常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价方法——基于全油气系统理论和TSM盆地模拟技术

doi:10.7623/syxb202309007

石油学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1487-1499.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202309007

常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价方法——基于全油气系统理论和TSM盆地模拟技术

宋振响, 周卓明, 江兴歌, 陈拥锋, 马中良, 罗昕, 李振明

1. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所江苏无锡 214126;
2. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室江苏无锡 214126;
3. 中国石油化工集团有限公司油气成藏重点实验室江苏无锡 214126

收稿日期:2023-06-01 修回日期:2023-07-13 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-09
通讯作者: 宋振响,男,1983年6月生,2009年获中国科学院研究生院硕士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所高级工程师,主要从事油气成烃成藏研究及资源评价工作。Email:songzx.syky@sinopec.com
作者简介:宋振响,男,1983年6月生,2009年获中国科学院研究生院硕士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所高级工程师,主要从事油气成烃成藏研究及资源评价工作。Email:songzx.syky@sinopec.com
基金资助:
中国石油化工股份有限公司科技攻关项目(P21035-2,P22132)和国家自然科学基金项目(No.42072156)资助。

Integrated assessment method of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources: based on whole petroleum system theory and TSM basin modeling technology

Song Zhenxiang, Zhou Zhuoming, Jiang Xingge, Chen Yongfeng, Ma Zhongliang, Luo Xin, Li Zhenming

1. Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology, Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Jiangsu Wuxi 214126, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Jiangsu Wuxi 214126, China;
3. Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Jiangsu Wuxi 214126, China

Received:2023-06-01 Revised:2023-07-13 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前,资源评价技术已不能满足常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价和立体勘探的需求,而"全油气系统"理论为评价常规、非常规油气及潜力分布提供了理论指导。在常规、非常规油气资源评价方法调研的基础上,结合地质理论研究进展、模拟实验以及盆地模拟技术的进步,提出了基于全油气系统理论和TSM盆地模拟技术的常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价新方法,通过在典型地区的应用实例,分析了新方法的适用性、优势及发展前景。从根源上来说,常规与非常规油气均来自有机质的生烃热降解,是"源-储协同演化、源-藏差异演化"的结果,具备开展一体化评价的基础;在分析烃源岩完整的生烃—排烃—滞留油气演化模式、排出油裂解演化模式和源内气演化过程的基础上,建立了常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价方法和流程,可统一开展源内体系和源外体系油气形成演化全过程的模拟和资源量计算。新方法体现了多类型油气资源有序共生的完整性和油气动态演化过程,其评价过程更科学且在盆地整体资源潜力的宏观把控方面具有独到优势。下一步仍需在烃源岩精细评价和油气运聚模拟技术方面加强研究,使资源评价结果更好地服务于勘探部署。

关键词: 全油气系统, 常规-非常规油气资源, 生-排烃模拟, TSM盆地模拟, 资源评价

Abstract: At present, resource assessment technology can not meet the needs of integrated evaluation and stereoscopic exploration of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources. The whole pertoleum system theory provides theoretical guidance for the evaluation of distribution and potential of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources. Based on the investigation of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resource assessment methods, combined with the progress of geological theory and basin modeling techniques, this paper puts forward a conventional and unconventional integrated resource assessment method based on whole petroleum system theory and TSM basin simulation technology. The applicability and advantages of the new method are analyzed through the application in typical areas. The future development prospects are also put forward. From the perspective of source analysis, conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources are derived from the thermal degradation of organic matter, which is the result of "co-evolution of source and reservoir and differential evolution of source and reservoir" and has the basis for integrated evaluation. Based on the analysis of the complete evolution model of hydrocarbon generation-expulsion-retention, the evolution model of oil discharge and cracking and the evolution process of gas in the source rock, an integrated resource assessment method and process of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources are established. The new method can be used to simulate the whole process of oil-gas formation and evolution and calculate the resource amount of the in-source system and the external-source system. The new method reflects the integrity of orderly symbiosis of multiple types of oil-gas resources and the dynamic evolution process of oil-gas. The evaluation process is more scientific, and it has unique advantages in the macro control of the overall resource potential of the basin. However, in the next step, it is still necessary to strengthen the research on the fine evaluation of source rock and the simulation technology of oil-gas migration and accumulation, so that the resource assessment results can better serve the exploration deployment.

Key words: whole petroleum system, conventional and unconventional oil-gas resource, hydrocarbon generation and expulsion simulation, TSM basin modeling, resource assessment

中图分类号:

TE122.1

宋振响, 周卓明, 江兴歌, 陈拥锋, 马中良, 罗昕, 李振明. 常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价方法——基于全油气系统理论和TSM盆地模拟技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1487-1499.

Song Zhenxiang, Zhou Zhuoming, Jiang Xingge, Chen Yongfeng, Ma Zhongliang, Luo Xin, Li Zhenming. Integrated assessment method of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources: based on whole petroleum system theory and TSM basin modeling technology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(9): 1487-1499.

参考文献

[1] 贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):1-11.
JIA Chengzao.Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):1-11.
[2] JIA Chengzao,PANG Xiongqi,SONG Yan.Whole petroleum system and ordered distribution pattern of conventional and unconventional oil and gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Science,2023,20(1):1-19.
[3] 唐勇,雷德文,曹剑,等.准噶尔盆地二叠系全油气系统与源内天然气勘探新领域[J].新疆石油地质,2022,43(6):654-662.
TANG Yong,LEI Dewen,CAO Jian,et al.Total petroleum system and inner-source natural gas exploration in Permian strata of Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2022,43(6):654-662.
[4] 支东明,唐勇,何文军,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组常规-非常规油气有序共生与全油气系统成藏模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(1):38-51.
ZHI Dongming,TANG Yong,HE Wenjun,et al.Orderly coexistence and accumulation models of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons in Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation,Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(1):38-51.
[5] 李二庭,王剑,李际,等.源储一体烃源岩精确评价——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(2):335-342.
LI Erting,WANG Jian,LI Ji,et al.Accurate evaluation of source rocks in source-reservoir integration:a case study of source rocks in Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar sag,Junggar Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(2):335-342.
[6] 邹才能,杨智,董大忠,等.非常规源岩层系油气形成分布与前景展望[J].地球科学,2022,47(5):1517-1533.
ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,DONG Dazhong,et al.Formation,distribution and prospect of unconventional hydrocarbons in source rock strata in China[J].Earth Science,2022,47(5):1517-1533.
[7] 杨智,邹才能,陈建军,等."进(近)源找油":油气地质理论创新与重点领域勘探思考[J].石油学报,2021,42(10):1310-1324.
YANG Zhi,ZOU Caineng,CHEN Jianjun,et al."Exploring petroleum inside or near the source kitchen":innovations in petroleum geology theory and reflections on hydrocarbon exploration in key fields[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(10):1310-1324.
[8] 马永生,蔡勋育,罗大清,等."双碳"目标下我国油气产业发展的思考[J].地球科学,2022,47(10):3501-3510.
MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,LUO Daqing,et al.Thoughts on development of China's oil and gas industry under "dual carbon" goals[J].Earth Science,2022,47(10):3501-3510.
[9] 操应长,远光辉,杨海军,等.含油气盆地深层-超深层碎屑岩油气勘探现状与优质储层成因研究进展[J].石油学报,2022,43(1):112-140.
CAO Yingchang,YUAN Guanghui,YANG Haijun,et al.Current situation of oil and gas exploration and research progress of the origin of high -quality reservoirs in deep-ultra-deep clastic reservoirs of petroliferous basins[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(1):112-140.
[10] 窦立荣,李大伟,温志新,等.全球油气资源评价历程及展望[J].石油学报,2022,43(8):1035-1048.
DOU Lirong,LI Dawei,WEN Zhixin,et al.History and outlook of global oil and gas resources evaluation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(8):1035-1048.
[11] 吴晓智,王社教,郑民,等.常规与非常规油气资源评价技术规范体系建立及意义[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(9):1640-1650.
WU Xiaozhi,WANG Shejiao,ZHENG Min,et al.Standard system establishment for conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources assessment techniques and its significance[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(9):1640-1650.
[12] 宋振响,陆建林,周卓明,等.常规油气资源评价方法研究进展与发展方向[J].中国石油勘探,2017,22(3):21-31.
SONG Zhenxiang,LU Jianlin,ZHOU Zhuoming,et al.Research progress and future development of assessment methods for conventional hydrocarbon resources[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2017,22(3):21-31.
[13] 宋振响,徐旭辉,王保华,等.页岩气资源评价方法研究进展与发展方向[J].石油与天然气地质,2020,41(5):1038-1047.
SONG Zhenxiang,XU Xuhui,WANG Baohua,et al.Advances in shale gas resource assessment methods and their future evolvement[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2020,41(5):1038-1047.
[14] 郭秋麟,周长迁,陈宁生,等.非常规油气资源评价方法研究[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(4):12-19.
GUO Qiulin,ZHOU Changqian,CHEN Ningsheng,et al.Evaluation methods for unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(4):12-19.
[15] 庞雄奇,贾承造,宋岩,等.全油气系统定量评价:方法原理与实际应用[J].石油学报,2022,43(6):727-759.
PANG Xiongqi,JIA Chengzao,SONG Yan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of whole petroleum system:principle and application[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(6):727-759.
[16] 胡宗全,郑伦举,申宝剑,等.非常规与常规统一的含油气系统之初探[J].地质论评,2021,67(4):1007-1020.
HU Zongquan,ZHENG Lunju,SHEN Baojian,et al.Preliminary study on unconventional and conventional oil-bearing gas systems[J].Geological Review,2021,67(4):1007-1020.
[17] 徐旭辉,朱建辉,江兴歌,等.TSM盆地模拟原理方法与应用[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(6):729-737.
XU Xuhui,ZHU Jianhui,JIANG Xingge,et al.Principle of TSM Basin simulation system and its application[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(6):729-737.
[18] DOW W G.Application of oil-correlation and source-rock data to exploration in Williston Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1974,58(7):1253-1262.
[19] 何登发,赵文智,雷振宇,等.中国叠合型盆地复合含油气系统的基本特征[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):23-37.
HE Dengfa,ZHAO Wenzhi,LEI Zhenyu,et al.Characteristics of composite petroleum systems of superimposed basins in China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(3):23-37.
[20] 赵文智,何登发,池英柳,等.中国复合含油气系统的基本特征与勘探技术[J].石油学报,2001,22(1):6-13.
ZHAO Wenzhi,HE Dengfa,CHI Yingliu,et al.Major characteristics and exploration technology of multi-source petroleum systems in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,22(1):6-13.
[21] 金之钧.中国典型叠合盆地及其油气成藏研究新进展(之一)——叠合盆地划分与研究方法[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(5):553-562.
JIN Zhijun.New advancement in research of China's typical superimposed basins and reservoiring (Part I):classification and research methods of superimposed basins[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(5):553-562.
[22] 何川,郑伦举,王强,等.烃源岩生排烃模拟实验技术现状、应用与发展方向[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(5):862-870.
HE Chuan,ZHENG Lunju,WANG Qiang,et al.Experimental development and application of source rock thermal simulation for hydrocarbon generation and expulsion[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(5):862-870.
[23] 马中良,郑伦举,李志明.烃源岩有限空间温压共控生排烃模拟实验研究[J].沉积学报,2012,30(5):955-963.
MA Zhongliang,ZHENG Lunju,LI Zhiming.The thermocompression simulation experiment of source rock hydrocarbon generation and expulsion in formation porosity[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(5):955-963.
[24] 栾治盛,杜江峰,孙平昌,等.生烃热模拟研究进展及对非常规油气成藏研究约束[J].中国煤炭地质,2021,33(7):19-26.
LUAN Zhisheng,DU Jiangfeng,SUN Pingchang,et al.Hydrocarbon generation thermal simulation research progress and constraint on unconventional oil and gas reservoiring study[J].Coal Geology of China,2021,33(7):19-26.
[25] 郑伦举.PVT共控作用下油气的形成过程与演化模式[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2013.
ZHENG Lunju.Formation process and evolution mode of petroleum controlled by PVT[D].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences,2013.
[26] TISSOT B P,WELTE D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence[M].2nd ed.Berlin:Springer,1984:381.
[27] 陈双,黄海平,张博原,等.原油及源内残余沥青裂解成气差异及地质意义[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(9):1375-1384.
CHEN Shuang,HUANG Haiping,ZHANG Boyuan,et al.Difference in gas generation from thermal cracking of oil within reservoir and from residual bitumen within source rock and its geological significance[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(9):1375-1384.
[28] 秦建中.中国烃源岩[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:42-51.
QIN Jianzhong.Source rocks in China[M].Beijing:Science Press,2005:42-51.
[29] ZHAO Wenzhi,ZHANG Shuichang,ZHANG Bin,et al.New insight into the kinetics of deep liquid hydrocarbon cracking and its significance[J].Geofluids,2017,2017:6340986.
[30] BEHAR F,VANDENBROUCKE M,TANG Y,et al.Thermal cracking of kerogen in open and closed systems:determination of kinetic parameters and stoichiometric coefficients for oil and gas generation[J].Organic Geochemistry,1997,26(5/6):321-339.
[31] BEHAR F,UNGERER P,KRESSMANN S,et al.Thermal evolution of crude oils in sedimentary basins:experimental simulation in a confined system and kinetic modeling[J].Oil & Gas Science and Technology,1991,46(2):151-181.
[32] BARKER C.Calculated volume and pressure changes during the thermal cracking of oil to gas in reservoirs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(8):1254-1261.
[33] 张水昌,何坤,王晓梅,等.深层多途径复合生气模式及潜在成藏贡献[J].天然气地球科学,2021,32(10):1421-1435.
ZHANG Shuichang,HE Kun,WANG Xiaomei,et al.The multi-path gas generation model and its potential contribution to petroleum accumulation in deep Formations[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,32(10):1421-1435.
[34] 郑伦举,秦建中,张渠,等.中国海相不同类型原油与沥青生气潜力研究[J].地质学报,2008,82(3):360-365.
ZHENG Lunju,QIN Jianzhong,ZHANG Qu,et al.Gas-generation potentiality of various marine crude oil and bitumen in China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(3):360-365.
[35] 郑伦举,王强,秦建中,等.海相古油藏及可溶有机质再生烃气能力研究[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(4):390-395.
ZHENG Lunju,WANG Qiang,QIN Jianzhong,et al.Hydrocarbon-regeneration capability of marine paleo-reservoir and soluble organic matter[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2008,30(4):390-395.
[36] LEI Rui,XIONG Yongqiang,LI Yun,et al.Main factors influencing the formation of thermogenic solid bitumen[J].Organic Geochemistry,2018,121:155-160.
[37] 宋振响,邱岐,赵琳洁,等.基于存滞系数的页岩气资源评价方法[J].天然气工业,2020,40(10):12-19.
SONG Zhenxiang,QIU Qi,ZHAO Linjie,et al.A shale gas resource evaluation method based on retention coefficient[J].Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(10):12-19.
[38] 朱夏.含油气盆地研究方向的探讨[J].石油实验地质,1983,5(2):116-123.
ZHU Xia.Approaches to theresearch of petroliferous basins[J].Experimental Petroleum Geology,1983,5(2):116-123.
[39] 徐旭辉,方成名,陆建林,等.原型控源、迭加控藏——油气盆地资源分级评价与有利勘探方向优选思维及技术[J].石油实验地质,2020,42(5):824-836.
XU Xuhui,FANG Chengming,LU Jianlin,et al.Hydrocarbon sources controlled by basin prototype and petroleum accumulation controlled by basin superposition:thoughts and technology of resource grading evaluation and exploration optimization in petroliferous basins[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2020,42(5):824-836.
[40] 金之钧,王冠平,刘光祥,等.中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J].石油学报,2021,42(7):821-835.
JIN Zhijun,WANG Guanping,LIU Guangxiang,et al.Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(7):821-835.
[41] 李斌,张欣,郭强,等.塔里木盆地寒武系超深层含油气系统盆地模拟[J].石油学报,2022,43(6):804-815.
LI Bin,ZHANG Xin,GUO Qiang,et al.Basin modeling of Cambrian ultra-deep petroleum system in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(6):804-815.
[42] 张鸿.页岩油赋存状态的地球化学表征——以东营凹陷沙河街组为例[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2020:61-75.
ZHANG Hong.Geochemical characterization on the occurrence of shale oil:a case study on Shahejie Formation,Dongying depression[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences,2020:61-75.
[43] 蒋启贵,黎茂稳,钱门辉,等.不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(6):842-849.
JIANG Qigui,LI Maowen,QIAN Menhui,et al.Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(6):842-849.
[44] 肖文联,杨玉斌,黄矗,等.基于核磁共振技术的页岩油润湿性及其对原油动用特征的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(1):112-121.
XIAO Wenlian,YANG Yubin,HUANG Chu,et al.Rock wettability and its influence on crude oil producing characteristics based on NMR technology[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(1):112-121.
[45] 王子强,葛洪魁,郭慧英,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔页岩油不同温压CO₂吞吐下可动性实验研究[J].石油实验地质,2022,44(6):1092-1099.
WANG Ziqiang,GE Hongkui,GUO Huiying,et al.Experimental study on the mobility of Junggar Basin's Jimsar shale oil by CO₂ huff and puff under different temperatures and pressures[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2022,44(6):1092-1099.
[46] 柳庄小雪,郑民,于京都,等.油气资源评价中石油运聚系数的量化分析与预测模型[J].海相油气地质,2021,26(1):35-42.
LIU Zhuangxiaoxue,ZHENG Min,YU Jingdu,et al.Quantitative analysis and prediction model of oil migration and accumulation coefficient in hydrocarbon resources evaluation[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2021,26(1):35-42.
[47] 宋振响,周卓明.梨树断陷主力烃源岩判定及其地球化学特征[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(4):438-444.
SONG Zhenxiang,ZHOU Zhuoming.Identification of chief hydrocarbon source rocks in Lishu fault depression and their geochemical characteristics[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(4):438-444.
[48] 宋振响,顾忆,路清华,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷天然气成因类型及勘探方向[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):622-630.
SONG Zhenxiang,GU Yi,LU Qinghua,et al.Genetic types of natural gas and its exploration direction in Lishu fault sag,Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):622-630.
[49] 张君峰,徐兴友,白静,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷白垩系沙河子组陆相页岩气形成条件与勘探突破[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(3):440-452.
ZHANG Junfeng,XU Xingyou,BAI Jing,et al.Accumulation and exploration of continental shale gas resources of Cretaceous Shahezi Formation in Lishu fault depression,Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(3):440-452.
[50] 王保华,李浩,陆建林,等.陆相页岩层系非泥页岩夹层发育程度定量表征[J].石油实验地质,2019,41(6):879-884.
WANG Baohua,LI Hao,LU Jianlin,et al.Quantitative characterization of development of permeable interlayers in continental shale strata[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2019,41(6):879-884.
[51] 刘可禹,刘建良.盆地和含油气系统模拟 (BPSM)研究现状及发展趋势[J].石油科学通报,2017,2(2):161-175.
LIU Keyu,LIU Jianliang.Current status and future development trends of Basin and Petroleum System Modeling (BPSM)[J].Petroleum Science Bulletin,2017,2(2):161-175.
[52] 郭秋麟,陈宁生,柳庄小雪,等.盆地模拟关键技术之油气运聚模拟技术进展[J].石油实验地质,2020,42(5):846-857.
GUO Qiulin,CHEN Ningsheng,LIU Zhuangxiaoxue,et al.Advance of basin modeling key techniques:hydrocarbon migration and accumulation simulation[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2020,42(5):846-857.
[53] 宋振响,周卓明,徐旭辉,等."十三五"中国石化油气资源评价关键技术进展与发展方向[J].中国石油勘探,2022,27(3):27-37.
SONG Zhenxiang,ZHOU Zhuoming,XU Xuhui,et al.Progress of key technologies for oil and gas resource assessment of Sinopec during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and development direction[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2022,27(3):27-37.

常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价方法——基于全油气系统理论和TSM盆地模拟技术

Integrated assessment method of conventional and unconventional oil-gas resources: based on whole petroleum system theory and TSM basin modeling technology

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.
[2]	贾承造, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 陈掌星, 王飞宇, 刘国勇, 高永进, 施砍园, 姜福杰, 姜林. 基于成因法评价油气资源:全油气系统理论和新一代盆地模拟技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1399-1416.
[3]	庞雄奇, 贾承造, 郭秋麟, 陈掌星, 王飞宇, 刘国勇, 高永进, 施砍园, 姜福杰, 姜林. 全油气系统理论用于常规和非常规油气资源评价的盆地模拟技术原理及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1417-1433.
[4]	王飞宇, 冯伟平, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 贾承造. 全油气系统生、排烃和运聚定量分析中的关键问题与解决途径[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1434-1444.
[5]	姜福杰, 郭婧, 庞雄奇, 陈迪, 王建伟, 汪英勋, 李亚茜, 陈雪, 郭婷玮, 房舟, 王晓昊, 齐振国, 文嘉豪. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷全油气系统3类油气资源联合评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1472-1486.
[6]	王建, 郭秋麟, 赵晨蕾, 王玉满, 于京都, 柳庄小雪, 陈宁生. 中国主要盆地页岩油气资源潜力及发展前景[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2033-2044.
[7]	唐勇, 何文军, 姜懿洋, 费李莹, 单祥, 赵毅, 郑孟林, 曹剑, 秦志军, 杨森, 王然, 朱涛, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相页岩油气富集条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 125-143.
[8]	窦立荣, 李大伟, 温志新, 王兆明, 米石云, 张倩. 全球油气资源评价历程及展望[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1035-1048.
[9]	庞雄奇, 贾承造, 宋岩, 陈君青, 施砍园, 庞礴, 姜林, 姜福杰, 陈冬霞, 庞宏, 胡涛, 张思玉, 孙耀玺. 全油气系统定量评价:方法原理与实际应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 727-759.
[10]	郭秋麟, 侯连华, 王建, 柳庄小雪, 罗霞, 陈宁生. 原位转化页岩油资源潜力评价方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1750-1757.
[11]	王社教, 李峰, 闫家泓, 胡俊文, 王凯鸿, 任衡泰. 油田地热资源评价方法及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 553-564.
[12]	郭秋麟, 武娜, 闫伟, 陈宁生. 深层天然气资源评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 383-394.
[13]	李登华, 李建忠, 张斌, 杨家静, 汪少勇. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油形成条件、资源潜力与甜点区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 740-752.
[14]	郭秋麟, 武娜, 陈宁生, 任洪佳, 杨智, 谢红兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组第7油层组致密油资源评价[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(6): 658-665.
[15]	郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 刘成林, 谢红兵, 吴晓智, 王社教, 胡俊文, 高日丽. 油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1305-1314.