不同极性溶剂萃取对泥页岩孔隙结构的影响

doi:10.7623/syxb201912007

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 1485-1494.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201912007

不同极性溶剂萃取对泥页岩孔隙结构的影响

林晓英^1,2, 黄美鑫², 陈浩², 王健², 王瑞杰³

1. 郑州大学水利科学与工程学院河南郑州 450001;
2. 河南理工大学能源科学与工程学院河南焦作 454000;
3. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院北京 102249

收稿日期:2018-05-15 修回日期:2019-03-08 出版日期:2019-12-25 发布日期:2020-01-04
通讯作者: 林晓英,女,1980年3月生,2002年获河南理工大学学士学位,2012年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为郑州大学水利科学与工程学院副教授,主要从事煤层气、页岩气、煤系气地质方面研究。Email:lxy2002199@126.com
作者简介:林晓英,女,1980年3月生,2002年获河南理工大学学士学位,2012年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为郑州大学水利科学与工程学院副教授,主要从事煤层气、页岩气、煤系气地质方面研究。Email:lxy2002199@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.41402142）、中国博士后基金项目（2015M572106）和河南省教育厅重点项目（14B44001）资助。

Influence of different polar solvent extraction on pore structure in shale

Lin Xiaoying^1,2, Huang Meixin², Chen Hao², Wang Jian², Wang Ruijie³

1. School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Henan Zhengzhou 450001, China;
2. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Henan Jiaozuo 454000, China;
3. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2018-05-15 Revised:2019-03-08 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2020-01-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩的孔隙类型与孔隙结构直接影响着气体的赋存和产出。为了研究泥页岩中可溶有机质对孔隙结构的影响，按照正己烷、二氯甲烷、四氢呋喃的顺序依次对泥页岩中不同极性可溶有机质进行分离与抽提，利用场发射扫描电子显微镜（FE-SEM）和低温氮气吸附实验，对比分析了原始样品和萃余物的孔隙结构特征，探讨了不同极性溶剂萃取对泥页岩孔隙结构的影响。结果表明：随着有机溶剂极性的增强，泥页岩中的可溶有机质依次按照饱和烃、芳香烃和非烃组分顺序溶出；原始样品的孔隙主要为粒间孔、粒内孔、有机质孔和微裂缝4种类型，可溶有机质溶出后，孔隙形态更为不规则，出现更多溶蚀孔，部分粒间孔被脱落黏土矿物碎屑充填；溶剂极性增强，滞后圈的面积减小，BJH孔体积和平均孔径增加，BET比表面积变化不明显；可溶有机质的溶出对泥页岩具有"增孔"和"扩孔"作用，孔径≤2 nm的孔隙含量增加，孔径>2 nm的孔隙含量减少；2~10 nm孔径范围内孔体积和孔比表面积的百分含量减小，10~30 nm孔径范围内变化不明显，30~50 nm孔径范围内明显增加；对孔隙形态的改造过程为：瓶身与瓶颈的孔径比相对较大的"墨水瓶"孔→瓶身与瓶颈的孔径比相对较小的"墨水瓶"孔→楔形孔→平行板状孔。

关键词: 泥页岩, 可溶有机质, 孔隙结构, 扩孔, 增孔

Abstract:

Shale's pore type and structure will directly affect the occurrence and production of gas. To discuss the effect of soluble organic matters in shale on the pore structure, different polar soluble organic matters in the shale are separated and extracted in the order of n-hexane, dichloromethane and tetrahydrofuran. Further, using the field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM)and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption tests, this paper comparatively analyzes the pore structure characteristics of original sample and raffinate, and explores the effects of different polar solvent extraction on the pore structure of shale. The results show that with the increasing of organic solvent polarity, the soluble organic matters in shale are dissolved in the order of saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbon components. The original pores mainly include four types:intergranular pores, intragranular pores, organic pores and micro-cracks. After the soluble organic matters are dissolved, the pore morphology is more irregular, thus forming more dissolved pores; some intergranular pores are filled with the detached debris. Solvent polarity is enhanced, the area of hysteresis loop is reduced, and the BJH pore volume and average pore size are increased, accompanied by insignificant change in the BET specific surface area. The dissolution of soluble organic matter has the effect of "enhancing pores" and "expanding pores" on shale, with the increased pore content ≤ 2 nm and relatively decreased pore content>2 nm. In the mesopore range, the percentage content of pore volume and specific surface area is decreased in the pores of 2-10 nm, with insignificant change in the pore size range of 10-30 nm and significant increase in the pore size range of 30-50 nm. The modification process of pore morphology is as follows:the "ink bottle" hole with a relatively large aperture ratio of bottle body to bottle neck→the "ink bottle" hole with a relatively small aperture ratio of bottle body to bottle neck→wedge-type hole→parallel plate hole.

Key words: shale, soluble organic matters, pore structure, enhancing pores, expanding pores

中图分类号:

TE122.2

林晓英, 黄美鑫, 陈浩, 王健, 王瑞杰. 不同极性溶剂萃取对泥页岩孔隙结构的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1485-1494.

Lin Xiaoying, Huang Meixin, Chen Hao, Wang Jian, Wang Ruijie. Influence of different polar solvent extraction on pore structure in shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(12): 1485-1494.

参考文献

[1] 张金川,汪宗余,聂海宽,等. 页岩气及其勘探研究意义[J].现代地质,2008,22(4):640-646.
ZHANG Jinchuan,WANG Zongyu,NIE Haikuan,et al.Shale gas and its significance for exploration[J].Geoscience,2008,22(4):640-646.
[2] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
[3] RANI S,PRUSTY B K,PAL S K.Methane adsorption and pore characterization of Indian shale samples[J].Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources,2015,11:1-10.
[4] 姜振学,唐相路,李卓,等.川东南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构全孔径表征及其对含气性的控制[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):126-134.
JIANG Zhenxue,TANG Xianglu,LI Zhuo,et al.The whole-aperture pore structure characteristics and its effect on gas content of the Longmaxi Formation shale in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):126-134.
[5] 纪文明,宋岩,姜振学,等.四川盆地东南部龙马溪组页岩微-纳米孔隙结构特征及控制因素[J].石油学报,2016,37(2):182-195.
JI Wenming,SONG Yan,JIANG Zhenxue,et al.Micro-nano pore structure characteristics and its control factors of shale in Longmaxi Formation,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(2):182-195.
[6] 刘圣鑫,钟建华,马寅生,等.柴东石炭系页岩微观孔隙结构与页岩气等温吸附研究[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(1):33-42.
LIU Shengxin,ZHONG Jianhua,MA Yinsheng,et al.Study of microscopic pore structure and adsorption isothermal of carboniferous shale,Eastern Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2015,39(1):33-42.
[7] 王香增,张丽霞,雷裕红,等.低熟湖相页岩内运移固体有机质和有机质孔特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7油层组为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):141-151.
WANG Xiangzeng,ZHANG Lixia,LEI Yuhong,et al.Characteristics of migrated solid organic matters and organic pores in low maturity lacustrine shale:a case study of the shale in Chang 7 oil-bearing Formation of Yanchang Formation,southeastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):141-151.
[8] 韩双彪,张金川,HORSFIELD B,等.页岩气储层孔隙类型及特征研究:以渝东南下古生界为例[J].地学前缘,2013,20(3):247-253.
HAN Shuangbiao,ZHANG Jinchuan,HORSFIELD B,et al.Pore types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:a case study of Lower Paleozoic shale in Southeast Chongqing[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(3):247-253.
[9] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[10] 刘忠宝,高波,胡宗全,等.高演化富有机质页岩储层特征及孔隙形成演——以黔南地区下寒武统九门冲组为[J].石油学报,2017,38(12):1381-1389.
LIU Zhongbao,GAO Bo,HU Zongquan,et al.Reservoir characteristics and pores Formation and evolution of high maturated organic rich shale:a case study of Lower Cambrian Jiumenchong Formation,southern Guizhou area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(12):1381-1389.
[11] 曹涛涛,刘光祥,曹清古,等.有机显微组成对泥页岩有机孔发育的影响——以川东地区海陆过渡相龙潭组泥页岩为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(1):40-53.
CAO Taotao,LIU Guangxiang,CAO Qinggu,et al.Influence of maceral composition on organic pore development in shale:a case study of transitional Longtan Formation shale in eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(1):40-53.
[12] 马存飞,董春梅,栾国强,等.苏北盆地古近系泥页岩有机质孔发育特征及影响因素[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2017,41(3):1-13.
MA Cunfei,DONG Chunmei,LUAN Guoqiang,et al.Characteristics and influencing factors of organic-matter pores in paleogene shale,Subei Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2017,41(3):1-13.
[13] LIU Zhongbao,GAO Bo,HU Zongquan,et al.Pore characteristics and formation mechanism of high-maturity organic-rich shale in Lower Cambrian Jiumenchong Formation,southern Guizhou[J].Petroleum Research,2018,3(1):57-65.
[14] 杨永良,李增华,季淮君,等.煤中可溶有机质对煤的孔隙结构及甲烷吸附特性影响[J].燃料化学学报,2013,41(4):385-390.
YANG Yongliang,LI Zenghua,JI Huaijun,et al.Effect of soluble organic matter in coal on its pore structure and methane sorption characteristics[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2013,41(4):385-390.
[15] 李成成,周世新,李靖,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组泥页岩孔隙特征及其控制因素[J].沉积学报,2017,35(2):315-329.
LI Chengcheng,ZHOU Shixin,LI Jing,et al.Pore characteristics and controlling factors of the Yanchang formation mudstone and shale in the south of Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2017,35(2):315-329.
[16] 张小东,郝宗超,张硕,等.溶剂改造下构造煤纳米级孔隙的差异性变化及机理[J].中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(1):148-154.
ZHANG Xiaodong,HAO Zongchao,ZHANG Shuo,et al.Difference of nano-scale pore changes and its control mechanism for tectonic coal under solvent reconstruction[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(1):148-154.
[17] JI Huaijun,LI Zenghua,PENG Yingjian,et al.Pore structures and methane sorption characteristics of coal after extraction with tetrahydrofuran[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2014,19:287-294.
[18] WEI Lin,MASTALERZ M,SCHIMMELMANN A,et al.Influence of Soxhlet-extractable bitumen and oil on porosity in thermally maturing organic-rich shales[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2014,132:38-50.
[19] 吉利明,吴远东,贺聪,等.富有机质泥页岩高压生烃模拟与孔隙演化特征[J].石油学报,2016,37(2):172-181.
JI Liming,WU Yuandong,HE Cong,et al.High-pressure hydrocarbon-generation simulation and pore evolution characteristics of organic-rich mudstone and shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(2):172-181.
[20] 马力,陈焕疆,甘克文,等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质(上)[M].北京:地质出版社,2004:284-285.
MA Li,CHEN Huanjiang,GAN Kewen,et al.South China earth structure and marine petroleum geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2004:284-285.
[21] 卢双舫,张敏.油气地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:70-107.
LU Shuangfang,ZHANG Min.Oil and gas geochemistry[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:70-107.
[22] 马中良,郑伦举,徐旭辉,等.富有机质页岩有机孔隙形成与演化的热模拟实验[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):23-30.
MA Zhongliang,ZHENG Lunju,XU Xuhui,et al.Thermal simulation experiment on the formation and evolution of organic pores in organic-rich shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):23-30.
[23] 朱汉卿,贾爱林,位云生,等.蜀南地区富有机质页岩孔隙结构及超临界甲烷吸附能力[J].石油学报,2018,39(4):391-401.
ZHU Hanqing,JIA Ailin,WEI Yunsheng,et al.Pore structure and supercritical methane sorption capacity of organic-rich shales in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(4):391-401.
[24] 赵杏媛,何东博.黏土矿物与页岩气[J].新疆石油地质,2012,33(6):643-647.
ZHAO Xingyuan,HE Dongbo.Clay minerals and shale gas[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2012,33(6):643-647.
[25] 杨锐,何生,胡东风,等.焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(5):105-113.
YANG Rui,HE Sheng,HU Dongfeng,et al.Characteristics and the main controlling factors of micro-pore structure of the shale in Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2015,34(5):105-113.
[26] LI Ang,DING Wenlong,HE Jianhua,et al.Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale reservoirs:a case study of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Malong block of eastern Yunnan Province,South China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,70:46-57.
[27] 金彦任,黄振兴.吸附与孔径分布[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2015.
JIN Yanren,HUANG Zhenxing.Adsorption and pore size distribution[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2015.
[28] 秦志宏,袁新华,宗志敏,等.用XRD、TEM和FTIR研究镜煤在CS2-N-甲基-2-吡咯烷酮混合溶剂中的溶解行为[J].燃料化学学报,1998,26(3):275-279.
QIN Zhihong,YUAN Xinhua,ZONG Zhimin,et al.Elucidation for dissolution behaviors of vitrains in CS2-N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone mixed solvent by XRD, TEM and FTIR analyses[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,1998,26(3):275-279.
[29] ABOURRICHE A K,OUMAM M,HANNACHE H,et al.Comparative studies on the yield and quality of oils extracted from Moroccan oil shale[J].The Journal of Supercritical Fluids,2013,84:98-104.
[30] 陈润,秦勇,韦重韬.镜煤有机溶剂二级抽提孔隙结构及吸附性差异[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1103-1110.
CHEN Run,QIN Yong,WEI Chongtao.Differences in pore structures and adsorptivity between raw and two-step-solvent-extracted vitrains[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(7):1103-1110.
[31] 张小东,秦勇,桑树勋.龙口褐煤萃取后的微孔结构及化学组成变化[J].中国矿业大学学报,2007,36(5):647-652.
ZHANG Xiaodong,QIN Yong,SANG Shuxun.Variations of micro-pore structure and chemical composition of the fractionally-extracted Longkou lignite[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2007,36(5):647-652.
[32] 张永刚,蔡进功,许卫平,等.泥质烃源岩中有机质富集机制[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007.
ZHANG Yonggang,CAI Jingong,XU Weiping,et al.Accumulation mechanism of organic matter in muddy source rock[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007.
[33] SUN Lina,TUO Jincai,ZHANG Mingfeng,et al.Formation and development of the pore structure in Chang 7 Member oil-shale from Ordos Basin during organic matter evolution induced by hydrous pyrolysis[J].Fuel,2015,158:549-557.

不同极性溶剂萃取对泥页岩孔隙结构的影响

Influence of different polar solvent extraction on pore structure in shale

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[2]	陈义林, 秦勇, 张博, 杨天宇, 刘静, 王兰花, 洪勇. 制样粒径对不同变质程度煤孔隙结构的差异化影响[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1313-1332.
[3]	丁骞, 甘利灯, 魏乐乐, 张宇生, 杨昊, 姜晓宇, 王峣钧. 双孔隙结构因子及其在储层渗透性地震预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 339-347.
[4]	唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 杨焦生, 邓泽, 李松, 陈世达, 冯鹏, 黄晨, 李站伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.
[5]	方正, 蒲秀刚, 陈世悦, 鄢继华, 陈星燃, 崔绮梦. 陆相湖盆深水区页岩高频层序对储层发育的影响——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1663-1682.
[6]	金国文, 王堂宇, 刘忠华, 谢然红, 邵亮, 李博宇. 基于核磁共振测井的砂砾岩储层分类与产能预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 648-657.
[7]	黄兴, 窦亮彬, 左雄娣, 高辉, 李天太. 致密油藏裂缝动态渗吸排驱规律[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 924-935.
[8]	李童, 龙安林, 刘波, 丁晓军, 于慧敏, 鲁珊珊, 宋彦辰, 石开波. 低渗透砂岩油藏隔夹层注气突破压力及注气开发策略——以柴达木盆地尕斯库勒油田E₃¹油藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1364-1372.
[9]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[10]	王安民, 曹代勇, 聂敬, 秦荣芳. 巨厚煤储层孔隙结构的垂向非均质性特征——以青海聚乎更矿区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 691-701.
[11]	单长安, 张廷山, 梁兴, 胡冉冉, 赵卫卫. 富镜质组和富惰质组高阶煤纳米孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 723-736.
[12]	罗文彬, 马中良, 郑伦举, 谭静强, 王张虎, 宁传祥. 海相页岩成岩-成烃过程中孔隙结构的演变——来自热模拟实验的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 540-552.
[13]	宋岩, 高凤琳, 唐相路, 陈磊, 王幸蒙. 海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.
[14]	姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 姜涛, 常佳琦, 宁传祥, 苏思远, 陈委涛. 沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1587-1600.
[15]	何晶, 何生, 刘早学, 翟刚毅, 王亿, 韩元佳, 万阔, 魏思乐. 鄂西黄陵背斜南翼下寒武统水井沱组页岩孔隙结构与吸附能力[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 27-42.