阿姆河右岸区块油气资源评价与勘探潜力区优选

doi:10.7623/syxb202603006

石油学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 580-592.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202603006

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

阿姆河右岸区块油气资源评价与勘探潜力区优选

单云鹏¹, 王红军¹, 马锋¹, 于豪¹, 刘剑波¹, 刘华阳², 唐昱哲^1,3, 陈鹏羽¹, 张新顺¹, 王思琦¹, 张良杰¹

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 怀柔实验室新疆研究院新疆乌鲁木齐 830013;
3. 中国石油工程技术研究院有限公司北京 102206

收稿日期:2024-09-24 修回日期:2025-04-02 发布日期:2026-04-09
通讯作者: 张良杰,男,1985年8月生,2010年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事构造地质与风险勘探研究。Email:zlj520@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:单云鹏,男,1992年10月生,2023年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气成藏与全油气系统模拟研究。Email:shan_yunpeng@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项“海外油气地质新理论资源评价新技术与超前选区研究”(2023ZZ77)资助。

Evaluation of hydrocarbon resources and optimization of exploration potential areas in the Amu Darya right bank block

Shan Yunpeng¹, Wang Hongjun¹, Ma Feng¹, Yu Hao¹, Liu Jianbo¹, Liu Huayang², Tang Yuzhe^1,3, Chen Pengyu¹, Zhang Xinshun¹, Wang Siqi¹, Zhang Liangjie¹

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Xinjiang Research Institute of the Huairou Laboratory, Xinjiang Urumqi 830013, China;
3. CNPC Engineering Technology R & D Company Limited, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2024-09-24 Revised:2025-04-02 Published:2026-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 整合阿姆河右岸区块十余年勘探开发的地质、地球物理数据,构建了三维地质模型,开展三维含油气系统模拟,以评价阿姆河右岸区块卡洛夫阶—牛津阶碳酸盐岩与中—下侏罗统砂岩层中的油气资源。综合地球化学数据对地质模型与热模型进行校准,约束模拟过程。研究结果表明:阿姆河右岸区块卡洛夫阶—牛津阶碳酸盐岩储层的石油资源量为3.82×10⁸t,天然气资源量为27 786×10⁸m³;中—下侏罗统砂岩储层的石油资源量为0.24×10⁸t,天然气资源量为14 479×10⁸m³。碳酸盐岩储层的天然气资源探明率约为22 % ,综合砂岩的天然气资源量,阿姆河右岸区块天然气资源的探明率约为15 % ,阿姆河右岸区块天然气资源的勘探前景明朗。现今阿姆河右岸区块的主力气田,如萨曼杰佩气田、别-皮气田、扬-恰气田等既适合部署针对碳酸盐岩气藏的加密井,也适合部署针对砂岩气藏的探井,风险较低;区块东部油气勘探的地质风险较大,但收益可能更高。阿盖雷气田深层可能发育现今区块内规模最大的整装砂岩气藏。阿姆河右岸区块东部具有"一高点一气藏"的特征,其生-储-盖成藏要素大规模发育,故研究重点应该聚焦于膏盐层下的构造高点识别,精准刻画圈闭形态。

关键词: 阿姆河右岸, 卡洛夫阶—牛津阶, 碳酸盐岩, 中—下侏罗统, 油气资源评价, 资源探明率, 探井部署

Abstract: By i ntegrating geological and geophysical data from over a decade of exploration and development in the Amu Darya right bank block, a three-dimensional geological model was constructed to simulate the petroleum system. This study aims to evaluate the hydrocarbon resources in the Callovian-Oxfordian carbonate and the Lower-Middle Jurassic sandstone reservoirs within the Amu Darya right bank block. The integrated geochemical data were used to calibrate the geological and thermal models, thereby constraining the simulation process. The results indicate that 3.82×10⁸t of oil and 27 786×10⁸m³ of natural gas are detected in Callovian-Oxfordian carbonate reservoirs, and 0.24×10⁸t of oil and 14 479×10⁸m³ of gas in the Lower-Middle Jurassic sandstone reservoirs within the Amu Darya right bank block. The proven natural gas reserves in carbonate reservoirs is approximately 22 % . Incorporating the gas resources in sandstone reservoirs, the proven natural gas reserves in the Amu Darya right bank block is about 15 %, indicating promising exploration potential in this region. The major gas fields in the Amu Darya right bank block, such as Samandepe, Bereketli-Pirguyi, and Yanguyi-Chashguyi, are suitable for deploying infill wells for carbonate rocks and exploratory wells for sandstone gas reservoirs, with relatively low exploration risks. Hydrocarbon exploration in the eastern section of the Amu Darya right bank block is associated with elevated geological risks, yet may yield higher returns. The deep intervals of Agayry gas field potentially host the largest continuous sandstone gas accumulation within the current block, representing a structurally intact reservoir system. The eastern section of the block exhibits the characteristic of "one structural high corresponding to one gas reservoir", where the basic elements of hydrocarbon accumulation, such as source rocks, reservoirs and cap rocks, have developed on a large scale. Consequently, the research focus should be on identifying structural highs beneath gypsum-salt layers and accurately characterizing trap structure.

Key words: Amu Darya right bank, Callovian-Oxfordian stages, carbonate rocks, Lower-Middle Jurassic, evaluation of oil and gas resources, proven resource reserves, exploratory well placement

中图分类号:

TE155

单云鹏, 王红军, 马锋, 于豪, 刘剑波, 刘华阳, 唐昱哲, 陈鹏羽, 张新顺, 王思琦, 张良杰. 阿姆河右岸区块油气资源评价与勘探潜力区优选[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(3): 580-592.

Shan Yunpeng, Wang Hongjun, Ma Feng, Yu Hao, Liu Jianbo, Liu Huayang, Tang Yuzhe, Chen Pengyu, Zhang Xinshun, Wang Siqi, Zhang Liangjie. Evaluation of hydrocarbon resources and optimization of exploration potential areas in the Amu Darya right bank block[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2026, 47(3): 580-592.

参考文献

[1] 戴金星,何斌,孙永祥,等. 中亚煤成气聚集域形成及其源岩——中亚煤成气聚集域研究之一[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(3):1-6.
DAI Jinxing,HE Bin,SUN Yongxiang,et al.Formation of the central-Asia coal-formed gas accumulation domain and its source rocks-series study I on the central-Asia coal-formed gas accumulation domain[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1995,22(3):1-6.
[2] ULMISHEK G F.Petroleum geology and resources of the Amu-Darya Basin,Turkmenistan,Uzbekistan,Afghanistan,and Iran[R].Denver:U.S.Geological Survey,2004.
[3] Energy Institute.Statistical review of world energy 2021|70 edition[R/OL].London:Energy Institute,2021.
https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review/home.
[4] S&P Global.Energy portal[DB/OL].(2023-06-01)[2023-10-21].https://www.spglobal.com/.
[5] SHAN Yunpeng,CHAI Hui,WANG Hongjun,et al.Origin and characteristics of the crude oils and condensates in the Callovian-Oxfordian carbonate reservoirs of the Amu Darya right bank block,Turkmenistan[J].Lithosphere,2022,2022(1):5446117.
[6] LIU Jianliang,LIU Keyu,HUANG Xiu.Effect of sedimentary heterogeneities on hydrocarbon accumulations in the Permian Shanxi Formation,Ordos Basin,China:insight from an integrated stratigraphic forward and petroleum system modelling[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,76:412-431.
[7] 吕功训,刘合年,邓民敏,等.阿姆河右岸盐下碳酸盐岩大型气田勘探与开发[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
LÜ Gongxun,LIU Henian,DENG Minmin,et al.Exploration and development of large scale gas fields in subsalt carbonate rocks of the Amu Darya right bank block[M].Beijing:Science Press,2014.
[8] 余一欣,殷进垠,郑俊章,等.阿姆河盆地成藏组合划分与资源潜力评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):750-756.
YU Yixin,YIN Jinyin,ZHENG Junzhang,et al.Division and resources evaluation of hydrocarbon plays in the Amu Darya Basin,Central Asia[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):750-756.
[9] 李浩武,童晓光,王素花,等.阿姆河盆地侏罗系成藏组合地质特征及勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2010,30(5):6-12.
LI Haowu,TONG Xiaoguang,WANG Suhua,et al.An analysis of geological characteristics and exploration potential of the Jurassic play,Amu Darya Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(5):6-12.
[10] 田雨,张兴阳,朱国维,等.阿姆河盆地右岸地区膏盐岩分布及其对盐下礁滩成藏的影响分析[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(12):220-227.
TIAN Yu,ZHANG Xingyang,ZHU Guowei,et al.Distribution characteristics of saline deposits and influences on subsalt reef-beach hydrocarbon accumulations in the right rank area of Amu Darya Basin[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(12):220-227.
[11] 方杰,徐树宝,吴蕾,等.阿姆河右岸地区侏罗系海相烃源岩生烃潜力[J].海相油气地质,2014,19(1):8-18.
FANG Jie,XU Shubao,WU Lei,et al.Hydrocarbon generation potential of Jurassic source rocks in right bank of Amu Darya[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2014,19(1):8-18.
[12] 聂明龙,徐树宝,方杰,等.阿姆河盆地侏罗系海相烃源岩地化特征及与中国海相烃源岩比较[J].沉积学报,2017,35(3):637-648.
NIE Minglong,XU Shubao,FANG Jie,et al.Geochemical characteristics of Jurassic marine source rock in Amu Darya Basin and comparison with marine source rocks in China[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2017,35(3):637-648.
[13] UNGERER P.State of the art of research in kinetic modelling of oil Formation and expulsion[J].Organic Geochemistry,1990,16(1/3):1-25.
[14] BURNHAM A K.A simple kinetic model of petroleum formation and cracking[R].Livermore:Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,1989.
[15] VANDENBROUCKE M,BEHAR F,RUDKIEWICZ J L.Kinetic modelling of petroleum Formation and cracking:implications from the high pressure/high temperature Elgin Field (UK,North Sea)[J].Organic Geochemistry,1999,30(9):1105-1125.
[16] 张婷,王强,刘斌.阿姆河右岸中下侏罗统沉积相及平面展布[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(6):27-38.
ZHANG Ting,WANG Qiang,LIU Bin.Sedimentary facies and its lateral distribution of the middle-lower Jurassic in Amu Darya right bank area[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2014,36(6):27-38.
[17] ZHANG Ting,WU Jiajie,FEI Huaiyi.Characteristics and controlling factors of the Lower-Middle Jurassic sandstone reservoirs in Amu Darya right bank area,Turkmenistan[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2019,12(9):293.
[18] LI Fengjie,JING Xigui,ZOU Chuyue,et al.Facies analysis of the Callovian-Oxfordian carbonates in the northeastern Amu Darya Basin,southeastern Turkmenistan[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,88:359-380.
[19] WEBSTER J M,BRAGA J C,HUMBLET M,et al.Response of the Great Barrier Reef to sea-level and environmental changes over the past 30,000 years[J].Nature Geoscience,2018,11(6):426-432.
[20] WYGRALA B P.Integrated computer-aided basin modeling applied to analysis of hydrocarbon generation history in a northern Italian oil field[M]//MATTAVELLI L,NOVELLI L.Organic geochemistry in petroleum exploration.Amsterdam:Elsevier,1988.
[21] 王良书,李成,刘绍文,等.库车前陆盆地大地热流分布特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):79-83.
WANG Liangshu,LI Cheng,LIU Shaowen,et al.Terrestrial heat flow distribution in Kuqa foreland basin,Tarim,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(4):79-83.

阿姆河右岸区块油气资源评价与勘探潜力区优选

Evaluation of hydrocarbon resources and optimization of exploration potential areas in the Amu Darya right bank block

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何文渊, 陈鑫, 夏亚良, 王波, 肖灯意, 唐资昌. 一种多源数据融合的碳酸盐岩高渗带预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(9): 1738-1750,1791.
[2]	胡宗全, 林会喜, 邓尚, 张继标, 李映涛, 王千军, 王石, 贾会冲, 潘磊, 刘大卫. 断裂及裂缝对不同岩性储层的改造作用[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(8): 1489-1501.
[3]	朱海燕, 王智辉, 范宇, 郭建华, 雷明, 高佳佳, 曹文科. 碳酸盐岩地层孔隙压力预测方法研究进展及展望[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(8): 1628-1646.
[4]	杜浩, 刘一锋, 范立勇, 马占荣, 罗晓容, 沈安江, 曾帅. 鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界碳酸盐岩超压成因及演化过程[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(5): 891-908.
[5]	朱光有, 姜华, 黄士鹏, 马德波, 张明, 陈玮岩, 管树巍, 范俊佳, 曾富英. 中国海相油气成藏理论新进展与万米深层超大型油气区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 816-842.
[6]	李潮流, 徐红军, 李霞, 冯周, 王磊, 王嵩然. 超深层碳酸盐岩储层油基钻井液阵列感应测井弱信号校正[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2106-2114.
[7]	熊亮, 董晓霞, 熊鹰, 王同, 罗思聪, 王保保, 石开波, 姚盈江, 王恩泽, 刘波. 川南地区二叠系茅口组一段致密碳酸盐岩储层类型及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1875-1891.
[8]	文龙, 罗冰, 周刚, 张本健, 葛冰飞, 杨岱林, 陶佳丽, 田兴旺, 马华灵, 严威, 史甲航, 刘常祺, 聂美怡, 李淑琦, 杨振中, 孙奕婷, 蒋航, 宋泽章. 四川盆地威寒1井奥陶系宝塔组天然气勘探发现及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1324-1335.
[9]	窦立荣, 温志新, 王兆明, 贺正军, 陈瑞银, 宋成鹏, 刘小兵. 全球古老油气成藏组合资源潜力、重大发现及启示[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1163-1173.
[10]	江同文, 田威振, 唐青松, 徐伟, 邬光辉. 四川盆地川中地区深层碳酸盐岩走滑断层控藏作用[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1174-1186.
[11]	黄亚浩, 汪如军, 文志刚, 张银涛, 崔仕提, 李梦勤, 王彭, 何涛华. 塔里木盆地富满油田深层—超深层油气成藏过程[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 947-960.
[12]	何文渊, 黄先雄, 王红平, 汪望泉, 范国章, 丁梁波, 赵俊峰, 朱晓辉, 张勇刚, 庞旭, 李伟强, 左国平, 杨柳, 王朝锋. 南美桑托斯盆地深水区古拉绍-1井油气勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 339-347.
[13]	贾承造, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 陈掌星, 王飞宇, 刘国勇, 高永进, 施砍园, 姜福杰, 姜林. 基于成因法评价油气资源:全油气系统理论和新一代盆地模拟技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1399-1416.
[14]	庞雄奇, 贾承造, 郭秋麟, 陈掌星, 王飞宇, 刘国勇, 高永进, 施砍园, 姜福杰, 姜林. 全油气系统理论用于常规和非常规油气资源评价的盆地模拟技术原理及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1417-1433.
[15]	王飞宇, 冯伟平, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 贾承造. 全油气系统生、排烃和运聚定量分析中的关键问题与解决途径[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1434-1444.