鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力

doi:10.7623/syxb202311008

石油学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 1854-1866,1902.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202311008

鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力

唐淑玲^1,2, 汤达祯^1,2, 杨焦生³, 邓泽³, 李松^1,2, 陈世达^1,2, 冯鹏^1,2, 黄晨^1,2, 李站伟^1,2

1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院北京 100083;
2. 国家煤层气工程中心煤储层物性实验室北京 100083;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-06-30 修回日期:2023-09-15 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-08
通讯作者: 汤达祯,男,1957年2月生,1991年获中国地质大学(北京)煤田地质专业博士学位,现为中国地质大学(北京)能源学院教授,主要从事煤与煤层气地质研究工作。Email:tang@cugb.edu.cn
作者简介:唐淑玲,女,1988年9月生,2018年获中国地质大学(北京)矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国地质大学(北京)能源学院副教授,主要从事非常规天然气勘探开发研究。Email:tangshuling@cugb.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.42130802，No.42372196）和中国石油天然气股份有限公司前瞻性基础性技术攻关项目（2021DJ2301）资助。

Pore structure characteristics and gas storage potential of deep coal reservoirs in Daning-Jixian block of Ordos Basin

Tang Shuling^1,2, Tang Dazhen^1,2, Yang Jiaosheng³, Deng Ze³, Li Song^1,2, Chen Shida^1,2, Feng Peng^1,2, Huang Chen^1,2, Li Zhanwei^1,2

1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Coal Reservoir Laboratory of National Engineering Research Center of Coalbed Methane, Beijing 100083, China;
3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2023-06-30 Revised:2023-09-15 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 深部复杂的地质环境导致深部煤储层的孔隙、裂隙结构及气体赋存状态有别于浅部煤储层，多相态气体并存使得深部煤层气兼具"常规"与"非常规"双重地质属性。基于系统采集的鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘大宁—吉县区块深部煤岩样品，通过场发射扫描电镜分析、高压压汞实验、低温N₂吸附和CO₂吸附联测，对深部煤岩全孔径的孔隙、裂隙结构进行了精细表征，并利用低场核磁共振技术分析了深部煤岩的可动流体空间及游离气可容纳潜力。研究结果表明：大宁—吉县区块深部煤岩的孔隙类型以气孔、粒间孔和压缩变形的植物细胞残留孔为主，裂隙由外生裂隙、内生裂隙和黏土矿物微裂隙组成，其中，在片状和手风琴状高岭石矿物中广泛发育微裂隙；孔隙多为一端封闭的不透气型孔和两端开放的透气型孔，含少量墨水瓶状孔。孔隙结构的跨尺度效应明显且非均质性极强。储集空间以孔径<2 nm的微孔最为发育，其次为孔径在50 nm~1 μm的宏孔和孔径>10 μm的裂隙，介孔（孔径在2~50 nm）及孔径在1~10 μm的宏孔的发育程度最差。微孔具有极大的比表面积和强吸附势能，是吸附气的最主要赋存空间；宏孔和微裂隙中均存在一定的可动流体空间，可动孔隙度为1.42%~3.89%，具备容纳游离气的储层条件。深部煤储层中的气、水饱和关系复杂，含水饱和度变化大，这将直接影响游离气的可容纳空间大小。研究认为，受孔隙、裂隙结构影响的气、水饱和关系是制约深部煤层"高饱和—超饱和"含气靶区精准预测的关键问题。

关键词: 大宁—吉县, 深部煤层气, 孔隙结构, 游离气, 含水饱和度

Abstract: Due to the complex deep geological environment, the pore, fracture structure and gas occurrence state of deep coal reservoirs are different from those of shallow coal reservoirs. The conventional and unconventional geologic attributes of deep coalbed methane are attributed to the coexistence of multi-phase gas. Using the deep coal and rock samples systematically collected from Daning-Jixian block in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin, the full-diameter pore and fracture structure of deep coal was fine characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy analysis, high-pressure mercury intrusion experiment, and joint measurement of low-temperature N₂ adsorption and CO₂ adsorption. Moreover, the movable fluid space and accommodation potential of free gas in deep coal was analyzed by means of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology. The research results show that the pore types of deep coal in Daning-Jixian block are dominated by gas pore, intergranular pores as well as compressed and deformed residual pores in plant cells. The fractures are composed of exogenous fractures, endogenous fractures and micro-fractures in clay minerals, and the micro-fractures are widely developed in the sheet-like and accordion-like kaolinite. There are mainly air-tight pores closed at one end and breathable pores open at both ends, and a small amount of ink bottle pores. The pore structure exhibits significant cross-scale effects and strong heterogeneity. Micropores with a pore diameter less than 2 nm are the most developed, followed by macropores with a diameter from 50 nm to 1 μm and fractures with a diameter greater than 10 μm. Mesopores (with the diameter from 2 nm to 50 nm) and macropores with a diameter from 1 μm to 10 μm are least developed. Micropores have a large specific surface area and strong adsorption potential energy, and are the most important occurrence space for adsorbed gas. In addition, there is a certain movable fluid space in the macropores and micro-fractures with the movable porosity from 1.42% to 3.89%, providing the reservoir conditions to accommodate free gas. However, the relationship between gas and water saturation is quite complex and the water saturation changes greatly in deep coal reservoirs, thus directly affecting the size of the accommodation space of free gas. The research suggests that the relationship between gas and water saturation affected by the porosity and fracture structure will be a key issue that restricts the accurate prediction of highly saturated to supersaturated gas-bearing target areas in deep coal seams.

Key words: Daning-Jixian, deep coalbed methane, pore structure, free gas, water saturation

中图分类号:

TE122.2

唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 杨焦生, 邓泽, 李松, 陈世达, 冯鹏, 黄晨, 李站伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.

Tang Shuling, Tang Dazhen, Yang Jiaosheng, Deng Ze, Li Song, Chen Shida, Feng Peng, Huang Chen, Li Zhanwei. Pore structure characteristics and gas storage potential of deep coal reservoirs in Daning-Jixian block of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国自然资源部.2015年全国石油天然气资源勘查开采情况通报[EB/OL].(2016-07-04)[2023-05-12].https://www.mnr.gov.cn/gk/tzgg/201607/t20160707_1991801.html.
Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China.2015 National oil and gas resource exploration and exploitation report[EB/OL].(2016-07-04)[2023-05-12].https://www.mnr.gov.cn/gk/tzgg/201607/t20160707_1991801.html.
[2] 申建.我国主要盆地深部煤层气资源量预测[R].徐州:中国矿业大学, 2021.
SHEN Jian.Prediction of deep coalbed methane resources in major basins in China[R].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology, 2021.
[3] 赵庆波, 孙粉锦, 李五忠.煤层气勘探开发地质理论与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2011.
ZHAO Qingbo, SUN Fenjin, LI Wuzhong.Geological theory and practice of coalbed methane exploration and development[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.
[4] 聂志宏, 巢海燕, 刘莹, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气生产特征及开发对策——以大宁-吉县区块为例[J].煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6):1738-1746.
NIE Zhihong, CHAO Haiyan, LIU Ying, et al.Development strategy and production characteristics of deep coalbed methane in the east Ordos Basin:taking Daning-Jixian block for example[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6):1738-1746.
[5] 徐凤银, 肖芝华, 陈东, 等.我国煤层气开发技术现状与发展方向[J].煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(10):205-215.
XU Fengyin, XIAO Zhihua, CHEN Dong, et al.Current status and development direction of coalbed methane exploration technology in China[J].Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(10):205-215.
[6] 孙钦平, 赵群, 姜馨淳, 等.新形势下中国煤层气勘探开发前景与对策思考[J].煤炭学报, 2021, 46(1):65-76.
SUN Qinping, ZHAO Qun, JIANG Xinchun, et al.Prospects and strategies of CBM exploration and development in China under the new situation[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(1):65-76.
[7] 徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 等.深部(层)煤层气成藏模式与关键技术对策——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘为例[J].中国海上油气, 2022, 34(4):30-42.
XU Fengyin, WANG Chengwang, XIONG Xianyue, et al.Deep (layer)coalbed methane reservoir forming modes and key technical countermeasures:taking the eastern margin of Ordos Basin as an example[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2022, 34(4):30-42.
[8] 徐凤银, 闫霞, 李曙光, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部(层)煤层气勘探开发理论技术难点与对策[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2023, 51(1):115-130.
XU Fengyin, YAN Xia, LI Shuguang, et al.Theoretical and technological difficulties and countermeasures of deep CBM exploration and development in the eastern edge of Ordos Basin[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2023, 51(1):115-130.
[9] 闫霞, 徐凤银, 聂志宏, 等.深部微构造特征及其对煤层气高产"甜点区"的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大吉地区为例[J].煤炭学报, 2021, 46(8):2426-2439.
YAN Xia, XU Fengyin, NIE Zhihong, et al.Microstructure characteristics of Daji area in east Ordos Basin and its control over the high yield dessert of CBM[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(8):2426-2439.
[10] 申建, 秦勇, 傅雪海, 等.深部煤层气成藏条件特殊性及其临界深度探讨[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9):1470-1476.
SHEN Jian, QIN Yong, FU Xuehai, et al.Properties of deep coalbed methane reservoir-forming conditions and critical depth discussion[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(9):1470-1476.
[11] ZHANG Songhang, TANG Shuheng, QIAN Zheng, et al.Evaluation of geological features for deep coalbed methane reservoirs in the Dacheng salient, Jizhong depression, China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 133:60-71.
[12] 李松, 汤达祯, 许浩, 等.深部煤层气储层地质研究进展[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(3):10-16.
LI Song, TANG Dazhen, XU Hao, et al.Progress in geological researches on the deep coalbed methane reservoirs[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(3):10-16.
[13] 康永尚, 邓泽, 皇甫玉慧, 等.中煤阶煤层气高饱和-超饱和带的成藏模式和勘探方向[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(12):1555-1566.
KANG Yongshang, DEND Ze, HUANGFU Yuhui, et al.Accumulation model and exploration direction of high- to over-saturation zone of the midium-rank coalbed methane[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12):1555-1566.
[14] 李曙光, 王成旺, 王红娜, 等.大宁-吉县区块深层煤层气成藏特征及有利区评价[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(9):59-67.
LI Shuguang, WANG Chengwang, WANG Hongna, et al.Reservoir forming characteristics and favorable area evaluation of deep coalbed methane in Daning-Jixian block[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(9):59-67.
[15] 聂志宏, 时小松, 孙伟, 等.大宁-吉县区块深层煤层气生产特征与开发技术对策[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(3):193-200.
NIE Zhihong, SHI Xiaosong, SUN Wei, et al.Production characteristics of deep coalbed methane gas reservoirs in Daning-Jixian block and its development technology countermeasures[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(3):193-200.
[16] 秦勇, 申建.论深部煤层气基本地质问题[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(1):125-136.
QIN Yong, SHEN Jian.On the fundamental issues of deep coalbed methane geology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(1):125-136.
[17] 汤达祯.深部煤层气系统及其能量动态平衡机理研究[R].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
TANG Dazhen.Research on deep coalbed methane system and its energy dynamic balance mechanism[R].Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2020.
[18] 张开仲, 程远平, 王亮, 等.基于煤中瓦斯赋存和运移方式的孔隙网络结构特征表征[J].煤炭学报, 2022, 47(10):3680-3694.
ZHANG Kaizhong, CHENG Yuanping, WANG Liang, et al.Pore network structure characterization based on gas occurrence and migration in coal[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(10):3680-3694.
[19] 李阳, 张玉贵, 张浪, 等.基于压汞、低温N2吸附和CO2吸附的构造煤孔隙结构表征[J].煤炭学报, 2019, 44(4):1188-1196.
LI Yang, ZHANG Yugui, ZHANG Lang, et al.Characterization on pore structure of tectonic coals based on the method of mercury intrusion, carbon dioxide adsorption and nitrogen adsorption[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(4):1188-1196.
[20] 杨峰, 宁正福, 胡昌蓬, 等.页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(2):301-311.
YANG Feng, NING Zhengfu, HU Changpeng, et al.Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):301-311.
[21] 姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 蔡益栋, 等.基于NMR和X-CT的煤的孔裂隙精细定量表征[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2010, 40(11):1598-1607.
YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, CAI Yidong, et al.Advanced characterization of pores and fractures in coals by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography[J].Science China Earth Sciences, 2010, 53(6):854-862.
[22] IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied chemistry).Physical chemistry division commission on colloid and surface chemistry, subcommittee on characterization of porous solids:recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (technical report)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1994, 66(8):1739-1758.
[23] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.岩石毛管压力曲线的测定:GB/T 29171-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2013.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Rock capillary pressure measurement:GB/T 29171-2012[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2013.
[24] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.气体吸附BET法测定固态物质比表面积:GB/T 19587-2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2017.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption using the BET method:GB/T 19587-2017[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2017.
[25] 姚艳斌, 刘大锰.基于核磁共振弛豫谱的煤储层岩石物理与流体表征[J].煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(6):14-22.
YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng.Petrophysics and fluid properties characterizations of coalbed methane reservoir by using NMR relaxation time analysis[J].Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(6):14-22.
[26] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.岩样核磁共振参数实验室测量规范:SY/T 6490-2007[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2008.
National Development and Reform Commission.Normalization measurement for core NMR parameter in laboratory:SY/T 6490-2007[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2008.
[27] THOMMES M, KANEKO K, NEIMARK A V, et al.Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2015, 87(9/10):1051-1069.
[28] 袁英, 董领峰.多孔材料孔径及孔径分布测试方法[J].世界有色金属, 2020(6):243-244.
YUAN Ying, DONG Lingfeng.Test Method for pore size and pore size distribution of porous materials[J].World Nonferrous Metals, 2020(6):243-244.
[29] 姚艳斌, 刘大锰.煤储层精细定量表征与综合评价模型[M].北京:地质出版社, 2013.
YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng.Advanced quantitative characterization and comprehensive evaluation model of coalbed methane reservoirs[M].Beijing:Geology Press, 2013.
[30] TANG Shuling, TANG Dazhen, LIU Shimin, et al.Multiscale pore characterization of coal measure reservoirs and gas storage and transport behavior in Yanchuannan gas field of China[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2022, 106(12):2387-2415.

鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力

Pore structure characteristics and gas storage potential of deep coal reservoirs in Daning-Jixian block of Ordos Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[2]	陈义林, 秦勇, 张博, 杨天宇, 刘静, 王兰花, 洪勇. 制样粒径对不同变质程度煤孔隙结构的差异化影响[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1313-1332.
[3]	丁骞, 甘利灯, 魏乐乐, 张宇生, 杨昊, 姜晓宇, 王峣钧. 双孔隙结构因子及其在储层渗透性地震预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 339-347.
[4]	徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 徐博瑞, 王红娜, 赵欣, 江山, 宋伟, 王玉斌, 陈高杰, 吴鹏, 赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1764-1780.
[5]	康永尚, 闫霞, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 邓泽. 深部超饱和煤层气藏概念及主要特点[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1781-1790.
[6]	秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1791-1811.
[7]	熊先钺, 闫霞, 徐凤银, 李曙光, 聂志宏, 冯延青, 刘莹, 陈明, 孙俊义, 周科, 李春虎. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1812-1826,1853.
[8]	刘建忠, 朱光辉, 刘彦成, 晁巍巍, 杜佳, 杨琦, 米洪刚, 张守仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策——以临兴—神府区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1827-1839.
[9]	桑树勋, 郑司建, 王建国, 周效志, 刘世奇, 韩思杰, 赵伟光, 黄华州, 王冉, 汪吉林, 张志镇, 赵立明, 潘冬明, 陈同俊. 岩石力学地层新方法在深部煤层气勘探开发“甜点”预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1840-1853.
[10]	杨焦生, 冯鹏, 唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 王玫珠, 李松, 赵洋, 李站伟. 大宁—吉县区块深部煤层气相态控制因素及含量预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1879-1891.
[11]	李勇, 高爽, 吴鹏, 徐立富, 马立涛, 胡维强, 杨江浩. 深部煤层气游离气含量预测模型评价与校正——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1892-1902.
[12]	胡超俊, 侯艳, 徐礼贵, 李洪革, 王天云, 李远, 王飞, 张宝权. 鄂尔多斯盆地深部煤层气地震勘探关键技术进展与应用成效[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1903-1917.
[13]	江同文, 熊先钺, 金亦秋. 深部煤层气地质特征与开发对策[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1918-1930.
[14]	龚斌, 王虹雅, 王红娜, 宋伟, 孙雄伟, 杨京华. 基于大数据分析算法的深部煤层气地质—工程一体化智能决策技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1949-1958.
[15]	云箭, 张华, 马信缘, 洪宁, 许洁, 刘毅, 陈曦, 王占生, 何柳婧. 深部煤层气井胍胶返排液回用处理技术优化及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1959-1973.