基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201607007

石油学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 887-897.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201607007

基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例

代全齐¹, 罗群^1,2, 张晨³, 卢朝进³, 张云钊¹, 鲁少杰¹, 赵岩¹

1. 中国石油大学非常规天然气研究院北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249;
3. 中国石油大学地球科学学院北京 102249

收稿日期:2015-11-03 修回日期:2016-04-19 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-07-28
通讯作者: 罗群,男,1963年9月生,1986年获武汉地质学院学士学位,2001年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)非常规天然气研究院副教授、硕士生导师,主要从事常规和非常规油气地质与资源评价的科研和教学工作。Email:luoqun2002@263.net
作者简介:代全齐,男,1991年6月生,2014年获中国地质大学(武汉)资源勘查工程专业学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)地质资源与地质工程专业硕士研究生,主要从事致密油储层特征研究与地质评价工作。Email:daiqq0614@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.41372145）和国家重点基础研究发展计划（973）项目（2015CB250901）资助。

Pore structure characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoir based on a new parameter measured by NMR experiment: a case study of seventh Member in Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin

Dai Quanqi¹, Luo Qun^1,2, Zhang Chen³, Lu Chaojin³, Zhang Yunzhao¹, Lu Shaojie¹, Zhao Yan¹

1. Unconventional Natural Gas Institutes, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China.

Received:2015-11-03 Revised:2016-04-19 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以核磁共振技术为基础，结合高压压汞、扫描电镜等实验资料，对鄂尔多斯盆地合水区块延长组7段致密油砂岩储层的66个岩心样品进行了分析，提出了一种新型孔隙结构参数——可动流体有效孔隙度。该参数不仅克服了核磁共振实验所测孔隙度偏小的影响，还将孔隙内的可动流体同时受到孔隙表面亲水性颗粒的黏滞及临近细小喉道的束缚这2个因素的影响考虑在内，对可动流体占据的有效孔隙空间的大小定量化标定出来，更加准确地反映了致密油储层的孔隙结构特征，弥补了可动流体孔隙度等现有参数对储层孔喉有效性评价的不足。研究孔隙结构特征与新参数影响关系发现，孔喉的连通性越好，可动流体有效孔隙度越大；孔喉分选系数介于1.4~1.9时，可动流体有效孔隙度达到最高；不同级别的孔喉配置关系是致密油砂岩储层孔喉有效性的关键。以可动流体有效孔隙度为主要标准，将研究区孔隙结构类型划分为3类：I类孔隙结构的可动流体有效孔隙度大于2 % ，II类孔隙结构的可动流体有效孔隙度介于1 % ~2 % ，III类孔隙结构的可动流体有效孔隙度小于1 % 。据此建立了适合致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构的分类评价标准，以指导油田的勘探开发。

关键词: 核磁共振, 可动流体有效孔隙度, 致密砂岩储层, 孔隙结构, 特征参数

Abstract:

Based on NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) technology in combination with high-pressure Hg injection, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and other experimental data, 66 core samples of tight-oil sandstone reservoir in seventh Member of Yanchang Formation, Heshui block, Ordos Basin were analyzed in this study. Then a new pore structure parameter was proposed, i.e., effective porosity of movable fluid. This parameter not only can overcome the impact of small porosity measured by NMR experiment, but also takes into account the movable fluid in the pores influenced by two factors, i.e., the viscosity of hydrophilic particulate on pore surface and the constraint of tiny throats nearby. The size of effective pore space occupied by movable fluid can be quantitatively calibrated to more accurately reflect the pore structure characteristics of tight-oil reservoir and make up the defects in effectiveness evaluation of pore throat using the existing parameters such as the porosity of movable fluid. Through analyzing the relation between pore structure characteristics and the influence of new parameter, it has been found that the better the connectivity of pore throat is, the larger the effective porosity of movable fluid will be; when pore-throat sorting coefficient is within the range of 1.4-1.9, the effective porosity of movable fluid can reach the maximum; different levels of pore-throat configurations are the key for pore-throat effectiveness in tight-oil sandstone reservoir. Then, based on the effective porosity of movable fluid as major criteria, pore structures in the study area can be divided into three types, i.e., Type I - the effective porosity of the movable fluid is large than 2 % ; Type II - the effective porosity is ranged between 1 % and 2 % ; Type III - the effective porosity is smaller than 1 % . Accordingly, the classified evaluation standard should be established for tight-oil sandstone reservoir to guide the exploration and development of oil field.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance, effective porosity of movable fluid, tight-oil sandstone reservoir, pore structure, characteristic parameter

中图分类号:

TE122

代全齐, 罗群, 张晨, 卢朝进, 张云钊, 鲁少杰, 赵岩. 基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 887-897.

Dai Quanqi, Luo Qun, Zhang Chen, Lu Chaojin, Zhang Yunzhao, Lu Shaojie, Zhao Yan. Pore structure characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoir based on a new parameter measured by NMR experiment: a case study of seventh Member in Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(7): 887-897.

参考文献

[1] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.非常规油气地质学重要理论问题[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):1-10.
Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Four important theoretical issues of unconventional petroleum geology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):1-10.
[2] 邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2011:1-310.
Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2011:1-310.
[3] Johnstone B.Bakken black gold[N].Leader-Poster,2007-12-10(6).
[4] 罗蛰潭,王允诚.油气储集层的孔隙结构[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1986:21-139.
Luo Zhetan,Wang Yuncheng.Pore structure of oil gas reservoir[M].Beijing:Science and Technology Press,1986:21-139.
[5] 裘亦楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997:71-96.
Qiu Yi'nan,Xue Shuhao.Evaluation technology of oil gas reservoir[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:71-96.
[6] 王国亭,何东博,李易隆,等.吐哈盆地巴喀气田八道湾组致密砂岩储层分析及孔隙度演化定量模拟[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(11):1847-1856.
Wang Guoting,He Dongbo,Li Yilong,et al.Tight sandstone reservoir analysis and porosity-evolution quantitative simulation of the Badaowan Formation in the Baka Gas Field,Turpan-Hami Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(11):1847-1856.
[7] 杨晓萍,裘亦楠.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组浊沸石的形成机理、分布规律与油气关系[J].沉积学报,2002,20(4):628-632.
Yang Xiaoping,Qiu Yi'nan.Formation process and distribution of laumontite in Yanchang Formation (Upper Triassic) of Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2002,20(4):628-632.
[8] Nelson P H.Pore-throat sizes in sandstones,tight sandstones,and shales[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(3):329-340.
[9] Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
[10] Desbois G,Urai J L,Kukla P A.Morphology of the pore space in claystones-evidence from BIB /FIB ion beam sectioning and cryo-SEM observations[J].eEarth,2009,4(1):15-22.
[11] 杜金虎,何海清,杨涛,等.中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(1):1-9.
Du Jinhu,He Haiqing,Yang Tao,et al.Progress in China's tight oil exploration and challenges[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(1):1-9.
[12] 王为民,郭和坤,叶朝辉.利用核磁共振可动流体评价低渗透油田开发潜力[J].石油学报,2001,22(6):40-44.
Wang Weimin,Guo Hekun,Ye Zhaohui.The evaluation of development potential in low permeability oilfield by the aid of NMR movable fluid detecting technology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,22(6):40-44.
[13] 刘堂宴,王绍民,傅容珊,等.核磁共振谱的岩石孔喉结构分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(3):328-333.
Liu Tangyan,Wang Shaomin,Fu Rongshan,et al.Analysis of rock pore throat structure with NMR spectra[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2003,38(3):328-333.
[14] 喻建,杨孝,李斌,等.致密油储层可动流体饱和度计算方法—以合水地区长7致密油储层为例[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):767-772.
Yu Jian,Yang Xiao,Li Bin,et al.A method of determining movable fluid saturation of tight oil reservoirs:a case study of tight oil reservoirs in seventh Member of Yanchang Formation in Heshui area[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2014,36(6):767-772.
[15] 刘天定,赵太平,李高仁,等.利用核磁共振评价致密砂岩储层孔径分布的改进方法[J].测井技术,2012,36(2):119-123.
Liu Tianding,Zhao Taiping,Li Gaoren,et al.An improved method to evaluate pore size distribution of tight sandstone reservoir using NMR[J].Well Logging Technology ,2012,36(2):119-123.
[16] 王瑞飞,陈明强.特低渗透砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及影响因素[J].石油学报,2008,29(4):558-561.
Wang Ruifei,Chen Mingqiang.Characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(4):558-561.
[17] 王为民,孙佃庆,苗盛.核磁共振测井基础实验研究[J].测井技术,1997,21(6):11-18.
Wang Weimin,Sun Dianqing,Miao Sheng.The fundamental study on NMR logging[J]. Well Logging Technology,1997,21(6):11-18.
[18] Ohen H A,Ajufo A O,Enwere P M.Laboratory NMR relaxation measurements for the acquisition of Calibration data for NMR logging tools[R].SPE 35683,1996.
[19] Agut R,Levallois B,Klopf W.Integrating core measurements and NMR logs in complex lithology[R].SPE 63211,2000.
[20] 周宇,魏国齐,郭和坤.核磁共振孔隙度影响因素分析与校准[J].测井技术,2011,35(3):210-214.
Zhou Yu,Wei Guoqi,Guo Hekun.Impact factors analysis and decision tree correction of NMR porosity measurements[J].Well Logging Technology,2011,35(3):210-214.
[21] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.SY/T 6490-2007 岩样核磁共振参数实验室测量规范[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2008.
National Development and Reform Commission.SY/T 6490-2007 Normalization measurement for core NMR parameter in laboratory[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.
[22] 何更生.油层物理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:192-215.
He Gengsheng.Reservoir physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994:192-215.
[23] 纪友亮.油气储层地质学[M].2版.东营:中国石油大学出版社,2009:42-74.
Ji Youliang.Petroleum reservoir geology[M].2nd ed.Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2009:42-74.
[24] 张荣虎,杨海军,王俊鹏,等.库车坳陷超深层低孔致密砂岩储层形成机制与油气勘探意义[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1057-1069.
Zhang Ronghu,Yang Haijun,Wang Junpeng,et al.The formation mechanism and exploration significance of ultra-deep,low-porosity and tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1057-1069.
[25] 高辉,孙卫.特低渗透砂岩储层可动流体变化特征与差异性成因——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组为例[J].地质学报,2010,84(8):1223-1230.
Gao Hui,Sun Wei.Movable fluid changing characteristics and diversity origin of ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir——take the Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin as an example[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2010,84(8):1223-1230.
[26] 叶礼友,高树生,熊伟,等.可动水饱和度作为低渗砂岩气藏储层评价参数的论证[J].石油天然气学报,2011,33(1):57-59.
Ye Liyou,Gao Shusheng,Xiong Wei,et al.Demonstration of mobile water saturation as evaluation parameter of low permeability sandstone gas reservoir[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2011,33(1):57-59.
[27] 何文祥,杨乐,马超亚,等.特低渗透储层微观孔隙结构参数对渗流行为的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地长6储层为例[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):477-481.
He Wenxiang,Yang Le,Ma Chaoya,et al.Effect of micro-pore structure parameter on seepage characteristics in ultra-low permeability reservoir:a case from Chang 6 reservoir of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):477-481.
[28] 王瑞飞,陈明强,孙卫.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组超低渗透砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征研究[J].地质论评,2008,54(2):270-277.
Wang Ruifei,Chen Mingqiang,Sun Wei.The research of micro-pore structure in super-low permeability sandstone reservoir of the Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Geological Review,2008,54(2):270-277.
[29] 赵继勇,刘振旺,谢启超,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长7致密油储层微观孔喉结构分类特征[J]. 中国石油勘探,2014,19(5):73-79.
Zhao Jiyong,Liu Zhenwang,Xie Qichao,et al.Micro pore throat structural classification of Chang 7 tight oil reservoir of Jiyuan oilfield in Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(5):73-79.
[30] 洪秀娥,戴胜群,郭建宇,等.应用毛细管压力曲线研究储层孔隙结构——以卫城油田Es₄储层为例[J].江汉石油学院学报,2002,24(1):53-54.
Hong Xiu'e,Dai Shengqun,Guo Jianyu,et al.Study on reservoir pore structure by using capillary pressure curve:taking Es₄ reservoir in Weicheng oilfield as an example[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,2002,24(1):53-54.
[31] 曾联波.低渗透砂岩油气储层裂缝及其渗流特征[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):11-17.
Zeng Lianbo.Fissure and its seepage characteristics in low-permeable sandstone reservoir[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2004,39(1):11-17.

基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例

Pore structure characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoir based on a new parameter measured by NMR experiment: a case study of seventh Member in Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[2]	王安民, 曹代勇, 聂敬, 秦荣芳. 巨厚煤储层孔隙结构的垂向非均质性特征——以青海聚乎更矿区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 691-701.
[3]	单长安, 张廷山, 梁兴, 胡冉冉, 赵卫卫. 富镜质组和富惰质组高阶煤纳米孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 723-736.
[4]	罗文彬, 马中良, 郑伦举, 谭静强, 王张虎, 宁传祥. 海相页岩成岩-成烃过程中孔隙结构的演变——来自热模拟实验的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 540-552.
[5]	宋岩, 高凤琳, 唐相路, 陈磊, 王幸蒙. 海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.
[6]	姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 姜涛, 常佳琦, 宁传祥, 苏思远, 陈委涛. 沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1587-1600.
[7]	曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 高志勇, 巩磊, 吕文雅. 库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1601-1609.
[8]	赵建斌, 黄显华, 刘晓燕, 李振林, 田扬, 丁伟, 刘玲莉. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷特低渗安山岩储层的有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1188-1196.
[9]	何晶, 何生, 刘早学, 翟刚毅, 王亿, 韩元佳, 万阔, 魏思乐. 鄂西黄陵背斜南翼下寒武统水井沱组页岩孔隙结构与吸附能力[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 27-42.
[10]	张磊, 乔向阳, 张亮, 吴克柳, 周伟, 白慧芳, 辛翠平, 王涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 88-95.
[11]	黄兴, 李天太, 王香增, 高辉, 倪军, 赵金省, 王琛. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 557-567.
[12]	苏俊霖, 董汶鑫, 罗平亚, 徐显广, 黄进军. 基于低场核磁共振技术的黏土表面水化水定量测试与分析[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 468-474.
[13]	林晓英, 黄美鑫, 陈浩, 王健, 王瑞杰. 不同极性溶剂萃取对泥页岩孔隙结构的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1485-1494.
[14]	王曦蒙, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 盛悦, 郑珊珊, 罗泽华. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩岩相对页岩孔隙空间的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1192-1201.
[15]	蒋裕强, 刘雄伟, 付永红, 陈虎, 张海杰, 燕军, 陈超, 谷一凡. 渝西地区海相页岩储层孔隙有效性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1233-1243.