柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式、演化与分布

doi:10.7623/syxb202211004

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 1558-1567,1622.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202211004

柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式、演化与分布

朱超¹, 刘占国¹, 宋光永¹, 龙国徽², 宫清顺¹, 赵健², 李森明¹, 夏志远¹, 吴颜雄², 田明智¹

1. 中国石油杭州地质研究院浙江杭州 310023;
2. 中国石油青海油田公司勘探开发研究院甘肃敦煌 736202

收稿日期:2021-09-02 修回日期:2022-03-11 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-02
通讯作者: 宋光永,男,1985年2月生,2010年获成都理工大学硕士学位,现为中国石油杭州地质研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气储层研究。Email:songgy_hz@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:朱超,男,1983年3月生,2009年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为中国石油杭州地质研究院高级工程师,主要从事区带评价综合研究。Email:zhuc_hz@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司前瞻性基础重大科技项目(2021DJ0402,2021DJ1808)和中国石油油气和新能源分公司科技攻关项目(2022KT0403 2022KT0304 )资助。

Sedimentary model,evolution and distribution of Paleogene lacustrine carbonate rocks in Yingxiongling structural belt, Q aidam Basin

Zhu Chao¹, Liu Zhanguo¹, Song Guangyong¹, Long Guohui², Gong Qingshun¹, Zhao Jian², Li Senming¹, Xia Zhiyuan¹, Wu Yanxiong², Tian Mingzhi¹

1. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310023, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Gansu Dunhuang 736202, China

Received:2021-09-02 Revised:2022-03-11 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于野外露头、钻井、岩心、岩石薄片及实验数据,对柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系下干柴沟组上段湖相碳酸盐岩的类型、演化规律和沉积模式进行了系统研究,并结合井-震资料分析和古地貌恢复,对其岩相古地理的平面分布特征进行了刻画,指出了下一步的有利勘探方向。研究表明:英雄岭构造带下干柴沟组上段主要发育藻灰岩、颗粒灰质白云岩、泥晶灰质白云岩3类碳酸盐岩,多具有混积特征,从早至晚经历了半咸化、咸化和盐湖3个沉积演化阶段;由于矿物组分及岩石结构的差异,湖相碳酸盐岩的储集性能呈现较强的非均质性,其中,藻灰岩的储集性能相对最好;储层的岩相组合在垂向上主要存在3种类型,分别发育于湖盆的不同位置。研究建立了凹隆型和缓坡型2种沉积发育模式,指出湖平面的升降频率及陆源碎屑输入量控制不同岩相的单层厚度,微古地貌控制不同岩相组合的平面分布。恢复的下干柴沟组上段沉积早、晚期的岩相古地理特征显示,泥晶灰质白云岩+颗粒灰质白云岩组合主要分布在英西—干柴沟—游园沟缓坡沿岸区和隆起区,其平面叠合面积约为600 km²,是下一步寻找常规油气藏的有利勘探方向;纹层泥晶灰质白云岩主要分布在游园沟及其以东地区的半深湖相凹陷区,其平面叠合面积可达2 500 km²,是下一步寻找非常规源内油气藏的有利勘探方向。

关键词: 湖相碳酸盐岩, 沉积模式, 沉积序列, 演化与分布, 英雄岭构造带

Abstract: Based on field outcrops, boreholes, cores, thin sections and experimental data, this paper systematically studies the type, evolution and sedimentary model of lacustrine carbonate rocks from the Upper Member of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation in Yingxiongling structural belt of Qaidam Basin and characterizes the lithofacies paleogeographical distribution combined with borehole-seismic data analysis and paleogeomorphology restoration, and points out the next favorable prospecting direction. The study shows that the Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in Yingxiongling structural belt is dominated by three types of carbonate rocks, i.e., algal limestone, granular calcareous dolomite and micritic calcareous dolomite, most of which have hybrid sedimentation characteristics, and have undergone three sedimentary evolution stages from early to late, namely brackish water, saline water and salt lake. Lacustrine carbonate reservoirs present the strongly heterogeneous properties due to the difference of mineral composition and rock texture, among which algal limestone has the best reservoir performance. There are three types of vertical lithofacies assemblages in reservoirs, which are developed in different positions of the lacustrine basin. Two sedimentary models, namely sag-uplift and gentle slope, were established. It is revealed that the lake level fluctuation and input of terrigenous detritus controlled the single layer thickness of different lithofacies, and the micro-paleogeomorphology controlled the distribution of different lithofacies assemblages. The early and late lithofacies paleogeographic characteristics of the Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation show that the assemblage of micritic calcareous limestone and granular calcareous dolomite is mainly distributed in the coastal area and uplift area of Yingxi-Ganchaigou-Youyuangou gentle slope, with a superposition area of about 600 km², indicating a favorable exploration direction for the next prospect for conventional oil and gas reservoirs. Laminated micritic calcareous dolomite is mainly distributed in the semi-deep lacustrine sag of Youyuangou and its east area, with a superposition area of up to 2 500 km², providing is a favorable exploration direction for the next prospect for unconventional intra-source oil and gas reservoirs.

Key words: lacustrine carbonate rocks, sedimentary model, sedimentary sequence, evolution and distribution, Yingxiongling structural belt

中图分类号:

TE121.3

朱超, 刘占国, 宋光永, 龙国徽, 宫清顺, 赵健, 李森明, 夏志远, 吴颜雄, 田明智. 柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式、演化与分布[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1558-1567,1622.

Zhu Chao, Liu Zhanguo, Song Guangyong, Long Guohui, Gong Qingshun, Zhao Jian, Li Senming, Xia Zhiyuan, Wu Yanxiong, Tian Mingzhi. Sedimentary model,evolution and distribution of Paleogene lacustrine carbonate rocks in Yingxiongling structural belt, Q aidam Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 1558-1567,1622.

参考文献

[1] 吴因业,吕佳蕾,方向,等. 湖相碳酸盐岩—混积岩储层有利相带分析——以柴达木盆地古近系为例[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(8):1150-1157.
WU Yinye,LV Jialei,FANG Xiang,et al.Analysis of favorable facies belts in reservoir of lacustrine carbonate rocks-hybrid sediments:case study of Paleogene in Qaidam Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(8):1150-1157.
[2] 张友,李强,郑兴平,等.塔里木盆地东部古城—肖塘地区寒武纪—奥陶纪台地类型、演化过程及有利储集相带[J].石油学报,2021,42(4):447-465.
ZHANG You,LI Qiang,ZHENG Xingping,et al.Types,evolution and favorable reservoir facies belts in the Cambrian-Ordovician platform in Gucheng-Xiaotang area,eastern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(4):447-465.
[3] LIU Zhanguo,ZHANG Yongshu,SONG Guangyong,et al.Mixed carbonate rocks lithofacies features and reservoirs controlling mechanisms in a saline lacustrine basin in Yingxi area,Qaidam Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(1):80-93.
[4] WANG Yanqing,LIU Zhanguo,SONG Guangyong,et al.Genesis of lacustrine carbonate breccia and its significance for hydrocarbon exploration in Yingxi region,Qaidam Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(1):104-112.
[5] 胡素云,陶士振,闫伟鹏,等.中国陆相致密油富集规律及勘探开发关键技术研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(8):1083-1093.
HU Suyun,TAO Shizhen,YAN Weipeng,et al.Advances on continental tight oil accumulation and key technologies for exploration and development in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(8):1083-1093.
[6] 杨有星,高永进,张君峰,等.歧口和泌阳凹陷两种类型湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特点[J].现代地质,2019,33(4):831-840.
YANG Youxing,GAO Yongjin,ZHANG Junfeng,et al.Depositional models and differences of lacustrine carbonate rocks:comparison between Qikou sag and Biyang sag[J].Geoscience,2019,33(4):831-840.
[7] 罗晓彤,文华国,彭才,等.巴西桑托斯盆地L油田BV组湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及高精度层序划分[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(3): 68-81.
LUO Xiaotong,WEN Huaguo,PENG Cai,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and high-precision sequence division of lacustrine carbonate rocks of BV Formation in L oilfield of Santos Basin,Brazil[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(3):68-81.
[8] 赵政璋,杜金虎.致密油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2012:1-13.
ZHAO Zhengzhang,DU Jinhu.Tight oil and gas[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2012:1-13.
[9] 张道伟,薛建勤,伍坤宇,等.柴达木盆地英西地区页岩油储层特征及有利区优选[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(4):1-11.
ZHANG Daowei,XUE Jianqin,WU Kunyu,et al.Shale oil reservoir characteristics and favorable area optimization in Yingxi area,Qaidam Basin [J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(4):1-11.
[10] 张世铭,王建功,张永庶,等.柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定[J].石油学报,2021,42(1): 45-55.
ZHANG Shiming,WANG Jiangong,ZHANG Yongshu,et al.Determination of petrophysical property cutoffs of lacustrine dolomite intercrystalline pore reservoir in the Xiaganchaigou Formation,western Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021,42(1):45-55.
[11] 陈登钱,沈晓双,崔俊,等.柴达木盆地英西地区深部混积岩储层特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):211-217.
CHEN Dengqian,SHEN Xiaoshuang,CUI Jun,et al.Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of deep diamictite in Yingxi area,Qaidam Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):211-217.
[12] 郭荣涛,马达德,张永庶,等.柴达木盆地英西地区下干柴沟组上段超压孔缝型储层特征及形成机理[J].石油学报,2019,40(4):411-422.
GUO Rongtao,MA Dade,ZHANG Yongshu,et al.Characteristics and Formation mechanism of overpressure pore-fracture reservoirs for Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in the west of Yingxiong ridge,Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(4):411-422.
[13] 王琳,赵孟军,孟庆洋,等.柴达木盆地英西地区中深层油气成藏过程分析[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(12):1846-1854.
WANG Lin,ZHAO Mengjun,MENG Qingyang,et al.Analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation process in middle-deep reservoirs of Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(12):1846-1854.

[14] 黄成刚,常海燕,崔俊,等.柴达木盆地西部地区渐新世沉积特征与油气成藏模式[J].石油学报,2017,38(11):1230-1243.
HUANG Chenggang,CHANG Haiyan,CUI Jun,et al.Oligocene sedimentary characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation model in the western Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(11):1230-1243.
[15] 夏志远,刘占国,李森明,等.岩盐成因与发育模式——以柴达木盆地英西地区古近系下干柴沟组为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(1): 55-66.
XIA Zhiyuan,LIU Zhanguo,LI Senming,et al.Origin and developing model of rock salt:a case study of Lower Ganchaigou Formation of Paleogene in the west of Yingxiong ridge,Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):55-66.
[16] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.
JIA Chengzao,ZHENG Min,ZHANG Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
[17] LAW B E,CURTIS J B.Introduction to unconventional petroleum systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1851-1852.
[18] NORDENG S H.The bakken petroleum system:an example of a continuous petroleum accumulation[J].DMR Newsletter,2010,36(1):21-24.
[19] PETZET A.Billions of barrels in Bakken recovery seen in Williston[J].Oil & Gas Journal,2006,106(46):42-48.
[20] 王建功,张道伟,白亚东,等.柴西地区上油砂山组咸化湖沼沉积与微生物岩[J].地质学报,2020,94(11):3228-3248.
WANG Jiangong,ZHANG Daowei,BAI Yadong,et al.Saline lacustrine palustrine sediments and microbialite in the Upper Youshashan Formation in the western Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2020,94(11):3228-3248.
[21] 姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
JIANG Zaixing,LIANG Chao,WU Jing,et al.Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
[22] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,周立宏,等.深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J].石油学报,2021,42(2):143-162.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Enrichment theory,exploration technology and prospects of shale oil in lacustrine facies zone of deep Basin:a case study of the Paleogene in Huanghua depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(2):143-162.
[23] 金振奎,石良,高白水,等.碳酸盐岩沉积相及相模式[J].沉积学报,2013,31(6):965-979.
JIN Zhenkui,SHI Liang,GAO Baishui,et al.Carbonate facies and facies models[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2013,31(6):965-979.
[24] 喻林,何燕,陈红,等.基于古地貌恢复的湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2016,51(增刊1):126-130.
YU Lin,HE Yan,CHEN Hong,et al.Analysis of lacustrine carbonate sedimentary patterns based on paleo-geomorphic restoration[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(S1):126-130.
[25] 杨占龙.地震地貌切片解释技术及应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2020,55(3):669-677.
YANG Zhanlong.Interpretation technique of seismic geomorphological slice and its application[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2020,55(3):669-677.
[26] 朱超,刘占国,杨少勇,等.利用相控分频反演预测英西湖相碳酸盐岩储层[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(4):832-841.
ZHU Chao,LIU Zhanguo,YANG Shaoyong,et al.Lacustrine carbonate reservoir prediction in Yingxi,Qaidam Basin with the facies-constrained and segmented-frequency-band inversion[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(4):832-841.
[27] 彭传圣.湖相碳酸盐岩有利储集层分布——以渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙四上亚段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(4):435-443.
PENG Chuansheng.Distribution of favorable lacustrine carbonate reservoirs:a case from the Upper Es₄ of Zhanhua sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(4):435-443.
[28] 郭泽清,钟建华,刘卫红,等.柴西第三纪湖相生物礁储层特征及意义[J].沉积学报,2004,22(3):425-433.
GUO Zeqing,ZHONG Jianhua,LIU Weihong,et al.Reservoir characteristics and significance of tertiary lacustrain reef in western Qaidam[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2004,22(3):425-433.
[29] 陈晓月,李建忠,江青春,等.四川盆地荷包场地区二叠系岩溶储层地球物理特征与分布预测[J].天然气工业,2019,39(7):41-48.
CHEN Xiaoyue,LI Jianzhong,JIANG Qingchun,et al.Geophysical characteristics and distribution prediction of the Permian karst reservoirs in the Hebaochang area,South Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2019,39(7):41-48.
[30] 江青春,胡素云,汪泽成,等.四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J].石油学报,2012,33(6):949-960.
JIANG Qingchun,HU Suyun,WANG Zecheng,et al.Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(6):949-960.

柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式、演化与分布

Sedimentary model,evolution and distribution of Paleogene lacustrine carbonate rocks in Yingxiongling structural belt, Q aidam Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋金民, 江青春, 刘树根, 金鑫, 范建平, 李智武, 黄士鹏, 苏旺, 杨迪, 姜华, 叶玥豪, 王佳蕊, 王俊轲, 任杉. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段含海泡石层系古环境与沉积格局指示意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
[2]	何文渊, 黄先雄, 王红平, 汪望泉, 范国章, 丁梁波, 赵俊峰, 朱晓辉, 张勇刚, 庞旭, 李伟强, 左国平, 杨柳, 王朝锋. 南美桑托斯盆地深水区古拉绍-1井油气勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 339-347.
[3]	任佳鑫, 宋金民, 刘树根, 赵容容, 罗忠, 李智武, 金鑫, 马行陟, 李柯然, 叶玥豪, 丁一, 李文皓, 赵玲丽, 田立洲. 四川盆地灯影组二段微生物丘滩体结构类型与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 312-328.
[4]	熊连桥, 谢晓军, 邓有根, 唐武, 张春宇, 白海强, 刘子玉, 廖计华. 坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1612-1623,1649.
[5]	张世铭, 王建功, 张永庶, 张小军, 张婷静, 崔俊. 柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 45-55,118.
[6]	周立宏, 韩国猛, 马建英, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 张莉华, 周可佳, 陈双清, 杨帆, 董越崎, 周静. 歧口凹陷西南缘沙河街组一段下亚段古环境特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 903-917.
[7]	王建功, 张永庶, 李翔, 徐丽, 石亚军, 黄叶秋, 王玉林, 管斌, 张世铭, 高妍芳. 柴达木盆地西部渐新统纹理石沉积特征与原位成藏[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 940-959.
[8]	高崇龙, 纪友亮, 靳军, 王剑, 杨召, 罗正江, 任影, 张月. 阵发性洪水控制的河流型冲积扇沉积特征及沉积演化模式——以和什托洛盖盆地北缘现代白杨冲积扇为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 310-328.
[9]	张昌民, 宋新民, 支东明, 周心怀, 尹太举, 尹艳树, 朱锐, 冯文杰, 张宝进. 陆相含油气盆地沉积体系再思考:来自分支河流体系的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 127-153.
[10]	陈宇航, 姚根顺, 吕福亮, 鲁银涛, 陈亮, 唐鹏程, 曹全斌. 东非鲁伍马盆地渐新统深水水道-朵体沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1047-1058.
[11]	马克, 侯加根, 刘钰铭, 史燕青, 闫林, 陈福利. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组咸化湖混合沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(6): 636-648.
[12]	黄兴, 杨香华, 朱红涛, 康洪全, 贾建忠, 王波, 季少聪. 下刚果盆地Madingo组海相烃源岩岩相特征和沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1168-1182.
[13]	吴靖, 姜在兴, 潘悦文, 张强, 贺连啟. 湖相细粒沉积模式——以东营凹陷古近系沙河街组四段上亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(9): 1080-1089.
[14]	高白水, 金振奎, 朱小二, 魏凯, 伊硕. 哈萨克斯坦扎纳诺尔油田石炭系碳酸盐岩浅滩沉积模式及储层质量差异机理[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 867-877.
[15]	石开波, 刘波, 田景春, 潘文庆. 塔里木盆地震旦纪沉积特征及岩相古地理[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11): 1343-1360.