水平井配汽三维物理模拟实验

doi:10.7623/syxb202012017

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1649-1656.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202012017

所属专题：《石油学报》创刊40周年专辑

水平井配汽三维物理模拟实验

林日亿, 李端, 王新伟, 杨正大, 张立强

中国石油大学(华东)新能源学院山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2020-04-29 修回日期:2020-10-02 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2021-01-06
通讯作者: 林日亿,男,1973年4月生,1996年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2007年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)新能源学院教授,主要从事热力采油和热能利用方面的教学和科研工作。Email:linry@upc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05012-002）、国家自然科学基金项目（No.51874333）和中央高校基本科研业务费专项（19CX02014A）资助。

Three-dimensional physical model experiment of steam distribution in horizontal wells

Lin Riyi, Li Duan, Wang Xinwei, Yang Zhengda, Zhang Liqiang

College of New Energy, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China

Received:2020-04-29 Revised:2020-10-02 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2021-01-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水平井注汽物理模拟实验是模拟油田实际注汽过程的有效手段，国内外学者针对水平井配汽效果开展了许多实验研究，但现阶段缺少水平井配汽结构影响配汽效果的相关研究。通过构建三维实验模型，设计注汽井配汽结构，开展了不同配汽结构下的三维注汽实验。实验结果表明，不同配汽结构对配汽效果影响较大，其中割缝管柱实验配汽效果最差，注汽井附近储层发生汽窜的时间较早；均匀开孔管柱和趾端附近射孔加密管柱实验储层发生汽窜的时间较晚，储层动用范围更广；进行趾端附近配汽实验时，随着配汽量增大，会造成蒸汽回流；当配汽孔沿水平井方向均匀分布时，虽然在注汽前期可以较为均匀地分配蒸汽，但随着注汽量增大，蒸汽会优先从水平井跟端分配，跟端配汽量始终最多；当调整注汽井前、后配汽孔分布密度时，可有效改变水平井前、后的配汽量，并优化配汽效果。模拟实验可以为油田注汽井配汽结构优化设计提供理论支撑，以达到有效提高配汽效果和均匀动用储层的目的。

关键词: 三维实验, 配汽结构, 水平井, 温度场, 配汽效果

Abstract:

The physical model experiment of steam distribution in horizontal wells is an effective means to simulate the actual steam injection process in the oilfield. Domestic and foreign scholars have carried out different experimental studies on the steam distribution effect of horizontal wells, but at this stage, few researches focus on the influence of the steam distribution structure of horizontal wells on the steam distribution effect. By constructing a three-dimensional experimental model, and designing the steam distribution structure of steam injection wells, the authors carried out three-dimensional steam injection experiments under different steam distribution structures. The experimental results show that different steam distribution structures have a great impact on the steam distribution effect. The steam distribution effect is the worst in the experiment using slotted tubing string, steam channeling occurred earlier in reservoirs near the steam injection well; and occurred later in experiments using the uniformly-perforated tubing strings, and the densely-perforated tubing strings near the toe end, the production range of reservoirs is wider. When performing the steam distribution experiment near the toe end, as the steam distribution volume increases, the steam will flow back. When the steam distribution hole is evenly distributed along the direction of horizontal well, although the steam can be distributed more evenly in the early stage of steam injection, with the increasing of steam injection volume, the steam will be preferentially distributed from the heel end of horizontal well, and the steam distribution volume at the heel end is always the largest. The steam distribution volume in front of and behind the horizontal well can be effectively changed and the steam distribution effect will be optimized by adjusting the distribution density of steam distribution holes in front of and behind the steam injection well. It will provide theoretical support for the optimization design of steam distribution structure of steam injection wells in oilfields, so as to achieve the goal of effectively improving the steam distribution effect and uniform reservoir production.

Key words: three-dimensional experiment, steam distribution structure, horizontal well, temperature field, steam distribution effect

中图分类号:

TE357.4

林日亿, 李端, 王新伟, 杨正大, 张立强. 水平井配汽三维物理模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1649-1656.

Lin Riyi, Li Duan, Wang Xinwei, Yang Zhengda, Zhang Liqiang. Three-dimensional physical model experiment of steam distribution in horizontal wells[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1649-1656.

参考文献

[1] HEIN F J.Geology of bitumen and heavy oil:an overview[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,154:551-563.
[2] 王勇,王立敏.提高能效低碳发展携手应对能源挑战——《BP2030世界能源展望》解读[J].国际石油经济,2012,20(4):14-20.
WANG Yong,WANG Limin.Improve energy efficiency and low-carbon development to meet energy challenges-On reading "BP Energy Outlook 2030"[J].International Petroleum Economics,2012,20(4):14-20.
[3] 钟文新,陈明霜.世界重油资源状况分析[J].石油科技论坛,2008,27(5):18-23.
ZHONG Wenxin,CHEN Mingshuang.Analysis of world heavy oil resources[J].Oil Forum,2008,27(5):18-23.
[4] 李术元,王剑秋,钱家麟.世界油砂资源的研究及开发利用[J].中外能源,2011,16(5):10-23.
LI Shuyuan,WANG Jianqiu,QIAN Jialin.Development and utilization of oil sand resources in the world[J].Sino-Global Energy,2011,16(5):10-23.
[5] 朱焱,高文彬,李瑞升,等.变流度聚合物驱提高采收率作用规律及应用效果[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):189-200.
ZHU Yan,GAO Wenbin,LI Ruisheng,et al.Action laws and application effect of enhanced oil recovery by adjustable-mobility polymer flooding[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):189-200.
[6] 贾爱林,王国亭,孟德伟,等.大型低渗-致密气田井网加密提高采收率对策——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(7):802-813.
JIA Ailin,WANG Guoting,MENG Dewei,et al.Well pattern infilling strategy to enhance oil recovery of giant low-permeability tight gasfield:a case study of Sulige gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(7):802-813.
[7] 毕向明.稠油开采技术现状及展望[J].石化技术,2017,24(3):225.
BI Xiangming.Current situation and prospect of heavy oil mining technology[J].Petrochemical Industry Technology,2017,24(3):225.
[8] 樊建明,王冲,屈雪峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油水平井注水吞吐开发实践——以延长组长7油层组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(6):706-715.
FAN Jianming,WANG Chong,QU Xuefeng,et al.Development and practice of water flooding huff-puff in tight oil horizontal well,Ordos Basin:a case study of Yanchang Formation Chang 7 oil layer[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(6):706-715.
[9] 陈会娟,李明忠,狄勤丰,等.多点注汽水平井井筒出流规律数值模拟[J].石油学报,2017,38(6):696-704.
CHEN Huijuan,LI Mingzhong,DI Qinfeng,et al.Numerical simulation of the outflow performance for horizontal wells with multiple steam injection valves[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38 (6):696-704.
[10] 杨建平,王诗中,林日亿,等.过热蒸汽辅助重力泄油吞吐预热模拟及方案优化[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2020,44(3):105-113.
YANG Jianping,WANG Shizhong,LIN Riyi,et al.Simulation and scheme optimization of using superheated steam for huff and puff for preheating in SAGD[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2020,44(3):105-113.
[11] 郭春生,薛世峰,徐明海,等.水平井注汽启动阶段流动特性研究[J].工程热物理学报,2016,37(3):567-572.
GUO Chunsheng,XUE Shifeng,XU Minghai,et al.Research on heat and mass transfer characteristics of steam injection thermal recovery by horizontal well in star stage[J].Journal of Engineering Thermophysics,2016,37(3):567-572.
[12] 郭玲玲,刘涛,刘影,等.蒸汽驱中-后期间歇注热理论模型与现场试验[J].石油学报,2019,40(7):823-829.
GUO Lingling,LIU Tao,LIU Ying,et al.Theoretical model and field test of intermittent heat injection in the middle and late stage of steam flooding[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(7):823-829.
[13] PALMGREN C T S,BRUINING J.An interface model to predict vertical sweep during steamdrive[R].SPE 24077,1992.
[14] ALAJMI A F F.Modeling the oil bank formation during steam flood[R].SPE 142618,2011.
[15] AKIN S,BAGCI S.A laboratory study of single-well steam-assisted gravity drainage process[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2001,32(1):23-33.
[16] HUANG S J,CHEN X,LIU H,et al.Experimental and numerical study of solvent optimization during horizontal-well solvent-enhanced steam flooding in thin heavy-oil reservoirs[J].Fuel,2018,228:379-389.
[17] 罗艳艳,程林松,高山,等.水平井蒸汽驱温度场与黏度场平面物理模拟[J].石油钻探技术,2012,40(1):74-77.
LUO Yanyan,CHENG Linsong,GAO Shan,et al.Experimental investigation of temperature and viscosity fields of steam flooding development of horizontal wells[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2012,40(1):74-77.
[18] HUANG S J,XIA Y,XIONG H,et al.A three-dimensional approach to model steam chamber expansion and production performance of SAGD process[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2018,127:29-38.
[19] QU M,HOU J R,ZHAO F L,et al.3-D visual experiments on fluid flow behavior of water flooding and gas flooding in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir[R].SPE 187273,2017.
[20] 马德胜,郭嘉,昝成,等.蒸汽辅助重力泄油改善汽腔发育均匀性物理模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):188-193.
MA Desheng,GUO Jia,ZAN Cheng,et al.Physical simulation of improving the uniformity of steam chamber growth in the steam assisted gravity drainage[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):188-193.
[21] 刘廷峰,白艳丽,王善堂,等.稠油油藏水平井不同注汽方式物模实验研究[J].石油地质与工程,2014,28(3):124-126.
LIU Tingfeng,BAI Yanli,WANG Shantang et al.Experimental study on the physical model experiment of different steam injection methods for horizontal wells in heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2014,28(3):124-126.
[22] 宋志学,郑继龙,陈平,等.稠油蒸汽驱三维物模实验影响因素分析[J].应用科技,2014(3):73-76.
SONG Zhixue,ZHENG Jilong,CHEN Ping,et al.Analysis of experimental factors based on the three-dimensional model of heavy oil steam flooding[J].Applied Science and Technology,2014(3):73-76.
[23] 贾大雷.水平井蒸汽驱物理模拟相似原理研究[J].天然气勘探与开发,2015,38(4):68-70.
JIA Dalei.Similarity principle of physical simulation of steam flooding for horizontal well[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2015,38(4):68-70.
[24] 袁忠超.水平井蒸汽驱相似准则研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2011:20-40.
YUAN Zhongchao.Study on scaling criteria of horizontal well steam flooding[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum,2011:20-40.

水平井配汽三维物理模拟实验

Three-dimensional physical model experiment of steam distribution in horizontal wells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨立红, 朱超凡, 曾皓, 苏建政, 王益维, 武俊文, 陈旭东, 郭威. 油页岩自生热原位转化直井与水平井开发效果数值模拟——以鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑地区油页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1333-1343.
[2]	高永海, 尹法领, 张党生, 孙小辉, 赵欣欣, 陈野, 孙宝江. 水合物储层水平井钻井井筒-储层耦合模型与井壁稳定性分析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1151-1166.
[3]	鲜保安, 高德利, 徐凤银, 毕延森, 李贵川, 王京光, 张洋, 韩金良. 中国煤层气水平井钻完井技术研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1974-1992.
[4]	陈志明, Yu Wei, 石璐铭, 胡连博, 廖新维. 压裂水平井的多模式裂缝网络试井模型及参数评价——以吉木萨尔页岩油为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1706-1726.
[5]	李宁, 冯周, 武宏亮, 田瀚, 刘鹏, 刘英明, 刘忠华, 王克文, 徐彬森. 中国陆相页岩油测井评价技术方法新进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 28-44.
[6]	唐雪平, 洪迪峰, 高文凯, 彭烈新, 杨宝斌. 七段制恒工具面角三维水平井轨道设计方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1315-1324.
[7]	史晓东, 孙灵辉, 战剑飞, 李斌会, 韩雪, 陆慧敏, 蒋成刚. 松辽盆地北部致密油水平井二氧化碳吞吐技术及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 998-1006.
[8]	柳军, 杜智刚, 郭晓强, 殷腾, 俞海, 曹大勇. 水平井裸眼分段压裂完井管柱下入屈曲磨损预测模型及规律[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1632-1641.
[9]	胡松, 王敏, 刘伟男, 王兵. 页岩水平井声波时差各向异性校正方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 58-66.
[10]	罗红文, 李海涛, 李颖, 汪凤, 向雨行, 蒋贝贝, 于皓. 低渗透气藏压裂水平井产出剖面与裂缝参数反演解释[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 936-947.
[11]	郜益华, 张迎春, 杨宝泉, 李珂, 苑志旺, 康博韬, 张昕, 张旭, 陈国宁. 复杂断块油田跨断层水平井产能预测及分段长度优化方法——以西非A深水油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 948-961.
[12]	李国欣, 吴志宇, 李桢, 陈强, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相源内非常规石油甜点优选与水平井立体开发技术实践 ——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 736-750.
[13]	张家强, 李士祥, 李宏伟, 周新平, 刘江艳, 郭睿良, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7油层组湖盆远端重力流沉积与深水油气勘探——以城页水平井区长7₃小层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 570-587.
[14]	张胜飞, 孙新革, 苟燕, 张忠义, 王红庄, 周晓义, 解阳波, 吕柏林. 流量控制器在SAGD技术中的应用现状及思考[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1395-1404.
[15]	李勇, 纪宏飞, 邢鹏举, 苏义脑, 刘硕琼, 魏风奇. 气井井筒温度场及温度应力场的理论解[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 84-94.