四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征

doi:10.7623/syxb202403004

石油学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 531-547.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202403004

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征

惠沙沙^1,2, 庞雄奇^1,2, 谌卓恒³, 王琛茜^1,2, 施砍园^1,2, 胡涛^1,2, 胡耀^1,2, 李敏^1,2, 梅术星^1,2, 黎茂稳⁴

1. 油气资源与工程全国重点实验室, 中国石油大学(北京) 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院北京 102249;
3. 加拿大联邦地质调查局加拿大卡尔加里 T2 L2 A7;
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-06-05 修回日期:2024-01-02 发布日期:2024-04-10
通讯作者: 庞雄奇,男,1961年8月生,1991年获中国地质大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)教授、博士生导师、学术委员会副主任,主要从事油气藏形成机制与分布规律、油气资源评价与油气田勘探的教学与科研工作。Email:pangxq@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:惠沙沙,女,1995年8月生,2017年获西安石油大学学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事油气成藏机理与资源评价研究。Email:Hui_Shasha@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金项目(No.U19B6003-02)和2022年度美国石油地质学家协会(AAPG)全球研究生助研金项目(22269437)资助。

Quantitative characterization of the contribution of pore types to pore space of marine shale in Sichuan Basin

Hui Shasha^1,2, Pang Xiongqi^1,2, Chen Zhuoheng³, Wang Chenxi^1,2, Shi Kanyuan^1,2, Hu Tao^1,2, Hu Yao^1,2, Li Min^1,2, Mei Shuxing^1,2, Li Maowen⁴

1. National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
2. College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
3. Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Calgary T2 L2 A7, Canada;
4. Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2023-06-05 Revised:2024-01-02 Published:2024-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为定量表征四川盆地古生界海相页岩孔隙类型对页岩微米-纳米孔隙空间的相对贡献,基于岩石学分析、地球化学分析、低温氮气吸附实验、场发射扫描电镜观察等方法对不同热演化阶段的海相页岩的孔隙类型及结构进行了对比分析,结合页岩的TOC含量和矿物组分信息,利用基于机器学习的图像分析方法提取页岩孔隙的几何参数,定量计算了不同热演化阶段海相页岩中不同类型孔隙的孔面积和孔体积。研究结果表明:随成熟度增加,四川盆地海相页岩中孔隙的平均孔径减小,而孔体积、孔面积、表面分形维数和结构分形维数均增大;在上二叠统大隆组低成熟海相页岩中,骨架矿物相关孔最为发育,其贡献了70%的孔面积和73%的孔体积;在志留系龙马溪组成熟海相页岩中,黏土矿物孔占主要优势,其贡献了63%的孔面积和58%的孔体积;在龙马溪组高成熟-过成熟页岩中,有机质孔贡献了68%的孔面积与52%的孔体积。四川盆地海相页岩的孔隙演化受成岩作用和生烃过程共同影响,明确不同热演化阶段海相页岩的优势孔隙类型可以为页岩油气高效开发提供理论指导。

关键词: 海相页岩, 孔隙类型, 孔隙结构, 孔隙演化, 图像分析, 定量表征, 四川盆地, 上二叠统大隆组, 志留系龙马溪组

Abstract: This study aims to quantitatively characterize the relative contribution of pore types to the micro-nano pore space of Paleozoic marine shale in Sichuan Basin. Based on petrological analysis, geochemical analysis, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption experiment and field emission scanning electron microscopy observation, comparison and analysis were performed on the pore types and structure of marine shale in different thermal evolution stages. Combined with the total organic carbon (TOC) content and mineral composition of shale, the geometric parameters of shale pores were extracted by means of image analysis based on machine learning, and then the pore surface area and pore volume of different types of pores in marine shale at different evolution stages were quantitatively calculated. The results show that with the increase of maturity, the average pore size of marine shale in Sichuan Basin is decreased, while the pore surface area, pore volume, surface fractal dimensions, and structure fractal dimension are increased. In the low-mature marine shale of the Upper Permian Dalong Formation, the mineral-related pores were the most developed, providing 70 % of pore surface area and 73 % of pore volume. The mature marine shale of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation was dominated by clay mineral pores, which provided 63 % of pore surface area and 58 % of pore volume. In the high-mature and over-mature shale of Longmaxi Formation, organic pores contributed to 68 % of pore surface area and 52 % of pore volume. The pore evolution of marine shale in Sichuan Basin is jointly influenced by diagenesis and hydrocarbon generation process. It is of important significance to clarify the dominant pore types of marine shale at different thermal evolution stages, thus providing theoretical guidance for the efficient development of shale oil and gas.

Key words: marine shale, pore type, pore structure, pore evolution, image analysis, quantitative characterization, Sichuan Basin, Upper Permian Dalong Formation, Silurian Longmaxi Formation

中图分类号:

TE122.2

惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.

Hui Shasha, Pang Xiongqi, Chen Zhuoheng, Wang Chenxi, Shi Kanyuan, Hu Tao, Hu Yao, Li Min, Mei Shuxing, Li Maowen. Quantitative characterization of the contribution of pore types to pore space of marine shale in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.

参考文献

[1] 孙龙德,邹才能,朱如凯,等. 中国深层油气形成、分布与潜力分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):641-649.
SUN Longde,ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,et al.Formation,distribution and potential of deep hydrocarbon resources in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):641-649.
[2] 贾承造,庞雄奇,姜福杰.中国油气资源研究现状与发展方向[J].石油科学通报,2016,1(1):2-23.
JIA Chengzao,PANG Xiongqi,JIANG Fujie.Research status and development directions of hydrocarbon resources in China[J].Petroleum Science Bulletin,2016,1(1):2-23.
[3] 贾承造,庞雄奇,宋岩.论非常规油气成藏机理:油气自封闭作用与分子间作用力[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(3):437-452.
JIA Chengzao,PANG Xiongqi,SONG Yan.The mechanism of unconventional hydrocarbon formation:hydrocarbon self-containment and intermolecular forces[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(3):437-452.
[4] 邹才能,潘松圻,荆振华,等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报,2020,41(1):1-12.
ZOU Caineng,PAN Songqi,JING Zhenhua,et al.Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(1):1-12.
[5] 张金川,陶佳,李振,等.中国深层页岩气资源前景和勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):15-28.
ZHANG Jinchuan,TAO Jia,LI Zhen,et al.Prospect of deep shale gas resources in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):15-28.
[6] HU Tao,PANG Xiongqi,JIANG Fujie,et al.Dynamic continuous hydrocarbon accumulation (DCHA):existing theories and a new unified accumulation model[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2022,232:104109.
[7] 马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣.中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):561-574.
MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong.China’s shale gas exploration and development:understanding and practice[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(4):561-574.
[8] 马新华,谢军.川南地区页岩气勘探开发进展及发展前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(1):161-169.
MA Xinhua,XIE Jun.The progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and exploitation in southern Sichuan Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(1):161-169.
[9] 赵文智,李建忠,杨涛,等.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):499-510.
ZHAO Wenzhi,LI Jianzhong,YANG Tao,et al.Geological difference and its significance of marine shale gases in South China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(4):499-510.
[10] BORJIGIN T,LU Longfei,YU Lingjie,et al.Formation,preservation and connectivity control of organic pores in shale[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(4):798-812.
[11] CAO Taotao,DENG Mo,CAO Qinggu,et al.Pore formation and evolution of organic-rich shale during the entire hydrocarbon generation process:examination of artificially and naturally matured samples[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2021,93:104020.
[12] 张廷山,杨洋,龚其森,等.四川盆地南部早古生代海相页岩微观孔隙特征及发育控制因素[J].地质学报,2014,88(9):1728-1740.
ZHANG Tingshan,YANG Yang,GONG Qisen,et al.Characteristics and mechanisms of the micro-pores in the Early Palaeozoic marine shale,southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(9):1728-1740.
[13] CAO Taotao,LIU Hu,PAN Anyang,et al.Pore evolution in siliceous shales and its influence on shale gas-bearing capacity in eastern Sichuan-western Hubei,China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2022,208:109597.
[14] GUO Xusheng,LI Yuping,BORJIGEN T,et al.Hydrocarbon generation and storage mechanisms of deep-water shelf shales of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):204-213.
[15] 姜振学,宋岩,唐相路,等.中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(3):617-628.
JIANG Zhenxue,SONG Yan,TANG Xianglu,et al.Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(3):617-628.
[16] 王恩泽,郭彤楼,刘波,等.四川盆地深层海相页岩地质特征及其含气量主控因素分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,53(9):3615-3627.
WANG Enze,GUO Tonglou,LIU Bo,et al.Geological features and key controlling factors of gas bearing properties of deep marine shale in the Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2022,53(9):3615-3627.
[17] 张维维.川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙—压力演化及页岩气赋存状态转化[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2020.
ZHANG Weiwei.Pore-pressure evolution and transformation of shale gas occurrence state in Longmaxi Formation in south Sichuan[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2020.
[18] XU Liangwei,YANG Keji,WEI Hao,et al.Pore evolution model and diagenetic evolution sequence of the Mesoproterozoic Xiamaling shale in Zhangjiakou,Hebei[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,207:109115.
[19] TIAN Weichao,LU Shuangfang,HUANG Wenbiao,et al.Quantifying the control of pore types on fluid mobility in low-permeability conglomerates by integrating various experiments[J].Fuel,2020,275:117835.
[20] 徐良伟,杨克基,鲁文婷,等.富有机质泥页岩微纳米孔隙系统演化特征及模式研究新进展[J].沉积学报,2022,40(1):1-21.
XU Liangwei,YANG Keji,LU Wenting,et al.New research progress on organic-rich shale micro- and nanoscale pore system evolution characteristics and models[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2022,40(1):1-21.
[21] 杨钦,苏思远,李昂,等.孔隙类型对页岩气赋存状态的影响——以川南长宁地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2022,51(4):704-717.
YANG Qin,SU Siyuan,LI Ang,et al.Influence of pore type on the occurrence state of shale gas:taking Wufeng-Longmaxi formation shale in Changning area of southern Sichuan as an example[J].Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2022,51(4):704-717.
[22] LI Xin,JIANG Zhenxue,WANG Shuai,et al.Differences of marine and transitional shales in the case of dominant pore types and exploration strategies,in China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2022,103:104628.
[23] HUI Shasha,PANG Xiongqi,CHEN Zhuoheng,et al.Quantifying the relative contribution and evolution of pore types to shale reservoir space: constraints from over-mature marine shale in the Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2023,249:105625.
[24] 邓模,翟常博,杨振恒,等.低成熟海相黑色页岩生烃特征的热模拟实验[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(1):130-137.
DENG Mo,ZHAI Changbo,YANG Zhenheng,et al.Thermal simulation experiment on hydrocarbon generation characteristics of low-mature marine black shale[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(1):130-137.
[25] LI Jijun,YIN Jianxin,ZHANG Yanian,et al.A comparison of experimental methods for describing shale pore features—A case study in the Bohai Bay Basin of eastern China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2015,152:39-49.
[26] CHEN Yufei,JIANG Changbao,LEUNG J Y,et al.Multiscale characterization of shale pore-fracture system:geological controls on gas transport and pore size classification in shale reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,202:108442.
[27] GAO Zhiye,LIANG Zhu,HU Qinhong,et al.A new and integrated imaging and compositional method to investigate the contributions of organic matter and inorganic minerals to the pore spaces of lacustrine shale in China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2021,127:104962.
[28] CHEN Qian,ZHANG Jinchuan,TANG Xuan,et al.Relationship between pore type and pore size of marine shale:an example from the Sinian-Cambrian formation,upper Yangtze region,South China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,158:13-28.
[29] LIU Kouqi,OSTADHASSAN M,GENTZIS T,et al.Image analysis of the pore structures:an intensive study for Middle Bakken[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2019,61:32-45.
[30] 戚明辉,李君军,曹茜.基于扫描电镜和JMicroVision图像分析软件的泥页岩孔隙结构表征研究[J].岩矿测试,2019,38(3):260-269.
QI Minghui,LI Junjun,CAO Qian.The pore structure characterization of shale based on scanning electron microscopy and JMicroVision[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis,2019,38(3):260-269.
[31] CHANDRA D,VISHAL V,DEBBARMA A,et al.Role of composition and depth on pore attributes of Barakar Formation gas shales of Ib valley,India,using a combination of low-pressure sorption and image analysis[J].Energy & Fuels,2020,34(7):8085-8098.
[32] 宋岩,高凤琳,唐相路,等.海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1501-1512.
SONG Yan,GAO Fenglin,TANG Xianglu,et al.Influencing factors of pore structure differences between marine and terrestrial shale reservoirs [J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(12):1501-1512.
[33] CHANDRA D,VISHAL V.A critical review on pore to continuum scale imaging techniques for enhanced shale gas recovery[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2021,217:103638.
[34] 陈宗铭,唐玄,梁国栋,等.基于深度学习的页岩扫描电镜图像有机质孔隙识别与比较[J].地学前缘,2023,30(3):208-220.
CHEN Zongming,TANG Xuan,LIANG Guodong,et al.Identification and comparison of organic matter-hosted pores in shale by SEM image analysis—a deep learning-based approach[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(3):208-220.
[35] 杨跃明,陈玉龙,刘燊阳,等.四川盆地及其周缘页岩气勘探开发现状、潜力与展望[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):42-58.
YANG Yueming,CHEN Yulong,LIU Shenyang,et al.Status,potential and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):42-58.
[36] 李飞,刘珠江,陈斐然,等.川东北地区二叠系大隆组泥岩硅质成因及对可压性影响[J].天然气地球科学,2023,34(2):349-358.
LI Fei,LIU Zhujiang,CHEN Feiran,et al.Origin of siliceous mudstone in Permian Dalong Formation and its influence on compressibility,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2023,34(2):349-358.
[37] 王晔.四川盆地下古生界页岩成熟度表征和成熟过程研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2019.
WANG Ye.Study on maturity characterization and maturation process of Lower Paleozoic shale in Sichuan Basin,China[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2019.
[38] 王淑芳,董大忠,王玉满,等.中美海相页岩气地质特征对比研究[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1666-1678.
WANG Shufang,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al.A comparative study of the geological feature of marine shale gas between China and the United States[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(9):1666-1678.
[39] SCHOENHERR J,LITTKE R,URAI J L,et al.Polyphase thermal evolution in the Infra-Cambrian Ara Group (South Oman Salt Basin)as deduced by maturity of solid reservoir bitumen[J].Organic Geochemistry,2007,38(8):1293-1318.
[40] PETERSEN H I,SCHOVSBO N H,NIELSEN A T.Reflectance measurements of zooclasts and solid bitumen in Lower Paleozoic shales,southern Scandinavia:correlation to vitrinite reflectance[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2013,114:1-18.
[41] LIU Kouqi,OSTADHASSAN M,ZHOU Jie,et al.Nanoscale pore structure characterization of the Bakken shale in the USA[J].Fuel,2017,209:567-578.
[42] SHAO Xinhe,PANG Xiongqi,LI Qianwen,et al.Pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shales:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shales in the Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,80:192-202.
[43] 刘冀蓬,刘德勋,胡海燕,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘山西组海陆过渡相页岩孔隙结构特征[J].中国科技论文,2022,17(1):21-30.
LIU Jipeng,LIU Dexun,HU Haiyan et al.Pore structure characteristics of marine continental transitional facies shale of Shanxi Formation in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J].China Sciencepaper,2022,17(1):21-30.
[44] SHI Kanyuan,PANG Xiongqi,CHEN Junqing,et al.Pore structure characteristics and evaluation of carbonate reservoir:a case study of the Lower Carboniferous in the Marsel exploration area,Chu-Sarysu Basin[J].Natural Resources Research,2023,32(2):771-793.
[45] 李子文,郝志勇,庞源,等.煤的分形维数及其对瓦斯吸附的影响[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(4):863-869.
LI Ziwen,HAO Zhiyong,PANG Yuan,et al.Fractal dimensions of coal and their influence on methane adsorption[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2015,40(4):863-869.
[46] WANG Zhe,LI Xianqing,ZHOU Baogang,et al.Characterization of microscopic pore structure and its influence on gas content of shale gas reservoirs from the Lower Paleozoic in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(9):2287-2297.
[47] 张步良.基于分类概率加权的朴素贝叶斯分类方法[J].重庆理工大学学报:自然科学,2012,26(7):81-83.
ZHANG Buliang.Naive Bayesian classifier method based on the classification of the probability-weighted[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Technology:Natural Science,2012,26(7):81-83.
[48] 胡瑶,李军,苏俊磊.用地球物理测井方法识别碳酸盐岩储集层的岩性及孔隙结构——以巴西深海J油田案例[J].地球物理学进展,2020,35(2):735-742.
HU Yao,LI Jun,SU Junlei.Identification of lithology and pore structure of subsalt carbonate rocks by geophysical logging method:Brazil deep sea J oilfield case[J].Progress in Geophysics,2020,35(2):735-742.
[49] 徐祖新,郭少斌.基于氩离子抛光-SEM和ImageJ软件的页岩储层孔隙结构分析——以中扬子地区陡山沱组为例[J].东北石油大学学报,2014,38(4):45-51.
XU Zuxin,GUO Shaobin.Analysis of the pore structure of shale gas reservoirs based on argon-ion milling SEM and ImageJ[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2014,38(4):45-51.
[50] 姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
JIANG Zaixing,LIANG Chao,WU Jing,et al.Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
[51] 王阳.上扬子区龙马溪组页岩微孔缝结构演化与页岩气赋存[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2017.
WANG Yang.Nanoscale pore structure evolution and shale gas occurrence of Longmaxi Formation in Upper Yangtze area[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2017.
[52] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[53] SING K S W.Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry,1985,57(4):603-619.
[54] 仰云峰,腾格尔,朱地,等.川渝地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构演化研究[J].地球化学,2021,50(4):415-428.
YANG Yunfeng,BORJIGIN T,ZHU Di,et al.Investigation of the evolution of pore structure of Longmaxi shale in South China[J].Geochimica,2021,50(4):415-428.
[55] 朱文博,张训华,周道容,等.下扬子地区二叠系海相页岩孔隙特征新认识及页岩气勘探启示[J].天然气工业,2021,41(7):41-55.
ZHU Wenbo,ZHANG Xunhua,ZHOU Daorong,et al.New cognition on pore structure characteristics of Permian marine shale in the Lower Yangtze Region and its implications for shale gas exploration[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(7):41-55.
[56] LYU Chengfu,ZHANG Ying,LI Chao,et al.Pore characterization of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation and Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoirs,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,5(6):327-340.
[57] KO L T,RUPPEL S C,LOUCKS R G,et al.Pore-types and pore-network evolution in Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Woodford and Mississippian Barnett mudstones:insights from laboratory thermal maturation and organic petrology[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,190:3-28.
[58] CAO Taotao,SONG Zhiguang,WANG Sibo,et al.Characterizing the pore structure in the Silurian and Permian shales of the Sichuan Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2015,61:140-150.
[59] MASTALERZ M,SCHIMMELMANN A,DROBNIAK A,et al.Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany Shale across a maturation gradient:insights from organic petrology,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(10):1621-1643.
[60] POMMER M,MILLIKEN K.Pore types and pore-size distributions across thermal maturity,Eagle Ford Formation,southern Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2015,99(9):1713-1744.
[61] LIU B,MASTALERZ M,SCHIEBER J.SEM petrography of dispersed organic matter in black shales:a review[J].Earth Science Reviews,2022,224:103874.
[62] 冯子辉,霍秋立,曾花森,等.松辽盆地古龙页岩有机质组成与有机质孔形成演化[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(5):40-55.
FENG Zihui,HUO Qiuli,ZENG Huasen,et al.Organic matter compositions and organic pore evolution in Gulong shale of Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(5):40-55.
[63] LIANG Tian,ZOU Yanrong,ZHAN Zhaowen,et al.An evaluation of kerogen molecular structures during artificial maturation[J].Fuel,2020,265:116979.

四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征

Quantitative characterization of the contribution of pore types to pore space of marine shale in Sichuan Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地沉积充填演化与含油气系统耦合模拟方法在超深层油气成藏模拟中的应用——以四川盆地中部震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
[2]	武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 孙玉平, 刘永, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[3]	夏钦禹, 马新华, 郭振华, 李文, 江林, 张林, 李新豫, 刘曦翔, 罗瑞兰, 闫海军, 刘钰洋, 阳成. 川中高石梯区块灯影组四段古岩溶带及内部储层分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[4]	陈义林, 秦勇, 张博, 杨天宇, 刘静, 王兰花, 洪勇. 制样粒径对不同变质程度煤孔隙结构的差异化影响[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1313-1332.
[5]	杨雨, 谢继容, 曹正林, 文龙, 王小娟, 肖尧, 杨建, 唐青松, 唐大海, 李明秋, 关旭, 曾青高, 陈伟华, 陈康, 肖红林. 四川盆地天府气田沙溪庙组大型致密砂岩气藏形成条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 917-932.
[6]	申威, 唐军, 信毅, 曹磊, 陈文迪, 唐保勇, 何泽, 齐戈为. 塔里木盆地北部潜山岩溶相带定量表征与储层评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 471-484.
[7]	席胜利, 魏嘉怡, 张才利, 王红伟, 井向辉, 杨亚娟, 刘刚, 李涵, 张艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地海相页岩油勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 253-269.
[8]	蒋华川, 张本健, 刘四兵, 王文之, 周刚, 和源, 李堃宇, 文华国. 四川盆地广安—石柱古隆起的发现及油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 270-284.
[9]	任佳鑫, 宋金民, 刘树根, 赵容容, 罗忠, 李智武, 金鑫, 马行陟, 李柯然, 叶玥豪, 丁一, 李文皓, 赵玲丽, 田立洲. 四川盆地灯影组二段微生物丘滩体结构类型与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 312-328.
[10]	丁骞, 甘利灯, 魏乐乐, 张宇生, 杨昊, 姜晓宇, 王峣钧. 双孔隙结构因子及其在储层渗透性地震预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 339-347.
[11]	唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 杨焦生, 邓泽, 李松, 陈世达, 冯鹏, 黄晨, 李站伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.
[12]	方正, 蒲秀刚, 陈世悦, 鄢继华, 陈星燃, 崔绮梦. 陆相湖盆深水区页岩高频层序对储层发育的影响——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1663-1682.
[13]	郭旭升, 魏志红, 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 陈超, 王道军. 四川盆地侏罗系陆相页岩油气富集条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 14-27.
[14]	姜鹏飞, 吴建发, 朱逸青, 张德宽, 吴伟, 张芮, 吴喆, 王青, 杨雨然, 杨雪, 伍秋姿, 陈丽清, 何一凡, 张娟. 四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 91-109.
[15]	何文渊, 蒙启安, 白雪峰, 王显东, 王有智, 谭万仓. 川东北地区二叠系—三叠系多期台缘演化规律及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1201-1212,1235.