖琳,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1069-1084.
LAN Caijun,XU Zhehang,MA Xiaolin,et al.Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1069-1084.

四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式

Reservoir types and gas well productivity models for Member 4 of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block, Sichuan Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋金民, 江青春, 刘树根, 金鑫, 范建平, 李智武, 黄士鹏, 苏旺, 杨迪, 姜华, 叶玥豪, 王佳蕊, 王俊轲, 任杉. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段含海泡石层系古环境与沉积格局指示意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
[2]	鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 汪泽成, 柳少波, 刘强, 范俊佳, 陈玮岩, 马行陟, 姜华, 付小东, 李文正, 钟源, 李堃宇, 谢武仁. 四川盆地中部走滑断裂活动时间与控藏作用——来自断裂带胶结物U-Pb定年和流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 642-658.
[3]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[4]	刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地沉积充填演化与含油气系统耦合模拟方法在超深层油气成藏模拟中的应用——以四川盆地中部震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
[5]	武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 孙玉平, 刘永, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[6]	夏钦禹, 马新华, 郭振华, 李文, 江林, 张林, 李新豫, 刘曦翔, 罗瑞兰, 闫海军, 刘钰洋, 阳成. 川中高石梯区块灯影组四段古岩溶带及内部储层分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[7]	杨雨, 谢继容, 曹正林, 文龙, 王小娟, 肖尧, 杨建, 唐青松, 唐大海, 李明秋, 关旭, 曾青高, 陈伟华, 陈康, 肖红林. 四川盆地天府气田沙溪庙组大型致密砂岩气藏形成条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 917-932.
[8]	魏国齐, 贾承造, 杨威. 安岳—奉节地区上震旦统—下寒武统陆架镶边台地地质特征及其对大气田(区)形成的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 223-240.
[9]	蒋华川, 张本健, 刘四兵, 王文之, 周刚, 和源, 李堃宇, 文华国. 四川盆地广安—石柱古隆起的发现及油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 270-284.
[10]	任佳鑫, 宋金民, 刘树根, 赵容容, 罗忠, 李智武, 金鑫, 马行陟, 李柯然, 叶玥豪, 丁一, 李文皓, 赵玲丽, 田立洲. 四川盆地灯影组二段微生物丘滩体结构类型与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 312-328.
[11]	郭旭升, 魏志红, 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 陈超, 王道军. 四川盆地侏罗系陆相页岩油气富集条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 14-27.
[12]	姜鹏飞, 吴建发, 朱逸青, 张德宽, 吴伟, 张芮, 吴喆, 王青, 杨雨然, 杨雪, 伍秋姿, 陈丽清, 何一凡, 张娟. 四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 91-109.
[13]	何文渊, 蒙启安, 白雪峰, 王显东, 王有智, 谭万仓. 川东北地区二叠系—三叠系多期台缘演化规律及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1201-1212,1235.
[14]	赵东方, 谭秀成, 罗文军, 王小芳, 徐伟, 罗思聪, 唐大海, 罗垚, 曾伟. 早成岩期岩溶特征及其对古老深层碳酸盐岩储层的成因启示——以川中地区磨溪8井区灯影组四段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1236-1252.
[15]	郭建春, 陶亮, 胡克剑, 邓咸安, 陈迟, 李鸣, 赵志红. 页岩储层水相渗吸作用规律实验[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1295-1304.