顺北地区主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区油气成藏特征与富集主控因素定量评价

doi:10.7623/syxb202605006

石油学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1024-1044.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202605006

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

顺北地区主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区油气成藏特征与富集主控因素定量评价

廖文毫^1,2, 曾溅辉^1,2, 韩俊³, 王鑫⁴, 黄诚³, 刘亚洲^1,2, 朱莲花³

1. 油气资源与工程全国重点实验室, 中国石油大学(北京) 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院北京 102249;
3. 中国石油化工股份有限公司西北油田分公司勘探开发研究院新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院北京 102206

收稿日期:2025-09-10 修回日期:2025-12-15 发布日期:2026-06-09
通讯作者: 曾溅辉,男,1962年10月生,1994年获中国地质科学院博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事油气成藏机理研究与教学工作。Email:zengjh@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:廖文毫,男,1994年4月生,2020年获中国石油大学(北京)地质工程专业硕士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事油气成藏机理研究。Email:18302824749@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金项目“克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂体系成因及控藏机制研究——以塔里木盆地为例”(No.U21B2063)资助。

Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and quantitative evaluation of main controlling factors for hydrocarbon enrichment in secondary fault zone between major strike-slip faults in Shunbei area

Liao Wenhao^1,2, Zeng Jianhui^1,2, Han Jun³, Wang Xin⁴, Huang Cheng³, Liu Yazhou^1,2, Zhu Lianhua³

1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Urumqi 830011, China;
4. Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2025-09-10 Revised:2025-12-15 Published:2026-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 顺北地区超深层碳酸盐岩油气勘探已进入主干走滑断裂之间的次级断裂发育区,其油气富集程度差异大,成藏特征、成藏条件和富集主控因素与主干走滑断裂带的油气藏具有明显的区别,因此亟需开展主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区的油气成藏和富集主控因素研究。基于地球化学测试、三维地震和钻井资料,运用灰色关联法和熵权法,结合典型油气藏剖析,明确了主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区的成藏特征与油气运聚类型,定量评价了主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区的油气成藏条件,揭示了其油气富集规律与差异性。研究结果表明:①主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区油气藏的油气成因和演化特征与相邻主干走滑断裂带的油气藏相似,但油气藏的地层压力系数较高,为异常高压凝析油气藏。烃源岩的类型、热演化程度与厚度分布控制了研究区凝析气藏的形成过程、类型及物性。②主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区的油气藏存在3类4种油气运聚类型,即A型(直接通源+垂向输导型)、B₁型(错位贯通式间接通源+垂向-侧向复合输导型)、B₂型(分段阶梯式间接通源+垂向-侧向复合输导型)和C型(相邻主干走滑断裂通源+ 侧向输导型),不同运聚类型的油气富集能力存在显著差异,油气富集能力依次表现为A型＞B₁型＞B₂型＞C型。③通源性、输导性和储集性基础评价参数的差异配置决定了油气富集程度,且与油气富集系数呈正相关,相关性判定系数可达0.85,油气成藏与富集主控因素的贡献度从大到小依次为膏盐岩层变形强度、通源性、储集性和膏盐岩层厚度,其中,膏盐岩层变形强度是制约主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区油气富集程度的重要因素。

关键词: 次级断裂, 成藏特征, 富集主控因素, 定量评价, 超深层碳酸盐岩, 顺北地区, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: Hydrocarbon exploration in ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs within Shunbei area has progressed into secondary fault zones situated between major strike-slip faults. These zones exhibit significant heterogeneity in hydrocarbon enrichment, as their accumulation characteristics, reservoir-forming conditions, and primary controlling factors differ markedly from those of major strike-slip fault zones. Consequently, it is imperative to investigate the hydrocarbon accumulation and dominant enrichment factors within these secondary fault zones. Integrating geochemical testing, three-dimensional seismic data, and drilling records, this study employs grey relational analysis coupled with the entropy weight method, complemented by typical reservoir analysis, to delineate the accumulation characteristics and classify migration-accumulation types. Furthermore, the accumulation conditions in these secondary fault zones are quantitatively evaluated, unveiling the underlying patterns and variations of hydrocarbon enrichment. The research results show as follows. (1) The hydrocarbon genesis and evolution characteristics of reservoirs in secondary fault zones between major strike-slip faults are similar to those in adjacent major strike-slip faults zones. However, these reservoirs exhibit higher formation pressure coefficients and are classified as abnormally high-pressure condensate gas reservoirs. The type, thermal maturity, and thickness distribution of source rocks govern the formation processes, types, and physical properties of the condensate gas reservoirs in the study area. (2) Three categories encompassing four distinct migration-accumulation types are identified within the secondary fault zones between major strike-slip faults, i.e., Type A (direct source supply and vertical migration), Type B₁ (displaced penetrating indirect source supply and composite vertical-lateral migration), Type B₂ (segmented-stepwise indirect source supply and composite vertical-lateral migration), and Type C (adjacent major strike-slip fault source supply and lateral migration). Significant disparities exist in the hydrocarbon enrichment capacity among these different types, following the hierarchy of Type A>Type B₁>Type B₂>Type C. (3) The differential configuration of fundamental evaluation parameters such as source connectivity, transport capacity, and reservoir quality determines the degree of hydrocarbon enrichment, which exhibits a positive correlation with the enrichment coefficient (the coefficient of determination is 0.85). The contribution of main controlling factors to hydrocarbon accumulation and enrichment follows a descending order from deformation intensity of the gypsum-salt layer, source connectivity, reservoir quality, to thickness of the gypsum-salt layer. Notably, the deformation intensity of the gypsum-salt layer is a crucial factor constraining the degree of hydrocarbon enrichment within secondary fault zones between major strike-slip faults.

Key words: secondary fault, accumulation characteristics, main controlling factors for enrichment, quantitative evaluation, ultra-deep carbonate rocks, Shunbei area, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.3

廖文毫, 曾溅辉, 韩俊, 王鑫, 黄诚, 刘亚洲, 朱莲花. 顺北地区主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区油气成藏特征与富集主控因素定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(5): 1024-1044.

Liao Wenhao, Zeng Jianhui, Han Jun, Wang Xin, Huang Cheng, Liu Yazhou, Zhu Lianhua. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and quantitative evaluation of main controlling factors for hydrocarbon enrichment in secondary fault zone between major strike-slip faults in Shunbei area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2026, 47(5): 1024-1044.

参考文献

[1] 朱光有,姜华,黄士鹏,等.中国海相油气成藏理论新进展与万米深层超大型油气区预测[J].石油学报,2025,46(4):816-842.
ZHU Guangyou,JIANG Hua,HUANG Shipeng,et al.New progress of marine hydrocarbon accumulation theory and prediction of super large oil and gas areas in deep strata buried at a depth of about 10000 meters in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2025,46(4):816-842.
[2] 李海英,韩俊,陈平,等.塔里木盆地顺北4号走滑断裂带变形特征及有利区评价[J].新疆石油地质,2023,44(2):127-135.
LI Haiying,HAN Jun,CHEN Ping,et al.Deformation and favorable area evaluation of Shunbei No.4 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2023,44(2):127-135.
[3] 云露,邓尚.塔里木盆地深层走滑断裂差异变形与控储控藏特征——以顺北油气田为例[J].石油学报,2022,43(6):770-787.
YUN Lu,DENG Shang.Structural styles of deep strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and the characteristics of their control on reservoir formation and hydrocarbon accumulation:a case study of Shunbei oil and gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(6):770-787.
[4] 马永生,蔡勋育,云露,等.塔里木盆地顺北超深层碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发实践与理论技术进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(1):1-17.
MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,YUN Lu,et al.Practice and theoretical and technical progress in exploration and development of Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate oil and gas field,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(1):1-17.
[5] 刘雨晴,邓尚,李海英,等.深层碳酸盐岩低序级断裂体系发育特征及勘探启示:以塔里木盆地顺北油气田为例[J].地球科学,2025,50(6):2239-2254.
LIU Yuqing,DENG Shang,LI Haiying,et al.Development characteristics and exploration implications of low-order fault systems in Tarim Basin:an example from Shunbei oil and gas field[J].Earth Science,2025,50(6):2239-2254.
[6] 韩剑发,苏洲,陈利新,等.塔里木盆地台盆区走滑断裂控储控藏作用及勘探潜力[J].石油学报,2019,40(11):1296-1310.
HAN Jianfa,SU Zhou,CHEN Lixin,et al.Reservoir-controlling and accumulation-controlling of strike-slip faults and exploration potential in the platform of Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(11):1296-1310.
[7] 邓尚,刘雨晴,刘军,等.克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂发育、演化特征及其石油地质意义:以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例[J].大地构造与成矿学,2021,45(6):1111-1126.
DENG Shang,LIU Yuqing,LIU Jun,et al.Structural styles and evolution models of intracratonic strike-slip faults and the implications for reservoir exploration and appraisal:a case study of the Shunbei area,Tarim Basin[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2021,45(6):1111-1126.
[8] 马庆佑,曹自成,蒋华山,等.塔河—顺北地区走滑断裂带的通源性及其与油气富集的关系[J].海相油气地质,2020,25(4):327-334.
MA Qingyou,CAO Zicheng,JIANG Huashan,et al.Source-connectivity of strike slip fault zone and its relationship with oil and gas accumulation in Tahe-Shunbei area,Tarim Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2020,25(4):327-334.
[9] 张雨涵.塔北哈拉哈塘地区走滑断裂精细表征及其对油气的控制作用[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2023.
ZHANG Yuhan.Fine characterization of strike-slip fault and its controlling on reservoir in Halahatang area,northern Tarim Basin[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum,2023.
[10] 张艳秋,陈红汉,王燮培,等.塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂带通源性评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2024,45(3):787-800.
ZHANG Yangqiu,CHEN Honghan,WANG Xiepei,et al.Assessment of connectivity between source rocks and strike-slip fault zone in the Fuman oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2024,45(3):787-800.
[11] 刘宝增.塔里木盆地顺北地区油气差异聚集主控因素分析——以顺北1号、顺北5号走滑断裂带为例[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(3):83-95.
LIU Baozeng.Analysis of main controlling factors of oil and gas differential accumulation in Shunbei area,Tarim Basin-taking Shunbei No.1 and No.5 strike slip fault zones as examples[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(3):83-95.
[12] 王清华,杨海军,李勇,等.塔里木盆地富满大型碳酸盐岩油气聚集区走滑断裂控储模式[J].地学前缘,2022,29(6):239-251.
WANG Qinghua,YANG Haijun,LI Yong,et al.Control of strike-slip fault on the large carbonate reservoir in Fuman,Tarim Basin—a reservoir model[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2022,29(6):239-251.
[13] 汪如军,王轩,邓兴梁,等.走滑断裂对碳酸盐岩储层和油气藏的控制作用——以塔里木盆地北部坳陷为例[J].天然气工业,2021,41(3):10-20.
WANG Rujun,WANG Xuan,DENG Xingliang,et al.Control effect of strike-slip faults on carbonate reservoirs and hydrocarbon accumulation:a case study of the northern depression in the Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(3):10-20.
[14] 李凤磊,林承焰,张国印,等.塔北地区多期走滑断裂地球物理响应特征及精细识别[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,48(3):1-14.
LI Fenglei,LIN Chengyan,ZHANG Guoyin,et al.Characteristics of geophysical response and fine identification of multi-stage strike-slip fault in Tabei area[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),2024,48(3):1-14.
[15] 郑和荣,胡宗全,云露,等.中国海相克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂发育特征及控藏作用[J].地学前缘,2022,29(6):224-238.
ZHENG Herong,HU Zongquan,YUN Lu,et al.Strike-slip faults in marine cratonic basins in China:development characteristics and controls on hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2022,29(6):224-238.
[16] RAMSAY J G.Shear zone geometry:a review[J].Journal of Structural Geology,1980,2(1/2):83-99.
[17] 杜仲元,李相文,李青霖,等.不同序级走滑断裂对碳酸盐岩储集层发育的控制差异[J].新疆石油地质,2024,45(4):425-431.
DU Zhongyuan,LI Xiangwen,LI Qinglin,et al.Differential controls of strike-slip faults of different orders on carbonate reservoirs[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2024,45(4):425-431.
[18] 韩强,云露,蒋华山,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系油气充注过程分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2021,51(3):645-658.
HAN Qiang,YUN Lu,JIANG Huashan,et al.Marine oil and gas filling and accumulation process in the north of Shuntuoguole area in northern Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2021,51(3):645-658.
[19] 曹自成,云露,漆立新,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北84X井超千米含油气重大发现及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2024,45(2): 341-356.
CAO Zicheng,YUN Lu,QI Lixin,et al.A major discovery of hydrocarbon-bearing layers over 1,000-meter thick in well Shunbei 84X,Shunbei area,Tarim Basin and its implications[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2024,45(2):341-356.
[20] 何登发,周新源,杨海军,等.塔里木盆地克拉通内古隆起的成因机制与构造类型[J].地学前缘,2008,15(2):207-221.
HE Dengfa,ZHOU Xinyuan,YANG Haijun,et al.Formation mechanism and tectonic types of intracratonic paleo-uplifts in the Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15(2):207-221.
[21] 李凤磊,林承焰,任丽华,等.塔里木盆地塔北地区多期断裂差异匹配控制下超深岩溶缝洞储层成藏特征[J].地学前缘,2024,31(4): 219-236.
LI Fenglei,LIN Chengyan,REN Lihua,et al.Characteristics of deep karst fracture-cavity reservoir formation controlled by multi-phase faults matching in the northern Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2024,31(4):219-236.
[22] 翟晓先,云露.塔里木盆地塔河大型油田地质特征及勘探思路回顾[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(5):565-573.
ZHAI Xiaoxian,YUN Lu.Geology of giant Tahe oilfield and a review of exploration thinking in the Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2008,29(5):565-573.
[23] 孟祥霞,王宏斌,姚清洲,等.塔北隆起构造演化特征及对奥陶系碳酸盐岩的控储控藏作用[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(增刊1):109-120.
MENG Xiangxia,WANG Hongbin,YAO Qingzhou,et al.Tectonic evolution characteristics of Tabei Uplift and its controlling effect on the reserv oir and hydrocarbon accumulation of Ordovician carbonate[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(S1):109-120.
[24] 马永生,蔡勋育,李慧莉,等.深层-超深层碳酸盐岩储层发育机理新认识与特深层油气勘探方向[J].地学前缘,2023,30(6):1-13.
MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,LI Huili,et al.New insights into the formation mechanism of deep-ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs and the direction of oil and gas exploration in extra-deep strata[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(6):1-13.
[25] 云露,曹自成,耿锋,等.塔里木盆地塔北台盆区奥陶系油气分布有序性[J].石油与天然气地质,2025,46(1):15-30.
YUN Lu,CAO Zicheng,GENG Feng,et al.Regularity of the Ordovician hydrocarbon system distribution in the Tabei nonforeland area of the Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2025,46(1):15-30.
[26] 崔福田,马安来,云露,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系凝析气地球化学特征及成因[J].石油实验地质,2025,47(5):1118-1133.
C UI Futian,MA Anlai,YUN Lu,et al.Geochemical characteristics and genesis of Ordovician condensate gas in Shunbei area,Tarim Basin[J].Pe troleum Geology & Experiment,2025,47(5):1118-1133.
[27] 曹自成,云露,平宏伟,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系天然气地球化学与成因[J].地质科技通报,2025,44(5):40-52.
CAO Zicheng,YUN Lu,PING Hongwei,et al.Geochemistry and origin of Ordovician natural gas in Shunbei area of Tarim Basin[J].Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2025,44(5):40-52.
[28] 陈红汉,吴悠,丰勇,等.塔河油田奥陶系油气成藏期次及年代学[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(6):806-819.
C HEN Honghan,WU You,FENG Yong,et al.Timing and chronology of hydrocarbon charging in the Ordovician of Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin ,NW China[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(6):806-819.
[29] 张煜,毛庆言,李海英,等.顺北中部超深层断控缝洞型油气藏储集体特征与实践应用[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(1):1-13.
ZHANG Yu,MAO Qingyan,LI Haiying,et al.Characteristics and practical application of ultra-deep fault-controlled fractured cavity type reservoir in central Shunbei area[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(1):1-13.
[30] 曹自成,耿锋,任丽丹,等.塔里木盆地深层-超深层碳酸盐岩油气勘探历程及新领域[J].新疆石油地质,2025,46(4):395-402.
CAO Zicheng,GENG Feng,REN Lidan,et al.Exploration history and new frontiers of oil and gas in deep to ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2025,46(4):395-402.
[31] DAHLSTROM C D A.Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,1970,18(3):332-406.
[32] 张继标,邓尚,韩俊,等.多期构造应力控制走滑断控储层发育机理与差异性研究——以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例[J].石油实验地质,2024,46(4):775-785.
ZHANG Jibiao,DENG Shang,HAN Jun,et al.Study on development mechanism and variability of strike-slip fault-controlled reservoirs regulated by multi-stage structural stress:a case study of the Shunbei area,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2024,46(4):775-785.
[33] 徐振平,陈书平,罗彩明,等.塔里木盆地中寒武统膏盐岩分布及封闭性评价[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(5):54-67.
XU Zhenping,CHEN Shuping,LUO Caiming,et al.Distribution and sealing capacity evaluation of gypsum-salt rocks in the Middle Cambrian in Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(5):54-67.
[34] 田鹏,马庆佑,吕海涛.塔里木盆地北部跃参区块走滑断裂对油气成藏的控制[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(2):156-161.
TIAN Peng,MA Qingyou,Lü Haitao.Strike-slip faults and their controls on hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Yuecan block of the northern Tarim uplift,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(2):156-161.
[35] WIBBERLEY C A J,YIELDING G,DI TORO G.Recent advances in the understanding of fault zone internal structure:a review[M]//WIBBERLEY C A J,KURZ W,IMBER J,et al.The internal structure of fault zones:implications for mechanical and fluid-flow properties.London:The Geological Society of London,2008:5-33.
[36] BEACH A,WELBON A I,BROCKBANK P J,et al.Reservoir damage around faults; outcrop examples from the Suez rift[J].Petroleum Geoscience,1999,5(2):109-116.
[37] FOSSEN H,HESTHAMMER J.Possible absence of small faults in the Gullfaks field,northern North Sea:implications for downscaling of faults in some porous sandstones[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2000,22(7):851-863.
[38] SHIPTON Z K,COWIE P A.Damage zone and slip-surface evolution over μm to km scales in high-porosity Navajo sandstone,Utah[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,2001,23(12):1825-1844.
[39] CELLO G,INVERNIZZI C,MAZZOLI S,et al.Fault properties and fluid flow patterns from Quaternary faults in the Apennines,Italy[J].Tectonophysics,2001,336(1/4):63-78.
[40] CAINE J S,EVANS J P,FORSTER C B.Fault zone architecture and permeability structure[J].Geology,1996,24(11):1025-1028.
[41] MITCHELL T M,FAULKNER D R.The nature and origin of off-fault damage surrounding strike-slip fault zones with a wide range of displacements:a field study from the Atacama fault system,northern Chile[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2009,31(8):802-816.
[42] BALSAMO F,CLEMENZI L,STORTI F,et al.Anatomy and paleofluid evolution of laterally restricted extensional fault zones in the Jabal Qusaybah anticline,Salakh arch,Oman[J].GSA Bulletin,2016,128(5/6):957-972.
[43] FAULKNER D R,JACKSON C A L,LUNN R J,et al.A review of recent developments concerning the structure,mechanics and fluid flow properties of fault zones[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2010,32(11):1557-1575.
[44] MAYOLLE S,SOLIVA R,CANIVEN Y,et al.Scaling of fault damage zones in carbonate rocks[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2019,124:35-50.
[45] 吴桐,付晓飞,王海学,等.膏盐岩脆塑性变形特征及封闭能力定量评价[J].地质论评,2016,62(1):127-137.
WU Tong,FU Xiaofei,WANG Haixue,et al.Brittle ductile deformation characteristics of anhydrite—salt rock and quantitative evaluation of its sealing ability[J].Geological Review,2016,62(1):127-137.
[46] 卓勤功,赵孟军,李勇,等.膏盐岩盖层封闭性动态演化特征与油气成藏——以库车前陆盆地冲断带为例[J].石油学报,2014,35(5): 847-856.
ZHUO Qingong,ZHAO Mengjun,LI Yong,et al.Dynamic sealing evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation of evaporite cap rocks:an example from Kuqa foreland basin thrust belt[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(5):847-856.
[47] 吴桐.泥岩和膏岩盖层封闭能力动态演化研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2020.
WU Tong.Study on the dynamic evolution of sealing capacity of mudstone and gypsum caprocks[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2020.
[48] 梁鑫鑫,张银涛,陈石,等.塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂多核破碎带地震响应特征[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):127-138.
LIANG Xinxin,ZHANG Yintao,CHEN Shi,et al.Seismic response characteristics of strike-slip fault multi-core damage zones in Fuman oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(2):127-138.
[49] 屈凯旋,于春勇,彭力,等.基于灰色关联法和主成分分析法的致密砂岩储层流体性质测井解释评价方法[J].录井工程, 2024,35(3):89-97.
QU Kaixuan,YU Chunyong,PENG Li,et al.Logging interpretation and evaluation method for fluid properties of tight sandstone reservoirs based on grey relational and principal component analysis[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2024,35(3):89-97.
[50] 曹梦晴,李业,夏志村,等.基于优化灰色关联法的矿井涌水量预测[J].矿产与地质,2024,38(6):1120-1127.
CAO Mengqing,LI Ye,XIA Zhicun,et al.Prediction of mine water inflow based on optimized grey correlation method[J].Mineral Resources and Geology,2024,38(6):1120-1127.
[51] 梁玉凯,宋荣彩,郑华安,等.基于熵权法-TOPSIS-灰色关联法的储层综合评价:以莺歌海盆地黄流组为例[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2024,51(1):91-101.
LIANG Yukai,SONG Rongcai,ZHENG Huaan,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of reservoirs based on the entropy weight method,TOPSIS,and the gray correlation method:taking the Huangliu Formation in Yinggehai Basin as an example[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2024,51(1):91-101.
[52] 韩民赛,杜江岩,付建波,等.基于层次分析-熵值定权法的莎车县崩塌灾害易发性评价[J].新疆地质,2023,41(4):586-590.
HAN Minsai,DU Jiangyan,FU Jianbo,et al.Evaluation of the susceptibility of collapse disasters in Shache county based on analytic hierarchy process entropy weighting method[J].Xinjiang Geology,2023,41(4):586-590.
[53] 周志杰,张小莉,杨振,等.基于优化熵权的储层非均质性定量表征新方法研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地志丹油区F井区长611储层为例[J].地球物理学进展,2023,38(4):1713-1721.
ZHOU Zhijie,ZHANG Xiaoli,YANG Zhen,et al.Study on a new method for quantitative characterization of reservoir heterogeneity based on optimized entropy weight:an example of the Chang 611 reservoir in the F well area of Zhidan oilfield in Ordos Basin[J].Progress in Geophysics,2023,38(4):1713-1721.

顺北地区主干走滑断裂之间次级断裂区油气成藏特征与富集主控因素定量评价

Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and quantitative evaluation of main controlling factors for hydrocarbon enrichment in secondary fault zone between major strike-slip faults in Shunbei area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王新新, 夏伟杰, 康婷婷, 王斌, 王平, 杨连刚, 石明辉, 陈新哲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地轮南—富满台缘带寒武系—奥陶系地震层序结构及演化特征[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(4): 814-830.
[2]	雷明珠, 金秋月, 唐圣明, 汪紫菱, 王碧维, 吴斌. 珠江口盆地珠三坳陷文昌10洼南断裂带和神狐隆起的油气来源及成藏特征[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(2): 422-436.
[3]	单长安, 梁兴, 张卓, 罗瑀峰, 彭丽莎, 袁晓俊, 费越, 范小东, 于宝石, 张永强, 党伟. 川南地区筠连复杂山地浅层改造区薄互煤层气勘探开发关键技术与创新实践[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(6): 1056-1073,1125.
[4]	云露, 曹自成, 刘湘华, 任文博, 王龙, 韩俊, 曹飞, 陈菁萍, 陈修平. 塔里木盆地“深地一号”超深层超长位移井地质与工程融合实践[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(3): 609-620.
[5]	王清华, 金武弟, 张荣虎, 杨海军, 徐振平, 杨宪彰, 张亮, 余朝丰. 塔里木盆地致密砂岩油气勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1): 89-103.
[6]	李建忠, 陈旋, 龚德瑜, 林霖, 刘俊田, 张华, 林潼, 王波, 王杰. 吐哈盆地致密砂岩气及煤层气勘探新领域与资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1): 104-117,172.
[7]	朱永进, 郑剑锋, 俞广, 陈永权, 康婷婷, 张友, 陈胜, 熊冉, 韩长伟. 塔里木盆地轮南—古城地区寒武系大型台地边缘层序结构、沉积演化及油气勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(7): 1061-1077.
[8]	黄亚浩, 汪如军, 文志刚, 张银涛, 崔仕提, 李梦勤, 王彭, 何涛华. 塔里木盆地富满油田深层—超深层油气成藏过程[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 947-960.
[9]	尚浩杰, 陈叔阳, 何云峰, 王立鑫, 尹艳树, 谢鹏飞. 断控缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层结构表征与三维地质建模——以顺北4号断裂带为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(11): 1662-1679.
[10]	王清华, 徐振平, 张荣虎, 杨海军, 杨宪彰. 塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 15-32.
[11]	郭秋麟, 黄少英, 卢玉红, 王建, 吴晓智, 陈宁生. 塔里木盆地台盆区下古生界油气系统模拟及资源分布预测[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1459-1471.
[12]	陈利新, 贾承造, 姜振学, 苏洲, 杨美纯, 杨博, 邱晨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩富油模式与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 948-961.
[13]	孔悦, 高晓鹏, 石开波, 刘波, 姜伟民, 于进鑫, 何卿, 吴淳. 塔北地区奥陶系鹰山组斑状白云岩成因及储层意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 598-611.
[14]	申威, 唐军, 信毅, 曹磊, 陈文迪, 唐保勇, 何泽, 齐戈为. 塔里木盆地北部潜山岩溶相带定量表征与储层评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 471-484.
[15]	梁兴, 单长安, 张磊, 罗瑀峰, 蒋立伟, 王高成, 李博硕, 张睿娇, 李林洁, 王旭. 中国南方复杂构造区多类型源内成储成藏非常规气勘探开发进展及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2179-2199.