涪陵页岩气区不同构造变形背景下页岩孔隙结构特征的差异

doi:10.7623/syxb202503005

石油学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 547-562.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202503005

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

涪陵页岩气区不同构造变形背景下页岩孔隙结构特征的差异

杨洋^1,2, 张晓明³, 石万忠⁴, 屈洋^1,2, 冯芊⁴, 余曹^1,2

1. 大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院黑龙江大庆 163712;
2. 多资源协同陆相页岩油绿色开采全国重点实验室黑龙江大庆 163712;
3. 新疆大学地质与矿业工程学院新疆乌鲁木齐 830046;
4. 中国地质大学资源学院湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2024-03-06 修回日期:2024-09-30 发布日期:2025-04-03
通讯作者: 张晓明,男,1989年9月生,2020年获中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位,现为新疆大学地质与矿业工程学院教师,主要从事非常规油气地质的研究工作。Email:zxm@xju.edu.cn
作者简介:杨洋,男,1995年12月生,2022年获中国地质大学(武汉)硕士学位,现为大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院助理工程师,主要从事非常规油气储层方面研究。Email:yang1221@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
大庆油田有限责任公司科技专题项目“凉高山组页岩油有效开发技术研究”和新疆维吾尔自治区“天池英才”引进计划项目资助。

Differences of shale pore structure characteristics under different tectonic deformation in Fuling shale gas field

Yang Yang^1,2, Zhang Xiaoming³, Shi Wanzhong⁴, Qu Yang^1,2, Feng Qian⁴, Yu Cao^1,2

1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Daqing Oilfield Limited Company, Heilongjiang Daqing 163712;
2. State Key Laboratory of Continental Shale Oil, Heilongjiang Daqing 163712, China;
3. School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Xinjiang Urumqi 830046, China;
4. School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Hubei Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2024-03-06 Revised:2024-09-30 Published:2025-04-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构造变形会对页岩孔隙结构造成显著影响。以涪陵页岩气田稳定区JY-C井、弱变形区JY-D井和强变形区JY-B井的五峰组—龙马溪组页岩为研究对象,选取矿物组成、有机地球化学特征和成岩作用相近的样品,结合低温气体吸附实验、扫描电镜观察、图像处理等手段,研究构造变形与页岩孔隙结构的关系。研究结果表明:①构造变形会促进页岩储层中粒内孔和微裂缝的发育,并在一定程度上造成粒间孔变小但粒间孔类型增加。②构造变形会造成宏孔体积及宏孔占比增加、介孔体积及介孔占比减小,且随着构造作用越强,孔体积的变化幅度越大;弱构造变形会造成微孔体积及微孔占比增加,而强构造变形会造成微孔体积及微孔占比减小;弱构造变形对微孔比表面积及比表面积占比的影响不大,而强构造变形会造成微孔比表面积减小,但对微孔比表面积的占比影响不大。③构造变形会造成有机孔形变,导致有机孔圆度、面密度和面孔率减小,且构造变形强度越大,其减幅越大;小孔径有机孔相较于大孔径有机孔的抗形变能力更强,形变程度相对更小。

关键词: 四川盆地, 页岩, 孔隙结构, 构造变形, 五峰组—龙马溪组

Abstract: Tectonic deformation significantly affects the pore structure of shale. This study targets at the shale of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Well JY-C (stable tectonic region), Well JY-D (weak tectonic deformation region)and Well JY-B (strong tectonic deformation region)in Fuling shale gas field. By using the shale samples with similar mineral compositions, organic geochemical characteristics and diagenesis, the relationship between tectonic deformation and pore structures was investigated through low-temperature gas adsorption experiment, scanning electron microscope observation and image processing. The results show as follows. (1)Tectonic deformation will promote the development of intragranular pores and micro-fractures in shale reservoirs, and cause the intergranular pores to become smaller but have more types to a certain extent. (2)Tectonic deformation will cause an increase in macropore volume and proportion, and a decrease in the mesopore volume and proportion. The stronger the tectonic deformation is, the larger the pore volume changes. The weak tectonic deformation will increase the micropore volume and proportion, while the strong tectonic deformation will decrease the micropore volume and proportion. Weak tectonic deformation has little effect on the specific surface area and its proportion of micropores, while strong tectonic deformation will reduce the specific surface area of micropores, but has little effect on proportion of the specific surface area. (3)Tectonic deformation will deform the organic pores, resulting in a reduction of the roundness, surface density, and surface porosity of organic pores. The greater the strength of tectonic deformation, the greater the reduction degree. Compared with large-size organic pores, small-size organic pores are more resistant to deformation, and suffer from lower degree of deformation.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, shale, pore structure, tectonic deformation, Wufeng-Longmaxi formations

中图分类号:

TE122.2

杨洋, 张晓明, 石万忠, 屈洋, 冯芊, 余曹. 涪陵页岩气区不同构造变形背景下页岩孔隙结构特征的差异[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(3): 547-562.

Yang Yang, Zhang Xiaoming, Shi Wanzhong, Qu Yang, Feng Qian, Yu Cao. Differences of shale pore structure characteristics under different tectonic deformation in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(3): 547-562.

参考文献

[1] 张金川,金之钧,袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J].天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18.
ZHANG Jinchuan,JIN Zhijun,YUAN Mingsheng.Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(7):15-18.
[2] 郭旭升,腾格尔,魏祥峰,等.四川盆地深层海相页岩气赋存机理与勘探潜力[J].石油学报,2022,43(4):453-468.
GUO Xusheng,TENGER B,WEI Xiangfeng,et al.Occurrence mechanism and exploration potential of deep marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(4):453-468.
[3] 姜鹏飞,吴建发,朱逸青,等.四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J].石油学报,2023,44(1):91-109.
JIANG Pengfei,WU Jianfa,ZHU Yiqing,et al.Enrichment conditions and favorable areas for exploration and development of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(1):91-109.
[4] 腾格尔,申宝剑俞凌杰,等.四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气形成与聚集机理[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):69-78.
BORJIGIN Tenger,SHEN Baojian,YU Lingjie,et al.Mechanisms of shale gas generation and accumulation in the Ordovician Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):69-78.
[5] 王会敏,金珊.川东南五峰-龙马溪组页岩气勘探开发进展、主要问题及对策[J].中国矿业,2019,28(9):136-142.
WANG Huimin,JIN Shan.Progress,main problems and countermeasures of the shale gas exploration and development in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,southeast Sichuan[J].China Mining Magazine,2019,28(9):136-142.
[6] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701.
ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al.Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects (Ⅰ)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.
[7] 郭旭升.四川盆地涪陵平桥页岩气田五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(1):1-10.
GUO Xusheng.Controlling factors on shale gas accumulations of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Pingqiao shale gas field in Fuling area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(1):1-10.
[8] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
[9] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.
ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,Formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6): 641-653.
[10] 王哲,李贤庆,祁帅,等.川南地区筇竹寺组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其影响因素[J].高校地质学报,2018,24(2):273-284.
WANG Zhe,LI Xianqing,QI Shuai,et al.Characteristics of microscopic pore structures and its influencing factors of the Qiongzhusi Formation shales in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2018,24(2):273-284.
[11] 陈曼霏.涪陵平桥和梓里场区块五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩孔隙结构和吸附性能研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2019.
CHEN Manfei.Pore structure and adsorption capacity of Wufeng Formation and Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation Shale reservoir in Pingqiao block and Zilichang block[D].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences (Wuhan),2019.
[12] 梁超,姜在兴,杨镱婷,等.四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩岩相及储集空间特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):691-698.
LIANG Chao,JIANG Zaixing,YANG Yiting,et al.Characteristics of shale lithofacies and reservoir space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):691-698.
[13] 霍建峰,高健,郭小文,等.川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2020,41(6):1162-1175.
HUO Jianfeng,GAO Jian,GUO Xiaowen,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of pore structures of various lithofacies in shales of Longmaxi Formation,eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2020,41(6):1162-1175.
[14] WANG Ximeng,LIU Luofu,WANG Yang,et al.Comparison of the pore structures of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shales with different lithofacies in the southern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2020,81:103419.
[15] 姜振学,李鑫,王幸蒙,等.中国南方典型页岩孔隙特征差异及其控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(1):41-53.
JIANG Zhenxue,LI Xin,WANG Xingmeng,et al.Characteristic differences and controlling factors of pores in typical South China shale[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(1):41-53.
[16] 王濡岳,胡宗全,聂海宽,等.川东南五峰组—龙马溪组与黔东南牛蹄塘组页岩储层特征对比分析与差异性探讨[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(5):639-649.
WANG Ruyue,HU Zongquan,NIE Haikuan,et al.Comparative analysis and discussion of shale reservoir characteristics in the Wufeng-Longmaxi and Niutitang formations:a case study of the Well JY1 in SE Sichuan Basin and Well TX1 in SE Guizhou area[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(5):639-649.
[17] ZHU Hongjian,JU Yiwen,HUANG Cheng,et al.Pore structure variations across structural deformation of Silurian Longmaxi Shale:an example from the Chuandong thrust-fold belt[J].Fuel,2019,241:914-932.
[18] LIANG Mingliang,WANG Zongxiu,GAO Li,et al.Evolution of pore structure in gas shale related to structural deformation[J].Fuel,2017,197:310-319.
[19] 聂海宽,张光荣,李沛,等.页岩有机孔研究现状和展望[J].石油学报,2022,43(12):1770-1787.
NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Guangrong,LI Pei,et al.Research status and prospect on organic matter pores in shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(12):1770-1787.
[20] 刘建华,朱西养,王四利,等.四川盆地地质构造演化特征与可地浸砂岩型铀矿找矿前景[J].铀矿地质,2005,21(6):321-330.
LIU Jianhua,ZHU Xiyang,WANG Sili,et al.Geologic-tectonic evolutional characteristics and prospecting potential for ISL-amenable sandstone-type uranium deposits in Sichuan Basin[J].Uranium Geology,2005,21(6):321-330.
[21] XU Shang,GOU Qiyang,HAO Fang,et al.Shale pore structure characteristics of the high and low productivity wells,Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin,China:dominated by lithofacies or preservation condition?[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,114:104211.
[22] 郭彤楼,张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36.
GUO Tonglou,ZHANG Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):28-36.
[23] GUO Tonglou.The Fuling shale gas field—a highly productive Silurian gas shale with high thermal maturity and complex evolution history,southeastern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Interpretation,2015,3(2):SJ25-SJ34.
[24] 张晓明,石万忠,徐清海,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层特征及控制因素[J].石油学报,2015,36(8):926-939.
ZHANG Xiaoming,SHI Wanzhong,XU Qinghai,et al.Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of shale gas in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(8):926-939.
[25] 庹秀松,陈孔全,罗顺社,等.渝东大焦石坝地区差异构造变形[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(5):1074-1083.
TUO Xiusong,CHEN Kongquan,LUO Shunshe,et al.Differential structural deformation of the Dajiaoshiba area,East Chongqing[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(5):1074-1083.
[26] 胡东风,张汉荣,倪楷,等.四川盆地东南缘海相页岩气保存条件及其主控因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):17-23.
HU Dongfeng,ZHANG Hanrong,NI Kai,et al.Main controlling factors for gas preservation conditions of marine shales in southeastern margins of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):17-23.
[27] 胡明,黄文斌,李加玉.构造特征对页岩气井产能的影响——以涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块为例[J].天然气工业,2017,37(8):31-39.
HU Ming,HUANG Wenbin,LI Jiayu.Effects of structural characteristics on the productivity of shale gas wells:a case study on the Jiaoshiba block in the Fuling Shale gasfield,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(8):31-39.
[28] 杨海平.涪陵平桥与江东区块页岩气水平井优快钻井技术[J].石油钻探技术,2018,46(3):13-19.
YANG Haiping.Optimized and fast drilling technology for horizontal shale gas wells in Pingqiao and Jiangdong blocks of Fuling area[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2018,46(3):13-19.
[29] 陈曼霏,何生,易积正,等.涪陵页岩气田平桥区块页岩气储层有机质孔发育特征[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):423-433.
CHEN Manfei,HE Sheng,YI Jizheng,et al.Development characteristics of organic pore in shale gas reservoir of Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Pingqiao block,Fuling shale gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):423-433.
[30] 王帆.涪陵页岩气平桥区块志留系地层钻井提速技术研究[D].北京:中国石油大学,2018.
WANG Fan.Research on speed raising technology of shale gas in Pingqiao block Silurian Formation[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum,2018.
[31] 陈洁.焦石坝地区中古生界构造变形作用对页岩气富集地质因素影响研究[D].荆州:长江大学,2017.
CHEN Jie.Mesozoic-Paleozoic tectonic deformation effect on the influenced research of shale gas enrichment geological factors in Jiaoshiba region[D].Jingzhou:Yangtze University,2017.
[32] 车世琦.涪陵气田平桥区块页岩气选区评价[J].石油地质与工程,2022,36(4):48-54.
CHE Shiqi.Selection evaluation of shale gas in Pingqiao block of Fuling gas field[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2022,36(4):48-54.
[33] 杨锐,何生,胡东风,等.焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(5):105-113.
YANG Rui,HE Sheng,HU Dongfeng,et al.Characteristics and the main controlling factors of micro-pore structure of the shale in Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba Area[J].Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2015,34(5):105-113.
[34] 纪文明,宋岩,姜振学,等.四川盆地东南部龙马溪组页岩微—纳米孔隙结构特征及控制因素[J].石油学报,2016,37(2):182-195.
JI Wenming,SONG Yan,JIANG Zhenxue,et al.Micro-nano pore structure characteristics and its control factors of shale in Lonamaxi Formation,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(2):182-195.
[35] XI Zhaodong,TANG Shuheng,WANG Jing,et al.Formation and development of pore structure in marine-continental transitional shale from northern China across a maturation gradient:insights from gas adsorption and mercury intrusion[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,200:87-102.
[36] MA Xiao,GUO Shaobin,SHI Dishi,et al.Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of marine-continental transitional shales from Longtan Formation using MICP,gas adsorption,and NMR (Guizhou,China)[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,107:555-571.
[37] ZHU Hongjian,JU Yiwen,QI Yu,et al.Impact of tectonism on pore type and pore structure evolution in organic-rich shale:implications for gas storage and migration pathways in naturally deformed rocks[J].Fuel,2018,228:272-289.
[38] WANG Xixin,HOU Jiagen,LI Shaohua,et al.Insight into the nanoscale pore structure of organic-rich shales in the Bakken Formation,USA[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2020,191:107182.
[39] LANDERS J,GOR G Y,NEIMARK A V.Density functional theory methods for characterization of porous materials[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2013,437:3-32.
[40] THOMMES M,KANEKO K,NEIMARK A V,et al.Physisorption of gases,with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry,2015,87(9/10):1051-1069.
[41] 郭旭升,李宇平,刘若冰,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):9-16.
GUO Xusheng,LI Yuping,LIU Ruobing,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi shale play in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):9-16.
[42] 刘卫彬,张世奇,李世臻,等.东濮凹陷沙三段储层微裂缝发育特征及意义[J].地质通报,2018,37(2/3):496-502.
LIU Weibin,ZHANG Shiqi,LI Shizhen,et al.Development characteristics and geological significance of microfractures in the Es₃ reservoirs of Dongpu depression[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2018,37(2/3):496-502.
[43] 曾联波,吕文雅,徐翔,等.典型致密砂岩与页岩层理缝的发育特征、形成机理及油气意义[J].石油学报,2022,43(2):180-191.
ZENG Lianbo,LV Wenya,XU Xiang,et al.Development characteristics,formation mechanism and hydrocarbon significance of bedding fractures in typical tight sandstone and shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(2):180-191.
[44] CURTIS J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
[45] GILLESPIE P,VAN HAGEN J,WESSELS S,et al.Hierarchical kink band development in the Appalachian Plateau decollement sheet[J].AAPG Bulletin,2015,99(1):51-76.

涪陵页岩气区不同构造变形背景下页岩孔隙结构特征的差异

Differences of shale pore structure characteristics under different tectonic deformation in Fuling shale gas field

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张永庶, 刘国强, 袁超, 张审琴, 李亚锋, 蔡亮, 崔俊, 李伸专, 杨兵, 岳大力. 融合宏观结构与矿物组分分析的页岩油岩相量化识别与有利岩相优选方法[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(2): 372-388.
[2]	马勇, 陈践发, 辛志源, 罗情勇, 罗超, 张海鹏, 钟可塑, 车世琦, 马健斌, 秦长彩. 非常规天然气中氦资源潜力及富集机制[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(2): 440-455,482.
[3]	文龙, 罗冰, 王小娟, 谢继容, 冉崎, 潘珂, 金值民, 关旭. 四川盆地陆相致密油气勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1): 77-88.
[4]	徐长贵, 杨海风, 徐伟, 王广源, 刘晓健, 燕歌. 渤海海域致密油气及页岩油勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1): 173-190,264.
[5]	赖锦, 宋翔羽, 杨薰, 赵仪迪, 田银宏, 李栋, 信毅, 张荣虎, 王贵文. 致密砂岩气储层测井综合评价技术研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1): 220-235.
[6]	雍锐, 吴建发, 吴伟, 杨雨然, 徐亮, 罗超, 刘佳, 何一凡, 钟可塑, 李彦佑, 朱逸青, 陈丽清. 四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气勘探发现及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1309-1323.
[7]	文龙, 罗冰, 周刚, 张本健, 葛冰飞, 杨岱林, 陶佳丽, 田兴旺, 马华灵, 严威, 史甲航, 刘常祺, 聂美怡, 李淑琦, 杨振中, 孙奕婷, 蒋航, 宋泽章. 四川盆地威寒1井奥陶系宝塔组天然气勘探发现及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1324-1335.
[8]	唐浩钦, 张本健, 熊晓军, 李天军. 四川盆地中北部二叠系茅口组复杂滩相白云岩储层地震预测——以角探1井区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1385-1398,1421.
[9]	蒲秀刚, 柴公权, 许静, 时战楠, 韩文中, 官全胜, 刘学伟, 李昊东, 王栋, 董姜畅. 黄骅坳陷古近系细粒沉积区勘探开发认识技术迭代与页岩油增储上产成效[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1399-1408.
[10]	窦立荣, 温志新, 王兆明, 贺正军, 陈瑞银, 宋成鹏, 刘小兵. 全球古老油气成藏组合资源潜力、重大发现及启示[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1163-1173.
[11]	江同文, 田威振, 唐青松, 徐伟, 邬光辉. 四川盆地川中地区深层碳酸盐岩走滑断层控藏作用[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1174-1186.
[12]	王茂云, 曾溅辉, 王小娟, 陈冬霞, 吴长江, 潘珂, 张欢乐, 崔虎旺. 源-储分离型致密砂岩气藏中气水分布控制因素——以四川盆地中部地区沙溪庙组致密砂岩气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1187-1201,1218.
[13]	黄军平, 刘新社, 张艳, 井向辉, 张才利, 李相博. 鄂尔多斯盆地海相页岩油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1202-1218.
[14]	武瑾, 郭为, 郭伟, 赵圣贤, 苟其勇, 曾凡成, 刘宇, 邹晓品, 王玉满, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩气立体开发"甜点"岩相及其成因机制——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1219-1233.
[15]	王飞, 乔润伟, 祝健, 张士诚. 基于焖井压降曲线的页岩油井压裂缝网特征诊断[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1234-1243,1269.