川中地区磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶微地貌及其发育特征

doi:10.7623/syxb202110004

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1299-1309,1336.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202110004

川中地区磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶微地貌及其发育特征

夏钦禹¹, 闫海军¹, 徐伟², 张林¹, 罗文军², 邓惠², 俞霁晨¹

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院四川成都 610051

收稿日期:2021-03-03 修回日期:2021-08-04 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-11-03
作者简介:夏钦禹,男,1991年4月生,2013年获长江大学学士学位,2016年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事石油天然气开发地质研究工作。Email:xiaqy-ordos@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项"深层碳酸盐岩气藏高效开发技术"（2016ZX05015-003）和中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项"川中地区灯四气藏规模有效开发关键技术研究与应用"（2016E-0606）资助。

Paleokarst microtopography of the Sinian top and its development characteristics in Moxi area,central Sichuan Basin

Xia Qinyu¹, Yan Haijun¹, Xu Wei², Zhang Lin¹, Luo Wenjun², Deng Hui², Yu Jichen¹

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Sichuan Chengdu 610051, China

Received:2021-03-03 Revised:2021-08-04 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对四川盆地磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶"微地貌"单元划分不系统、研究较为缺乏的问题，综合分析磨溪区块的三维地震资料和钻井资料，论证并选取下寒武统沧浪铺组内部海泛面作为震旦系灯影组的上覆标志面，采用印模法恢复了震旦系顶面的古岩溶地貌。在此基础上，借鉴地貌学的经典坡位分类，结合磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶地貌的发育特征，建立了磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶微地貌的发育模式。优选坡度、剖面曲率、相对高程和长宽比4个参数，厘定各参数定量表征的标准，结合沟谷提取的分析结果，将磨溪区块划分为8类古岩溶微地貌单元，明确了磨溪区块震旦系顶面不同微地貌单元的发育特征，分析了不同微地貌单元中垂向岩溶风化带及溶蚀孔洞层发育程度的差异。研究表明，磨溪区块可划分为陡坡、坡肩、坡脚、残丘、坡顶、坡底、洼地和沟谷8类古岩溶微地貌单元。其中，残丘、洼地、坡顶和坡底在平面上呈低长宽比的似圆状、不规则状；坡肩、陡坡、坡脚和沟谷呈条带状。从坡肩、坡脚到坡底，各微地貌单元中的地表岩溶带和垂直渗流带厚度明显减小，水平潜流带厚度增大。溶蚀孔洞层在水平潜流带中的发育程度大于地表岩溶带和垂直渗流带中的发育程度，且水平潜流带厚度越大的部位其溶蚀孔洞层的累计厚度越大。坡底是有利于溶蚀孔洞层发育的微地貌单元。

关键词: 四川盆地, 磨溪区块, 震旦系, 古岩溶, 微地貌, 坡位, 岩溶带, 溶蚀孔洞

Abstract: Aiming at the problems such as unsystematic division and less research of the paleokarst microtopography units of the Sinian top in Moxi area, Sichuan Basin, this paper analyzes the three-dimensional seismic data and drilling data of Moxi area, demonstrates and selects the marine flooding surface inside the Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation as the overlying marker horizon of the Sinian Dengying Formation. The molding method is used to restore the paleokarst topography of the Sinian top. Referring to the classical classification of slope positions in geomorphology, in combination with the development characteristics of paleokarst, this paper builds up a development model for the paleokarst microtopography of the Sinian top in Moxi area. By optimizing 4 parameters of slope, profile curvature, relative elevation and aspect ratio, determining the quantitative characterization standard of each parameter and combining with the analysis results of valley extraction, the Moxi area is divided into 8 types of paleokarst microgeomorphic units, thus making clear the development characteristics of different microgeomorphic units of the Sinian top. Meanwhile, an analysis is conducted on the development degree differences of vertical karst weathering zone and karst cave layer in different microgeomorphic units. The research shows that Moxi area can be divided into 8 types of paleokarst microgeomorphic units:steep slope, slope shoulder, slope toe, monadnock, slope top, slope bottom, hollow and valley. Among them, the monadnock, hollow, slope top and slope bottom are round or irregular with low aspect ratios; slope shoulder, steep slope, slope toe and valley are stripe-shaped. From the slope shoulder, the slope toe to the slope bottom, the thickness of the surface karst zone and vertical seepage zone in each microgeomorphic unit decreases obviously, but the thickness of the horizontal underflow zone increases. The development degree of karst cave layer in the horizontal underflow zone is greater than that in the surface karst zone and vertical seepage zone, and the greater the thickness of the horizontal underflow zone, the greater the cumulative thickness of the karst cave layer. Slope bottom is a microgeomorphic unit that is conducive to the development of karst cave layer.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Moxi area, Sinian, paleokarst, microtopography, slope position, karst zone, karst cave

中图分类号:

TE122.2

夏钦禹, 闫海军, 徐伟, 张林, 罗文军, 邓惠, 俞霁晨. 川中地区磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶微地貌及其发育特征[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1299-1309,1336.

Xia Qinyu, Yan Haijun, Xu Wei, Zhang Lin, Luo Wenjun, Deng Hui, Yu Jichen. Paleokarst microtopography of the Sinian top and its development characteristics in Moxi area,central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 1299-1309,1336.

参考文献

[1] 杨跃明,杨雨,杨光,等.安岳气田震旦系、寒武系气藏成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):493-508.
YANG Yueming,YANG Yu,YANG Guang,et al.Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies of Sinian and Cambrian gas reservoirs in Anyue gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):493-508.
[2] 马振芳,付锁堂,陈安宁.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系古风化壳气藏分布规律[J].海相油气地质,2000,5(1/2):98-102.
MA Zhenfang,FU Suotang,CHEN Anning.Distribution of Ordovician paleo weathered crust gas reservoir in Ordos Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2000,5(1/2):98-102.
[3] 汤济广,胡望水,李伟,等.古地貌与不整合动态结合预测风化壳岩溶储集层分布——以四川盆地乐山-龙女寺古隆起灯影组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):674-681.
TANG Jiguang,HU Wangshui,LI Wei,et al.Prediction of weathering paleokarst reservoirs by combining paleokarst landform with unconformity:a case study of Sinian Dengying Formation in Leshan-Longnüsi paleo-uplift,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):674-681.
[4] 何自新,郑聪斌,陈安宁,等.长庆气田奥陶系古沟槽展布及其对气藏的控制[J].石油学报,2001,22(4):35-38.
HE Zixin,ZHEN Congbin,CHEN Anning,et al.Distributive configuration of ancient valley-trough on ordovician erosion surface in Changqing gas field and its control over gas accumulations[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,22(4):35-38.
[5] 闫海军,彭先,夏钦禹,等.高石梯-磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义[J].石油学报,2020,41(6):658-670.
YAN Haijun,PENG Xian,XIA Qinyu,et al.Distribution features of ancient karst landform in the fourth Member of the Dengying Formation in the Gaoshiti-Moxi region and its guiding significance for gas reservoir development[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(6):658-670.
[6] 李启桂,李克胜,周卓铸,等.四川盆地桐湾不整合面古地貌特征与岩溶分布预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):516-521.
LI Qigui,LI Kesheng,ZHOU Zhuozhu,et al.Palaeogeomorphology and karst distribution of Tongwan unconformity in Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(4):516-521.
[7] 刘宏,罗思聪,谭秀成,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组古岩溶地貌恢复及意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):283-293.
LIU Hong,LUO Sicong,TAN Xiucheng,et al.Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin and its significance,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):283-293.
[8] 洪余刚,陈景山,代宗仰,等.古地貌恢复在风化壳岩溶型储层研究中的应用——以川中-川南过渡带奥陶系为例[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(1):1-5.
HONG Yugang,CHEN Jingshan,DAI Zongyang,et al.The application of ancient geomorphy recovery to the study on the palaeoweathering crust-type karst reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2007,26(1):1-5.
[9] 杨雨,黄先平,张健,等.四川盆地寒武系沉积前震旦系顶界岩溶地貌特征及其地质意义[J].天然气工业,2014,34(3):38-43.
YANG Yu,HUANG Xianping,ZHANG Jian,et al.Features and geologic significances of the top Sinian karst landform before the Cambrian deposition in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(3):38-43.
[10] 张庆玉,梁彬,曹建文,等.塔里木盆地轮古东地区前石炭纪古岩溶微地貌及岩溶发育模式[J].海相油气地质,2017,22(3):30-36.
ZHANG Qingyu,LIANG Bin,CAO Jianwen,et al.Micro-paleogeomorphology and karst development model of the pre-Carboniferous in eastern Lungu area,Tarim Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2017,22(3):30-36.
[11] 韩长城,林承焰,鲁新便,等.塔河油田奥陶系岩溶地貌对储集层的控制作用[J].新疆石油地质,2016,37(4):417-422.
HAN Changcheng,LIN Chengyan,LU Xinbian,et al.Controlling effects of Ordovician karst paleogeomorphology on reservoirs in Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(4):417-422.
[12] HAN Changcheng,LIN Chengyan,WEI Ting,et al.Paleogeomorphology restoration and the controlling effects of paleogeomorphology on karst reservoirs:a case study of an ordovician-aged section in Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin,China[J].Carbonates Evaporites,2019,34(1):31-44.
[13] 曹建文,夏日元,张庆玉.应用古地貌成因组合识别法恢复塔河油田主体区古岩溶地貌[J].新疆石油地质,2015,36(3):283-287.
CAO Jianwen,XIA Riyuan,ZHANG Qingyu. Application of paleogeomorphic genesis assembly identification method to recovery of paleokarst landform in major blocks of Tahe oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2015,36(3):283-287.
[14] CAO Jianwen,TANG Zhonghua,ZHANG Qingyu,et al.Paleogeomorphic genesis assembly method for paleogeomorphic recovery in the major region of the Tahe oil field,Tarim Basin,northwest China[J].Carbonates Evaporites,2019,34(2):283-229.
[15] 金民东,谭秀成,童明胜,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区灯四段岩溶古地貌恢复及地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):58-68.
JIN Mindong,TAN Xiucheng,TONG Mingsheng,et al.Karst paleogeomorphology of the fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area,Sichuan Basin,SW China:restoration and geological significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):58-68.
[16] 冯伟明,谢渊,李嵘,等.川东南-黔西北桐湾Ⅲ幕岩溶古地貌恢复[J].地质论评,2017,63(5):1270-1280.
FENG Weiming,XIE Yuan,LI Rong,et al.Restoration of karst palaeotopography on the tongwan movement period in the southeastern Sichuan and northwestern Guizhou[J].Geological Review,2017,63(5):1270-1280.
[17] 江青春,胡素云,汪泽成,等.四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J].石油学报,2012,33(6):949-960.
JIANG Qingchun,HU Suyun,WANG Zecheng,et al.Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(6):949-960.
[18] 魏新善,任军峰,赵俊兴,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳古地貌特征嬗变及地质意义[J].石油学报,2017,38(9):999-1009.
WEI Xinshan,REN Junfeng,ZHAO Junxing,et al.Paleo-geomorphologic characteristic evolution and geological significance of the Ordovician weathering crust in eastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(9):999-1009.
[19] 李笑天,潘仁芳,鄢杰,等.四川盆地灯四段岩溶古地貌精细刻画及油气勘探意义[J].地质科技情报,2018,37(3):191-195.
LI Xiaotian,PAN Renfang,YAN Jie,et al.Karst paleogeomorphology features of the fourth Member of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin and the significance of oil and gas exploration[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2018,37(3):191-195.
[20] 朱茂,沈安江,曾洪流,等.古地貌恢复在岩溶风化壳储层研究中的应用——以川中磨溪地区灯影组四段为例[J].海相油气地质,2018,23(4):87-95.
ZHU Mao,SHEN Anjiang,ZENG Hongliu,et al.The application of paleogeomorphy restoration to the study of karst weathering crust reservoir:a case from the fourth Member of Dengying Formation in Moxi area,Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2018,23(4):87-95.
[21] 陈娅娜,沈安江,潘立银,等.微生物白云岩储集层特征、成因和分布——以四川盆地震旦系灯影组四段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(5):704-715.
CHEN Yana,SHEN Anjiang,PAN Liyin,et al.Features,origin and distribution of microbial dolomite reservoirs:a case study of 4th Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(5):704-715.
[22] 兰才俊,徐哲航,马肖琳,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1069-1084.
LAN Caijun,XU Zhehang,MA Xiaolin,et al.Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1069-1084.
[23] 谷一凡,周路,蒋裕强,等.四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式[J].石油学报,2020,41(5):574-583.
GU Yifan,ZHOU Lu,JIANG Yuqiang,et al.Reservoir types and gas well productivity models for Member 4 of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti block,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(5):574-583.
[24] 汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312.
WANG Zecheng,JIANG Hua,WANG Tongshan,et al.Paleo-geomorphology formed during Tongwan tectonization in Sichuan Basin and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):305-312.
[25] 罗冰,杨跃明,罗文军,等.川中古隆起灯影组储层发育控制因素及展布[J].石油学报,2015,36(4):416-426.
LUO Bing,YANG Yueming,LUO Wenjun,et al.Controlling factors and distribution of reservoir development in Dengying Formation of paleo-uplift in central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(4):416-426.
[26] RUHE R V.Elements of the soil landscape[C]//Transactions of the 9th Congress of the International Society of Soil Science.Madison,Wisconsin:International Soil Science Society,1960:165-170.
[27] SCHMIDT J,HEWITT A.Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position[J].Geoderma,2004,121(3/4):243-256.
[28] PENNOCK D J,ZEBARTH B J,DE JONG E.Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain,Saskatchewan,Canada[J].Geoderma,1987,40(3/4):297-315.
[29] WYSOCKI D A,SCHOENEBERGER P J,HIRMAS D R,et al.Geomorphology of soil landscapes[M]//HUANG P M,LI Y,SUMMER M E.Handbook of soil science:properties and processes.2nd ed.Boca Raton:CRC Press,2011:969-994.
[30] 秦承志,朱阿兴,李宝林,等.坡位的分类及其空间分布信息的定量化[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2009,34(3):374-377.
QIN Chengzhi,ZHU Axing,LI Baolin,et al.Taxonomy of slope positions and quantification of their spatial distribution information[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2009,34(3):374-377.
[31] SKIDMORE A K.Terrain position as mapped from a gridded digital elevation model[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,1990,4(1):33-49.
[32] PEUCKER T K,DOUGLAS D H.Detection of surface-specific points by local parallel processing of discrete terrain elevation data[J].Computer Graphics and Image Processing,1975,4(4):375-387.

川中地区磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶微地貌及其发育特征

Paleokarst microtopography of the Sinian top and its development characteristics in Moxi area,central Sichuan Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭旭升, 腾格尔, 魏祥峰, 俞凌杰, 陆现彩, 孙磊, 魏富彬. 四川盆地深层海相页岩气赋存机理与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 453-468.
[2]	杨雪, 石学文, 朱逸青, 刘佳, 李怡, 何亮, 徐亮, 李彦佑, 陈瑶, 蒋佳玉. 四川盆地南部泸州地区凯迪阶—埃隆阶深水页岩沉积演化与有机质富集[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 469-482.
[3]	田华, 鲁雪松, 张水昌, 柳少波, 田兴旺, 马行陟, 刘强. 四川盆地安岳气田龙王庙组气藏多层盖层天然气扩散量[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(3): 355-363,398.
[4]	潘立银, 郝毅, 梁峰, 胡安平, 俸月星, 赵建新. 白云岩储层成因的激光原位U-Pb定年和同位素地球化学新证据——以四川盆地西北部中二叠统栖霞组白云岩储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 223-233.
[5]	郭彤楼, 王勇飞, 叶素娟, 刘林. 四川盆地中江气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 141-155.
[6]	熊晓军, 陈容, 袁野, 张鑫, 冯亮, 吴永宏, 徐发波. 四川盆地卧龙河构造茅口组岩溶储层地震预测[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 724-735.
[7]	鲁雪松, 柳少波, 田华, 马行陟, 于志超, 范俊佳, 桂丽黎, 刘强. 深层背斜圈闭中泥岩盖层完整性评价方法及其应用——以四川盆地川中地区震旦系气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 415-427.
[8]	王尉, 赵路子, 罗冰, 刘冉, 李亚, 赵立可, 裴森奇, 胡涛. 川西地区二叠系火山岩异常高压演化与天然气成藏的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1437-1445.
[9]	闫磊, 朱光有, 王珊, 陈志勇, 朱永峰, 杨敏, 杜德道, 陈永权. 塔里木盆地震旦系—寒武系万米超深层天然气成藏条件与有利区带优选[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1446-1457.
[10]	闫海军, 彭先, 夏钦禹, 徐伟, 罗文军, 李新豫, 张林, 朱秋影, 朱迅, 刘曦翔. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 658-670,752.
[11]	谷一凡, 周路, 蒋裕强, 倪佳, 李俊良, 朱讯, 付永红, 蒋增政. 四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 574-583.
[12]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 蒋廷学, 王濡岳, 张钰莹, 张光荣, 卢志远. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391.
[13]	杨威, 魏国齐, 谢武仁, 马石玉, 金惠, 苏楠, 孙爱, 沈珏红, 郝翠果, 武赛军. 川中地区龙王庙组优质储层发育的主控因素及成因机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 421-432.
[14]	高国辉, 曹剑, 罗冰, 肖笛, 张亚, 陈聪. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统海相混合型烃源岩的证据及对双鱼石大气藏的成藏贡献[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 433-445.
[15]	聂海宽, 李东晖, 姜涛, 颜彩娜, 杜伟, 张光荣. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 273-283.