混源天然气源岩贡献定量测试轻烃指纹技术

doi:10.7623/syxb2006S1014

石油学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (S1): 71-75.DOI: 10.7623/syxb2006S1014

混源天然气源岩贡献定量测试轻烃指纹技术

张居和, 冯子辉, 霍秋立, 李景坤, 方伟

大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院黑龙江大庆 163712

收稿日期:2006-07-25 修回日期:2006-10-30 出版日期:2006-12-25 发布日期:2006-12-25
作者简介:张居和,男,1965年8月生,2002年毕业于石油大学石油工程专业,现为大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事油气地球化学研究工作.E-mail:zhangjuhe@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"原油中C₅-C₁₅轻馏分精细分离定性及地球化学应用"(No.40573030)资助.

Quantitative test for contribution of mixed source rocks of natural gas using light hydrocarbon fingerprints technique

Zhang Juhe, Feng Zihui, Huo Qiuli, Li Jingkun, Fang Wei

Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163712, China

Received:2006-07-25 Revised:2006-10-30 Online:2006-12-25 Published:2006-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出了混源天然气源岩贡献色谱轻烃指纹定量测试的理论测试方法及数学模拟计算方法,选择松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷深层源岩和天然气样品进行实验验证。采用源岩吸附气和天然气轻烃指纹色谱检测方法,利用源岩吸附气中相邻或相近的结构和性质相似的轻烃分子化合物的比值参数,确定表征深层登娄库组、营城组、沙河子组和火石岭组、石炭-二叠系4套源岩的特征轻烃指纹参数,按不同混合配比模式获得地球化学模型参数,用智能神经网络学习算法训练建立源岩贡献测试模板,模拟计算了徐家围子断陷深层4套源岩分别对15个深层混源天然气样品的定量贡献。结果表明,不同地区或同一地区不同井及层段的天然气来源有差别,呈现主要来源于下伏气源岩和以垂向运移为主的源控型气藏特征,沙河子组和火石岭组、营城组、石炭-二叠系、登娄库组的源岩贡献平均分别为69.2%、16.2%、9.7%、4.8%。

关键词: 徐家围子断陷, 混源天然气, 源岩贡献, 轻烃指纹色谱, 测试模板, 模拟计算

Abstract: Theoretical test and mathematical calculation methods of quantitative test for contribution of mixed sources rocks of natural gas using chromatogram fingerprints of light hydrocarbon have been proposed, and the related experimental verification for deep source rocks and natural gas samples collected from Xujiaweizi fault-depression in northern Songliao Basin has been made. With light hydrocarbon fingerprint chromatographic detecting method for adsorbed gas and natural gas in hydrocarbon source rocks, using the ratio parameter of light-hydrocarbon molecular compound with adjacent/similar structure and similar feature in absorbed gas in hydrocarbon source rocks, the feature light-hydrocarbon fingerprint parameters are fixed to characterize the four sets of source rocks including Denglouku Formation, Yingcheng Formation, Shahezi Formation and Huoshiling Formtion as well as Carboniferous-Permian systems. According to the different mixed matching models, the geochemical model parameter is obtained and used to establish the test model of source rocks contribution by intelligent neural network algorithm training. So the quantitative contribution of the four sets of deep source rocks in Xujiaweizi fault-depression to 15 deep mixed-source natural gas samples is calculated. Results have indicated that the origin of natural gas from different areas or from different wells and intervals in the same area is different, underlying gas source rock would be as the main source and the gas reservoir is featured by source-controlled type mainly with vertical migration. The contribution of source rocks from Shahezi Formation and Huoshiling Formation, Yingcheng Formation, Permo-Carboniferous System and Denglouku Formation is 69.2%, 16.2%, 9.7% and 4.8%, respectively.

Key words: Xujiaweizi fault-depression, source-mixed natural gas, contribution of source rocks, chromatogram fingerprint of light-hydrocarbon, test model, simulated calculation

中图分类号:

TE12

张居和, 冯子辉, 霍秋立, 李景坤, 方伟. 混源天然气源岩贡献定量测试轻烃指纹技术[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(S1): 71-75.

Zhang Juhe, Feng Zihui, Huo Qiuli, Li Jingkun, Fang Wei. Quantitative test for contribution of mixed source rocks of natural gas using light hydrocarbon fingerprints technique[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2006, 27(S1): 71-75.

[1]	马永乾, 孙宝江, 邵茹, 王志远, 刘晓兰. 注气法双梯度钻井隔水管环空温度场模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4): 779-785.
[2]	史集建吕延防付广李丽丽. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷火山岩盖层封气能力综合定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(3): 424-431.
[3]	李景坤方伟曾花森刘伟邹艳荣刘金钟. 徐家围子断陷烷烃气碳同位素反序机制[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 54-61.
[4]	蔡周荣夏斌郭峰万志峰刘维亮. 松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷营城组火山岩受控机制分析[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(6): 941-945.
[5]	蔡东梅孙立东齐景顺董景海朱映康. 徐家围子断陷火山岩储层特征及演化规律[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 400-407.
[6]	张旭翟应虎李祖光杨明合. 利用分形理论评价地层可钻性[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1): 124-128.
[7]	郑茂盛, 明方飞, 朱秀红, 毕渭滨, 马益平. 振动对岩石及地层渗透率的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(6): 875-879.
[8]	王志远, 孙宝江, 高永海, 曹世敬, 宋林松. 深水司钻法压井模拟计算[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(5): 786-790.
[9]	赵为永, 刘文龙, 门广田, 赵全国. 烃源岩分布面积及厚度的预测方法——以松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(5): 67-71.
[10]	李景坤, 冯子辉, 刘伟, 宋兰斌, 舒萍. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷深层天然气成藏期研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(S1): 42-46.
[11]	崔旭明, 何富君, 罗敏, 张永弘, 黄兆芝. 抽油机井油管载荷及应力应变分析[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(1): 108-112.
[12]	江茂泽, 曾自强, 刘良坚. 天然气在复杂枝状管网系统内不稳定流动及其计算机模拟[J]. 石油学报, 1992, 13(4): 136-147.
[13]	张茂林, 孙良田, 李士伦. 凝析油气藏K值多组分模型数值模拟方法[J]. 石油学报, 1991, 12(1): 60-68.

混源天然气源岩贡献定量测试轻烃指纹技术

Quantitative test for contribution of mixed source rocks of natural gas using light hydrocarbon fingerprints technique

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价