减氧对空气泡沫驱井下管柱的缓蚀作用及减氧界限

doi:10.7623/syxb201901008

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 99-107.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201901008

减氧对空气泡沫驱井下管柱的缓蚀作用及减氧界限

杨怀军¹, 潘红¹, 章杨¹, 钟显康²

1. 中国石油大港油田公司采油工艺研究院天津 300280;
2. 西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2018-05-21 修回日期:2018-10-29 出版日期:2019-01-25 发布日期:2019-01-29
通讯作者: 章杨,男,1987年12月生,2010年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2016年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司采油工艺研究院工程师,主要从事三次采油方向研究。Email:zhangyang08@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:杨怀军,男,1963年2月生,2000年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2005年获西南石油学院博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司三次采油首席专家,主要从事老油田提高采收率技术及理论研究。Email:yanghjun@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.51601159）资助。

Corrosion inhibition effect of deoxygenation on down-hole string of air foam flooding process and deoxygenation limit

Yang Huaijun¹, Pan Hong¹, Zhang Yang¹, Zhong Xiankang²

1. Oil Production Technology Institute, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China;
2. School of Oil & Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China

Received:2018-05-21 Revised:2018-10-29 Online:2019-01-25 Published:2019-01-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氧腐蚀是限制空气泡沫驱油技术应用推广的主要因素，减氧能够降低腐蚀速率。笔者利用高压腐蚀反应釜模拟工况条件，采用失重法测试了N80套管钢在不同氧含量（2%~21%）、不同压力（20~50 MPa）、不同温度（70~120℃）条件下的腐蚀速率，根据测试结果拟合建立了腐蚀速率与氧分压关系的数学模型；采用扫描电镜、能谱仪和X射线衍射分析表征了腐蚀产物的微观形貌和成分。结果表明，空气泡沫驱过程中N80钢的腐蚀速率随空气氧含量的降低呈非线性下降，但无法将腐蚀速率控制在0.076 mm/a标准以下。温度120℃、压力50~20 MPa，N80钢标准挂片的减氧界限为0.021%~0.054%，已经达到纯氮气的标准。工况条件下不同氧含量的N80钢材腐蚀产物疏松多孔，其成分为Fe₂O₃、FeOOH和Fe₃O₄，腐蚀产物对基体金属无保护作用，工况的改变并不会显著改变腐蚀产物的形貌和成分。

关键词: 空气泡沫驱, 套管钢, 氧腐蚀, 减氧界限, 缓蚀作用

Abstract:

Oxygen corrosion is a main factor hindering the wide application of air foam flooding. Although deoxygenation can result in the decrease of corrosion rate. In this study, the high-pressure corrosion reaction kettle is used to simulate the working conditions, and the corrosion rate of N80 casing steel is measured using weight loss method under different oxygen contents (2% -21%)at various pressures (20-50 MPa)and temperatures (70-120℃). According to the experimental results, a mathematical model of the relationship between corrosion rate and partial pressure of oxygen is established. The morphology and composition of corrosion products are characterized using the scanning electron microscope, energy disperse spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results show that the corrosion rate of N80 steel presents the nonlinear decrease with the decreasing oxygen contents of air in the air foam flooding process. However, the corrosion rate is impossible to be controlled below the standard value of 0.076 mm/a. The deoxygenation limit of N80 steel is 0.021% -0.054% at 120℃ when the pressure is between 50 MPa and 20 MPa, and has reached the standard of pure nitrogen. Under the working conditions, the corrosion products of N80 steel are loose and porous with different oxygen contents as well as Fe₂O₃, FeOOH and Fe₃O₄, indicating no ability to protect base metal. In addition, the morphology and composition of corrosion products vary little with the changes in the working conditions.

Key words: air foam flooding, casing steel, oxygen corrosion, deoxygenation limit, corrosion inhibition effect

中图分类号:

TE357

杨怀军, 潘红, 章杨, 钟显康. 减氧对空气泡沫驱井下管柱的缓蚀作用及减氧界限[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(1): 99-107.

Yang Huaijun, Pan Hong, Zhang Yang, Zhong Xiankang. Corrosion inhibition effect of deoxygenation on down-hole string of air foam flooding process and deoxygenation limit[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(1): 99-107.

参考文献

[1] YU Hongmin,YANG Baoquan,XU Guorui,et al.Air foam injection for IOR:from laboratory to field implementation in Zhongyuan oilfield China[R].SPE 113913,2008.
[2] 于洪敏,任韶然,左景栾.空气泡沫驱数学模型与数值模拟方法[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):653-657.
YU Hongmin,REN Shaoran,ZUO Jingluan.A mathematical model and numerical simulation method for air-foam flooding[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):653-657.
[3] 任韶然,于洪敏,左景栾,等.中原油田空气泡沫调驱提高采收率技术[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):413-416.
REN Shaoran,YU Hongmin,ZUO Jingluan,et al.EOR technology of profile control and displacement process by air foam injection in Zhongyuan oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):413-416.
[4] LIU Pengcheng,ZHANG Xiaokun,WU Yongbin,et al.Enhanced oil recovery by air-foam flooding system in tight oil reservoirs:Study on the profile-controlling mechanisms[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,150:208-216.
[5] DONG Xiaohu,LIU Huiqing,SUN Peng,et al.Air-foam-injection process:an improved-oil-recovery technique for waterflooded light-oil reservoirs[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2012,15(4):436-444.
[6] GILLHAM T H,CERVENY B W,FORNEA M A,et al.Low cost IOR:an update on the W.Hackberry air injection project[R].SPE 39642,1998.
[7] 林伟民,李雪峰,陈秀玲,等.注空气泡沫驱油过程中的腐蚀与防护研究[J].油田化学,2010,27(3):342-345.
LIN Weimin,LI Xuefeng,CHEN Xiuling,et al.Corrosion and protection in air-foam injection process[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2010,27(3):342-345.
[8] 毛志高,曹瑛,周圣昊,等.空气泡沫驱腐蚀治理技术研究及应用[J].化学工程与装备,2017(1):116-119.
MAO Zhigao,CAO Ying,ZHOU Shenghao,et al.Research and application of air foam flooding treatment technology[J].Chemical Engineering & Equipment,2017(1):116-119.
[9] 周权,任韶然,于洪敏,等.注空气驱油中的腐蚀及缓蚀剂加注工艺[J].腐蚀与防护,2009,30(10):745-746,760.
ZHOU Quan,REN Shaoran,YU Hongmin,et al.Implantation technique of corrosion inhibitors for air injection enhanced oil recovery[J].Corrosion & Protection,2009,30(10):745-746,760.
[10] 李凯凯,杨其彬.空气驱油安全控制研究[J].断块油气田,2008,15(5):93-95.
LI Kaikai,YANG Qibin.Safety control of air injection displacement[J].Fault-Block & Gas Field,2008,15(5):93-95.
[11] 董亮,姜子涛,杜艳霞,等.地铁杂散电流对管道牺牲阳极的影响及防护[J].石油学报,2016,37(1):117-124.
DONG Liang,JIANG Zitao,DU Yanxia,et al.Influence and protection of metro stray current on pipeline sacrificial anode[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):117-124.
[12] 樊恒,闫相祯,冯耀荣,等.基于分项系数法的套管实用可靠度设计方法[J].石油学报,2016,37(6):807-814.
FAN Heng,YAN Xiangzhen,FENG Yaorong,et al.Practical reliability design method of casing based on partial coefficient method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(6):807-814.
[13] 张鹏,彭杨.考虑随机变量相关性的腐蚀管道失效概率[J].石油学报,2016,37(10):1293-1301.
ZHANG Peng,PENG Yang.Failure probability of corroded pipeline considering random variables correlation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(10):1293-1301.
[14] 张智,刘志伟,谢玉洪,等.井筒载荷-腐蚀耦合作用对碳钢套管服役寿命的影响[J].石油学报,2017,38(3):342-347,362.
ZHANG Zhi,LIU Zhiwei,XIE Yuhong,et al.Influence of shaft load-corrosion coupling on the service life of carbon steel casing pipe[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(3):342-347,362.
[15] 张新生,李亚云,王小完.基于逆高斯过程的腐蚀油气管道维修策略[J].石油学报,2017,38(3):356-362.
ZHANG Xinsheng,LI Yayun,WANG Xiaowan.Maintenance strategy of corroded oil-gas pipeline based on inverse Gaussian process[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(3):356-362.
[16] 何东升,郭简,张鹏.腐蚀管道剩余强度评价方法及其应用[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):125-128.
HE Dongsheng,GUO Jian,ZHANG Peng.Assessment method for remaining strength of corroded pipeline and its application[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):125-128.
[17] 顾春元,狄勤丰,王掌洪.N80钢在地层水中的应力腐蚀行为研究[J].石油学报,2006,27(2):141-144.
GU Chunyuan,DI Qinfeng,WANG Zhanghong.Stress corrosion performance of N80 steel in formation water[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(2):141-144.
[18] 廖广志,杨怀军,蒋有伟,等.减氧空气驱适用范围及氧含量界限[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(1):105-110.
LIAO Guangzhi,YANG Huaijun,JIANG Youwei,et al.Applicable scope of oxygen-reduced air flooding and the limit of oxygen content[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(1):105-110.
[19] WU W,HAO W K,LIU Z Y,et al.Corrosion behavior of E690 high-strength steel in alternating wet-dry marine environment with different pH values[J].Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,2015,24(12):4636-4646.
[20] CHEN Mingyan,WANG Hua,LIU Yucheng,et al.Corrosion behavior study of oil casing steel on alternate injection air and foam liquid in air-foam flooding for enhance oil recovery[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,165:970-977.
[21] ZURILLA R W,SEN R K,YEAGER E.The kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction on gold in alkaline solution[J].Journal of the Electrochemical Society,1978,125(7):1103-1109.
[22] TANNER E E L,XIONG Linhongjia,BARNES E O,et al.One electron oxygen reduction in room temperature ionic liquids:a comparative study of Butler-Volmer and Symmetric Marcus-Hush theories using microdisc electrodes[J].Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry,2014,727:59-68.
[23] BOCKRIS J O M,GOCHEV A.Temperature dependence of the symmetry factor in electrode kinetics[J].The Journal of Physical Chemistry,1986,90(21):5232-5239.
[24] NORDSVEEN M,NEŠI? S,NYBORG R,et al.A mechanistic model for carbon dioxide corrosion of mild steel in the presence of protective iron carbonate films-part 1:theory and verification[J].Corrosion,2003,59(5):443-456.
[25] NEŠI? S,NORDSVEEN M,NYBORG R,et al.A mechanistic model for carbon dioxide corrosion of mild steel in the presence of protective iron carbonate films-part 2:a numerical experiment[J].Corrosion,2003,59(6):489-497.
[26] 油气田开发专业标准化技术委员会.碎屑岩油藏注水水质指标及分析方法:SY/T 5329-2012[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2012.
Standardization Technical Committees of Oil & Gas Field Development Engineering.Water quality standard and practice for analysis of oilfield injecting waters in clastic reservoirs:SY/T 5329-2012[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2012.

减氧对空气泡沫驱井下管柱的缓蚀作用及减氧界限

Corrosion inhibition effect of deoxygenation on down-hole string of air foam flooding process and deoxygenation limit

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张文通, 王若榕, 黄海, 宁正福, 李正, 何延龙, 杨兵, 郑永. 电场强化致密砂岩储层CO₂驱油气混相实验[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(4): 881-892.
[2]	张云鹏, 王斌, 李根生, 王海柱, 郑永, Alexey Cheremisin, Sergey Stanchits, 孙廉贺, 丁柏昕, 张忠罡. 非均匀润湿条件下CO₂-油微观运移与碳封存机理[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(3): 624-640.
[3]	翁定为, 杨战伟, 彭建新, 才博, 付海峰, 王丽伟, 刘举, 高莹, 黄瑞, 徐敏杰, 张朝阳. 万米特深碳酸盐岩储层改造技术研究和试验[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(2): 466-481,490.
[4]	王香增, 杨红, 孙晓. 低渗透致密油藏CO₂压裂—驱油—封存一体化技术及矿场实践[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(1): 120-133.
[5]	吕伟峰, 闫玉同, 吕文峰, 俞宏伟. CO₂驱前缘表征方法及运移影响因素研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(1): 155-171.
[6]	刘月亮, 刘辰, 刘鑫磊. 致密油注CO₂提高采收率机理及技术研究现状与展望[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(1): 198-216.
[7]	郭二鹏, 毛晓鹏, 贺吉涛, 蒋旭, 张侃毅, 刘宗建, 任铄文, 王新伟. 非凝结气体掺混对蒸汽干度影响实验[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2332-2342,2426.
[8]	贾德利, 王治, 孙福超, 王全宾, 杨清海. 分层注水井筒通讯技术进展及展望[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2410-2426.
[9]	吕文雅, 刘艳祥, 曾联波, 安小平, 张昊文, 张皎生, 李超, 陈欢, 李德生. 致密砂岩储层复杂缝网系统三维地质建模方法——以姬塬油田L井区三叠系延长组8段1亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2115-2127.
[10]	张家麟, 盛茂, 司丽娟, 张彦军, 李杰, 李川, 田守嶒, 李根生. 基于泵注压力时频特征的压裂暂堵有效性评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2128-2140.
[11]	杨立强, 王飞, 柳明, 李彦超, 张显聪. 基于停泵压降监测数据的支撑缝网参数解释方法——以四川盆地威远页岩气田A井为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1928.
[12]	慕立俊, 齐银, 陈文斌, 徐荣利, 拜杰, 涂志勇, 叶凯. 庆城页岩油水力压裂试验场岩心裂缝及支撑剂分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(9): 1764-1775.
[13]	陈超, 张晶晨, 董海海, 向娟, 张文, 王晓光. 低渗透砾岩油藏CO₂驱孔隙和剩余油动用机理及驱替效率[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(7): 1434-1446.
[14]	李宾飞, 赵希芮, 郑磊, 李兆敏, 朱迪, 曹小朋. CO₂压驱高速注入对基质驱油特征的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(5): 926-937.
[15]	康志勤, 武致辉, 王磊, 杨栋, 赵静, 韩贺旭, 赵阳升. 油页岩无水、近/超临界水热解细观结构演变及宏观力学响应[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 801-815.