受原油黏度影响的鄂尔多斯盆地油湿和水湿砂岩导电响应规律

doi:10.7623/syxb202206007

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 829-839,859.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202206007

受原油黏度影响的鄂尔多斯盆地油湿和水湿砂岩导电响应规律

韩玉娇^1,2, 周灿灿³, 李潮流³, 俞军³, 徐红军³

1. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室北京 100101;
2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油工程技术研究院北京 100101;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院测井技术研究所北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-05-23 修回日期:2022-01-05 发布日期:2022-06-28
通讯作者: 韩玉娇,女,1990年10月生,2019年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司石油工程技术研究院工程师,主要从事地球物理测井理论与方法研究工作。
作者简介:韩玉娇,女,1990年10月生,2019年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司石油工程技术研究院工程师,主要从事地球物理测井理论与方法研究工作。Email:hanyj@sinopec.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFA0708303)、国家自然科学基金项目(No.U19B6003)和页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室开发课题(20-YYGZ-KF-GC-11)资助。第一作者及

Conductive response law of oil-wet and water-wet sandstone in Ordos Basin under the influence of oil viscosity

Han Yujiao^1,2, Zhou Cancan³, Li Chaoliu³, Yu Jun³, Xu Hongjun³

1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Beijing 100101, China;
3. Research Institute of Well Logging, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-05-23 Revised:2022-01-05 Published:2022-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了明确原油黏度对油湿和水湿砂岩储层的电性影响规律和机理,选用鄂尔多斯盆地长庆油田原油(黏度约为90 mPa ·s)和煤油配置原油(黏度约为1 mPa ·s),针对油湿和水湿的中—低渗透延长组砂岩开展了岩电、核磁共振、扫描电镜等对比实验,从岩石物理角度探索了不同黏度原油对油湿和水湿砂岩导电响应规律的影响机理。研究结果表明:1不论原油黏度高低,相同饱和度下油湿岩心电阻率都明显高于水湿岩心;2原油黏度对水湿岩心的岩电响应特征影响较小,但对油湿岩心影响很大,即油湿岩心的电性曲线呈明显的分段特征,且原油黏度越大,分段性越明显;3造成油湿岩心电性差异的主要原因在于高黏度原油对孔隙结构的叠加影响。研究成果对于油湿储层的油层识别和饱和度模型建立具有一定指导意义。在实际的岩石物理实验中,要注意原油黏度对油湿岩心岩电响应规律的影响,选取与地下原油黏度相近的油品进行实验才能得到具有代表性的结果。

关键词: 原油黏度, 油湿, 砂岩, 电阻率, 影响规律, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: To clarify the influence law and mechanism of crude oil viscosity on the electrical properties of oil-wet and water-wet sandstone reservoirs, the crude oil of Changqing oilfield in Ordos Basin (the viscosity is about 90 mPa ·s) and crude oil with kerosene (the viscosity is about 1 mPa ·s) were selected to carry out the contrast experiments of rock electricity, nuclear magnetic resonance, and scanning electron microscope on oil-wet and water-wet medium-to-low permeability Yanchang Formation sandstone, and the influence mechanism of the crude oil with different viscosity on the conductivity response law of oil-wet and water-wet sandstone was explored from the perspective of petrophysics. The results show as follows. (1) Regardless of the viscosity of crude oil, the resistivity of oil-wet core is significantly higher than that of water-wet core under the same saturation. (2) Crude oil viscosity has less influence on the rock electrical response characteristic of water-wet core, but has a great influence on that of oil-wet core:the electrical property curve of oil-wet core is characterized with obvious segmentation, and the greater the viscosity of crude oil, the more obvious the segmentation. (3) The main reason for the difference in electrical properties of oil-wet core is the cumulated influence of high viscosity crude oil on the pore structure. The research results are of certain guidance significance for identifying the oil-wet reservoirs and building the saturation model of oil-wet reservoirs. In the actual petrophysics experiment, attention should be paid to the influence of crude oil viscosity on the rock electrical response law of oil-wet core. The representative results can be only obtained by selecting the oil for experiment with the viscosity similar to that of the underground crude oil.

Key words: oil viscosity, oil-wet, sandstone, resistivity, influence law, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE135

韩玉娇, 周灿灿, 李潮流, 俞军, 徐红军. 受原油黏度影响的鄂尔多斯盆地油湿和水湿砂岩导电响应规律[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 829-839,859.

Han Yujiao, Zhou Cancan, Li Chaoliu, Yu Jun, Xu Hongjun. Conductive response law of oil-wet and water-wet sandstone in Ordos Basin under the influence of oil viscosity[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 829-839,859.

参考文献

[1] 胡文瑞,鲍敬伟,胡滨.全球油气勘探进展与趋势[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):409-413.
HU Wenrui,BAO Jingwei,HU Bin.Trend and progress in global oil and gas exploration[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):409-413.
[2] 邹才能,杨智,何东博,等.常规-非常规天然气理论、技术及前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):575-587.
ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,HE Dongbo,et al.Theory,technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(4):575-587.
[3] 张君峰,毕海滨,许浩,等.国外致密油勘探开发新进展及借鉴意义[J].石油学报,2015,36(2):127-137.
ZHANG Junfeng,BI Haibin,XU Hao,et al.New progress and reference significance of overseas tight oil exploration and development[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):127-137.
[4] 邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2011:1-310.
ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,HOU Lianhua,et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2011:1-310.
[5] MORGAN W B,PIRSON S J.The effect of fractional wettability on the Archie saturation exponent[R].Houston:SPWLA,1964.
[6] 李文龙,丛琳.大庆长垣萨尔图-葡萄花-高台子油层组倾斜油水界面形成机理与增储潜力[J].石油学报,2021,42(11):1477-1485.
LI Wenlong,CONG Lin.Formation mechanism and reservoir increasing potential of inclined oil-water interface in Saertu-Putaohua-Gaotaizi reservoir groups of Daqing placanticline[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(11):1477-1485.
[7] HAN Y J,ZHOU C C,YU J,et al.Experimental investigation on the effect of wettability on rock-electricity response in sandstone reservoirs[J].Fuel,2019,239:1246-1257.
[8] 王拥军,孙圆辉,杨思玉,等.中东东鲁卜哈利盆地碳酸盐岩微孔型低电阻率油层饱和度评价方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(1):81-92.

WANG Yongjun,SUN Yuanhui,YANG Siyu,et al.Saturation evaluation of microporous low resistivity carbonate oil pays in Rub Al Khali Basin in the Middle East[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(1):81-92.
[9] GUNNARSSON O,CALANDRA M,HAN J E.Colloquium:saturation of electrical resistivity[J].Reviews of Modern Physics,2003,75(4):1085-1099.
[10] 陈新,匡立春,孙中春,等.利用饱和度分析资料确定阿尔奇参数[J].石油学报,2002,23(5):69-72.
CHEN Xin,KUANG Lichun,SUN Zhongchun,et al.Determination of Archie's parameters with saturation analysis data[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(5):69-72.
[11] 高楚桥,章成广,毛志强.润湿性对岩石电性的影响[J].地球物理学进展,1998,13(1):61-73.
GAO Chuqiao,ZHANG Chengguang,MAO Zhiqiang.The effects of wettability on the electrical properties of rocks[J].Progress in Geophysics,1998,13(1):61-73.
[12] 冯程,毛志强,殷文,等.低渗透复杂润湿性储层电阻率实验及导电机理研究[J].地球物理学报,2017,60(3):1211-1220.
FENG Cheng,MAO Zhiqiang,YIN Wen,et al.Study on resistivity experiments and conductive mechanism in low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2017,60(3):1211-1220.
[13] WANG Dongmei,BUTLER R,ZHANG Jin,et al.Wettability survey in Bakken shale with surfactant-formulation imbibition[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation&Engineering,2012,15(6):695-705.
[14] 张丽华,潘保芝,王云梅,等.砂岩中绿泥石包膜与岩石润湿性及岩电参数的关系研究[J].石油物探,2020,59(4):647-654.
ZHANG Lihua,PAN Baozhi,WANG Yunmei,et al.Relationship between pore-lining chlorite and wettability of rocks,and rock electrical parameters of sandstone[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2020,59(4):647-654.
[15] ANDERSON W G.Wettability literature survey-Part 1:rock/oil/brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1986,38(10):1124-1244.

[16] ALVAREZ J O,SCHECHTER D S.Altering wettability in Bakken shale by surfactant additives and potential of improving oil recovery during injection of completion fluids[R].SPE 179688,2016.
[17] 梁灿.岩石润湿性的核磁共振表征方法及应用研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2019.
LIANG Can.Study on magnetic resonance relaxation characterizing rock wettability[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum,2019.
[18] NEUMANN A W,GOOD R J.Techniques of measuring contact angles[M]//GOOD R J,STROMBERG R R.Surface and Colloid Science.Boston:Springer,1979:31-91.
[19] 梁天博,马实英,魏东亚,等.低渗透油藏水锁机理与助排表面活性剂的优选原则[J].石油学报,2020,41(6):745-752.
LIANG Tianbo,MA Shiying,WEI Dongya,et al.Water blocking mechanism of low-permeability reservoirs and screening principle of flowback surfactants[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(6):745-752.
[20] TREIBER L E,OWENS W W.A laboratory evaluation of the wettability of fifty oil-producing reservoirs[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1972,12(6):531-540.
[21] 高凤琳,王成锡,宋岩,等.氩离子抛光-场发射扫描电镜分析方法在识别有机显微组分中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(2):360-367.
GAO Fenglin,WANG Chengxi,SONG Yan,et al.Ar-ion polishing FE-SEM analysis of organic maceral identification[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2021,43(2):360-367.

受原油黏度影响的鄂尔多斯盆地油湿和水湿砂岩导电响应规律

Conductive response law of oil-wet and water-wet sandstone in Ordos Basin under the influence of oil viscosity

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	魏国齐, 朱秋影, 杨威, 张春林, 莫午零, 武雪琼. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘寒武纪铜川裂陷的发现及油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1223-1235.
[2]	刘致水, 王康宁, 包乾宗, 李之旭. 致密砂岩储层岩石物理横波速度预测方法 ——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1284-1294.
[3]	王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 余朝丰, 徐振平, 周露, 王珂, 张亮. 库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.
[4]	王珂, 张荣虎, 唐永, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 唐雁刚, 周露. 库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.
[5]	王福伟, 陈冬霞, 解广杰, 李士祥, 曾溅辉, 姚东升, 成铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区延长组7段源-储结构控制下致密砂岩油的差异富集机制[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 941-956,976.
[6]	邱正松, 高健, 赵欣, 耿麒, 刘书杰, 孙昊, 邢希金. 深水疏松砂岩储层微粒运移损害的控制方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 1016-1025.
[7]	付金华, 牛小兵, 李明瑞, 刘新社, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 周新平, 刘江艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段页岩油风险勘探突破与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 760-769,787.
[8]	尚婷, 田景春, 刘鑫, 谢先奎, 张晓磊, 余威, 郭懿萱, 王峰, 陈江萌. 石油伴生H₂S的成因分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地彭阳油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 595-604.
[9]	党伟, 张金川, 聂海宽, 王凤琴, 唐玄, 蒋恕, 魏晓亮, 刘秋波, 李沛, 李菲, 孙江涛. 页岩油微观赋存特征及其主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区延长组7段3亚段陆相页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 507-523.
[10]	曾联波, 吕文雅, 徐翔, 田鹤, 陆诗磊, 张洺菁. 典型致密砂岩与页岩层理缝的发育特征、形成机理及油气意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 180-191.
[11]	吴小力, 徐旺林, 李荣西, 李宁熙, 刘齐, 赵迪, 赵帮胜, 覃小丽, 白莹. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部奥陶系马家沟组硫化氢成因——来自流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 250-261.
[12]	付金华, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 郭雯, 周新平, 刘江艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及有利区优选[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1702-1716.
[13]	郭秋麟, 侯连华, 王建, 柳庄小雪, 罗霞, 陈宁生. 原位转化页岩油资源潜力评价方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1750-1757.
[14]	李士祥, 郭芪恒, 周新平, 刘元博, 刘江艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段页岩型页岩油储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1509-1519.
[15]	刘翰林, 邹才能, 邱振, 潘松圻, 张文正, 荆振华, 郝记华, 尹帅, 吴松涛, 李士祥, 郭秋雷. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段异常高有机质沉积富集因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1520-1541.