柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定

doi:10.7623/syxb202101004

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 45-55,118.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202101004

柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定

张世铭^1,2, 王建功^1,2, 张永庶³, 张小军^1,2, 张婷静^1,2, 崔俊³

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院甘肃兰州 730020;
2. 中国石油天然气集团公司油藏描述重点实验室甘肃兰州 730020;
3. 中国石油青海油田公司甘肃敦煌 736202

收稿日期:2019-06-09 修回日期:2020-08-30 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-02-05
通讯作者: 张世铭,男,1986年11月生,2010年获成都理工大学学士学位,2013年获成都理工大学硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院工程师,主要从事沉积储层方面的研究工作。
作者简介:张世铭,男,1986年11月生,2010年获成都理工大学学士学位,2013年获成都理工大学硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院工程师,主要从事沉积储层方面的研究工作。Email:zhang_sm@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项"柴达木复杂构造区油气成藏、关键勘探技术与新领域目标优选"（2016ZX05003-006）和中国石油天然气集团公司科技重大专项"柴达木盆地建设千万吨油气田综合配套技术研究"（2016E-0101）资助。

Determination of petrophysical property cutoffs of lacustrine dolomite intercrystalline pore reservoir in the Xiaganchaigou Formation,western Q aidam Basin

Zhang Shiming^1,2, Wang Jiangong^1,2, Zhang Yongshu³, Zhang Xiaojun^1,2, Zhang Tingjing^1,2, Cui Jun³

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest(NWGI), Gansu Lanzhou 730020, China;
2. CNPC Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description, Gansu Lanzhou 730020, China;
3. PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Gansu Dunhuang 736202, China

Received:2019-06-09 Revised:2020-08-30 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 物性下限是储层有效性评价及资源量计算的重要参数。以柴达木盆地英西地区古近系致密湖相碳酸盐岩为研究对象，在高压压汞测试及场发射扫描电镜分析确定纳米级白云石晶间孔孔喉分布范围的基础上，提出了一种确定储层物性下限的实验方法，该方法的核心是通过核磁共振多次离心测试来达到分离可动流体与束缚流体的目的，将可动流体与束缚流体分离点对应的孔喉半径作为可动流体分布孔喉下限，通过孔喉半径与物性的拟合关系确定储层物性下限，此外，通过毛细管曲线法、分布函数法及测井解释结论对核磁共振离心方法确定的物性下限进行了验证。研究结果表明，通过压汞及扫描电镜确定的白云石晶间孔孔喉分布范围为40~300 nm，蒸馏水饱和后核磁共振测试确定的样品孔径分布范围为50~300 nm；可动流体分离点对应的可动流体分布孔喉下限为47 nm，通过核磁共振离心测试确定的孔隙度下限为3.29%，渗透率下限为0.02 mD，该结果相对压汞曲线法确定的物性下限偏小，这是由于两种方法采用的测试流体不同造成的，该结果与分布函数法确定的物性下限一致，与测井解释结论的符合程度达85%，确定的物性下限可作为一种评价低渗储层有效性的依据。

关键词: 柴达木盆地, 英西地区, 湖相碳酸盐岩, 白云石晶间孔, 孔喉下限, 物性下限

Abstract: The petrophysical property cutoffs are important parameters for the evaluation of reservoir effectiveness and resources calculation. Focusing on the Paleogene tight lacustrine carbonate rocks in the Yingxi area of Qaidam Basin, based on determining the distribution range of nano-scale dolomite intercrystalline pore throat by high pressure mercury injection test and field emission scanning electron microscopy analysis, this study proposes an experimental method to determine the petrophysical property cutoffs of reservoirs. The core of the method is to separate the movable fluid from the irreducible fluid through multiple centrifugal tests under nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); the pore throat radius corresponding to the separation point of movable fluid is taken as the pore throat radius cutoffs for the movable fluid distribution. The petrophysical property cutoffs of reservoirs are determined by the fitting relationship between the pore throat radius and physical properties. In addition, the petrophysical property cutoffs determined by the NMR-based centrifugal method is verified by the capillary curve method, distribution function method and log interpretation conclusions. The research results show that the distribution range of dolomite intercrystalline pore throat determined by mercury injection test and scanning electron microscope is 40 to 300 nm, and that of pore size of the sample determined by NMR test after saturated distilled water is 50 to 300 nm. The separation point of movable fluid corresponds to the pore throat radius cutoffs of 47 nm for the movable fluid distribution, the porosity cutoffs determined by NMR-based centrifugal test is 3.29%, and the permeability cutoff is 0.02 mD. These results are smaller compared with the petrophysical property cutoffs determined by mercury injection curve method. It is because two different test fluids were used in the two methods. The result is consistent with the petrophysical property cutoffs determined by the distribution function method, and the degree of coincidence with the log interpretation conclusions is 85%. The determined petrophysical property cutoffs can be used as a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of low-permeability reservoirs.

Key words: Qaidam Basin, Yingxi area, lacustrine carbonate rock, dolomite intercrystalline pore, pore throat cutoffs, petrophysical property cutoffs

中图分类号:

TE122.2

张世铭, 王建功, 张永庶, 张小军, 张婷静, 崔俊. 柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 45-55,118.

Zhang Shiming, Wang Jiangong, Zhang Yongshu, Zhang Xiaojun, Zhang Tingjing, Cui Jun. Determination of petrophysical property cutoffs of lacustrine dolomite intercrystalline pore reservoir in the Xiaganchaigou Formation,western Q aidam Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 45-55,118.

参考文献

[1] 操应长,张会娜,葸克来,等.饶阳凹陷南部古近系中深层有效储层物性下限及控制因素[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2015,45(6):1567-1579.
CAO Yingchang,ZHANG Huina,XI Kelai,et al.Petrophysical parameter cutoff and controlling factors of medium-deep effective reservoirs of Palaeogene in southern Raoyang sag[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2015,45(6):1567-1579.
[2] 吕雪莹,蒋有录,刘景东,等.东濮凹陷杜寨地区沙三中-下段致密砂岩气藏有效储层物性下限[J].地质科技情报,2017,36(3):182-188.
LV Xueying,JIANG Youlu,LIU Jingdong,et al.Lower limits of porosity and permeability of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the middle-lower Es₃ in Duzhai area,Dongpu depression[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2017,36(3):182-188.
[3] 李易隆,贾爱林,冀光,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中-东部下石盒子组八段辫状河储层构型[J].石油学报,2018,39(9):1037-1050.
LI Yilong,JIA Ailin,JI Guang,et al.Reservoir architecture of braided river in Member 8 of Xiashihezi Formation,central-eastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(9):1037-1050.
[4] 姜航,庞雄奇,陈冬霞,等.含油气盆地深层有效砂岩储层判别与定量评价——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(增刊2):112-119.
JIANG Hang,PANG Xiongqi,CHEN Dongxia,et al.Effective sandstone reservoir determination and quantitative evaluation of deep strata in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(S2):112-119.
[5] 路智勇,韩学辉,张欣,等.储层物性下限确定方法的研究现状与展望[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2016,40(5):32-42.
LU Zhiyong,HAN Xuehui,ZHANG Xin,et al.Research status and outlook for methods of determining petrophysical property cutoffs[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2016,40(5):32-42.
[6] 焦翠华,夏冬冬,王军,等.特低渗砂岩储层物性下限确定方法——以永进油田西山窑组储集层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(3):379-383.
JIAO Cuihua,XIA Dongdong,WANG Jun,et al.Methods for determining the petrophysical property cutoffs of extra-low porosity and permeability sandstone reservoirs:an example from the Xishanyao Formation reservoirs in Yongjin oilfield[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(3):379-383.
[7] 王艳忠,操应长,宋国奇,等.试油资料在渤南洼陷深部碎屑岩有效储层评价中的应用[J].石油学报,2008,29(5):701-706.
WANG Yanzhong,CAO Yingchang,SONG Guoqi,et al.Application of production test data to evaluation of the effective reservoir in deep clastic of Bonan sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(5):701-706.
[8] 时宇,杨正明,黄延章.储层流动孔喉下限研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2009,31(6):41-44.
SHI Yu,YANG Zhengming,HUANG Yanzhang.The study of cut-off pore-throat in reservoir[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2009,31(6):41-44.
[9] 吴康军,刘洛夫,徐正建,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油成藏物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(1):63-69.
WU Kangjun,LIU Luofu,XU Zhengjian,et al.Lower limits of pore throat radius,porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang7 member,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(1):63-69.
[10] 付金华,罗安湘,张妮妮,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7油层组有效储层物性下限的确定[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(6):82-88.
FU Jinhua,LUO Anxiang,ZHANG Nini,et al.Determine lower limits of physical properties of effective reservoirs in Chang 7 oil formation in Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(6):82-88.
[11] 刘晓鹏,刘新社,赵会涛,等.一种计算致密砂岩油气藏有效孔喉下限的新方法-以苏里格气田盒8气藏为例[J].新疆石油地质,2016,37(3):360-364.
LIU Xiaopeng,LIU Xinshe,ZHAO Huitao,et al.A new method to calculate the lower limit of effective pore throat threshold of tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of He 8 gas reservoir in Sulige gas field[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(3):360-364.
[12] 公言杰,柳少波,方世虎,等.四川盆地侏罗系致密油聚集孔喉半径下限研究[J].深圳大学学报:理工版,2014,31(1):103-110.
GONG Yanjie,LIU Shaobo,FANG Shihu,et al.Radius threshold of pore throat for tight oil accumulation[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2014,31(1):103-110.
[13] 张洪,张水昌,柳少波,等.致密油充注孔喉下限的理论探讨及实例分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):367-374.
ZHANG Hong,ZHANG Shuichang,LIU Shaobo,et al.A theoretical discussion and case study on the oil-charging throat threshold for tight reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):367-374.
[14] 黄成刚,倪祥龙,马新民,等.致密湖相碳酸盐岩油气富集模式及稳产、高产主控因素——以柴达木盆地英西地区为例[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2017,47(5):724-738.
HUANG Chenggang,NI Xianglong,MA Xinmin,et al.Petroleum and gas enrichment pattern and major controlling factors of stable and high production of tight lacustrine carbonate rock reservoirs:a case of the Yingxi area in Qaidam Basin[J].Journal of Northwest University:Natural Science Edition,2017,47(5):724-738.
[15] 袁剑英,黄成刚,曹正林,等.咸化湖盆白云岩碳氧同位素特征及古环境意义:以柴西地区始新统下干柴沟组为例[J].地球化学,2015,44(3):254-266.
YUAN Jianying,HUANG Chenggang,CAO Zhenglin,et al.Carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of saline lacustrine dolomite and its palaeoenvironmental significance:a case study of Lower Eocene Ganchaigou Formation in western Qaidam Basin[J].Geochimica,2015,44(3):254-266.
[16] 付锁堂,张道伟,薛建勤,等.柴达木盆地致密油形成的地质条件及勘探潜力分析[J].沉积学报,2013,31(4):672-682.
FU Suotang,ZHANG Daowei,XUE Jianqin,et al.Exploration potential and geological conditions of tight oil in the Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2013,31(4):672-682.
[17] 纪友亮,马达德,薛建勤,等.柴达木盆地西部新生界陆相湖盆碳酸盐岩沉积环境与沉积模式[J].古地理学报,2017,19(5):757-772.
JI Youliang,MA Dade,XUE Jianqing,et al.Sedimentary environments and sedimentary model of carbonate rocks in the Cenozoic lacustrine basin,western Qaidam Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2017,19(5):757-772.
[18] 张世铭,张小军,张婷静,等.柴西狮子沟地区古近系下干柴沟组混积岩储层特征及影响因素分析[J].现代地质,2017,31(5):1059-1068.
ZHANG Shiming,ZHANG Xiaojun,ZHANG Tingjing,et al.Reservoir characteristics of the paleogene mixed carbonate-siliciclastic rock or succession and its influencing factors in the Shizigou area of the western Qaidam Basin[J].Geoscience,2017,31(5):1059-1068.
[19] 郭荣涛,马达德,张永庶,等.柴达木盆地英西地区下干柴沟组上段超压孔缝型储层特征及形成机理[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):411-422.
GUO Rongtao,MA Dade,ZHANG Yongshu,et al.Characteristics and Formation mechanism of overpressure pore-fracture reservoirs for upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in the west of Yingxiong ridge,Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):411-422.
[20] 操应长,葸克来,刘可禹,等.陆相湖盆致密砂岩油气储层储集性能表征与成储机制——以松辽盆地南部下白垩统泉头组四段为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(3):247-265.
CAO Yingchang,XI Kelai,LIU Keyu,et al.Reservoir properties characterization and its genetic mechanism for tight sandstone oil and gas reservoir in Lacustrine Basin:the case of the fourth Member of Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in the southern Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(3):247-265.
[21] 房涛,张立宽,刘乃贵,等.核磁共振技术定量表征致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构——以临清坳陷东部石炭系-二叠系致密砂岩储层为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(8):902-915.
FANG Tao,ZHANG Likuan,LIU Naigui,et al.Quantitative characterization of pore structure of tight gas sandstone reservoirs by NMR T₂ spectrum technology:a case study of Carboniferous-Permian tight sandstone reservoir in Linqing depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(8):902-915.
[22] 刘晓鹏,胡晓新.近五年核磁共振测井在储集层孔隙结构评价中的若干进展[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(6):2194-2201.
LIU Xiaopeng,HU Xiaoxin.Progress of NMR log in evaluating reservoir pore structure in the last five years[J].Progress in Geophysics,2009,24(6):2194-2201.
[23] 闫建平,温丹妮,李尊芝,等.基于核磁共振测井的低渗透砂岩孔隙结构定量评价方法——以东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段为例[J].地球物理学报,2016,59(4):1543-1552.
YAN Jianping,WEN Danni,LI Zongzhi,et al.The quantitative evaluation method of low permeable sandstone pore structure based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2016,59(4):1543-1552.
[24] VOLOKIT Y,LOOYESTIJN W J,SLIJKERMAN W F J,et al.A practical approach to obtain 1st drainage capillary pressure curves from NMR core and log data[J].Petrophysics,2001,42(4):334-343.
[25] 刘堂宴,王绍民,傅容珊,等.核磁共振谱的岩石孔喉结构分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(3):328-333.
LIU Tangyan,WANG Shaomin,FU Rongshan,et al.Analysis of rock pore throat structure with NMR spectra[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2003,38(3):328-333.
[26] 颜其彬,赵辉,司马立强,等.碳酸盐岩核磁共振实验与认识[J].天然气工业,2010,30(1):36-38.
YAN Qibin,ZHAO Hui,SIMA Liqiang,et al.A study of NMR experiments of carbonates[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2010,30(1):36-38.
[27] 运华云,赵文杰,刘兵开,等.利用T₂分布进行岩石孔隙结构研究[J].测井技术,2002,26(1):18-21.
YUN Huayun,ZHAO Wenjie,LIU Bingkai,et al.Researching rock pore structure with T₂ distribution[J].Well Logging Technology,2002,26(1):18-21.
[28] MÜLLER-HUBER E,SCHÖN J,BÖRNER F.Pore space characterization in carbonate rocks-approach to combine nuclear magnetic resonance and elastic wave velocity measurements[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics,2016,127:68-81.
[29] 黄兴,李天太,王香增,等.致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(5):557-567.
HUANG Xing,LI Tiantai,WANG Xiangzeng,et al.Distribution characteristics and its influence factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoir:a case study from Chang-8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(5):557-567.
[30] 周华,高峰,周萧,等.云冈石窟不同类型砂岩的核磁共振T₂谱-压汞毛管压力换算C值研究[J].地球物理学进展,2013,28(5):2759-2766.
ZHOU Hua,GAO Feng,ZHOU Xiao,et al.The translation research of different types sandstone of Yungang Grottoes in NMR T₂-mercury capillary pressure[J].Progress in Geophysics,2013,28(5):2759-2766.
[31] 龚小平,唐洪明,赵峰,等.四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构的定量表征[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(3):48-57.
GONG Xiaoping,TANG Hongming,ZHAO Feng,et al.Quantitative characterization of pore structure in shale reservoir of Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(3):48-57.
[32] ZHOU Liming,PANG Xiongqi,WU Luya,et al.Critical conditions for tight oil charging and delineation of effective oil source rocks in Lucaogou Formation,Jimusar sag,Junggar Basin,northwest China[J].Australian Journal of Earth Sciences,2016,63(2):205-216.
[33] 黎菁,杨勇,王少飞,等.苏里格气田东区致密砂岩储层物性下限值的确定[J].特种油气藏,2012,18(6):52-56.
LI Jing,YANG Yong,WANG Shaofei,et al.Determination of the lower limits of the physical properties of consolidated sandstone reservoirs in eastern Sulige gas field[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2012,18(6):52-56.
[34] 邓亚仁,任战利,马文强,等.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长8层段致密砂岩储层特征及充注下限[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(2):288-294.
DENG Yaren,REN Zhanli,MA Wenqiang,et al.Reservoir properties and hydrocarbon charging threshold of Chang 8 tight sandstones in Fuxian area,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(2):288-294.
[35] 崔景伟,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.致密砂岩层内非均质性及含油下限——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(5):877-882.
CUI Jingwei,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Heterogeneity and lower oily limits for tight sandstones:a case study on Chang-7 oil layers of the Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(5):877-882.
[36] 明红霞,孙卫,周清波,等.马岭油田北三区延1012储层微观孔隙结构特征及其生产动态分析[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2014,44(6):970-978.
MING Hongxia,SUN Wei,ZHOU Qingbo,et al.Characteristics of micro-pore structure and production dynamic analysis of Yan 1012 reservoir in Northern Maling oilfield[J].Journal of Northwest University:Natural Science Edition,2014,44(6):970-978.
[37] 邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,BAI Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
[38] 王伟明,卢双舫,田伟超,等.吸附水膜厚度确定致密油储层物性下限新方法——以辽河油田大民屯凹陷为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):135-140.
WANG Weiming,LU Shuangfang,TIAN Weichao,et al.A new method to determine porosity and permeability cutoffs of tight oil reservoirs by using thickness of adsorption water film:a case study from the Damintun sag,Liaohe oifield[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):135-140.
[39] 张以明,付小东,郭永军,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾一下段致密油有效储层物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(4):551-558.
ZHANG Yiming,FU Xiaodong,GUO Yongjun,et al.Petrophysical property limits of effective tight oil reservoirs in the lower part of the first Member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation,A'nan sag,Erlian Basin,North China[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(4):551-558.
[40] 蒋启贵,黎茂稳,马媛媛,等.页岩油可动性分子地球化学评价方法——以济阳坳陷页岩油为例[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(6):849-854.
JIANG Qigui,LI Maowen,MA Yuanyuan,et al.Molecular geochemical evaluation of shale oil mobility:a case study of shale oil in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(6):849-854.
[41] 张世铭,张小军,郑联勇,等.酒西盆地老君庙构造白杨河组间泉子段储层孔隙结构特征[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):40-50.
ZHANG Shiming,ZHANG Xiaojun,ZHENG Lianyong,et al.Reservoir pore structures of Jianquanzi Member in Laojunmiao structure,Jiuxi Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):40-50.
[42] 刘之的,石玉江,周金昱,等.有效储层物性下限确定方法综述及适用性分析[J].地球物理学进展,2018,33(3):1102-1109.
LIU Zhidi,SHI Yujiang,ZHOU Jinyu,et al.Review and applicability analysis of determining methods for the lower limit of physical properties of effective reservoirs[J].Progress in Geophysics,2018,33(3):1102-1109.
[43] 李烨,司马立强,吴丰,等.注汞压力对致密砂岩储层物性下限分析的影响[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,37(5):79-84.
LI Ye,SIMA Liqiang,WU Feng,et al.Influence of mercury injection pressure on lower limits analysis of tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2015,37(5):79-84.
[44] 代全齐,罗群,张晨,等.基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):887-897.
DAI Quanqi,LUO Qun,ZHANG Chen,et al.Pore structure characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoir based on a new parameter measured by NMR experiment:a case study of seventh Member in Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):887-897.
[45] 卢双舫,李俊乾,张鹏飞,等.页岩油储集层微观孔喉分类与分级评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):436-444.
LU Shuangfang,LI Junqian,ZHANG Pengfei,et al.Classification of microscopic pore-throats and the grading evaluation on shale oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):436-444.
[46] CLARKSON C R,JENSEN J L,PEDERSEN P K,et al.Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012, 96(2):355-374.
[47] YAO Yanbin,LIU Dameng.Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals[J].Fuel,2012,95:152-158.
[48] 姚光庆,张建光,姜平,等.涠西南凹陷11-7构造区流沙港组中深层有效储层下限厘定[J].地学前缘,2012,19(2):102-109.
YAO Guangqing,ZHANG Jianguang,JIANG Ping,et al.The physical property lower limit of medium-deep effective clastic reservoirs in Liushagang Formation,11-7 district of Weixinan depression[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(2):102-109.
[49] 郭华军,单祥,李亚哲,等.玛湖凹陷北斜坡百口泉组储集层物性下限及控制因素[J].新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):63-69.
GUO Huajun,SHAN Xiang,LI Yazhe,et al.Lower limits of reservoir physical properties and controlling factors of Baikouquan Formation on the northern slope of Mahu sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2018,39(1):63-69.
[50] 赵瑜,王超林,曹汉,等.页岩渗流模型及孔压与温度影响机理研究[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(6):1754-1760.
ZHAO Yu,WANG Chaolin,CAO Han,et al.Influencing mechanism and modelling study of pore pressure and temperature on shale permeability[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2018,43(6):1754-1760.
[51] 牛小兵,冯胜斌,刘飞,等.低渗透致密砂岩储层中石油微观赋存状态与油源关系——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(3):288-293.
NIU Xiaobing,FENG Shengbin,LIU Fei,et al.Microscopic occurrence of oil in tight sandstones and its relation with oil sources:a case study from the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(3):288-293.

柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定

Determination of petrophysical property cutoffs of lacustrine dolomite intercrystalline pore reservoir in the Xiaganchaigou Formation,western Q aidam Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何文渊, 黄先雄, 王红平, 汪望泉, 范国章, 丁梁波, 赵俊峰, 朱晓辉, 张勇刚, 庞旭, 李伟强, 左国平, 杨柳, 王朝锋. 南美桑托斯盆地深水区古拉绍-1井油气勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 339-347.
[2]	熊连桥, 谢晓军, 邓有根, 唐武, 张春宇, 白海强, 刘子玉, 廖计华. 坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1612-1623,1649.
[3]	朱超, 刘占国, 宋光永, 龙国徽, 宫清顺, 赵健, 李森明, 夏志远, 吴颜雄, 田明智. 柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式、演化与分布[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1558-1567,1622.
[4]	何媛媛, 张斌, 桂丽黎, 张国卿, 袁莉. 从原油地球化学特征看致密油聚集机制——以柴达木盆地西部扎哈泉油藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1060-1072.
[5]	王建功, 张永庶, 李翔, 徐丽, 石亚军, 黄叶秋, 王玉林, 管斌, 张世铭, 高妍芳. 柴达木盆地西部渐新统纹理石沉积特征与原位成藏[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 940-959.
[6]	田继先, 李剑, 曾旭, 孔骅, 沙威, 郭泽清, 张静, 付艳双. 柴达木盆地东坪地区原油裂解气的发现及成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 154-162,255.
[7]	黄成刚, 张小军, 胡贵, 刘应如, 张希文, 张国辉, 李红哲, 吴梁宇. 高原咸化湖盆基底储层特征与成藏主控因素——以柴达木盆地东坪地区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 179-196.
[8]	卞青, 陈琰, 张国卿, 刘润超, 王振东, 郭召杰. 柴达木盆地膏盐层岩石物理特征及其对构造变形的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 197-204.
[9]	刘池洋, 付锁堂, 张道伟, 陈琰, 黄雷, 石亚军. 柴达木盆地巨型油气富集区的确定及勘探成效——改造型盆地原盆控源、改造控藏之范例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1527-1537.
[10]	郭荣涛, 马达德, 张永庶, 刘波, 陈晓冬, 崔俊, 王鹏, 张庆辉, 姜营海, 李亚锋. 柴达木盆地英西地区下干柴沟组上段超压孔缝型储层特征及形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 411-422.
[11]	宫清顺, 刘占国, 宋光永, 夏志远, 柳金城, 管斌, 范卫光. 柴达木盆地昆北油田冲积扇厚层砂砾岩储集层内部隔夹层[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(2): 152-164.
[12]	马达德, 陈琰, 夏晓敏, 魏学斌, 吴颜雄, 袁莉, 何柳. 英东油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(1): 115-130.
[13]	曹正林, 孙秀建, 吴武军, 田光荣, 张世铭, 李海滨, 孙知明, 徐丽, 王瑞菊. 柴达木盆地盆缘冲断古隆起的形成演化及对油气成藏的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 980-989.
[14]	张斌, 何媛媛, 陈琰, 孟庆洋, 黄家旋, 袁莉. 柴达木盆地西部咸化湖相优质烃源岩形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 674-685.
[15]	王海学, 刘志达, 沙威, 付晓飞, 孙永河, 赵政权, 卢明旭, 吴桐. 高孔隙性砂岩内变形带特征及对流体流动的影响——以柴达木盆地西缘油砂山背斜为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 554-563.