二连盆地乌兰花凹陷特低渗安山岩储层的有效性评价

doi:10.7623/syxb202010003

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1188-1196.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202010003

二连盆地乌兰花凹陷特低渗安山岩储层的有效性评价

赵建斌¹, 黄显华², 刘晓燕³, 李振林¹, 田扬¹, 丁伟³, 刘玲莉³

1. 中国石油集团测井有限公司测井应用研究院陕西西安 710077;
2. 中国石油华北油田公司勘探开发研究院河北任丘 062550;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院亚太研究所北京 100083

收稿日期:2019-09-05 修回日期:2020-02-10 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-11-05
通讯作者: 赵建斌,男,1984年10月生,2009年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2012年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为中国石油集团测井有限公司测井应用研究院高级工程师,主要从事岩石物理实验分析及测井资料解释评价工作。
作者简介:赵建斌,男,1984年10月生,2009年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2012年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为中国石油集团测井有限公司测井应用研究院高级工程师,主要从事岩石物理实验分析及测井资料解释评价工作。Email:zhaojb123_cpl@163.com
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项"华北油田持续有效稳产勘探开发关键技术研究与应用"（2017E-15）资助。

Effectiveness evaluation of extra-low permeability andesite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag,Erlian Basin

Zhao Jianbin¹, Huang Xianhua², Liu Xiaoyan³, Li Zhenlin¹, Tian Yang¹, Ding Wei³, Liu Lingli³

1. Applied Research Institute, China Petroleum Logging Co., Ltd, Shaanxi Xi'an 710077, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hebei Renqiu 062550, China;
3. Department of Asia-Pacific E&P, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2019-09-05 Revised:2020-02-10 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对二连盆地乌兰花凹陷安山岩储层的特性认识不清、有效储层划分不准确的问题，利用岩心薄片、黏土矿物分析、物性测试以及核磁共振实验等手段开展了岩石储集空间特征、岩石蚀变程度、测井响应特征分析。在此基础上，重点开展了基于核磁共振实验的安山岩储层有效孔隙度计算模型研究，开发了相适应的测井解释评价模块，并结合常规测井和试油结果建立了安山岩储层的分类标准。结果表明：安山岩储集空间具有发育"微孔"、"杏仁孔"双孔隙的特征，且以微孔为主；根据不同蚀变程度所建立的安山岩有效孔隙度计算模型具有很高的精度，平均绝对误差为0.16%，平均相对误差为19.40%；新测井解释储层分类标准在实际应用中与试油结论具有很好的一致性，有利于乌兰花凹陷安山岩有效储层的精确划分，并为该地区开发方案的设计及可采储量评价提供技术支持。

关键词: 乌兰花凹陷, 蚀变安山岩, 核磁共振, 有效孔隙度, 有效储层

Abstract:

Aiming at the problems of unclear understanding of the characteristics of andesite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag, Erlian Basin and inaccurate classification of effective reservoirs, this paper analyzes the characteristics of reservoir spaces, rock alteration extents, and logging response characteristics by means of the thin sections of core samples, clay minerals, physical properties and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. This study focuses on the calculation model of effective porosity of andesite reservoirs based on nuclear magnetic resonance experiments, develops a suitable logging interpreting evaluation module, and establishes the classification standard of andesite reservoirs based on the results of conventional logging and oil testing. The results show that the reservoir space of andesite has dual pore characteristics of developing "micropores" and "amygdales", and micropores are dominant. The calculation model of effective porosity of andesite established according to different alteration extents has high accuracy. The average absolute error is 0.16%, and the average relative error is 19.40%. The new classification standard of reservoir based on logging interpretation is in good agreement with the results of oil testing in applications, which is conducive to the precise classification of effective andesite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag, and provides technical support for the design of development program and the evaluation of recoverable reserves in this area.

Key words: Wulanhua sag, altered andesite, nuclear magnetic resonance, effective porosity, effective reservoir

中图分类号:

TE122.2

赵建斌, 黄显华, 刘晓燕, 李振林, 田扬, 丁伟, 刘玲莉. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷特低渗安山岩储层的有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1188-1196.

Zhao Jianbin, Huang Xianhua, Liu Xiaoyan, Li Zhenlin, Tian Yang, Ding Wei, Liu Lingli. Effectiveness evaluation of extra-low permeability andesite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 1188-1196.

参考文献

[1] 张以明,陈树光,崔永谦,等. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷安山岩岩相展布及储层预测[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(6):1-9.
ZHANG Yiming,CHEN Shuguang,CUI Yongqian,et al.Lithofacies distribution and reservoir prediction of andesite in Wulanhua sag,Erlian Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(6):1-9.
[2] 冯帅,王连君,邢雅文,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷安山岩有利储层预测[J].石油地球物理勘探,2017,52(增刊1):117-122.
FENG Shuai,WANG Lianjun,XING Yawen,et al.Andesite reservoir prediction in Wulanhua sag,Erlian Basin[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2017,52(S1):117-122.
[3] 段贵府,才博,康如坤,等.二连油田安山岩裂缝性储层压裂技术研究[J].非常规油气,2016,3(1):77-81.
DUAN Guifu,CAI Bo,KANG Rukun,et al.Fracturing technology for andesite fractured reservoir in Erlian oilfield[J].Unconventonal Oil & Gas,2016,3(1):77-81.
[4] 张杰,王孟华,祖志勇,等.一种基于测井解释模型的火山岩致密储层预测方法——以二连探区乌兰花南洼安山岩为例[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会.中国石油学会2019年物探技术研讨会论文集.涿州:石油地球物理勘探编辑部,2019.
ZHANG Jie,WANG Menghua,ZU Zhiyong,et al.A tight reservoir prediction method based on well logging interpretation model for volcanic rock:a case study of andesite in Erlian area[C]//Society of PetroleumGeophysicists.Paper of the 2019 Symposium on Geophysical Exploration Technology,Chinese Petroleum Society.Zhuozhou:Editorial Department of Oil Geophysical Prospecting.2019.
[5] 杨笑,王志章,周子勇,等.基于参数优化AdaBoost算法的酸性火山岩岩性分类[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):457-467.
YANG Xiao,WANG Zhizhang,ZHOU Ziyong,et al.Lithology classification of acidic volcanic rocks based on parameter-optimized AdaBoost algorithm[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):457-467.
[6] 王敏,王永诗,田淼,等.火成岩蚀变层段的有效储层识别及孔隙度定量表征——以滨南油田沙四段上亚段火成岩为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(4):22-26.
WANG Min,WANG Yongshi,TIAN Miao,et al.Identification of effective reservoir and quantitative evaluation of porosity of altered igneous rock:a case study of igneous rock in the Upper Fourth Member of Shahejie Formation in Binnan oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(4):22-26.
[7] MORDENSKY S P,HEAP M J,KENNEDY B M,et al.Influence of alteration on the mechanical behaviour and failure mode of andesite:implications for shallow seismicity and volcano monitoring[J].Bulletin of Volcanology,2019,81(8):1-12.
[8] 黄玉欣,阮宝涛,李忠诚,等.王府断陷上侏罗统火石岭组火山岩类储层孔隙类型及微观结构特征[J].东北石油大学学报,2018,42(6):1-9.
HUANG Yuxin,RUAN Baotao,LI Zhongcheng,et al.Pore types and micro pore-structure of Upper Jurassic Huoshiling Formation in Wangfu rift[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2018,42(6):1-9.
[9] 何辉,李顺明,孔垂显,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系佳木河组火山岩有效储层特征与定量评价[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2016,40(2):1-12.
HE Hui,LI Shunming,KONG Chuixian,et al.Characteristics and quantitative evaluation of volcanic effective reservoir in Jiamuhe Formation of Permian,northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2016,40(2):1-12.
[10] 任康绪,王小军,吴宝成,等.不同碱度火成岩溶蚀增孔差异性对比[J].石油学报,2015,36(7):799-808.
REN Kangxu,WANG Xiaojun,WU Baocheng,et al.Comparation on differences of increasing porosity for different alkali contents igneous rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(7):799-808.
[11] 林红梅,刘鹏,王彤达,等.基于母岩类型差异的深层砂砾岩储集体成岩演化机制——以渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(10):1180-1191.
LIN Hongmei,LIU Peng,WANG Tongda,et al.Diagenetic evolution mechanism of deep glutenite reservoirs based on differences in parent rock types:a case study of lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Chezhen sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(10):1180-1191.
[12] 刘航宇,田中元,刘波,等.中东地区巨厚强非均质碳酸盐岩储层分类与预测——以伊拉克W油田中白垩统Mishrif组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(6):677-691.
LIU Hangyu,TIAN Zhongyuan,LIU Bo,et al.Classification and prediction of giant thick strongly heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs in the Middle East area:a case study of Mid-Cretaceous Mishrif Formation in the W oilfield of Iraq[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(6):677-691.
[13] 董冬.火山岩储层中的一种重要储集空间——气孔[J].石油勘探与开发,1991(1):89-93.
DONG Dong.An important reservoir space in igneous oil reservoir rocks——gas pores[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1991(1):89-93.
[14] 李宁,陶宏根,刘传平.酸性火山岩测井解释理论、方法与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009.
LI Ning,TAO Honggen,LIU Chuanping.Logging interpretation theory,method and application of acid igneous rocks[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.
[15] 中国石油勘探与生产分公司.火山岩油气藏测井评价技术及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009.
PetroChina Exploration & Production Company.Logging evaluation technology and application of igneous reservoir[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.
[16] 王春燕,张雷,金雪英.蚀变火山岩储层特征及气水层识别方法[J].大庆石油学院学报,2013,37(3):18-23.
WANG Chunya,ZHANG Lei,JIN Xueying.Characteristics and fluid identification of altered volcanic reservoirs[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2013,37(3):18-23.
[17] 朱学娟,张向明,范宜仁,等.蚀变玄武岩储层的有效性分析及储集性能评价[J].物探与化探,2013,37(3):400-405.
ZHU Xuejuan,ZHANG Xiangming,FAN Yiren,et al.Research on the effectiveness analysis and storage evaluation of the melaphyre reservoir[J].Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration,2013,37(3):400-405.
[18] 黄兴,李天太,王香增,等.致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(5):557-567.
HUANG Xing,LI Tiantai,WANG Xiangzeng,et al.Distribution characteristics and its influence factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoir:a case study from Chang-8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(5):557-567.
[19] COATES G R,MARSCHALL D,MARDON D,et al.A new characterization of bulk-volume irreducible using magnetic resonance[C]//SPWLA 38th Annual Logging Symposium.Houston,Texsa:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,1997.
[20] 张冲,毛志强,金燕.基于实验室条件下的核磁共振测井束缚水饱和度计算方法研究[J].核电子学与探测技术,2010,30(4):514-518.
ZHANG Chong,MAO Zhiqiang,JIN Yan.Experimental studies of NMR logging irreducible water saturation[J].Nuclear Electronics & Detection Technology,2010,30(4):514-518.
[21] 王伟,赵延伟,毛锐,等.页岩油储层核磁有效孔隙度起算时间的确定——以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):550-557.
WANG Wei,ZHAO Yanwei,MAO Rui,et al.Determination of the starting time for measurement of NMR effective porosity in shale oil reservoir:a case study of the Permian Lucaogou shale oil reservoir,Jimusaer sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):550-557.
[22] 王振林,毛志强,孙中春,等.致密油储层孔隙结构核磁共振测井评价方法[J].断块油气田,2017,24(6):783-787.
WANG Zhenlin,MAO Zhiqiang,SUN Zhongchun,et al.Evaluation of pore structure using NMR logs for tight oil reservoirs[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2017,24(6):783-787.
[23] 赵建斌,万金彬,罗安银,等.储层品质评价中的核磁共振研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2018,40(1):89-96.
ZHAO Jianbin,WAN Jinbin,LUO Anyin,et al.A study on nuclear magnetic resonance to reservoir quality evaluation[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2018,40(1):89-96.
[24] 王岩泉,边伟华,刘宝鸿,等.辽河盆地火成岩储层评价标准与有效储层物性下限[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2016,40(2):13-22.
WANG Yanquan,BIAN Weihua,LIU Baohong,et al.Evaluation criterion and cut-off value of igneous rock reservoirs in Liaohe Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum,2016,40(2):13-22.

二连盆地乌兰花凹陷特低渗安山岩储层的有效性评价

Effectiveness evaluation of extra-low permeability andesite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag,Erlian Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[2]	张磊, 乔向阳, 张亮, 吴克柳, 周伟, 白慧芳, 辛翠平, 王涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 88-95.
[3]	黄兴, 李天太, 王香增, 高辉, 倪军, 赵金省, 王琛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 557-567.
[4]	苏俊霖, 董汶鑫, 罗平亚, 徐显广, 黄进军. 基于低场核磁共振技术的黏土表面水化水定量测试与分析[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 468-474.
[5]	蒋裕强, 刘雄伟, 付永红, 陈虎, 张海杰, 燕军, 陈超, 谷一凡. 渝西地区海相页岩储层孔隙有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1233-1243.
[6]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 袁超, 李霞, 李长喜, 刘学锋. 利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1019-1027.
[7]	房涛, 张立宽, 刘乃贵, 张立强, 王为民, 于岚, 李超, 雷裕红. 核磁共振技术定量表征致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构——以临清坳陷东部石炭系—二叠系致密砂岩储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 902-915.
[8]	杨正明, 黄辉, 骆雨田, 雷启鸿, 李海波. 致密油藏混合润湿性测试新方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(3): 318-323.
[9]	刘标, 姚素平, 胡文瑄, 曹剑, 解德录. 核磁共振冻融法表征非常规油气储层孔隙的适用性[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(12): 1401-1410.
[10]	肖佃师, 卢双舫, 姜微微, 黄文彪, 张鲁川, 李勃. 基于粒间孔贡献量的致密砂岩储层分类——以徐家围子断陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1123-1134.
[11]	狄勤丰, 张景楠, 叶峰, 王文昌, 陈会娟, 华帅. 驱替过程中重力舌进特征的核磁共振可视化实验[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1183-1188.
[12]	代全齐, 罗群, 张晨, 卢朝进, 张云钊, 鲁少杰, 赵岩. 基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 887-897.
[13]	邓少贵, 牛云峰, 赵岳, 马明明, 谢伟彪, 庄东志. 致密含气砂岩核磁共振-声波速度联合实验[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(6): 768-776.
[14]	白松涛, 程道解, 万金彬, 杨林, 彭洪立, 郭笑锴, 曾静波. 砂岩岩石核磁共振T₂谱定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3): 382-391,414.
[15]	朱华银, 徐轩, 安来志, 郭长敏, 肖佳蕊. 致密气藏孔隙水赋存状态与流动性实验[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 230-236.