Formation and evolution of Upper Sinian to Lower Cambrian intraplatformal basin in Sichuan Basin

doi:10.7623/syxb201503006

Acta Petrolei Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 310-323.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201503006

• Petroleum Exploration • Previous Articles Next Articles

Formation and evolution of Upper Sinian to Lower Cambrian intraplatformal basin in Sichuan Basin

Zhou Hui, Li Wei, Zhang Baomin, Liu Jingjiang, Deng Shenghui, Zhang Shiben, Shan Xiuqin, Zhang Jing, Wang Xiaobo, Jiang Hua

PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2014-09-03 Revised:2015-02-01 Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-03-11

四川盆地震旦纪末期—寒武纪早期台盆的形成与演化

周慧, 李伟, 张宝民, 刘静江, 邓胜徽, 张师本, 单秀琴, 张静, 王晓波, 姜华

中国石油勘探开发研究院提高石油采收率国家重点实验室北京 100083

通讯作者: 周慧,男,1983年12月生,2005年获同济大学学士学位,2008年获中国石油勘探开发研究院硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事碳酸盐岩沉积储层研究工作。Email:zhouhui03@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:周慧,男,1983年12月生,2005年获同济大学学士学位,2008年获中国石油勘探开发研究院硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事碳酸盐岩沉积储层研究工作。Email:zhouhui03@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项"四川、塔里木等盆地及邻区海相碳酸盐岩大油气田形成条件、关键技术及目标评价"(2011ZX05004)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of welling, logging, seismic information and outcrops, the formation and evolution of Upper Sinian to Lower Cambrian intraplatformal basin (IPB) in Sichuan Basin was studied from the aspects of sedimentation, tectonics and karstification, and its distribution was defined by using total residual thickness of the 3rd and 4th member of Dengying Formation (DYF), total thickness of Maidiping Formation (MDPF) and Qiongzhusi Formation (QZSF), and lithofacies features, and its control on natural gas distribution of DYF was revealed. Its typical characteristics were small total residual thickness of the 3rd and 4th member of DYF, large total thickness of MDPF and QZSF, and developing mudstone containing phosphates and silicon. It underwent 4 stages: (1) During the 1st and 2nd member of DYF, Sichuan Basin was a rimmed platform with mounds and shoals developed in platform margin and interior. The first episode of Tongwan taphrogenesis between the 2nd and 3rd member of Dengying Formation formed the embryonic form of the IPB in western Sichuan Basin. And there exited landform difference between the IPB and its two sides. (2) During the 3rd member of DYF, Upper Yangzi craton extended and a subsidence zone was formed with Moxi, Changning and Zhengxiong area as its depositional centers, controlling the distribution of favored hydrocarbon source rocks. During the 4th member of DYF, Sichuan Basin evolved into a rimmed platform with an IPB. The second episode of Tongwan taphrogenesis after DYF made Sichuan Basin rise as a whole characterized by weather denudation in high position and fluid erosion in low part, and Qingchuan-Ziyang-Yibin IPB was shaped. (3) MDPF of Lower Cambrian was the first sediment on karst landform of DYF, with 3 lithology zones in plane distribution, and the third episode of Tongwan taphrogenesis reformed the depositional landform locally. (4) After lasting filling of QZSF and Canglangpu Formation, Sichuan Basin evolved into a siliclastic ramp. The formation and evolution of the IPB did not only promote the formation of high quality platform-margin dolomite reservoirs of the 4th member of DYF, but also control the distribution of two high quality hydrocarbon source rocks of MDPF and QZSF. The surrounding areas of the IPB were favorable petroleum exploration areas, with good contact configuration relationships between Cambrian hydrocarbon source rocks and dolomite reservoir of DYF.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Sinian, Cambrian, carbonate, intraplatformal basin, lithofacies paleogeography, petroleum exploration

摘要：

基于钻测井、地震和露头资料,从沉积、构造和岩溶作用的角度分析了四川盆地震旦纪末期—寒武纪早期台盆的形成与演化过程,利用灯影组三段+灯影组四段的残余厚度、麦地坪组+筇竹寺组的厚度及麦地坪组的岩相分区特点综合确定了台盆的展布,并揭示其对灯影组天然气分布的控制作用。台盆区表现为灯影组三段+灯影组四段残厚小、上覆充填的麦地坪组与筇竹寺组厚度大、麦地坪组以深水相的含磷碳硅泥岩为主,平面上主要分布于青川—资阳—宜宾一带,其形成和演化经历了4个阶段:1灯影组一段、灯影组二段沉积期,四川盆地为一镶边碳酸盐台地,台地边缘和台地内部丘滩体发育,灯影组二段、灯影组三段之间的桐湾运动一幕作用形成了川西海盆的雏形,台盆与其两侧地貌存在差异;2灯影组三段沉积期,上扬子内克拉通由于拉张裂陷,形成了以磨溪、长宁、镇雄等为沉积中心的沉降带,控制着优质烃源岩的分布;灯影组四段沉积期,四川盆地演化为一内部发育台盆的镶边碳酸盐台地,灯影组末期的桐湾运动二幕作用使得四川盆地整体抬升遭受暴露,高部位风化剥蚀、低部位流体下切侵蚀,并使台盆区的范围达到最大;3寒武纪早期的麦地坪组为灯影组岩溶地貌基础上的第一套充填沉积,且平面上发育3个岩相区,麦地坪组与筇竹寺组之间的桐湾运动三幕作用对麦地坪组沉积后的地貌进行了局部改造;4筇竹寺组与沧浪铺组的持续充填,使四川盆地演化为一较平缓的碎屑岩缓坡。台盆的形成与演化不仅促进了其周缘灯影组四段台缘带优质储层的形成,而且控制着寒武系麦地坪组与筇竹寺组2套优质烃源岩的分布,环台盆灯影组白云岩具有良好的源-储配置关系,是最有利的勘探领域。

关键词: 四川盆地, 震旦纪, 寒武纪, 碳酸盐岩, 台盆, 岩相古地理, 油气勘探

CLC Number:

TE122.14

Zhou Hui, Li Wei, Zhang Baomin, Liu Jingjiang, Deng Shenghui, Zhang Shiben, Shan Xiuqin, Zhang Jing, Wang Xiaobo, Jiang Hua. Formation and evolution of Upper Sinian to Lower Cambrian intraplatformal basin in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(3): 310-323.

周慧, 李伟, 张宝民, 刘静江, 邓胜徽, 张师本, 单秀琴, 张静, 王晓波, 姜华. 四川盆地震旦纪末期—寒武纪早期台盆的形成与演化[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(3): 310-323.

References

[1] 侯方浩,方少仙,王兴志,等.四川震旦系灯影组天然气藏储渗体的再认识[J].石油学报,1999,20(6):16-21.
Hou Fanghao,Fang Shaoxian,Wang Xingzhi,et al.Further understandings of the gas-reservoir rocks of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan,China [J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1999,20(6):16-21.
[2] 张健,张奇.四川盆地油气勘探—历史回顾及展望[J].天然气工业,2002,22(增刊):3-7.
Zhang Jian,Zhang Qi.History review and prospect of petroleum exploration in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2002,22(Supplement):3-7.
[3] 陈宗清.四川盆地震旦系灯影组天然气勘探[J].中国石油勘探,2010(4):1-14.
Chen Zongqing.Gas exploration in Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2010(4):1-14.
[4] 杜金虎,邹才能,徐春春,等.川中古隆起龙王庙组特大型气田战略发现与理论技术创新[J].石油勘探与开发 ,2014,41(3):12-21.
Du Jinhu,Zou Caineng,Xu Chunchun,et al.Theoretical and technical innovations in strategic discovery of a giant gas field in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of central Sichuan paleo-uplift,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):12-21.
[5] 徐春春,沈平,杨跃明,等.乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系—下寒武统龙王庙组天然气成藏条件与富集规律[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):1-7.
Xu Chunchun,Shen Ping,Yang Yueming,et al.Accumulation conditions and enrichment patterns of natural gas in the Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Fm reservoirs of the Leshan-Longnüsi Paleohigh,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):1-7.
[6] 邹才能,杜金虎,徐春春,等.四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):22-35.
Zou Caineng,Du Jinhu,Xu Chunchun,et al.Formation,distribution,resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):22-35.
[7] 钟勇,李亚林,张晓斌,等.四川盆地下组合张性构造特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(5):498-510.
Zhong Yong,Li Yalin,Zhang Xiaobin,et al.Features of extensional structures in pre-Sinian to Cambrian strata,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(5):498-510.
[8] 刘树根,孙玮,罗志立,等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(5):511-520.
Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,Luo Zhili,et al.Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian Strata in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(5):511-520.
[9] 宋金民,刘树根,孙玮,等.兴凯地裂运动对四川盆地灯影组优质储层的控制作用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(6):658-670.
Song Jinmin,Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,et al.Control of Xingkai taphrogenesis on Dengying Formation high quality reservoirs in Upper Sinian of Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(6):658-670.
[10] 汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):36-44.
Wang Zecheng,Jiang Hua,Wang Tongshan,et al.Paleo-geomorphology formed during Tongwan tectonization in Sichuan Basin and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):36-44.
[11] 杨雨,黄先平,张健,等.四川盆地寒武系沉积前震旦系顶界岩溶地貌特征及其地质意义[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):38-43.
Yang Yu,Huang Xianping,Zhang Jian,et al.Features and geologic significances of the top Sinian karst landform before the Cambrian deposition in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):38-43.
[12] 李忠权,赖芳,李应,等.四川盆地震旦系威远—安岳拉张侵蚀槽特征及形成演化[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):26-33.
Li Zhongquan,Lai Fang,Li Ying,et al.Formation and evolution of Weiyuan-Anyue extension-erosion groove in Sinian system,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):26-33.
[13] 潘杏南,赵济湘,张选阳,等.康滇构造与裂谷作用[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1987.
Pan Xingnan,Zhao Jixiang,Zhang Xuanyang,et al.Tectonics and rifting in Kangdian region[M].Chongqing:Chongqing Publishing House,1987.
[14] 郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉,等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1996.
Guo Zhengwu,Deng Kangling,Han Yonghui,et al.The formation and development of Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1996.
[15] 杨志如,王学军,冯许魁,等.川中地区前震旦系裂谷研究及其地质意义[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):80-85.
Yang Zhiru,Wang Xuejun,Feng Xukui,et al.Geological research and significance of a rift valley in the Per-Sinian period in central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):80-85.
[16] 谷志东,汪泽成.四川盆地川中地块新元古代伸展构造的发现及其在天然气勘探中的意义[J].中国科学:地球科学,2014,44(10):2210-2220.
Gu Zhidong,Wang Zecheng.The discovery of Neoproterozoic extensional structures and its significance for gas exploration in the Central Sichuan Block,Sichuan Basin,South China[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2014,57(11):2758-2768.
[17] 宋文海.对四川盆地加里东期古隆起的新认识[J].天然气工业,1987,7(3):6-11.
Song Wenhai.Some new knowledge of Caledonian paleo-uplift in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,1987,7(3):6-11.
[18] 谷志东,李宗银,袁苗,等.四川盆地及其周缘晚震旦世—早寒武世早期区域抬升运动对岩溶储层发育的影响[J].天然气工业,2014,34(8):37-45.
Gu Zhidong,Li Zongyin,Yuan Miao,et al.Influences of regional uplifting during the Late Sinian-Early Cambrian on the development of karst reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin and its peripheral area[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(8):37-45.
[19] 邢凤存,侯明才,林良彪,等.四川盆地晚震旦世—早寒武世构造运动记录及动力学成因讨论[J].地学前缘, 2015,22(1):115-125.
Xing Fengcun,Hou Mingcai,Lin Liangbiao,et al.The records and its dynamic genesis discussion of tectonic movement during the late Sinian and the Early Cambrian of Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2015,22(1):115-125.
[20] 陈志明,陈其英.扬子地台早寒武世梅树村早期的古地理及其磷块岩展布特征[J].地质科学,1987(3):246-257.
Chen Zhiming,Chen Qiying.Paleogenography of Yangzi Platform and the characteristics of the phosphorite Distribution of Early Meishucun Stage,Early Cambrian[J].Scientia Geologica Sinica,1987(3):246-257.
[21] 钱逸.中国小壳化石分类学与生物地层学[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:108-115.
Qian Yi.Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy of Small shelly Fossils in China[M].Beijing:Science Press,1999:108-115.
[22] 徐世琦,张光荣.四川盆地资阳地区震旦系气藏储层分布与控制因素[J].天然气勘探与开发,1999,22(3):1-5.
Xu Shiqi,Zhang Guangrong.Factors affecting the reservoir distribution in Sinian gas field in Ziyang area,Sichuan[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,1999,22(3):1-5.
[23] 陈学时,易万霞,卢文忠.中国油气田古岩溶与油气储层[J].沉积学报,2004,22(2):244-253.
Chen Xueshi,Yi Wanxia,Lu Wenzhong.The paleokarst reservoirs of oil/gas fields in China[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2004,22(2):244-253.
[24] 刘树根,马永生,黄文明,等.四川盆地上震旦统灯影组储集层致密化过程研究[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(4):485-496.
Liu Shugen,Ma Yongsheng,Huang Wenming,et al.Densification process of Upper Sinian Dengying formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(4):485-496.
[25] 刘满仓,杨威,李其荣,等.四川盆地蜀南地区寒武系地层划分及对比研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):100-106.
Liu Mancang,Yang Wei,Li Qirong,et al.Characteristics and stratigraphic classification and correlation of cambrian on South Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(1):100-106.
[26] 李伟,余华琪,邓鸿斌.四川盆地中南部寒武系地层划分对比与沉积演化特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):681-690.
Li Wei,Yu Huaqi,Deng Hongbin.Stratigraphic division and correlation and sedimentary characteristics of the Cambrian in centra1-southern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):681-690.
[27] 牟南,吴朝东.上扬子地区震旦-寒武纪磷块岩岩石学特征及成因分析[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2005,41(4):551-562.
Mou Nan,Wu Chaodong.Characteristics and phosphogenesis of phosphorite of the Sinian-Cambrian,West Yangtze Area[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2005,41(4):551-562.
[28] 曾允孚,沈丽娟,何廷贵.滇东磷块岩的沉积环境和成矿机理[J].矿物岩石,1989,9(2):45-59.
Zeng Yunfu,Shen Lijuan,He Tinggui.Sedimentary environment and minerogenetic mechanism of phosphorite ores in east Yunnan[J].Minerals and Rocks,1989,9(2):45-59.
[29] 刘魁梧,陈其英,韩安平.磷块岩中的硅质组分和硅质岩[J].岩石学报,1990(1):46-55.
Liu Kuiwu,Chen Qiying,Han Anping.Siliceous component and siliceous rock in phosphorite strata[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,1990(1):46-55.
[30] 黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):69-75.
Huang Jinliang,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Southern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):69-75.
[31] 魏国齐,沈平,杨威,等.四川盆地震旦系大气田形成条件与勘探远景区[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):129-138.
Wei Guoqi,Shen Ping,Yang Wei,et al.Formation conditions and exploration prospects of Sinian large gas fields,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):129-138.
[32] 韩辉,李大华,马勇,等.四川盆地东北地区下寒武统海相页岩气成因:来自气体组分和碳同位素组成的启示[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):453-459.
Han Hui,Li Dahua,Ma Yong,et al.The origin of marine shale gas in the northeastern Sichuan Basin,China:implications from chemical composition and stable carbon isotope of desorbed gas[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(3):453-459.
[33] 魏国齐,李剑,谢增业,等.中国大气田成藏地质特征与勘探理论[J].石油学报,2013,34(增刊1):1-13.
Wei Guoqi,Li Jian,Xie Zengye,et al.Reservoir geology and exploration theories of large gas fields in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(Suppl1):1-13.
[34] 谢增业,魏国齐,李剑,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩大气田成藏特征与模式[J].石油学报,2013,34(增刊1):29-40.
Xie Zengye,Wei Guoqi,Li Jian,et al.Reservoir characteristics and accumulation modes of large carbonate gas fields in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(Suppl1):29-40.

Formation and evolution of Upper Sinian to Lower Cambrian intraplatformal basin in Sichuan Basin

四川盆地震旦纪末期—寒武纪早期台盆的形成与演化

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Song Jinmin, Jiang Qingchun, Liu Shugen, Jin Xin, Fan Jianping, Li Zhiwu, Huang Shipeng, Su Wang, Yang Di, Jiang Hua, Ye Yuehao, Wang Jiarui, Wang Junke, Ren Shan. Paleoenvironment and sedimentary significances of sepiolite-containing succession in the first Member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation,Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
[2]	Huang Yahao, Wang Rujun, Wen Zhigang, Zhang Yintao, Cui Shiti, Li Mengqin, Wang Peng, He Taohua. Hydrocarbon accumulation process of the deep to ultra deep reservoirs in Fuman oilfield,Tarim Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 947-960.
[3]	Lu Xuesong, Gui Lili, Wang Zecheng, Liu Shaobo, Liu Qiang, Fan Junjia, Chen Weiyan, Ma Xingzhi, Jiang Hua, Fu Xiaodong, Li Wenzheng, Zhong Yuan, Li Kunyu, Xie Wuren. Activity time of strike-slip faults and their controlling effects on hydrocarbon accumulation in central Sichuan Basin: evidence from U-Pb dating and fluid inclusions of cements in fault zone [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 642-658.
[4]	Hui Shasha, Pang Xiongqi, Chen Zhuoheng, Wang Chenxi, Shi Kanyuan, Hu Tao, Hu Yao, Li Min, Mei Shuxing, Li Maowen. Quantitative characterization of the contribution of pore types to pore space of marine shale in Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[5]	He Wenyuan, Huang Xianxiong, Wang Hongping, Wang Wangquan, Fan Guozhang, Ding Liangbo, Zhao Junfeng, Zhu Xiaohui, Zhang Yonggang, Pang Xu, Li Weiqiang, Zuo Guoping, Yang Liu, Wang Chaofeng. Hydrocarbon discovery and its significance of Well Gulashao-1 in deepwater area of Santos Basin, South America [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 339-347.
[6]	Liu Keyu, Liu Jianliang. Application of basin modeling method coupling sedimentary filling evolution with petroleum system in simulating ultra-deep oil-gas accumulations: a case study of Sinian Dengying Formation in central Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
[7]	Wu Jin, Li Hai, Yang Xuefeng, Zhao Shengxian, Guo Wei, Sun Yuping, Liu Yongyang, Liu Zhaolong. Types and combinations of deep marine shale laminae and their effects on reservoir quality: a case study of the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou block,south Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[8]	Xia Qinyu, Ma Xinhua, Guo Zhenhua, Li Wen, Jiang Lin, Zhang Lin, Li Xinyu, Liu Xixiang, Luo Ruilan, Yan Haijun, Liu Yuyang, Yang Cheng. Distribution characteristics of paleokarst zones and internal reservoirs in the fourth Member of Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block, central Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[9]	Yang Yu, Xie Jirong, Cao Zhenglin, Wen Long, Wang Xiaojuan, Xiao Yao, Yang Jian, Tang Qingsong, Tang Dahai, Li Mingqiu, Guan Xu, Zeng Qinggao, Chen Weihua, Chen Kang, Xiao Honglin. Forming conditions and key technologies for exploration and development of large tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Shaximiao Formation, Tianfu gas field of Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(6): 917-932.
[10]	Chen Lixin, Jia Chengzao, Jiang Zhenxue, Su Zhou, Yang Meichun, Yang Bo, Qiu Chen. Oil enrichment model and main controlling factors of carbonate reservoirs in Halahatang area, Tarim Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(6): 948-961.
[11]	Wei Guoqi, Jia Chenzhao, Yang Wei. Geological characteristics of shelf-rimmed platform from Upper Sinian to Lower Cambrian and its control on formation of large gas fields in Anyue-Fengjie area [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2): 223-240.
[12]	Jiang Huachuan, Zhang Benjian, Liu Sibing, Wang Wenzhi, Zhou Gang, He Yuan, Li Kunyu, Wen Huaguo. Discovery of Guang’an-Shizhu paleo-uplift in Sichuan Basin and its oil and gas geological significance [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2): 270-284.
[13]	Ren Jiaxin, Song Jinmin, Liu Shugen, Zhao Rongrong, Luo Zhong, Li Zhiwu, Jin Xin, Ma Xingzhi, Li Keran, Ye Yuehao, Ding Yi, Li Wenhao, Zhao Lingli, Tian Lizhou. Framework and sedimentary model of microbial mound-bank complex in Member 2 of Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2): 312-328.
[14]	Yu Yichang, Guo Rui, Lin Minjie, Shen Yi, Shen Boheng, Zhu Guangya, Li Fengfeng, Wang Yifan, Yan Yuan. Pore throat structure characteristics and development countermeasures of carbonate reservoirs in the Middle East:a case study of M Formation in X oilfield in Iraq [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2): 369-384.
[15]	Xiong Lianqiao, Xie Xiaojun, Deng Yougen, Tang Wu, Zhang Chunyu, Bai Haiqiang, Liu Ziyu, Liao Jihua. Genesis and evolution of Lower Cretaceous silicified carbonate reservoirs in southern Campos Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(10): 1612-1623,1649.