常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法

doi:10.7623/syxb202109002

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 1126-1141.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202109002

常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法

侯连华^1,2, 杨帆¹, 杨春¹, 杨海军³, 李勇³

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 国家能源致密油气研发中心北京 100083;
3. 中国石油塔里木油田公司勘探开发研究院新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2020-05-04 修回日期:2021-06-27 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-12
通讯作者: 侯连华,男,1970年7月生,1992年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2003年获石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院石油地质实验研究中心主任、教授级高级工程师,主要从事常规、非常规油气理论技术研发与综合研究工作;杨帆,男,1984年10月生,2005年获中国地质大学(北京)学士学位,2010年获中国地质大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院石油天然气地质研究所高级工程师,主要从事岩性地层油气藏勘探研究工作。Email:yf2010@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:侯连华,男,1970年7月生,1992年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2003年获石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院石油地质实验研究中心主任、教授级高级工程师,主要从事常规、非常规油气理论技术研发与综合研究工作。Email:houlh@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05001）资助。

Principles and methods for quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of conventional petroleum zones and traps

Hou Lianhua^1,2, Yang Fan¹, Yang Chun¹, Yang Haijun³, Li Yong³

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. National Energy Tight Oil and Gas Research & Development Center, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and De velopment, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China

Received:2020-05-04 Revised:2021-06-27 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着含油气盆地勘探程度的不断提高，油气区带与圈闭的定量评价成为油气勘探走向精细化、提高评价精度的必由之路。基于中国49个石油开发区带、44个天然气开发区带和360个圈闭的解剖与控制因素分析，综合不同类型油气区带和圈闭的控制因素，优选评价油气区带和圈闭有效性的关键参数，提出了基于评价参数网格化的油气区带与圈闭的无量纲定量评价方法。通过对油气区带和圈闭的评价参数进行无量纲归一化和网格化定量处理，计算被评价油气区带和圈闭的有效性评价参数，结合资源量可以确定油气区带和圈闭的有效性，实现油气区带与圈闭有效性的定量评价。塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深1—克深2圈闭的勘探实践验证了天然气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价思路和方法的有效性，在新方法的指导下于秋里塔格构造带中秋1井白垩系巴什基奇克组获得高产工业油气流。油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价方法可大幅提高油气区带与圈闭评价的符合率，有效提高油气区带和钻探靶区的选择精度，为提高油气勘探的钻探成功率提供技术支撑。

关键词: 油气区带, 油气圈闭, 有效性, 定量评价, 库车坳陷, 白垩系

Abstract: With the continuous improvement of the exploration of petroliferous basins, the quantitative evaluation of petroleum plays and traps is an essential way for the refined exploration of oil and gas and the accuracy of evaluation. Based on analyzing the control factors of 49 petroleum development zones, as well as 44 gas development zones and 360 traps in China, summarizing the controlling factors for different types of petroleum zones and traps, this paper selects the optimal key parameters for evaluating the effectiveness of petroleum zones and traps, and proposes a dimensionless quantitative evaluation method for petroleum zones and traps based on the gridding of evaluation parameters. Through the dimensionless normalization and gridding quantitative processing of the evaluation parameters of petroleum zones and traps, this paper calculates the effective evaluation parameters of the evaluated petroleum zones and traps. Further, in combination with resource extent, the effectiveness of hydrocarbon zones and traps can be determined, thus realizing the quantitative evaluation of hydrocarbon zones and traps. The exploration practice of Keshen 1 and Keshen 2 traps in the Kuqa depression of Tarim Basin has verified the effectiveness of the ideas and methods for quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of gas zones and traps. Under the instruction of the new methods, high-yield commercial oil and gas flow has been obtained in the Cretaceous Bashjiqike Formation in Well Qiu-1 in the Qiulitage structural belt. The quantitative evaluation method for the effectiveness of hydrocarbon zones and traps can greatly improve the rate of agreement between the evaluations of hydrocarbon zones and traps, effectively increase the accuracy of selecting hydrocarbon zones and drilling targets, which provides technical support for improving the success rate of drilling in oil and gas exploration.

Key words: petroleum zone, petroleum trap, effectiveness, quantitative evaluation, Kuqu depression, Cretaceous

中图分类号:

TE122

侯连华, 杨帆, 杨春, 杨海军, 李勇. 常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1126-1141.

Hou Lianhua, Yang Fan, Yang Chun, Yang Haijun, Li Yong. Principles and methods for quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of conventional petroleum zones and traps[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 1126-1141.

参考文献

[1] MAGOON L B, DOW W G.The petroleum system-from source to trap[R].AAPG Memoir 60, 1994:3-24.
[2] 武守诚.石油资源地质评价导论[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1994.
WU Shoucheng.Introduction of oil and gas resource assessment[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1994.
[3] 丁贵明.油气勘探工程及实践[J]. 勘探家, 1996, 1(1):1-5.
DING Guiming.Hydrocarbon exploration engineering and practice[J]. Explorationist, 1996, 1(1):1-5.
[4] 胡见义.含油气地质单元序列划分及其意义——兼论"含油气系统", 中国含油气系统的应用与进展[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1997.
HU Jianyi.Sequence division of petroleum geological units and its significance- "petroleum system", application and progress of petroleum system in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1997.
[5] 牛嘉玉, 姜雪竹, 刘海涛, 等.成熟探区精细勘探分层系区带评价方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(1):27-35.
NIU Jiayu, JIANG Xuezhu, LIU Haitao, et al.Detailed assessment of a single-combination oil-gas accumulation zone in a mature exploration basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(1):27-35.
[6] ALLEN P A, ALLEN J R.Basin analysis[M]. Black Science Ltd., 1990.
[7] BAKER R A, GEHMAN H M, JAMES W R, et al.Geologic field and size assessment of oil and gas play[J]. AAPG Studies in Geology, 1986, 21:25-31.
[8] 童晓光, 何登发.油气勘探原理和方法[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2001:90-138.
TONG Xiaoguang, HE Dengfa.Principals and methods of petroleum exploration[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2001:90-138.
[9] 刘德良, 谈迎, 杨晓勇, 等.溱潼油气区带评价中的R型因子分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20(4):283-289.
LIU Deliang, TAN Ying, YANG Xiaoyong, et al.R-factor analysis assessment of oil-gas zones in Qingtong[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1999, 20(4):283-289.
[10] 谈迎, 刘德良, 杨晓勇.R型因子分析和油气区带评价的多层系垂向叠合[J]. 中国科技大学学报, 1999, 29(6):658-663.
TAN Ying, LIU Deliang, YANG Xiaoyong.R-factor analysis in petroleum exploration comprehensive assessment[J]. Journal of China University of Science and Technology, 1999, 29(6):658-663.
[11] 孙耀华, 罗涛.一种定量化区带综合评价方法[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(3):25-26.
SUN Yaohua, LUO Tao.A quantitative & integrated assessment method for plays[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004, 26(3):25-26.
[12] 蔡庆龙, 陈莉琼.油气勘探目标的经济评价[J]. 石油化工技术经济, 2003, 19(4):30-34.
CAI Qinglong, CHEN Liqiong.Economic evaluation of oil-gas exploration targets[J]. Techno-Economics in Petrochemicals, 2003, 19(4):30-34.
[13] 中国科学院地质研究所.数学地质引论[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1977:120-160.
Institute of geology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Introduction to mathematical geology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1977:120-160.
[14] 于志钧, 赵旭东.石油数学地质[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1984:60-92.
YU Zhijun, ZHAO Xudong.Mathematical geology of petroleum[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1984:60-92.
[15] 米石云, 郭秋麟, 谢红兵, 等.中高勘探程度区带精细评价技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(4):443-450.
MI Shiyun, GUO Qiulin, XIE Hongbing, et al.A fine assessment technology for medium-high exploration degree plays[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(4):443-450.
[16] 柳广第.石油地质学[M]. 4版.北京:石油工业出版社, 2009.
LIU Guangdi.Petroleum geology[M]. 4th ed.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009.
[17] ALLAIS M.Évaluation des Perspectives Économiques de la Recherche Minière sur de Grands Espaces-application au Sahara Algérien[M]. Paris:Revue de l'Industrie Minérale, 1956.
[18] KAUFMAN G M.Statistical decision and related techniques in oil and gas exploration[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1963.
[19] DREW L J.Grid-drilling exploration and its application to the search for petroleum[J]. Economic Geology, 1967, 62(5):698-710.
[20] 肖芳淳.地质圈闭模糊灰元综合评价[J]. 天然气工业, 1996, 16(3):13-19.
XIAO Fangchun.Comprehensive evaluation fuzzy grey unit for geological traps[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1996, 16(3):13-19.
[21] 齐景顺, 戴跃进, 王广仁, 等.深层天然气藏开发决策风险性经济评价方法研究[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2000, 17(1):27-32.
QI Jingshun, DAI Yuejin, WANG Guangren, et al.Study of economic assessment of risks in deep natural gas reservoir exploitation decision-making[J]. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2000, 17(1):27-32.
[22] 蔡庆龙.油气勘探风险评价方法与评价模型[J]. 石油化工技术经济, 2003, 19(6):58-62.
CAI Qinglong.Evaluation method and model of risks in oil-gas exploration[J]. Techno-Economics in Petrochemicals, 2003, 19(6):58-62.
[23] 董桥梁, 周玉冰, 靳晓丽.圈闭地质评价的人工神经网络算法[J]. 断块油气田, 1998, 5(2):14-15.
DONG Qiaoliang, ZHOU Yubing, JIN Xiaoli.Artificial neural network algorithm of geological trap appraisal[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 1998, 5(2):14-15.
[24] 王英.应用神经网络技术进行油气圈闭评价研究[J]. 新疆地质, 2003, 21(4):493-494.
WANG Ying.The application of neural network technique to study oil trap in the Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2003, 21(4):493-494.
[25] 齐景顺, 张吉光, 杨明杰.灰色关联分析法在油气勘探早期构造圈闭评价中的应用[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2003, 20(5):1-4.
QI Jingshun, ZHANG Jiguang, YANG Mingjie.Application of gray correlative analysis to structural trap assessment in early oil and gas exploration[J]. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2003, 20(5):1-4.
[26] 张立国, 张吉光.灰色关联分析在圈闭评价中的应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1995, 14(4):12-19.
ZHANG Liguo, ZHANG Jiguang.Application of grey association analysis in trap evaluation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 1995, 14(4):12-19.
[27] 杨昌明, 王美丽, 聂新坤.圈闭地质评价中模糊数学综合评判法的优势[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 1999, 21(2):41-42.
YANG Changming, WANG Meili, NIE Xinkun.The advantage of comprehensive evaluation method by blurred mathematics in trap evaluation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 1999, 21(2):41-42.
[28] 左友东, 徐国盛, 刘树根.层次分析法在盆地勘探方案优选中的应用[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2002, 29(3):305-309.
ZUO Youdong, XU Guosheng, LIU Shugen.The application of analytical hierarchy process to selecting the basin exploration projects[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2002, 29(3):305-309.
[29] SAATY T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[30] 杨海军, 李勇, 唐雁刚, 等.塔里木盆地克深气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3):399-414.
YANG Haijun, LI Yong, TANG Yangang, et al.Accumulation conditions, key exploration and development technologies for Keshen gas field in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3):399-414.
[31] 曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 等.库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12):1601-1609.
ZENG Lianbo, LIU Guoping, ZHU Rukai, et al.A quantitative evaluation method of structural diagenetic strength of deep tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa Foreland Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12):1601-1609.
[32] 杨敏, 赵一民, 闫磊, 等.塔里木盆地东秋里塔格构造带构造特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6):826-833.
YANG Min, ZHAO Yimin, YAN Lei, et al.Structural features of the eastern Qiulitage tectonic belt and petroleum geological significance[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(6):826-833.
[33] 刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 等.远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3):307-318.
LIU Chun, CHEN Shijia, ZHAO Jilong, et al.Accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of far-source oil and gas reservoirs:a case study of Meso-Cenozoic reservoirs in the southern slope of Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3):307-318.

常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法

Principles and methods for quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of conventional petroleum zones and traps

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵文智, 汪泽成, 黄福喜, 赵振宇, 姜华, 徐洋. 中国陆上叠合盆地超深层油气成藏条件与勘探地位[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2020-2032.
[2]	王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 余朝丰, 徐振平, 周露, 王珂, 张亮. 库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.
[3]	王冰, 邱楠生, 王祥, 张海祖, 刘一锋, 常健, 朱传庆. 库车坳陷克拉苏-依奇克里克构造带构造挤压型超压识别与计算[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1107-1121.
[4]	王珂, 张荣虎, 唐永, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 唐雁刚, 周露. 库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.
[5]	魏国齐, 张荣虎, 智凤琴, 王珂, 余朝丰, 董才源. 库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1113-1125.
[6]	李峰峰, 宋新民, 郭睿, 刘立峰, 宋世琦. 厚层生物碎屑灰岩油藏隔夹层特征及成因——以中东地区M油田白垩系Mishrif组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 853-864.
[7]	刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 陈戈, 苏洲, 高乔. 远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 307-318.
[8]	冯建伟, 赵力彬, 王焰东. 库车坳陷克深气田超深层致密储层产能控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 478-488.
[9]	张月, 韩登林, 杨铖晔, 袁瑞, 王晨晨, 张娟. 超深层碎屑岩储层裂缝充填流体迁移规律——以库车坳陷克深井区白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 292-300.
[10]	史超群, 许安明, 魏红兴, 胡春雷, 张星, 张文, 莫涛, 张慧芳, 周露, 史玲玲, 朱文慧, 陈维力. 构造挤压对碎屑岩储层破坏程度的定量表征——以库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系阿合组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 205-215.
[11]	李思亦, 唐晓明, 何娟, 许松, 孙福亭, 苏远大. 基于声波远探测和岩石力学分析的井旁裂缝有效性评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1388-1395.
[12]	鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 陈竹新, 李学义, 胡瀚文, 卓勤功. 准噶尔盆地南缘齐古油田油气成藏再认识及勘探启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1045-1058,1115.
[13]	刘刚, 卫延召, 陈棡, 贾开富, 龚德瑜, 王峰, 孙靖, 朱峰, 麻伟娇. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系-白垩系次生油气藏形成机制及分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 914-927.
[14]	刘桃, 刘景东. 欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 971-979.
[15]	张荣虎, 邹伟宏, 陈戈, 赵继龙, 张惠良, 伍劲, 李娴静. 塔里木盆地北部下白垩统大型湖相砂坝特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(8): 845-857.