高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义

doi:10.7623/syxb202006002

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 658-670,752.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202006002

高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义

闫海军¹, 彭先², 夏钦禹¹, 徐伟², 罗文军², 李新豫¹, 张林¹, 朱秋影¹, 朱迅², 刘曦翔²

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院四川成都 610051

收稿日期:2019-07-07 修回日期:2020-02-18 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-07-11
通讯作者: 闫海军,男,1983年3月生,2006年获大庆石油学院学士学位,2009年获中国石油勘探开发研究院硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发地质及开发方案编制研究工作。
作者简介:闫海军,男,1983年3月生,2006年获大庆石油学院学士学位,2009年获中国石油勘探开发研究院硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发地质及开发方案编制研究工作。Email:yhj010@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项"复杂天然气藏开发关键技术"（2016ZX05015）和中国石油天然气集团公司科技重大专项"川中地区灯四气藏规模有效开发关键技术研究与应用"（2016E-06）资助。

Distribution features of ancient karst landform in the fourth Member of the Dengying Formation in the Gaoshiti-Moxi region and its guiding significance for gas reservoir development

Yan Haijun¹, Peng Xian², Xia Qinyu¹, Xu Wei², Luo Wenjun², Li Xinyu¹, Zhang Lin¹, Zhu Qiuying¹, Zhu Xun², Liu Xixiang²

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Sichuan Chengdu 610051, Chnia

Received:2019-07-07 Revised:2020-02-18 Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-07-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区三维地震和完钻井资料，结合高分辨率法、层拉平法、残厚法和印模法的优点，采用双界面法对高石梯—磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段（灯四段）岩溶古地貌进行恢复。灯四段岩溶古地貌包括岩溶低地、岩溶斜坡和岩溶台地3种一级古地貌单元以及陡坡、缓坡、台坡、台面、洼地、沟谷和残丘7种二级古地貌单元。灯四段岩溶古地貌表现为"两沟三区、北缓南陡"的特征，同时高石梯地区发育台坡、台面和残丘3种古地貌单元，磨溪地区主体发育缓坡和台面，台地内部发育台面、洼地和残丘。台坡、台面和斜坡微地貌单元岩溶发育程度好，优质储层发育，完钻井效果较好，高石梯和磨溪地区差异性明显。研究结果表明，岩溶古地貌对高产井控制作用明显，下一步需要精细刻画沟谷分布，论证断层及古沟槽对古地貌分布的控制作用、分区建立古地貌划分标准，评价台地内部优势微地貌单元分布，支撑建产有利区筛选和目标开发井位优化，从而为高石梯—磨溪地区震旦系气藏快速建产和长期稳产提供保障。

关键词: 古地貌, 双界面, 岩溶, 灯影组四段, 高石梯&mdash, 磨溪, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Based on the 3D seismic and well completion data in the Gaoshiti-Moxi region of Sichuan Basin, this study restores the ancient karst landform of the fourth member of the Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi region using the dual interface method in combination with advantages of the high-resolution method, bedding flattening method, residual thickness method, and impression method. The ancient karst landform of the fourth Member of Dengying Formation is composed of three first-order ancient landform units of karst lowland, karst slope, and karst platform and seven second-order ancient landform units of steep slope, gentle slope, platform slope, platform surface, depression, gully, and monadnock. The ancient karst landform in the fourth member of Dengying Formation has the characteristics of "two ditches and three regions, gentle in the north and steep in the south". Three ancient landform units of platform slope, platform surface and monadnock are developed in Gaoshiti. Gentle slope and platform surface are developed in the main body of Moxi region butplatform surface, depression and monadnock are developed inside the platform. In the micro-geomorphic units of platform slope, platform surface and slope, high-quality reservoirs are well developed, andit has achieved good effect of drilled wells. There are obvious differences between Gaoshiti and Moxi areas. The results show that the ancient karst landform has obvious control effect onhigh-yield well. The next step is to finely characterize the distribution of gullies, argue the control of faults and paleo-grooves on the distribution of ancient landform, establish theclassification standard of ancient landforms in different regions, and evaluate the distribution of dominant micro-topographic units in the study area to support the selection of favorable production regions and optimization of the target development well locations, so as to ensure the rapid production and long-term stable production of Sinian gas reservoirs in the Gaoshiti-Moxi region.

Key words: ancient landform, dual interface, karst, fourth Member of Dengying Formation, Gaoshiti-Moxi, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.3

闫海军, 彭先, 夏钦禹, 徐伟, 罗文军, 李新豫, 张林, 朱秋影, 朱迅, 刘曦翔. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 658-670,752.

Yan Haijun, Peng Xian, Xia Qinyu, Xu Wei, Luo Wenjun, Li Xinyu, Zhang Lin, Zhu Qiuying, Zhu Xun, Liu Xixiang. Distribution features of ancient karst landform in the fourth Member of the Dengying Formation in the Gaoshiti-Moxi region and its guiding significance for gas reservoir development[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 658-670,752.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,杜金虎,徐春春,等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):278-293.
ZOU Caineng,DU Jinhu,XU Chunchun,et al.Formation,distribution,resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):278-293.
[2] 魏国齐,王志宏,李剑,等.四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(1):1-13.
WEI Guoqi,WANG Zhihong,LI Jian,et al.Characteristics of source rocks,resource potential and exploration direction of Sinian and Cambrian in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(1):1-13.
[3] 魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪古隆起构造特征及对特大型气田形成的控制作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):257-265.
WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,DU Jinhu,et al.Tectonic features of Gaoshiti-Moxi paleo-uplift and its controls on the formation of a giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):257-265.
[4] 李启桂,李克胜,周卓铸,等.四川盆地桐湾不整合面古地貌特征与岩溶分布预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):516-521.
LI Qigui,LI Kesheng,ZHOU Zhuozhu,et al.Palaeogeomorphology and karst distribution of Tongwan unconformity in Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(4):516-521.
[5] 汤济广,胡望水,李伟,等.古地貌与不整合动态结合预测风化壳岩溶储集层分布——以四川盆地乐山-龙女寺古隆起灯影组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):674-681.
TANG Jiguang,HU Wangshui,LI Wei,et al.Prediction of weathering paleokarst reservoirs by combining paleokarst landform with unconformity:a case study of Sinian Dengying Formation in Leshan-Longnüsi paleo-uplift,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):674-681.
[6] 汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312.
WANG Zecheng,JIANG Hua,WANG Tongshan,et al.Paleo-geomorphology formed during Tongwan tectonization in Sichuan Basin and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):305-312.
[7] 罗思聪.四川盆地灯影组岩溶古地貌恢复及意义[D].成都:西南石油大学,2015.
LUO Sicong.Karst paleogeomorphology of the forth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin and its significance[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2015.
[8] 金民东,谭秀成,童明胜,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区灯四段岩溶古地貌恢复及地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):58-68.
JIN Mindong,TAN Xiucheng,TONG Mingsheng,et al.Karst paleogeomorphology of the fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area,Sichuan Basin,SW China:restoration and geological significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):58-68.
[9] 闫海军,何东博,许文壮,等.古地貌恢复及对流体分布的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥区气藏评价阶段为例[J].石油学报,2016,37(12):1483-1494.
YAN Haijun,HE Dongbo,XU Wenzhuang,et al.Paleotopography restoration method and its controlling effect on fluid distribution:a case study of the gas reservoir evaluation stage in Gaoqiao,Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(12):1483-1494.
[10] 杨跃明,文龙,罗冰,等.四川盆地乐山-龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):179-188.
YANG Yueming,WEN Long,LUO Bing,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation of sinian natural gas reservoirs,Leshan-Longnüsi paleohigh,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):179-188.
[11] 杜金虎,邹才能,徐春春,等.川中古隆起龙王庙组特大型气田战略发现与理论技术创新[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):268-277.
DU Jinhu,ZOU Caineng,XU Chunchun,et al.Theoretical and technical innovations in strategic discovery of a giant gas field in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of central Sichuan paleo-uplift,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):268-277.
[12] 金民东.高磨地区震旦系灯四段岩溶型储层发育规律及预测[D].成都:西南石油大学,2017:10-11.
JIN Mindong.Karst reservoir of the fourth Member of Dengying Formation in Moxi-gaoshiti area:development regularity and forecasting[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2017:10-11.
[13] 许海龙,魏国齐,贾承造,等.乐山-龙女寺古隆起构造演化及对震旦系成藏的控制[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(4):406-416.
XU Hailong,WEI Guoqi,JIA Chengzao,et al.Tectonic evolution of the Leshan-Longnüsi paleo-uplift and its control on gas accumulation in the Sinian strata,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(4):406-416.
[14] 黄捍东,罗群,王春英,等.柴北缘西部中生界剥蚀厚度恢复及其地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(1):44-48.
HUANG Handong,LUO Qun,WANG Chunying,et al.Mesozoic group denudation recover and its petroleum geologic significations in the west Qaidam Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(1):44-48.
[15] 加东辉,徐长贵,杨波,等.辽东湾辽东带中南部古近纪古地貌恢复和演化及其对沉积体系的控制[J].古地理学报,2007,9(2):155-166.
JIA Donghui,XU Changgui,YANG Bo,et al.Paleogene palaeogeomorphology reconstruction and evolution and its control on sedimentary systems in central-southern Liaodong zone,Liaodongwan Bay[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2007,9(2):155-166.
[16] 赵俊兴,陈洪德,向芳.高分辨率层序地层学方法在沉积前古地貌恢复中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2003,30(1):76-81.
ZHAO Junxing,CHEN Hongde,XIANG Fang.The possibility of rebuilding paleogeomorphology before basin deposition by high-resolution sequence stratigraphy[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,2003,30(1):76-81.
[17] 赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(3):260-266.
ZHAO Junxing,CHEN Hongde,SHI Zhiqiang.The way and implications of rebuilding palaeogeomorphology:taking the research of palaeogeomorphology of the Ordos Basin before Jurassic deposition as example[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,2001,28(3):260-266.
[18] 王敏芳,焦养泉,任建业,等.沉积盆地中古地貌恢复的方法与思路——以准噶尔盆地西山窑组沉积期为例[J].新疆地质,2006,24(3):326-330.
WANG Minfang,JIAO Yangquan,REN Jianye,et al.Method and thinking of palaeogeomorphologic reconstruction in sedimentary basin-example from depositional stage of Xishanyao Formation in Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Geology,2006,24(3):326-330.
[19] 何自新,郑聪斌,陈安宁,等.长庆气田奥陶系古沟槽展布及其对气藏的控制[J].石油学报,2001,22(4):35-38.
HE Zixin,ZHENG Congbin,CHEN Anning,et al.Distributive configuration of ancient valley-trough on ordovician erosion surface in Changqing gas field and its control over gas accumulations[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,22(4):35-38.
[20] 庞艳君,代宗仰,刘善华,等.川中乐山-龙女寺古隆起奥陶系风化壳古地貌恢复方法及其特征[J].石油地质与工程,2007,21(5):8-10.
PANG Yanjun,DAI Zongyang,LIU Shanhua,et al.Restoration method of Ordovician weathering crust paleo-geomorphology of Leshan-Longnv temple paleohigh and its features in central Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2007,21(5):8-10.
[21] 杜金虎.古老碳酸盐岩大气田地质理论与勘探实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2015:18.
DU Jinhu.Geologic theory and exploration practice of ancient large carbonates gas field[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2015:18.
[22] 刘宏,罗思聪,谭秀成,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组古岩溶地貌恢复及意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):283-293.
LIU Hong,LUO Sicong,TAN Xiucheng,et al.Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin and its significance,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):283-293.
[23] 周成虎.地貌学词典[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006.
ZHOU Chenghu.A dictionary of geomorphology[M].Beijing:China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press,2006.
[24] 马振芳,付锁堂,陈安宁.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系古风化壳气藏分布规律[J].海相油气地质,2000,5(1/2):98-102.
MA Zhenfang,FU Suotang,CHEN Anning.Distribution of Ordovician paleo weathered crust gas reservoir in Ordos Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2000,5(1/2):98-102.
[25] 王雪莲,王长陆,陈振林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系风化壳岩溶储层研究[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(3):32-35.
WANG Xuelian,WANG Changlu,CHEN Zhenlin,et al.Study of Ordovician weathering crust karst reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2005,12(3):32-35.
[26] 兰才俊,徐哲航,马肖琳,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1069-1084.
LAN Caijun,XU Zhehang,MA Xiaolin,et al.Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1069-1084.
[27] 杨跃明,杨雨,杨光,等.安岳气田震旦系、寒武系气藏成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):493-508.
YANG Yueming,YANG Yu,YANG Guang,et al.Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies of Sinian and Cambrian gas reservoirs in Anyue gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):493-508.
[28] 魏国齐,杨威,谢武仁,等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系天然气成藏模式与勘探领域[J].石油学报,2018,39(12):1317-1327.
WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,XIE Wuren,et al.Accumulation modes and exploration domains of Sinian-Cambrian natural gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(12):1317-1327.
[29] 李熙喆,郭振华,胡勇,等.中国超深层大气田高质量开发的挑战、对策与建议[J].天然气工业,2020,40(2):75-82.
LI Xizhe,GUO Zhenhua,HU Yong,et al.High-quality development of ultra-deep large gas fields in China:challenges,strategies and proposals[J].Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(2):75-82.
[30] 李熙喆,郭振华,胡勇,等.中国超深层构造型大气田高效开发策略[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(1):111-118.
LI Xizhe,GUO Zhenhua,HU Yong,et al.Efficient development strategies for large ultra-deep structural gas fields in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(1):111-118.
[31] 李熙喆,郭振华,万玉金,等.安岳气田龙王庙组气藏地质特征与开发技术政策[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(3):398-406.
LI Xizhe,GUO Zhenhua,WAN Yujin,et al.Geological characteristics and development strategies for Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation gas reservoir in Anyue gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(3):398-406.
[32] 闫海军,贾爱林,冀光,等.岩溶风化壳型含水气藏气水分布特征及开发技术对策——以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥区下古气藏为例[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(5):801-811.
YAN Haijun,JIA Ailin,JI Guang,et al.Gas-water distribution characteristic of the karst weathering crust type water-bearing gas reservoirs and its development countermeasures:case study of Lower Paleozoic gas reservoir in Gaoqiao,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(5):801-811.
[33] 贾爱林,闫海军.不同类型典型碳酸盐岩气藏开发面临问题与对策[J].石油学报,2014,35(3):519-527.
JIA Ailin,YAN Haijun.Problems and countermeasures for various types of typical carbonate gas reservoirs development[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(3):519-527.
[34] 贾爱林,闫海军,郭建林,等.不同类型碳酸盐岩气藏开发特征[J].石油学报,2013,34(5):914-923.
JIA Ailin,YAN Haijun,GUO Jianlin,et al.Development characteristics for different types of carbonate gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(5):914-923.
[35] 贾爱林,闫海军,郭建林,等.全球不同类型大型气藏的开发特征及经验[J].天然气工业,2014,34(10):33-46.
JIA AIlin,YAN Haijun,GUO Jianlin,et al.Characteristics and experiences of the development of various giant gas fields all over the world[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(10):33-46.

高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义

Distribution features of ancient karst landform in the fourth Member of the Dengying Formation in the Gaoshiti-Moxi region and its guiding significance for gas reservoir development

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋金民, 江青春, 刘树根, 金鑫, 范建平, 李智武, 黄士鹏, 苏旺, 杨迪, 姜华, 叶玥豪, 王佳蕊, 王俊轲, 任杉. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段含海泡石层系古环境与沉积格局指示意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
[2]	鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 汪泽成, 柳少波, 刘强, 范俊佳, 陈玮岩, 马行陟, 姜华, 付小东, 李文正, 钟源, 李堃宇, 谢武仁. 四川盆地中部走滑断裂活动时间与控藏作用——来自断裂带胶结物U-Pb定年和流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 642-658.
[3]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[4]	杨德彬, 何新明, 张恒, 汪彦, 刘遥, 王明. 塔河油田主体区奥陶系表层岩溶带智能识别及缝洞发育规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 374-389,411.
[5]	刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地沉积充填演化与含油气系统耦合模拟方法在超深层油气成藏模拟中的应用——以四川盆地中部震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
[6]	武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 孙玉平, 刘永, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[7]	夏钦禹, 马新华, 郭振华, 李文, 江林, 张林, 李新豫, 刘曦翔, 罗瑞兰, 闫海军, 刘钰洋, 阳成. 川中高石梯区块灯影组四段古岩溶带及内部储层分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[8]	杨雨, 谢继容, 曹正林, 文龙, 王小娟, 肖尧, 杨建, 唐青松, 唐大海, 李明秋, 关旭, 曾青高, 陈伟华, 陈康, 肖红林. 四川盆地天府气田沙溪庙组大型致密砂岩气藏形成条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 917-932.
[9]	申威, 唐军, 信毅, 曹磊, 陈文迪, 唐保勇, 何泽, 齐戈为. 塔里木盆地北部潜山岩溶相带定量表征与储层评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 471-484.
[10]	蒋华川, 张本健, 刘四兵, 王文之, 周刚, 和源, 李堃宇, 文华国. 四川盆地广安—石柱古隆起的发现及油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 270-284.
[11]	任佳鑫, 宋金民, 刘树根, 赵容容, 罗忠, 李智武, 金鑫, 马行陟, 李柯然, 叶玥豪, 丁一, 李文皓, 赵玲丽, 田立洲. 四川盆地灯影组二段微生物丘滩体结构类型与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 312-328.
[12]	郭旭升, 魏志红, 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 陈超, 王道军. 四川盆地侏罗系陆相页岩油气富集条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 14-27.
[13]	姜鹏飞, 吴建发, 朱逸青, 张德宽, 吴伟, 张芮, 吴喆, 王青, 杨雨然, 杨雪, 伍秋姿, 陈丽清, 何一凡, 张娟. 四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 91-109.
[14]	何文渊, 蒙启安, 白雪峰, 王显东, 王有智, 谭万仓. 川东北地区二叠系—三叠系多期台缘演化规律及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1201-1212,1235.
[15]	赵东方, 谭秀成, 罗文军, 王小芳, 徐伟, 罗思聪, 唐大海, 罗垚, 曾伟. 早成岩期岩溶特征及其对古老深层碳酸盐岩储层的成因启示——以川中地区磨溪8井区灯影组四段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1236-1252.