深部煤层气游离气含量预测模型评价与校正——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层为例

doi:10.7623/syxb202311011

石油学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 1892-1902.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202311011

深部煤层气游离气含量预测模型评价与校正——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层为例

李勇¹, 高爽¹, 吴鹏², 徐立富¹, 马立涛³, 胡维强³, 杨江浩³

1. 中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院北京 100083;
2. 中联煤层气有限责任公司北京 100015;
3. 中海油能源发展股份有限公司工程技术公司天津 300457

收稿日期:2023-07-02 修回日期:2023-09-14 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-08
通讯作者: 李勇,男,1988年4月生,2015年获中国地质大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国矿业大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事煤层气等非常规油气和煤系成矿学的教学和科研工作。
作者简介:李勇,男,1988年4月生,2015年获中国地质大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国矿业大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事煤层气等非常规油气和煤系成矿学的教学和科研工作。Email:liyong@cumtb.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"基于煤层气高效排采的煤粉凝聚—沉降机制研究"（No.42072194）和"沁水盆地高煤阶煤层气井产能控制因素与增产机理研究"（No.U1910205）资助。

Evaluation and correction of prediction model for free gas content in deep coalbed methane: a case study of deep coal seams in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin

Li Yong¹, Gao Shuang¹, Wu Peng², Xu Lifu¹, Ma Litao³, Hu Weiqiang³, Yang Jianghao³

1. College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
2. China United Coalbed Methane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100015, China;
3. Oilfield Technology Engineering Company, CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Company Limited, Tianjin 300457, China

Received:2023-07-02 Revised:2023-09-14 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鄂尔多斯盆地深部煤层气资源量丰富，实现规模开发有助于油气增储上产，助力双碳目标落实。围绕深部煤层游离气含量预测这一关键问题，以盆地东缘埋深在1 911.60~1 924.84 m煤层的保压取心数据为依托，基于已有游离气含量预测模型的验证与评价，提出了新的游离气含量预测模型。研究结果表明，9件保压密闭取心样品的含气量在4.22~16.35 m³/t，其中游离气含量为1.24~2.56 m³/t，占总含气量的11.00%~36.17%。含气量差异受灰分含量影响明显，高灰分和高密度样品的含气量偏低，在垂向上呈现中间煤层过饱和、上下煤层欠饱和的特点。综合实验和理论计算储层实际温压条件下的甲烷气体密度、含水饱和度和孔隙度等参数，结合吸附态甲烷占据的孔隙空间，构建了基于吸附膨胀效应的深部煤层游离气含量预测模型。采用该模型预测的游离气含量在1.29~2.69 m³/t，占总含气量的10.01%~38.54%，含气比（实际含气量与理论最大吸附气量的比值）在33.86%~148.26%，与保压取心样品实测含气量的吻合程度高。相关模型可应用于深部煤层的含气性评价，为深部煤层气资源的准确预测和定量排采提供理论支撑。

关键词: 深部煤层气, 游离气, 含气量, 保压取心, 等温吸附

Abstract: The Ordos Basin is rich in deep coalbed methane resources, the development of which is helpful to increase the reserve and production of oil and gas and achieve the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Focusing on the key problem of predicting free gas content in deep coal seams, the paper proposes a new free gas content prediction model based on the validation and evaluation of the existing free gas content prediction model, when relying on pressure-retaining coring data from the eastern margin of the basin at the depth from 1 911.60 m to 1 924.84 m. The results show that the gas content of 9 pressure-retaining sealed coring samples is ranged from 4.22 m³/t to 16.35 m³/t; the free gas content is ranged from 1.24 m³/t to 2.56 m³/t, accounting for 11.00% to 36.17% of the total gas content. The difference in gas content is obviously affected by ash content, and the samples with high ash content and high density tend to have low gas content, characterized by oversaturation in the middle coal seam and undersaturation in the upper and lower coal seams. Comprehensively considering the methane gas density, water saturation and porosity of the reservoirs under certain temperature and pressure conditions, in combination with the pore space occupied by adsorbed methane, a prediction model of free gas content in deep coal seams has been constructed based on the effect of adsorption swelling. As predicted using the model, the free gas content is ranging from 1.29 m³/t to 2.69 m³/t, accounting for 10.01% to 38.54% of the total gas content, and the gas content ratio (actual gas content/theoretical maximum gas adsorption capacity) is within the range of 33.86% to 148.26%, which is highly consistent with the measured gas content in the pressure-retaining coring samples. In addition, the correlation model can be used to evaluate the gas content in deep coal seams, thus providing theoretical support for the accurate prediction and quantitative drainage and production of deep coalbed methane resources.

Key words: deep coalbed methane, free gas, gas content, pressure-retaining coring, isothermal adsorption

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李勇, 高爽, 吴鹏, 徐立富, 马立涛, 胡维强, 杨江浩. 深部煤层气游离气含量预测模型评价与校正——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1892-1902.

Li Yong, Gao Shuang, Wu Peng, Xu Lifu, Ma Litao, Hu Weiqiang, Yang Jianghao. Evaluation and correction of prediction model for free gas content in deep coalbed methane: a case study of deep coal seams in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1892-1902.

参考文献

[1] 秦勇, 申建, 史锐.中国煤系气大产业建设战略价值与战略选择[J].煤炭学报, 2022, 47(1):371-387.
QIN Yong, SHEN Jian, SHI Rui.Strategic value and choice on construction of large CMG industry in China[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(1):371-387.
[2] 孙钦平, 赵群, 姜馨淳, 等.新形势下中国煤层气勘探开发前景与对策思考[J].煤炭学报, 2021, 46(1):65-76.
SUN Qinping, ZHAO Qun, JIANG Xinchun, et al.Prospects and strategies of CBM exploration and development in China under the new situation[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(1):65-76.
[3] 李曙光, 王成旺, 王红娜, 等.大宁-吉县区块深层煤层气成藏特征及有利区评价[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(9):59-67.
LI Shuguang, WANG Chengwang, WANG Hongna, et al.Reservoir forming characteristics and favorable area evaluation of deep coalbed methane in Daning-Jixian block[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(9):59-67.
[4] 李勇, 徐立富, 张守仁, 等.深煤层含气系统差异及开发对策[J].煤炭学报, 2023, 48(2):900-917.
LI Yong, XU Lifu, ZHANG Shouren, et al.Gas bearing system difference in deep coal seams and corresponded development strategy[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(2):900-917.
[5] FLORES R M.Coal and coalbed gas:fueling the future[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2014.
[6] 晋香兰.鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗系煤层含气性分析及地质意义[J].煤炭科学技术, 2015, 43(7):111-117.
JIN Xianglan.Geological significances and analysis of gas potential for Jurassic coal seam in Ordos Basin[J].Coal Science and Technology, 2015, 43(7):111-117.
[7] BUSTIN R M, CLARKSON C R.Free gas storage in matrix porosity:a potentially significant coalbed resource in low rank coals[C]//Proceedings of the 1999 International Coalbed Methane Symposium.Tuscaloosa:The University of Alabama, 1999:197-214.
[8] LI Yong, WANG Zhuangsen, TANG Shuheng, et al.Re-evaluating adsorbed and free methane content in coal and its ad- and desorption processes analysis[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 428:131946.
[9] LI Junqian, LU Shuangfang, ZHANG Pengfei, et al.Estimation of gas-in-place content in coal and shale reservoirs:a process analysis method and its preliminary application[J].Fuel, 2020, 259:116266.
[10] LI Wenbiao, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al.Geochemical modeling of carbon isotope fractionation during methane transport in tight sedimentary rocks[J].Chemical Geology, 2021, 566:120033.
[11] 李俊乾, 卢双舫, 李文镖, 等.基于过程分析法的页岩原位含气性评价[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 43(5):42-55.
LI Junqian, LU Shuangfang, LI Wenbiao, et al.Evaluation on in-situ gas-bearing characteristic of shale based on process analysis method[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2021, 43(5):42-55.
[12] 俞凌杰, 刘可禹, 范明, 等.页岩孔隙中气-水赋存特征研究——以川东南地区下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6):1089-1096.
YU Lingjie, LIU Keyu, FAN Ming, et al.Co-occurring characteristics of pore gas and water in shales:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6):1089-1096.
[13] 赵群, 王红岩, 丛连铸, 等.考虑到吸附气所占空间的页岩气资源/储量计算方法[J].天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(2):326-333.
ZHAO Qun, WANG Hongyan, CONG Lianzhu, et al.Shale gas resources/reserves calculation method considering the space taken by adsorbed gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(2):326-333.
[14] 周尚文, 张介辉, 邹辰, 等.基于保压取心的页岩含气量测试新方法[J].煤炭学报, 2022, 47(4):1637-1646.
ZHOU Shangwen, ZHANG Jiehui, ZOU Chen, et al.A new method for testing shale gas content based on pressure-holding coring technology[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(4):1637-1646.
[15] 张抗, 张立勤, 刘冬梅.近年中国油气勘探开发形势及发展建议[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(1):15-28.
ZHANG Kang, ZHANG Liqin, LIU Dongmei.Situation of China's oil and gas exploration and development in recent years and relevant suggestions[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(1):15-28.
[16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.煤的工业分析方法仪器法:GB/T 30732-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2014.
Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Proximate analysis of coal-Instrumental method:GB/T 30732-2014[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2014.
[17] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.煤的高压等温吸附试验方法:GB/T 19560-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2009.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Experimental method of high-pressure isothermal adsorption to coal:GB/T 19560-2008[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2009.
[18] 邹冠贵, 范凤, 汤小明, 等.沁水盆地寺河矿3#煤层弹性参数与吸附能力的关系[J].中国煤炭地质, 2018, 30(1):22-29.
ZOU Guangui, FAN Feng, TANG Xiaoming, et al.Relationship between elastic parameters and adsorptivity in sihe coalmine coal No.3[J].Coal Geology of China, 2018, 30(1):22-29.
[19] 张遂安, 刘欣佳, 温庆志, 等.煤层气增产改造技术发展现状与趋势[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(1):105-118.
ZHANG Sui'an, LIU Xinjia, WEN Qingzhi, et al.Development situation and trend of stimulation and reforming technology of coalbed methane[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(1):105-118.
[20] 马力宁, 李江涛, 华锐湘, 等.保压取心储层流体饱和度分析方法——以柴达木盆地台南气田第四系生物成因气藏为例[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(1):76-80.
MA Lining, LI Jiangtao, HUA Ruixiang, et al.An analysis method for reservoir fluid saturation by pressure coring:a case study from Quaternary biogenetic gas reservoirs in the Tainan gas field, Qaidam Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(1):76-80.
[21] 刘刚, 赵谦平, 高潮, 等.提高页岩含气量测试中损失气量计算精度的解吸临界时间点法[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(2):71-75.
LIU Gang, ZHAO Qianping, GAO Chao, et al.A critical desorption time method to improve the calculation accuracy of gas loss in shale gas content testing[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(2):71-75.
[22] 张群, 何坤, 李贤庆, 等.页岩高压解析放气过程中甲烷碳同位素分馏特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(3):540-550.
ZHANG Qun, HE Kun, LI Xianqing, et al.Characteristics of methane carbon isotope fractionation during high-pressure degassing of shale[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(3):540-550.
[23] 李文镖, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等.页岩气运移过程中的碳同位素分馏:机理、表征及意义[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2020, 50(4):553-569.
LI W B, LU S F, LI J Q, et al.Carbon isotope fractionation during shale gas transport:mechanism, characterization and significance[J].Science China Earth Sciences, 2020, 63(5):674-689.
[24] 陶成, 翟常博, 俞凌杰, 等.页岩释气过程中碳同位素的分馏特征[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1):113-116.
TAO Cheng, ZHAI Changbo, YU Lingjie, et al.Carbon isotope fractionation characteristics during shale gas release[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(1):113-116.
[25] 庞小婷, 陈国辉, 许晨曦, 等.涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩吸附-游离气定量评价及相互转化[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6):1247-1258.
PANG Xiaoting, CHEN Guohui, XU Chenxi, et al.Quantitative evaluation of adsorbed and free gas and their mutual conversion in Wufeng-Longmaxi shale, Fuling area[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6):1247-1258.
[26] 胡志明, 穆英, 顾兆斌, 等.渗吸效应对页岩气赋存状态的影响规律[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(5):66-71.
HU Zhiming, MU Ying, GU Zhaobin, et al.Law of imbibition effect on shale gas occurrence state[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5):66-71.
[27] 高鉴东.新疆阜康矿区煤储层吸附气与游离气含量模拟[D].徐州:中国矿业大学, 2015.
GAO Jiandong.Simulation on adsorbed gas and free gas content of coal reservoir in Fukang mining area, Xinjiang[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology, 2015.
[28] 曹军涛, 赵军龙, 王轶平, 等.煤层气含量影响因素及预测方法[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 28(4):28-34.
CAO Juntao, ZHAO Junlong, WANG Yiping, et al.Review of influencing factors and prediction methods of gas content in coal seams and prospect of prediction methods[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition, 2013, 28(4):28-34.
[29] 郭旭升, 腾格尔, 魏祥峰, 等.四川盆地深层海相页岩气赋存机理与勘探潜力[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(4):453-468.
GUO Xusheng, TENGER B, WEI Xiangfeng, et al.Occurrence mechanism and exploration potential of deep marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(4):453-468.
[30] 李明明.页岩含气量主控因素及其定量模型[D].大庆:东北石油大学, 2015.
LI Mingming.Main control factors of Shale gas content and its quantitative models[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2015.
[31] 饶权, 康永尚, 黄毅, 等.蜀南地区龙马溪组页岩气工业建产区游离气和孔隙度下限讨论[J].现代地质, 2021, 35(4):1054-1064.
RAO Quan, KANG Yongshang, HUANG Yi, et al.Cutoff of free gas and porosity in shale gas industrial production area of Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Geoscience, 2021, 35(4):1054-1064.
[32] 李勇.煤结构演化及燃料、原料和材料属性开发[J].煤炭学报, 2022, 47(11):3936-3951.
LI Yong.Coal structure evolution and its fuel, raw material and functional material properties development[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(11):3936-3951.
[33] 孙健.黔北地区浅层龙马溪组页岩含气性及其控制因素[D].广州:中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2020.
SUN Jian.Gas in place and its controlling factors of the shallow Longmaxi shale in northern Guizhou area[D].Guangzhou:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2020.
[34] 吕超.页岩气储层含气量影响因素及测井评价方法研究[D].北京:中国石油大学, 2019.
LYU Chao.Research on influence factors and well logging evaluation method of gas content for shale gas reservoir[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 2019.
[35] 王鸣华.气藏工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1997:33.
WANG Minghua.Gas reservoir engineering[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1997:33.
[36] LUCIER A M, HOFMANN R, BRYNDZIA L T.Evaluation of variable gas saturation on acoustic log data from the Haynesville shale gas play, NW Louisiana, USA[J].The Leading Edge, 2011, 30(3):300-311.
[37] HETENY M.Handbook of experimental stress analysis[M].New York:John Wiley, 1966:23-25.
[38] AMBROSE R J, HARTMAN R C, DIAZ-CAMPOS M, et al.Shale gas-in-place calculations part I:new pore-scale considerations[J].SPE Journal, 2012, 17(1):219-229.
[39] 俞凌杰, 范明, 陈红宇, 等.富有机质页岩高温高压重量法等温吸附实验[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(5):557-563.
YU Lingjie, FAN Ming, CHEN Hongyu, et al.Isothermal adsorption experiment of organic-rich shale under high temperature and pressure using gravimetric method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(5):557-563.
[40] 黄盼.页岩气储量计算关键参数测井评价方法研究[J].能源与节能, 2021(5):2-6.
HUANG Pan.Study on log evaluation method of key parameters for shale gas reserve calculation[J].Energy and Conservation, 2021(5):2-6.
[41] OZAWA S, KUSUMI S, OGINO Y.Physical adsorption of gases at high pressure.IV.An improvement of the Dubinin-Astakhov adsorption equation[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1976, 56(1):83-91.
[42] NEVILLE R G.The discovery of Boyle's Law, 1661-62[J].Journal of Chemical Education, 1962, 39(7):356.
[43] 宋涛涛, 毛小平.页岩气资源评价中含气量计算方法初探[J].中国矿业, 2013, 22(1):34-36.
SONG Taotao, MAO Xiaoping.Discussion on gas content calculation method of shale gas resource evaluation[J].China Mining Magazine, 2013, 22(1):34-36.
[44] 申建, 杜磊, 秦勇, 等.深部低阶煤三相态含气量建模及勘探启示——以准噶尔盆地侏罗纪煤层为例[J].天然气工业, 2015, 35(3):30-35.
SHEN Jian, DU Lei, QIN Yong, et al.Three-phase gas content model of deep low-rank coals and its implication for CBM exploration:a case study from the Jurassic coal in the Junggar Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(3):30-35.

深部煤层气游离气含量预测模型评价与校正——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层为例

Evaluation and correction of prediction model for free gas content in deep coalbed methane: a case study of deep coal seams in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 徐博瑞, 王红娜, 赵欣, 江山, 宋伟, 王玉斌, 陈高杰, 吴鹏, 赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1764-1780.
[2]	康永尚, 闫霞, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 邓泽. 深部超饱和煤层气藏概念及主要特点[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1781-1790.
[3]	秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1791-1811.
[4]	熊先钺, 闫霞, 徐凤银, 李曙光, 聂志宏, 冯延青, 刘莹, 陈明, 孙俊义, 周科, 李春虎. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1812-1826,1853.
[5]	刘建忠, 朱光辉, 刘彦成, 晁巍巍, 杜佳, 杨琦, 米洪刚, 张守仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策——以临兴—神府区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1827-1839.
[6]	桑树勋, 郑司建, 王建国, 周效志, 刘世奇, 韩思杰, 赵伟光, 黄华州, 王冉, 汪吉林, 张志镇, 赵立明, 潘冬明, 陈同俊. 岩石力学地层新方法在深部煤层气勘探开发“甜点”预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1840-1853.
[7]	唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 杨焦生, 邓泽, 李松, 陈世达, 冯鹏, 黄晨, 李站伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.
[8]	杨焦生, 冯鹏, 唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 王玫珠, 李松, 赵洋, 李站伟. 大宁—吉县区块深部煤层气相态控制因素及含量预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1879-1891.
[9]	胡超俊, 侯艳, 徐礼贵, 李洪革, 王天云, 李远, 王飞, 张宝权. 鄂尔多斯盆地深部煤层气地震勘探关键技术进展与应用成效[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1903-1917.
[10]	江同文, 熊先钺, 金亦秋. 深部煤层气地质特征与开发对策[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1918-1930.
[11]	龚斌, 王虹雅, 王红娜, 宋伟, 孙雄伟, 杨京华. 基于大数据分析算法的深部煤层气地质—工程一体化智能决策技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1949-1958.
[12]	云箭, 张华, 马信缘, 洪宁, 许洁, 刘毅, 陈曦, 王占生, 何柳婧. 深部煤层气井胍胶返排液回用处理技术优化及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1959-1973.
[13]	陈世达, 汤达祯, 侯伟, 李永洲, 陶树, 许浩, 李松, 唐淑玲, 蒲一帆, 张彬. 深部煤层气地质条件特殊性与储层工程响应[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1993-2006.
[14]	刘香禺, 张烈辉, 李树新, 张介辉, 赵玉龙, 张芮菡, 郭晶晶, 唐慧莹, 张帆. 考虑页岩多重吸附机制的超临界甲烷等温吸附模型[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1487-1499.
[15]	康永尚, 邓泽, 皇甫玉慧, 毛得雷. 中煤阶煤层气高饱和—超饱和带的成藏模式和勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1555-1566.