高凝油油藏水—油—固多相渗流规律

doi:10.7623/syxb202307009

石油学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 1129-1139.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202307009

高凝油油藏水—油—固多相渗流规律

王敉邦^1,2, 杨胜来², 李帅³, 王鸿博⁴, 肖传敏⁵

1. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院北京 102206;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程教育部重点实验室北京 102249;
3. 西安石油大学新能源学院陕西西安 710065;
4. 国家管网集团工程技术创新有限公司天津 300450;
5. 中国石油辽河油田公司勘探开发研究院辽宁盘锦 124010

收稿日期:2022-03-11 修回日期:2023-04-28 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-08-08
通讯作者: 杨胜来,男,1961年10月生,1996年获中国矿业大学博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院教授,主要从事油气田开发工程方向的研究工作。Email:yangsl@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:王敉邦,男,1991年7月生,2021年获中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发工程专业博士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院助理研究员,主要从事油气田开发工程方向的研究工作。Email:zgsydxwmb@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05016-006-003）、中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项"辽河油田千万吨稳产关键技术研究与应用"（2017E-16）和中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目（P21045-1）资助。

Water-oil-solid multi-phase flow law of high-pour-point oil reservoir

Wang Mibang^1,2, Yang Shenglai², Li Shuai³, Wang Hongbo⁴, Xiao Chuanmin⁵

1. Sinopec Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China;
2. MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. School of New Energy, Xi'an Shiyou University, Shaanxi Xi'an 710065, China;
4. PipeChina Engineering Technology Innovation Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300450, China;
5. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Liaoning Panjin 124010, China

Received:2022-03-11 Revised:2023-04-28 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-08-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在高压条件下对高凝油多相渗流规律的研究较少。针对高凝油水驱过程中出现的相渗曲线波动和润湿性变化滞后等现象，在微观上刻画了固相颗粒不同时期的影响，并提出了原位生长、水退油进和覆膜3种润湿性反转假说。通过实验和数值模拟进行验证的结果表明：固相颗粒在孔喉处的堵塞与运移导致了驱替压差和水驱前缘推进速度的波动变化，也是相渗曲线震荡的主要原因；孔隙壁面上的水膜会抑制岩心表面向油湿转变；水膜上的蜡沉积层厚度小于岩石壁面，且二者差值最大可达21.5%；水膜的非均质性导致岩心内蜡沉积层厚度仅为无束缚水时的59%~77%，并随水膜厚度的减小岩心润湿性向油湿转变加快；低渗岩心比高渗岩心更容易受温度的影响，低渗岩心采收率最低仅为高渗岩心的23.6%。

关键词: 高凝油, 多相渗流规律, 微观流动, 润湿性, 蜡沉积

Abstract: Currently, there are few studies on the multi-phase flow law of high-pour-point oil under high pressure. Focusing on the phenomena of the relative permeability curve fluctuation and wettability hysteresis in the water-flooding process of high-pour-point oil, the effect of solid particles in different periods was described microscopically; moreover, three hypotheses on wettability reversal was also proposed, including in-situ growth, water removal and oil in, and film coating. The results verified by experiments and numerical simulation indicate that the plugging and migration of solid particles at pore throat leads to the fluctuation of the displacement pressure difference and the waterflood front advance velocity, which is also the primary cause for the oscillation of relative permeability curve; the water film on the pore wall will inhibit the transformation of core surface to oil wet surface; the wax deposit thickness on the water film is smaller than that of rock wall, and the difference between them can reach 21.5%; the water film heterogeneity results in that the wax deposit thickness in the core is only 59%-77% of that of dry core (without connate water), and the transformation of core wettability to oil wet is accelerated as the water film thickness decreases; low-permeability cores are more easily affected by temperature than high-permeability cores, and the oil recovery of low-permeability cores is the lowest, which is only 23.6% of that of high-permeability cores.

Key words: high-pour-point oil, multi-phase flow law, micro flow, wettability, wax deposition

中图分类号:

TE312

王敉邦, 杨胜来, 李帅, 王鸿博, 肖传敏. 高凝油油藏水—油—固多相渗流规律[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1129-1139.

Wang Mibang, Yang Shenglai, Li Shuai, Wang Hongbo, Xiao Chuanmin. Water-oil-solid multi-phase flow law of high-pour-point oil reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(7): 1129-1139.

参考文献

[1] 中国石油天然气总公司. 油藏分类:SY/T 6169-1995[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 1996.
China National Petroleum Corporation.Reservoir classification:SY/T 6169-1995[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1996.
[2] 陈涛平, 刘继军.高凝油热水驱提高采收率实验[J].大庆石油学院学报, 2008, 32(4):45-48.
CHEN Taoping, LIU Jijun.Experimental research of tar oil EOR by hot water flooding[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2008, 32(4):45-48.
[3] 杨帆, 李治平, 周金应, 等.石蜡沉积对储层的伤害[J].海洋石油, 2007, 27(1):72-75.
YANG Fan, LI Zhiping, ZHOU Jinying, et al.Reservoir damage caused by paraffin precipitation[J].Offshore Oil, 2007, 27(1):72-75.
[4] 杨帆, 李治平.石蜡沉积对储层孔隙度和渗透率的影响[J].天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(6):848-850.
YANG Fan, LI Zhiping.Reservoir damage caused by paraffin precipitation[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2006, 17(6):848-850.
[5] DU Mingze, GONG Bin, XU Yanchun, et al.Migration mechanism of fine particles in aquifer during water injection[J].Natural Hazards, 2020, 102(3):1095-1116.
[6] ZHANG Wenlong, HOU Jian, LIU Yongge, et al.Determination of relative permeability curve under combined effect of polymer and surfactant[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 215:110588.
[7] YU Xiaocong, WANG Yushu, YANG Yongfei, et al.Effect of particle content on relative permeabilities in water flooding[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 205:108856.
[8] WANG Yanji, LI Hangyu, XU Jianchun, et al.Machine learning assisted relative permeability upscaling for uncertainty quantification[J].Energy, 2022, 245:123284.
[9] 田乃林, 张丽华, 范增安.高凝油渗流特性的实验研究[J].断块油气田, 1996, 3(3):33-37.
TIAN Nailin, ZHANG Lihua, FAN Zengan.Laboratory study on permeating characteristics of high wax content and high pour point crude[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 1996, 3(3):33-37.
[10] 田乃林, 冯积累, 任瑛, 等.早期注冷水开发对高含蜡高凝固点油藏的冷伤害[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版, 1997, 21(1):42-45.
TIAN Nailin, FENG Jilei, REN Ying, et al.Cooling damage of reservoir with high wax content and high pour point crude in early cooling injection oilfield[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 1997, 21(1):42-45.
[11] 王璐, 杨胜来, 孟展, 等.高凝油油藏气水交替驱提高采收率参数优化[J].复杂油气藏, 2016, 9(3):55-60.
WANG Lu, YANG Shenglai, MENG Zhan, et al.Parameter optimization of WAG flooding for improving oil recovery of high pour-point oil reservoir[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2016, 9(3):55-60.
[12] 王璐, 杨胜来, 孟展, 等.高凝油油藏水驱油效率影响因素[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(5):69-73.
WANG Lu, YANG Shenglai, MENG Zhan, et al.Influencing factors of the oil displaced efficiency by water for high pour-point reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(5):69-73.
[13] 聂向荣.疏松砂岩高凝油油藏注水开发渗流特征研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2014:20-50.
NIE Xiangrong.Study on seepage characteristics of water injection development of unconsolidated sandstone high pour point oil reservoir[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2014:20-50.
[14] MALONEY D.Effects of paraffin wax precipitation during cold water injection in a fractured carbonate reservoir[J].Petrophysics, 2005, 46(5):354-360.
[15] WANG Lu, HE Yongming, CHEN Hao, et al.Experimental investigation of the live oil-water relative permeability and displacement efficiency on Kingfisher waxy oil reservoir[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178:1029-1043.
[16] 王敉邦, 杨胜来, 郑祖号, 等.析蜡温度确定方法的研究与分析[J].石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(4):43-48.
WANG Mibang, YANG Shenglai, ZHENG Zuhao, et al.Study and analysis of methods for determining wax evolution temperature[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2020, 33(4):43-48.
[17] WANG Mibang, YANG Shenglai, LI Jiajun, et al.Pressure-sensitive characteristics of high-pour-point live oil and quantitative analysis of composition change[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193:107430.
[18] WANG Mibang, YANG Shenglai, LI Jiajun, et al.Cold water-flooding in a heterogeneous high-pour-point oil reservoir using computerized tomography scanning:characteristics of flow channel and trapped oil distribution[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 202:108594.
[19] 王敉邦, 杨胜来, 郑祖号, 等.高压条件下含气高凝油析蜡特征[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(12):1511-1518.
WANG Mibang, YANG Shenglai, ZHENG Zuhao, et al.Wax precipitation characteristics of high pour-point live oil under high pressure[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(12):1511-1518.
[20] 王敉邦, 杨胜来, 郑祖号, 等.基于激光法的含气高含蜡原油熔蜡规律[J].科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(36):134-139.
WANG Mibang, YANG Shenglai, ZHENG Zuhao, et al.The law of wax dissolution in high waxy live oil based on laser method[J].Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(36):134-139.
[21] 国家能源局.油气藏流体物性分析方法:SY/T 5542-2009[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2010.
National Energy Administration.Test method for reservoir fluid physical properties:SY/T 5542-2009[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2010.
[22] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.岩石中两相流体相对渗透率测定方法:SY/T 5345-2007[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2008.
National Development and Reform Commission.Test method for two phase relative permeability in rock:SY/T 5345-2007[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2008.
[23] 国家能源局.油藏岩石润湿性测定方法:SY/T 5153-2017[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2017.
National Energy Administration.Test method of reservoir rock wettability:SY/T 5153-2017[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2017.
[24] CLARK D G, VAN GOLF-RACHT T D.Pressure-derivative approach to transient test analysis:a high-permeability north sea reservoir example (includes associated papers 15270 and 15320)[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1985, 37(11):2023-2039.
[25] 陈忠, 殷宜平, 陈浩.非稳态法计算油水相对渗透率的方法探讨[J].断块油气田, 2005, 12(1):41-43.
CHEN Zhong, YIN Yiping, CHEN Hao.The calculation method of oil-water relative permeability by unsteady-state[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2005, 12(1):41-43.
[26] LI Huiyuan, ZHANG Jinjun, XU Qinggong, et al.Influence of asphaltene on wax deposition:deposition inhibition and sloughing[J].Fuel, 2020, 266:117047.
[27] LEONTARITIS K J, GEROULIS E.Wax deposition correlation-application in multiphase wax deposition models[C]//Offshore Technology Conference.Houston, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4043/21623-MS
[28] 夏阳, 金衍, 陈康平, 等.页岩油藏油气两相流动模型及其对油藏开发的启示[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(2):348-357.
XIA Yang, JIN Yan, CHEN Kangping, et al.The oil-gas two-phase flow model for shale reservoirs and its enlightenment to reservoir development[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2):348-357.
[29] 孙宝泉.温度对稠油/热水相对渗透率的影响[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 39(2):99-104.
SUN Baoquan.Impact of temperature on relative permeability of heavy oil/hot water[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2017, 39(2):99-104.
[30] 郭建春, 陶亮, 胡克剑, 等.页岩储层水相渗吸作用规律实验[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(9):1295-1304.
GUO Jianchun, TAO Liang, HU Kejian, et al.Experiment on imbibition law of aqueous phase in shale reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(9):1295-1304.
[31] 杨胜来, 魏俊之.油层物理学[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2004.
YANG Shenglai, WEI Junzhi.Reservoir physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2004.
[32] FALODE O, MANUEL E.Wettability effects on capillary pressure, relative permeability, and irredcucible saturation using porous plate[J].Journal of Petroleum Engineering, 2014, 2014:465418.
[33] BONN D, EGGERS J, INDEKEU J, et al.Wetting and spreading[J].Reviews of Modern Physics, 2009, 81(2):739-805.
[34] 王顺, 王敬, 刘慧卿, 等.表面活性剂辅助残余油剥离机制的分子模拟[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(3):518-533.
WANG Shun, WANG Jing, LIU Huiqing, et al.Molecular simulation on the detachment mechanism of residual oil with the aid of surfactant[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(3):518-533.
[35] 李元生.凝析气藏油气水动态分布及产出机理研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2015.
LI Yuansheng.Dynamic distribution of condensate-gas water and production mechanism of gas condensate reservoirs[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2015.
[36] SALATHIEL R A.Oil recovery by surface film drainage in mixed-wettability rocks[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1973, 25(10):1216-1224.
[37] 王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 等.CO₂驱油过程中孔喉结构对储层岩石物性变化的影响[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(5):654-668.
WANG Qian, YANG Shenglai, BAI Jie, et al.Influence of pore throat structure on changes in physical properties of reservoir rock during CO₂ flooding[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(5):654-668.
[38] KASSA A M, GASDA S E, KUMAR K, et al.Modeling of relative permeabilities including dynamic wettability transition zones[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 203:108556.

高凝油油藏水—油—固多相渗流规律

Water-oil-solid multi-phase flow law of high-pour-point oil reservoir

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	钟俊杰, 王曾定, 孙志刚, 姚军, 杨永飞, 孙海, 张磊, 张凯. 基于纳米流控技术的页岩储层微观流体特征研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 207-222.
[2]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 赵卫, 李佳峻, 陈浩. CO₂驱油过程中孔喉结构对储层岩石物性变化的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 654-668,685.
[3]	郭建春, 陶亮, 陈迟, 李鸣, 赵志红. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 216-225.
[4]	计秉玉. 对油气藏工程研究方法发展趋势的几点认识[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1774-1778.
[5]	王敉邦, 杨胜来, 郑祖号, 温静, 王鸿博, 钱坤. 高压条件下含气高凝油析蜡特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1511-1518.
[6]	鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 刘可禹, 卓勤功, 范俊佳, 于志超, 公言杰. 库车前陆盆地深层高效致密砂岩气藏形成条件与机理[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 365-378.
[7]	胡钦红, 刘惠民, 黎茂稳, 李政, 杨锐, 张宇翔, 孙梦迪. 东营凹陷沙河街组页岩油储集层润湿性、孔隙连通性和流体—示踪剂运移[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(3): 278-289.
[8]	黄志龙, 马剑, 梁世君, 梁浩, 陈旋, 康积伦. 源-储分离型凝灰岩致密油藏形成机理与成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(8): 975-985.
[9]	李相臣, 康毅力, 周来诚, 战丽颖. 水饱和煤岩储层甲烷运移动态特征[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7): 876-881.
[10]	姜彬, 邱凌, 刘向东, 杜定宇, 李雪, 李珂, 陈翰. 固相沉积模型在高凝油藏注水开发中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 101-105.
[11]	江雪源董加宇李宜强 . 驱油FPS-B剂的表界面化学性能和微观驱油机理[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(6): 1023-1027.
[12]	刘　扬　王志华　成庆林　李玉春. 大庆原油管输结蜡规律与清管周期的确定[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(5): 892-987.
[13]	姚传进雷光伦吴川蒋宝云刘海庆高达. 高凝油井电伴热优化计算[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(5): 843-848.
[14]	杨永飞姚军 M.I.J.van Dijke. 油藏岩石润湿性对气驱剩余油微观分布的影响机制[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 467-470.
[15]	王斐岳湘安王雯靓刘怀珠唐思睿张羽王宝祥. 润湿性对模拟原油微尺度流动和渗流的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(2): 302-305.