库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向

doi:10.7623/syxb202109001

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 1113-1125.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202109001

• 地质勘探 • 下一篇

库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向

魏国齐¹, 张荣虎^1,2, 智凤琴^1,2, 王珂^1,2, 余朝丰^1,2, 董才源¹

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100086;
2. 中国石油杭州地质研究院浙江杭州 310023

收稿日期:2020-08-05 修回日期:2021-03-09 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-12
通讯作者: 张荣虎,男,1976年9月生,2000年获大庆石油学院学士学位,2013年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,主要从事碎屑岩沉积储层、成藏与油气地质综合研究工作。Email:zrh_hz@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:魏国齐,男,1964年9月生,1986年获江汉石油学院学士学位,2000年获南京大学博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,长期从事油气地质综合研究与勘探部署工作。Email:weigq@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05003-001，2016ZX05007）和国家重点研发计划项目（2019YFC0605501）资助。

Formation conditions and exploration directions of Mesozoic structural-lithologic stratigraphic reservoirs in the eastern Kuqa depression

Wei Guoqi¹, Zhang Ronghu^1,2, Zhi Fengqin^1,2, Wang Ke^1,2, Yu Chaofeng^1,2, Dong Caiyuan¹

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100086, China;
2. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2020-08-05 Revised:2021-03-09 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 前陆盆地以蕴藏构造油气藏为主，岩性地层油气藏在以往被认为难以形成规模资源量。以库车坳陷东部中生界为例，在大量露头、钻井、地震和测井资料叠合分析的基础上，分析出吐格尔明大型背斜构造为古新世和上新世继承性基底冲断作用的产物，其变形主压应力场的方位为NNE—SSW向；依奇克里克背斜构造为基底卷入的冲断构造，其褶皱南翼相对简单，为迪北斜坡带，北翼呈低角度北倾，变形主压应力场的方位为NNW—SSE向。库车坳陷东部中—下侏罗统和上三叠统发育巨厚层煤系腐殖型和暗色泥岩腐泥型烃源岩，沉积中心分布在库车河地区、迪北地区和吐东地区，TOC含量为2.1%~3.3%，R_o为1.0%~2.0%，处于成熟—高成熟阶段，生烃潜力大；广泛发育中层—薄层辫状河三角洲平原—前缘砂体，累计厚度为200~280 m，砂体在垂向上不连续加积，在横向上呈透镜状，延伸距离最大可达4 km。油气藏主要发育在3个有利区带：构造-岩性油气藏发育在大型背斜围斜部位，大面积致密砂岩构造-岩性型油气藏发育在阳霞凹陷和深部背斜平缓带，构造-地层超覆油气藏发育在阳霞凹陷南斜坡。

关键词: 库车坳陷, 中—下侏罗统, 上三叠统, 构造-岩性地层, 油气藏

Abstract: The foreland basin is dominated by structural reservoirs, and generally it is difficult for lithostratigraphic reservoirs to form large-scale resource fields. Based on the case study of the Mesozoic in the eastern Kuqa depression, as well as the superposition analysis of a large number of outcrop, drilling, seismic and logging data, it is obtained that the large-scale Tugeerming anticline in the eastern Kuqa depression was formed by successive basement thrusting in Paleocene and Pliocene with NNE-SSW trending main compressive stress field of deformation. Yiqikelike anticline is a basement-involved thrust structure. Its southern wing is the Dibei slope with simple topography, while the northern wing incline to the north at a low angle with NNW-SSE trending main compressive stress field. In the Middle and Lower Jurassic and Upper Triassic, sapropelic source rocks with huge thick layers of humic and dark mudstone in coal measures were developed in the eastern Kuqa depression. The sedimentary centers are distributed in Kuqa River, Dibei and Tudong areas. The total organic carbon content is 2.1% to 3.3%, and the R_o is 1.0% to 2.0%, indicating the mature and high-mature stages of reservoirs with large hydrocarbon generation potential. Middle- and thin-layered sandbodies of the braided river delta plain and delta front is widely developed, with the cumulative thickness of 200 m to 280 m. The sand body is discontinuous in the vertical direction and lenticular in the transverse direction, and the extension distance is up to 4 km. There are three types of large-scale favorable areas for oil and gas accumulation. Structural-lithologic reservoirs are developed in the large anticline slope, large area of tight sand structural-lithologic reservoirs are developed in Yangxia sag and the gentle zone of the deep anticline, as well as the structural-stratigraphic onlap reservoirs are developed in the south slope of Yangxia sag.

Key words: Kuqa depression, Middle and Lower Jurassic, Upper Triassic, structural-lithologic strata, reservoir

中图分类号:

TE122.3

魏国齐, 张荣虎, 智凤琴, 王珂, 余朝丰, 董才源. 库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1113-1125.

Wei Guoqi, Zhang Ronghu, Zhi Fengqin, Wang Ke, Yu Chaofeng, Dong Caiyuan. Formation conditions and exploration directions of Mesozoic structural-lithologic stratigraphic reservoirs in the eastern Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 1113-1125.

参考文献

[1] 贾承造, 顾家裕, 张光亚.库车拗陷大中型气田形成的地质条件[J]. 科学通报, 2002, 47(增刊1):49-55.
JIA Chenzao, GU Jiayu, ZHANG Guangya.Geological constraints of giant and medium-sized gas fields in Kuqa depression[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(S1):47-54.
[2] 刘志宏, 卢华复, 贾承造, 等.库车再生前陆盆地的构造与油气[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(4):297-303.
LIU Zhihong, LU Huafu, JIA Chengzao, et al.Structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in Kuqa rejuvenated foreland basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(4):297-303.
[3] 杜金虎, 田军, 李国欣, 等.库车坳陷秋里塔格构造带的战略突破与前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(1):16-23.
DU Jinhu, TIAN Jun, LI Guoxin, et al.Strategic breakthrough and prospect of Qiulitag structural belt in Kuqa depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(1):16-23.
[4] 陈发景, 汪新文, 张光亚, 等.新疆塔里木盆地北部构造演化与油气关系[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1996.
CHEN Fajing, WANG Xinwen, ZHANG Guangya, et al.The tectonic evolution related with oil and gas in the northern Tarim Basin in Xinjiang[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1996.
[5] 王招明, 钟端, 赵培荣, 等.库车前陆盆地露头区油气地质[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2004:201-205.
WANG Zhaoming, ZHONG Duan, ZHAO Peirong, et al.Petroleum geology of outcrops areas in Kuche foreland basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2004:201-205.
[6] 顾家裕, 朱筱敏, 贾进华, 等.塔里木盆地沉积与储层[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003.
GU Jiayu, ZHU Xiaomin, JIA Jinghua, et al.Sedimentation and reservoir in the Tarim Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.
[7] 贾承造, 张师本, 吴绍祖, 等.塔里木盆地及周边地层[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2004.
JIA Chengzao, ZHANG Shiben, WU Shaozu, et al.Stratigraphy of the Tarim Basin and adjacent areas[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2004.
[8] 王根海, 寿建峰.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统砂体特征与储集层性质的关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(4):33-35.
WANG Genhai, SHOU Jianfeng.The relationship between the characteristics of sand bodies and the properties of Lower Jurassic reservoirs in eastern Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(4):33-35.
[9] 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 等.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(1):160-169.
ZHANG Nini, LIU Luofu, SU Tianxi, et al.Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the Lower Jurassic tight sandstone in eastern Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1):160-169.
[10] 杨帆, 邸宏利, 王少依, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系储层特征及成因[J]. 古地理学报, 2002, 4(2):46-55.
YANG Fan, DI Hongli, WANG Shaoyi, et al.Reservoir characteristics and genesis of the Jurassic in Yiqikelike tectonic zone of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2002, 4(2):46-55.
[11] 陈子炓, 寿建峰, 张惠良, 等.库车坳陷吐格尔明下侏罗统阿合组储层沉积非均质性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(1):60-63.
CHEN Ziliao, SHOU Jianfeng, ZHANG Huiliang, et al.Heterogeneity of reservoirs from Arhe Formation Lower Jurassic in Tugerming, Kuqa depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(1):60-63.
[12] 张惠良, 寿建峰, 陈子料, 等.库车坳陷下侏罗统沉积特征及砂体展布[J]. 古地理学报, 2002, 4(3):47-58.
ZHANG Huiliang, SHOU Jianfeng, CHEN Ziliao, et al.Sedimentary characteristics and sandstone body distribution of the Lower Jurassic in Kuqa depression[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2002, 4(3):47-58.
[13] 申延平, 吴朝东, 岳来群, 等.库车坳陷侏罗系砂岩碎屑组分及物源分析[J]. 地球学报, 2005, 26(3):235-240.
SHEN Yanping, WU Chaodong, YUE Laiqun, et al.An analysis of Jurassic sandstone fragment components and their provenance in Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2005, 26(3):235-240.
[14] 何宏, 郭建华, 高云峰.塔里木盆地库车坳陷侏罗系层序地层与沉积相[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2002, 24(4):1-3.
HE Hong, GUO Jianhua, GAO Yunfeng.Jurassic sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary facies in Kuqa depression of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2002, 24(4):1-3.
[15] 寿建峰, 张惠良, 沈扬.库车前陆地区吐格尔明背斜下侏罗统砂岩成岩作用及孔隙发育的控制因素分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2007, 25(6):869-875.
SHOU Jianfeng, ZHANG Huiliang, SHEN Yang.The analysis of controlling factors on sandstone diagenesis and porosity preservation of Lower Juarassic in Tugerming anticline, Kuqa forland basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(6):869-875.
[16] 刘云田, 陈子炓, 施泽进, 等.库车坳陷下侏罗统阿合组高分辨率层序地层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 31(1):40-45.
LIU Yuntian, CHEN Ziliao, SHI Zejin, et al.High-resolution sequence stratigraphy in Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in Kuqa depression[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition, 2004, 31(1):40-45.
[17] 黄克难, 詹家祯, 邹义声, 等.新疆库车河地区三叠系和侏罗系沉积环境及古气候[J]. 古地理学报, 2003, 5(2):197-208.
HUANG Kenan, ZHAN Jiazhen, ZOU Yisheng, et al.Sedimentary environments and palaeoclimate of the Triassic and Jurassic in Kuqa river area, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(2):197-208.
[18] 曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 等.库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12):1601-1609.
ZENG Lianbo, LIU Guoping, ZHU Rukai, et al.A quantitative evaluation method of structural diagenetic strength of deep tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12):1601-1609.
[19] 巩磊, 高铭泽, 曾联波, 等.影响致密砂岩储层裂缝分布的主控因素分析——以库车前陆盆地侏罗系-新近系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2):199-208.
GONG Lei, GAO Mingze, ZENG Lianbo, et al.Controlling factors on fracture development in the tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of Jurassic-Neogene in the Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(2):199-208.
[20] 王珂, 杨海军, 李勇, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带地质特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7):885-905.
WANG Ke, YANG Haijun, LI Yong, et al.Geological characteristics and exploration potential of the northern tectonic belt of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):885-905.
[21] 王招明.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏盐下深层大气田形成机制与富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(2):153-166.
WANG Zhaoming.Formation mechanism and enrichment regularities of Kelasu subsalt deep large gas field in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(2):153-166.
[22] 张荣虎, 杨海军, 魏红兴, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带中东段中下侏罗统砂体特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(9):1243-1252.
ZHANG Ronghu, YANG Haijun, WEI Hongxing, et al.The sandstone characteristics and hydrocarbon exploration signification of Lower Jurassic in middle east section of northern tectonic belt in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(9):1243-1252.
[23] 张月, 韩登林, 杨铖晔, 等.超深层碎屑岩储层裂缝充填流体迁移规律——以库车坳陷克深井区白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3):292-300.
ZHANG Yue, HAN Denglin, YANG Chengye, et al.Migration law of fracture filling fluid in ultra-deep clastic reservoirs:a case study of the Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen well block, Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(3):292-300.
[24] 李谨, 王超, 李剑, 等.库车坳陷北部迪北段致密油气来源与勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(4):485-497.
LI Jin, WANG Chao, LI Jian, et al.Source and exploration direction of tight oil and gas in the Dibei section of northern Kuqa depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(4):485-497.
[25] 史超群, 许安明, 魏红兴, 等.构造挤压对碎屑岩储层破坏程度的定量表征——以库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系阿合组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2):205-215.
SHI Chaoqun, XU Anming, WEI Hongxing, et al.Quantitative characterization on the clastic reservoir destruction by tectonic compression:a case study of the Jurassic Ahe Formation in Yiqikelike structural belt, Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(2):205-215.
[26] 秦胜飞, 潘文庆, 韩剑发, 等.库车坳陷油气相态分布的不均一性及其控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(2):19-22.
QIN Shengfei, PAN Wenqing, HAN Jianfa, et al.Inhomogeneity of oil and gas distribution and its controlling factors in Kuche depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(2):19-22.
[27] 姜振学, 李峰, 杨海军, 等.库车坳陷迪北地区侏罗系致密储层裂缝发育特征及控藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(S2):102-111.
JIANG Zhenxue, LI Feng, YANG Haijun, et al.Development characteristics of fractures in Jurassic tight reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression and its reservoir-controlling mode[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(S2):102-111.
[28] 李伟, 王雪柯, 张本健, 等.中国中西部砂岩天然气大规模聚集机制与成藏效应[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4):668-678.
LI Wei, WANG Xueke, ZHANG Benjian, et al.Large-scale gas accumulation mechanisms and reservoir-forming geological effects in sandstones of Central and Western China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4):668-678.
[29] 李伟, 朱智鹏, 张海杰.中西部含油气盆地喜山期强烈隆升剥蚀与大气田的成藏效应[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(8):48-55.
LI Wei, ZHU Zhipeng, ZHANG Haijie.Relationship between strong uplifting and denudation during the Himalayan epoch and hydrocarbon accumulation effects of large gas fields in the central western petroliferous basins of China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(8):48-55.

库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向

Formation conditions and exploration directions of Mesozoic structural-lithologic stratigraphic reservoirs in the eastern Kuqa depression

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周立宏, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 李宏军, 刘国全, 崔宇, 吴雪松, 石倩茹, 徐雯婧, 董文韬. 陆相断陷盆地深凹区致密油气成藏模式与勘探实践——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 755-770.
[2]	张洪安, 李令喜, 陈清棠, 万晶, 史大海, 彭国桃, 周勇水. 银额盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 147-162.
[3]	李斌, 姜潇俊, 赵星星, 邬光辉, 韩剑发, 刘强, 汪如军. 塔里木盆地台盆过渡带多相态油气藏成因及差异富集模式——以玉科地区奥陶系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(5): 794-808.
[4]	闫伟, 冷光耀, 李中, 贺梦琦, 邓金根, 马泽林. 氢能地下储存技术进展和挑战[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 556-568.
[5]	刘惠民, 高阳, 秦峰, 杨怀宇. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2141-2159.
[6]	淡伟宁, 陈树光, 李志军, 王建广, 谢佩宇, 田思思, 武函, 冯广业, 肖伟, 杨少欣, 万照飞. 河套盆地油气勘探新领域及有利方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2217-2230.
[7]	钟俊杰, 王曾定, 孙志刚, 姚军, 杨永飞, 孙海, 张磊, 张凯. 基于纳米流控技术的页岩储层微观流体特征研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 207-222.
[8]	王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 余朝丰, 徐振平, 周露, 王珂, 张亮. 库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.
[9]	王冰, 邱楠生, 王祥, 张海祖, 刘一锋, 常健, 朱传庆. 库车坳陷克拉苏-依奇克里克构造带构造挤压型超压识别与计算[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1107-1121.
[10]	王珂, 张荣虎, 唐永, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 唐雁刚, 周露. 库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.
[11]	匡立春, 支东明, 王小军, 宋永, 蒋文龙, 曹正林, 杨智峰, 何文军. 准噶尔盆地上二叠统上乌尔禾组大面积岩性-地层油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(3): 325-340.
[12]	刘文岭, 韩大匡. 数字孪生油气藏:智慧油气田建设的新方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1450-1461.
[13]	侯连华, 杨帆, 杨春, 杨海军, 李勇. 常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1126-1141.
[14]	国建英, 周立宏, 李剑, 楼达, 齐雪宁, 蒲秀刚, 付立新, 陈大伟, 李志生, 郝爱胜, 谢增业, 李宏军, 姜文亚, 冯建园. 黄骅坳陷乌马营潜山天然气地球化学特征及差异聚集[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(8): 1039-1052.
[15]	张兴文, 庞雄奇, 李才俊, 于吉旺, 汪文洋, 肖惠译, 李昌荣, 余季陶. 深层—超深层高孔高渗碎屑岩油气藏地质特征、形成条件及成藏模式——以墨西哥湾盆地为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 466-480.