页岩储层渗吸过程中水的微观分布及其气测渗透率动态响应特征

doi:10.7623/syxb202204007

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 533-547.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202204007

页岩储层渗吸过程中水的微观分布及其气测渗透率动态响应特征

朱秀川^1,2, 胡钦红³, 蒙冕模^1,2, 张军建⁴, 张涛^1,2, 尹娜^1,2, 孙小惠^1,2, 晁静⁵, 杜玉山⁵, 刘惠民⁵

1. 中国石油大学(华东)山东省深层油气重点实验室山东青岛 266580;
2. 青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室山东青岛 266071;
3. 美国德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校德克萨斯州阿灵顿 76019;
4. 山东科技大学地球科学与工程学院山东青岛 266590;
5. 中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2021-03-27 修回日期:2022-01-02 发布日期:2022-04-30
通讯作者: 胡钦红,男,1965年7月生,1995年获美国亚里桑那大学博士学位,现为美国德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校教授,主要从事裂隙基岩相互作用、微观孔隙结构和宏观页岩油气的赋存和运移行为研究。Email:water19049@gmail.com
作者简介:朱秀川,男,1997年2月生,2019年获中国石油大学胜利学院资源勘查工程专业学士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)硕士研究生,主要从事页岩孔隙结构表征、页岩油气的赋存和运移方面的研究。Email:xiuchuan9702@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目"陆相页岩油在基质-裂缝体系中的多尺度运移机理研究"（No.41830431）资助。

Microscopic distribution of water in the imbibition process of shale reservoir and dynamic response characteristics of its gas logging permeability

Zhu Xiuchuan^1,2, Hu Qinhong³, Meng Mianmo^1,2, Zhang Junjian⁴, Zhang Tao^1,2, Yin Na^1,2, Sun Xiaohui^1,2, Chao Jing⁵, Du Yushan⁵, Liu Huimin⁵

1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China;
2. Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Shandong Qingdao 266071, China;
3. University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington Texas 76019, USA;
4. College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University and Technology, Shandong Qingdao 266590, China;
5. Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Shandong Dongying 25700, China

Received:2021-03-27 Revised:2022-01-02 Published:2022-04-30
Contact: 胡钦红,男,1965年7月生,1995年获美国亚里桑那大学博士学位,现为美国德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校教授,主要从事裂隙基岩相互作用、微观孔隙结构和宏观页岩油气的赋存和运移行为研究。Email:water19049@gmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在页岩油气储层水力压裂过程中，压裂液的滤失行为会增加储层的含水饱和度、降低储层渗透率。研究压裂液侵入对储层渗透率的影响，对于页岩油气的高效开发具有重要意义。为此，针对渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段灰质页岩和混合质页岩岩相样品，通过自发渗吸实验获得了样品不同含水饱和度行为，利用核磁共振表征水在孔隙中的动态运移，结合覆压渗透率定量表征气测渗透率动态变化。实验结果表明：①在含水饱和度为5%~40%的渗吸过程中，以微孔（核磁共振T₂<1 ms）吸水为主，T₂谱累积信号呈上升趋势，占比逐渐增加，而中孔和大孔的T₂累积信号呈缓慢上升和波动状态且占比逐渐降低。当含水饱和度达到40%时，微孔累积信号占比高达87%以上。②水化改善作用与水锁和水敏损害相互制约，影响渗透率的动态变化，主要分为3种制约状态（水化远大于、大于、小于水锁和水敏）。结合矿物组分和孔隙结构分析发现，在黏土矿物含量为25%~43%的页岩中，渗透率损害率与黏土矿物和石英含量呈正相关，与脆性指数和碳酸盐矿物含量呈负相关性，灰质页岩水化改善作用优于混合质页岩，且大于1 μm孔喉的发育既能促进水化改善作用，又能降低水锁和水敏对孔喉的损害。

关键词: 页岩油储层, 含水饱和度, 核磁共振, 气测渗透率, 自发渗吸

Abstract: In the process of hydraulic fracturing in shale oil and gas reservoirs, the leakage behavior of fracturing fluid can increase the water saturation of reservoirs, and reduce the permeability of reservoirs. A study on the influence of fracturing fluid invasion on the effective permeability of reservoirs is of great significance for the efficient development of shale oil and gas. Therefore, in view of the calcareous and mixed shale lithofacies samples in the lower sub member of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation, Zhanhua sag, Bohai Bay Basin, different water saturations of samples were obtained through spontaneous imbibition test in the laboratory, the dynamic migration of water in pores was characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and the dynamic changes in gas permeability was characterized quantitatively using overburden permeability. The results shows that:(1) When the water saturation ranges from 5% to 40%, the imbibition process is dominated by small pores (NMR T₂<1 ms), and the cumulative signalof T₂ spectrum shows an upward trend and its proportion is gradually increased; the cumulative signal of T₂ spectrum in the mesopores and macropores slowly rises or fluctuates up and down, respectively, and their proportions are gradually decreased. When the water saturation reaches 40%, the cumulative signal of small pores accounts for as high as 87% and more. (2) The hydration improvement effect and the damage of water blocking and water sensitivity are interacting, and thus affect the dynamic changes in permeability, which can be mainly divided into three states, i.e., hydration improvement is far greater than, greater than, and less than water-locking and water-sensitivity. Further, through the analysis of mineral composition and pore structure, it is found that in the shale with a clay mineral content of 25%-43%, the damaging rate of permeability is positively correlated with clay mineral and quartz contents, while negatively correlated with brittleness index and the carbonate content; calcareous shale has a better hydration improvement than mixed shale, and the development of the pore-throat greater than 1 μm not only can promote hydration improvement, but can reduce the damages of water blocking and water sensitivity to the pore throat.

Key words: shale oil reservoir, water saturation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas permeability, spontaneous imbibition

中图分类号:

TE311

朱秀川, 胡钦红, 蒙冕模, 张军建, 张涛, 尹娜, 孙小惠, 晁静, 杜玉山, 刘惠民. 页岩储层渗吸过程中水的微观分布及其气测渗透率动态响应特征[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 533-547.

Zhu Xiuchuan, Hu Qinhong, Meng Mianmo, Zhang Junjian, Zhang Tao, Yin Na, Sun Xiaohui, Chao Jing, Du Yushan, Liu Huimin. Microscopic distribution of water in the imbibition process of shale reservoir and dynamic response characteristics of its gas logging permeability[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(4): 533-547.

参考文献

[1] 胡钦红, 刘惠民, 黎茂稳, 等. 东营凹陷沙河街组页岩油储集层润湿性、孔隙连通性和流体-示踪剂运移[J].石油学报, 2018, 39(3):278-289.
HU Qinhong, LIU Huimin, LI Maowen, et al.Wettability, pore connectivity and fluid-tracer migration in shale oil reservoirs of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Dongying sag of Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(3):278-289.
[2] MA Binyu, HU Qinhong, YANG Shengyu, et al.Pore structure typing and fractal characteristics of lacustrine shale from Kongdian Formation in east China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 85:103709.
[3] YANG Rui, HU Qinhong, YI Jizheng, et al.The effects of mineral composition, TOC content and pore structure on spontaneous imbibition in Lower Jurassic Dongyuemiao shale reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 109:268-278.
[4] MENG Mianmo, GE Hongkui, SHEN Yinghao, et al.The effect of clay-swelling induced cracks on imbibition behavior of marine shale reservoirs[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 83:103525.
[5] LIANG Lixi, XIONG Jian, LIU Xiangjun, et al.Experimental study on crack propagation in shale formations considering hydration and wettability[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23:492-499.
[6] LIU Jingping, ZHI Yang, SUN Jinsheng, et al.Experimental investigation on hydration mechanism of Sichuan shale (China)[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 201:108421.
[7] KLINKENBERG L J.The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases[C]//Proceedings of 1941 Drilling and Production Practice.New York:American Petroleum Institute, 1941:200-213.
[8] 张杰, 李熙喆, 高树生, 等.致密砂岩气藏产水机理及其对渗流能力的影响[J].天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(10):1519-1530.
ZHANG Jie, LI Xizhe, GAO Shusheng, et al.Water production mechanism of tight sandstone gas reservoir and its influence on percolation capacity[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(10):1519-1530.
[9] 高树生, 胡志明, 郭为, 等.页岩储层吸水特征与返排能力[J].天然气工业, 2013, 33(12):71-76.
GAO Shusheng, HU Zhiming, GAO Wei, et al.Water absorption characteristics of gas shale and the fracturing fluid flowback capacity[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(12):71-76.
[10] 宋付权, 宋兴兴, 龙运前, 等.束缚水条件下气体在裂缝性页岩多孔介质中的流动特征[J].水动力学研究与进展:A辑, 2019, 34(3):317-322.
SONG Fuquan, SONG Xingxing, LONG Yunqian, et al.Characteristics of starting pressure of gas flow in fractured shale porous media under irreducible water condition[J].Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 34(3):317-322.
[11] 赖南君, 叶仲斌, 刘向君, 等.低渗透致密砂岩气藏水锁损害室内研究[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(4):125-127.
LAI Nanjun, YE Zhongbin, LIU Xiangjun, et al.In-house study on water locking damage of tight sand gas reservoirs with low permeability[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(4):125-127.
[12] 丁锐.地层黏土水化的总体机理和影响因素[J].油田化学, 1998(2):180-184.
DING Rui.The general mechanisms and influencing factors in formation clay hydration[J].Oilfield Chemistry, 1998(2):180-184.
[13] 曾凡辉, 张蔷, 陈斯瑜, 等.水化作用下页岩微观孔隙结构的动态表征——以四川盆地长宁地区龙马溪组页岩为例[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(10):66-75.
ZENG Fanhui, ZHANG Qiang, CHEN Siyu, et al.Dynamic characterization of microscopic pore structures of shale under the effect of hydration:a case study of Longmaxi Formation shale in the Changning area of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(10):66-75.
[14] 穆英, 胡志明, 端祥刚, 等.页岩吸水对储层的作用机理研究[J].天然气与石油, 2020, 38(6):73-79.
MU Ying, HU Zhiming, DUAN Xianggang, et al.Study on shale water absorption Mechanism on reservoir[J].Natural Gas and Oil, 2020, 38(6):73-79.
[15] 康毅力, 杨斌, 李相臣, 等.页岩水化微观作用力定量表征及工程应用[J].石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(2):301-308.
KANG Yili, YANG Bin, LI Xiangchen, et al.Quantitative characterization of micro forces in shale hydration and field applications[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(2):301-308.
[16] 唐文泉.泥页岩水化作用对井壁稳定性影响的研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学, 2011.
TANG Wenquan.Study on effects of shale hydration on wellbore stability[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum, 2011.
[17] 游利军, 程秋洋, 康毅力, 等.页岩裂缝网络水相自吸试验[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 42(1):82-89.
YOU Lijun, CHENG Qiuyang, KANG Yili, et al.Experimental study on spontaneous water imbibition in fracture networks of shale rocks[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science, 2018, 42(1):82-89.
[18] ZHANG Pengfei, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al.Petrophysical characterization of oil-bearing shales by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 89:775-785.
[19] BRACE W F, WALSH J B, FRANGOS W T.Permeability of granite under high pressure[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1968, 73(6):2225-2236.
[20] 李俊乾, 卢双舫, 张鹏飞, 等.页岩基质孔隙水定量表征及微观赋存机制[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(8):979-990.
LI Junqian, LU Shuangfang, ZHANG Pengfei, et al.Quantitative characterization and microscopic occurrence mechanism of pore water in shale matrix[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(8):979-990.
[21] 王萍, 屈展.基于核磁共振的脆硬性泥页岩水化损伤演化研究[J].岩土力学, 2015, 36(3):687-693.
WANG Ping, QU Zhan.NMR technology based hydration damage evolution of hard brittle shale[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(3):687-693.
[22] 李耀华, 宋岩, 徐兴友, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段凝灰质页岩油层的润湿性及自发渗吸特征[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(10):1229-1237.
LI Yaohua, SONG Yan, XU Xingyou, et al.Wettability and spontaneous imbibition characteristics of the tuffaceous shale reservoirs in the Member 7 of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(10):1229-1237.
[23] 陈莉.海陆过渡相页岩润湿性评价——以南华北盆地牟页1井山西-太原组页岩为例[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
CHEN Li.Wettability evaluation of marine-continental transitional shale:a case study of Shanxi-Taiyuan Formation shale of Mouye 1 well in Southern North China Basin[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2020.
[24] GATES C H, PERFECT E, LOKITZ B S, et al.Transient analysis of advancing contact angle measurements on polished rock surfaces[J].Advances in Water Resources, 2018, 119:142-149.
[25] WANG Qiming, ZHOU Wen, HU Qinhong, et al.Pore geometry characteristics and fluid-rock interaction in the Haynesville Shale, East Texas, United States[J].Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(1):237-250.
[26] 胡钦红, 张宇翔, 孟祥豪, 等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系沙河街组页岩油储集层微米-纳米级孔隙体系表征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(5):681-690.
HU Qinhong, ZHANG Yuxiang, MENG Xianghao, et al.Characterization of micro-nano pore networks in shale oil reservoirs of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Dongying sag of Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5):681-690.
[27] 王子龙, 郭少斌.海陆过渡相页岩储层孔隙表征方法对比研究[J].中国地质, 2021:1-16.
WANG Zilong, GUO Shaobin.Comparative study on pore characterization methods of shale reservoir[J].Geology in China, 2021:1-16.
[28] 向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 等.页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4):137-146.
XIANG Xuebing, SIMA Liqiang, WANG Liang, et al.Pore fluid division and effective pore size calculation of shale gas reservoir:a case study of Longtan Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4):137-146.
[29] 邵新荷, 庞雄奇, 胡涛, 等.渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段泥页岩储层孔隙微观特征及其对油气滞留的意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1):67-77.
SHAO Xinhe, PANG Xiongqi, HU Tao, et al.Microscopic characteristics of pores in Es₃ shales and its significances for hydrocarbon retention in Dongpu sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(1):67-77.
[30] 蒋裕强, 刘雄伟, 付永红, 等.渝西地区海相页岩储层孔隙有效性评价[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(10):1233-1243.
JIANG Yuqiang, LIU Xiongwei, FU Yonghong, et al.Evaluation of effective porosity in marine shale reservoir, western Chongqing[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(10):1233-1243.
[31] 苏俊霖, 董汶鑫, 罗平亚, 等.基于低场核磁共振技术的黏土表面水化水定量测试与分析[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(4):468-474.
SU Junlin, DONG Wenxin, LUO Pingya, et al.Quantitative test and analysis of clay surface hydration water based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(4):468-474.
[32] 梁天博, 马实英, 魏东亚, 等.低渗透油藏水锁机理与助排表面活性剂的优选原则[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(6):745-752.
LIANG Tianbo, MA Shiying, WEI Dongya, et al.Water blocking mechanism of low-permeability reservoirs and screening principle of flowback surfactants[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6):745-752.
[33] 薛华庆, 周尚文, 蒋雅丽, 等.水化作用对页岩微观结构与物性的影响[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6):1075-1081.
XUE Huaqing, ZHOU Shangwen, JIANG Yali, et al.Effects of hydration on the microstructure and physical properties of shale[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6):1075-1081.
[34] 赵峰, 唐洪明, 孟英峰, 等.微观地质特征对硬脆性泥页岩井壁稳定性影响与对策研究[J].钻采工艺, 2007, 30(6):16-18.
ZHAO Feng, TANG Hongming, MENG Yingfeng, et al.Study on the influence of microscopic geologic characteristics on wellbore stability of brittle shale[J].Drilling & Production Technology, 2007, 30(6):16-18.
[35] 郑祥波.页岩气储层粘土矿物及水敏性测井评价[D].北京:中国石油大学, 2018.
ZHENG Xiangbo.Study on log evaluation of clay mineral and water sensitivity for shale gas reservoirs[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2018.
[36] 李国欣, 刘国强, 侯雨庭, 等.陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(11):1405-1416.
LI Guoxin, LIU Guoqiang, HOU Yuting, et al.Optimization method of favorable lithofacies and fracturing parameter for continental shale oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(11):1405-1416.
[37] 熊周海, 操应长, 王冠民, 等.湖相细粒沉积岩纹层结构差异对可压裂性的影响[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(1):74-85.
XIONG Zhouhai, CAO Yingchang, WANG Guanmin, et al.Influence of laminar structure differences on the fracability of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(1):74-85.

页岩储层渗吸过程中水的微观分布及其气测渗透率动态响应特征

Microscopic distribution of water in the imbibition process of shale reservoir and dynamic response characteristics of its gas logging permeability

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王强, 赵金洲, 胡永全, 赵超能, 张祯祥. 岩心尺度静态自发渗吸的数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 860-870.
[2]	金国文, 王堂宇, 刘忠华, 谢然红, 邵亮, 李博宇. 基于核磁共振测井的砂砾岩储层分类与产能预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 648-657.
[3]	黄兴, 窦亮彬, 左雄娣, 高辉, 李天太. 致密油藏裂缝动态渗吸排驱规律[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 924-935.
[4]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[5]	赵建斌, 黄显华, 刘晓燕, 李振林, 田扬, 丁伟, 刘玲莉. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷特低渗安山岩储层的有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1188-1196.
[6]	李耀华, 宋岩, 徐兴友, 白静, 陈珊, 刘卫彬. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段凝灰质页岩油层的润湿性及自发渗吸特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1229-1237.
[7]	张磊, 乔向阳, 张亮, 吴克柳, 周伟, 白慧芳, 辛翠平, 王涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 88-95.
[8]	黄兴, 李天太, 王香增, 高辉, 倪军, 赵金省, 王琛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 557-567.
[9]	苏俊霖, 董汶鑫, 罗平亚, 徐显广, 黄进军. 基于低场核磁共振技术的黏土表面水化水定量测试与分析[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 468-474.
[10]	蒋裕强, 刘雄伟, 付永红, 陈虎, 张海杰, 燕军, 陈超, 谷一凡. 渝西地区海相页岩储层孔隙有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1233-1243.
[11]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 袁超, 李霞, 李长喜, 刘学锋. 利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1019-1027.
[12]	房涛, 张立宽, 刘乃贵, 张立强, 王为民, 于岚, 李超, 雷裕红. 核磁共振技术定量表征致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构——以临清坳陷东部石炭系—二叠系致密砂岩储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 902-915.
[13]	杨正明, 黄辉, 骆雨田, 雷启鸿, 李海波. 致密油藏混合润湿性测试新方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(3): 318-323.
[14]	刘标, 姚素平, 胡文瑄, 曹剑, 解德录. 核磁共振冻融法表征非常规油气储层孔隙的适用性[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(12): 1401-1410.
[15]	肖佃师, 卢双舫, 姜微微, 黄文彪, 张鲁川, 李勃. 基于粒间孔贡献量的致密砂岩储层分类——以徐家围子断陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1123-1134.