石油学报 ›› 1997, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 117-121.DOI: 10.7623/syxb199704021

• 石油工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平井与直井的经济效益对比评价

胡月亭1, 周煜辉1, 周祥源2   

  1. 1. 石油勘探开发科学研究院 北京;
    2. 中国人民大学
  • 收稿日期:1995-06-19 修回日期:1996-04-08 出版日期:1997-10-25 发布日期:2013-07-08
  • 作者简介:胡月亭,1987年毕业于华东石油学院.现为中国技术经济研究会高级会员,硕士,工程师.通讯处:北京学院路20号.邮政编码:200083
  • 基金资助:
    国家“八五”重点攻关课题

A VERTICAL WELL AND A HORIZONTAL WELL

Hu Yueting1, Zhou Yuhui1, Zhou Xiangyuan2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing;
    2. People's University of China
  • Received:1995-06-19 Revised:1996-04-08 Online:1997-10-25 Published:2013-07-08

摘要: 针对石油开发项目经济评价过程中存在的诸多问题进行分析研究,提出了通过对差额寿命期内基准折现率的修正等方法,解决直井与水平井方案比选时寿命期不等问题的方法;通过对钻井费用类型的重新划分及对油气藏参数的”历史拟合“,有效降低了项目评价中关键参数的预测误差;通过对方案评价指标的分析研究,提出了净现值与净现值率相结合的方案比选评价方法;并针对石油钻井-开发项目随机因素多、风险大等特点,对其进行蒙特卡罗风险模拟分析,提高了评价方法的可靠性.

关键词: 水平井, 经济评价, 净现值

Abstract: The paper is the evaluation on the economic effect of a horizontal well.By modifying the MARR,the Minimum Attractive Rate of Return,within the marginal planning horizon makes a vertical well and a horizontal well with different planning horizons,can be compared on the same level,thus the precision of evaluanon can be also improved remarkablely.Through analying the character of horizontal well's variable prefile and the defects of cost classification made before,the dissertation reclassifys the drilling cost items according to the nature time-concerned so that the error of drilling cost predication can be reduced effectively.Because of the high risk of the drilling project,the undefinite analysis commonly used can not meet its demand,Monte Carlo method is introduced to simulate the complex case in order to make the evaluation method much more dependable,then compared with the vertical well,a comparative evaluation method is set up defered to the rule made by the State Planning Commission

Key words: horizontal well, economic evaluation, net worth of present value