库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测

doi:10.7623/syxb202207004

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 925-940.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202207004

库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测

王珂^1,2, 张荣虎^1,2, 唐永³, 余朝丰^1,2, 杨钊^1,2, 唐雁刚⁴, 周露⁴

1. 中国石油杭州地质研究院浙江杭州 31002;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院塔里木盆地研究中心新疆库尔勒 841000;
3. 长江大学非常规油气湖北省协同创新中心湖北武汉 430100;
4. 中国石油塔里木油田公司勘探开发研究院新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2021-06-10 修回日期:2021-11-07 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-01
通讯作者: 王珂,男,1987年7月生,2014年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油杭州地质研究院高级工程师,主要从事碎屑岩储层研究工作。
作者简介:王珂,男,1987年7月生,2014年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油杭州地质研究院高级工程师,主要从事碎屑岩储层研究工作。Email:wangk_hz@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司"十四五"前瞻性基础性研究重大科技项目"前陆冲断带下组合规模储层形成机理与有效性评价技术研究"（2021DJ0302）和国家重点研发计划"盐下超深层碎屑岩规模储层成因与油气成藏机理"（2019YFC0605501）资助。

Structural diagenesis and reservoir prediction of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression

Wang Ke^1,2, Zhang Ronghu^1,2, Tang Yong³, Yu Chaofeng^1,2, Yang Zhao^1,2, Tang Yang'gang⁴, Zhou Lu⁴

1. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310023, China;
2. Tarim Basin Research Center, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China;
3. Hubei Cooperative Innovation Center of Unconventional Oil and Gas, Yangtze University, Hubei Wuhan 430100, China;
4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China

Received:2021-06-10 Revised:2021-11-07 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构造成岩作用是控制库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组储层特征的重要因素，主要包括古构造应力的压实减孔作用和构造造缝两个方面。在储层特征及构造应力特征分析的基础上，通过定量分析古构造应力对北部构造带阿合组储层的压实减孔作用及构造裂缝的控制作用，对研究区阿合组的古构造应力和储层物性进行了有限元数值模拟，预测了储层有利区。研究表明，古构造应力是控制北部构造带阿合组储层物性和构造裂缝特征的重要因素。最大古构造应力与储层孔隙度呈负相关，与构造应力的压实减孔量呈幂函数正相关；最大古构造应力的方位控制了构造裂缝的优势走向，其大小控制了构造裂缝的发育程度；最大古构造应力与裂缝面密度和裂缝面孔率呈指数正相关。根据最大古构造应力与储层物性之间的交会关系，北部构造带阿合组储层可划分为孔隙型、裂缝-孔隙型和裂缝型3种类型，其中，裂缝-孔隙型又包含a型、b型、c型和d型4亚类。北部构造带巴什构造段中部黑英山—库车河一线发育裂缝-孔隙a型相对优质储层和裂缝-孔隙b型中等储层，目前尚处于勘探空白区，是北部构造带油气勘探的潜在领域，但存在一定勘探风险。

关键词: 致密砂岩储层, 构造应力, 构造成岩作用, 压实减孔, 构造裂缝, 储层预测, 北部构造带, 库车坳陷

Abstract: Structural diagenesis is an important factor controlling reservoir characteristics of the Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression, mainly involving porosity loss by compaction under paleo-tectonic stress and tectonic fractures. Based on analyzing the characteristics of reservoirs and tectonic stress, through quantitative analysis of the controlling effect of paleo-tectonic stress on porosity loss by compaction and tectonic fracture characteristics of Ahe Formation, this paper carries out the infinite element numerical simulation of paleo-tectonic stress and reservoir physical property of the Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression, so as to predict favorable reservoir areas. The research shows that the paleo-tectonic stress is an important factor controlling reservoir physical property and tectonic fracture feature of Ahe Formation. The maximum paleo-tectonic stress has a negative linear correlation with the average reservoir porosity, and has a positive correlation of power function with the porosity loss by compaction under tectonic stress. The direction of maximum paleo tectonic stress controls the primary strike of tectonic fractures, and its magnitude controls the development degree of tectonic stress. The maximum paleo-tectonic stress has a good positive correlation of exponential function with the surface density and surface porosity of tectonic fractures. According to the mutual relationship between maximum paleo-tectonic stress and reservoir physical property, the Ahe Formation reservoirs can be divided into porous type, fractured-porous type and fractured type, and the fractured-porous type is further subdivided into subtypes a, b, c, and d. The relatively high-quality reservoir of subtype a and medium-quality reservoir of subtype b are developed in the Heiyingshan to Kuqa River area in the middle section of Bashi structural belt. This is still a blank area of exploration, and considered to be a potential field for hydrocarbon exploration but with some exploration risks.

Key words: tight sandstone reservoir, tectonic stress, structural diagenesis, porosity loss by compaction, tectonic fracture, reservoir prediction, northern structural belt, Kuqa depression

中图分类号:

TE122.2

王珂, 张荣虎, 唐永, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 唐雁刚, 周露. 库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.

Wang Ke, Zhang Ronghu, Tang Yong, Yu Chaofeng, Yang Zhao, Tang Yang'gang, Zhou Lu. Structural diagenesis and reservoir prediction of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 925-940.

参考文献

[1] 曾联波, 朱如凯, 高志勇, 等. 构造成岩作用及其油气地质意义[J].石油科学通报, 2016, 1(2):191-197.
ZENG Lianbo, ZHU Rukai, GAO Zhiyong, et al.Structural diagenesis and its petroleum geological significance[J].Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016, 1(2):191-197.
[2] LAUBACH S E, EICHHUBL P, HILGERS C, et al.Structural diagenesis[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 2010, 32(12):1866-1872.
[3] 袁静, 俞国鼎, 钟剑辉, 等.构造成岩作用研究现状及展望[J].沉积学报, 2018, 36(6):1177-1189.
YUAN Jing, YU Guoding, ZHONG Jianhui, et al.An overview of structural diagenesis[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(6):1177-1189.
[4] 张荣虎, 曾庆鲁, 王珂, 等.储层构造动力成岩作用理论技术新进展与超深层油气勘探地质意义[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(10):1278-1292.
ZHANG Ronghu, ZENG Qinglu, WANG Ke, et al.New progress in the theory and technology of tectonic diagenesis on reservoir and the geological significance of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(10):1278-1292.
[5] 巩磊, 曾联波, 杜宜静, 等.构造成岩作用对裂缝有效性的影响——以库车前陆盆地白垩系致密砂岩储层为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(3):514-519.
GONG Lei, ZENG Lianbo, DU Yijing, et al.Influences of structural diagenesis on fracture effectiveness:a case study of the Cretaceous tight sandstone reservoirs of Kuqa foreland basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining &Technology, 2015, 44(3):514-519.
[6] 曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 等.库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(12):1601-1609.
ZENG Lianbo, LIU Guoping, ZHU Rukai, et al.A quantitative evaluation method of structural diagenetic strength of deep tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa foreland basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12):1601-1609.
[7] 寿建峰, 斯春松, 朱国华, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷下侏罗统砂岩储层性质的控制因素[J].地质论评, 2001, 47(3):272-277.
SHOU Jianfeng, SI Chunsong, ZHU Guohua, et al.Control factors of the properties of the Lower Jurassic sandstone reservoirs in the Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Geological Review, 2001, 47(3):272-277.
[8] 寿建峰, 朱国华, 张惠良.构造侧向挤压与砂岩成岩压实作用——以塔里木盆地为例[J].沉积学报, 2003, 21(1):90-95.
SHOU Jianfeng, ZHU Guohua, ZHANG Huiliang.Lateral structure compression and its influence on sandstone diagenesis-a case study from the Tarim Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(1):90-95.
[9] 寿建峰, 斯春松, 张达.库车坳陷下侏罗统岩石古应力场与砂岩储层性质[J].地球学报, 2004, 25(4):447-452.
SHOU Jianfeng, SI Chunsong, ZHANG Da.Factors controlling properties of Lower Jurassic sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2004, 25(4):447-452.
[10] 寿建峰, 张惠良, 沈扬.库车前陆地区吐格尔明背斜下侏罗统砂岩成岩作用及孔隙发育的控制因素分析[J].沉积学报, 2007, 25(6):869-875.
SHOU Jianfeng, ZHANG Huiliang, SHEN Yang.The analysis of controlling factors on sandstone diagenesis and porosity preservation of Lower Juarassic in Tugerming anticline, Kuqa forland basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(6):869-875.
[11] 李忠, 张丽娟, 寿建峰, 等.构造应变与砂岩成岩的构造非均质性——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷研究为例[J].岩石学报, 2009, 25(10):2320-2330.
LI Zhong, ZHANG Lijuan, SHOU Jianfeng, et al.Structural strain and structural heterogeneity of sandstone diagenesis:a case study for the Kuqa subbasin in the northern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(10):2320-2330.
[12] 高志勇, 胡永军, 张莉华, 等.准噶尔南缘前陆盆地白垩纪-新近纪构造挤压作用与储层关系的新表征:镜质体反射率与颗粒填集密度[J].中国地质, 2010, 37(5):1336-1352.
GAO Zhiyong, HU Yongjun, ZHANG Lihua, et al.The interpretation of the controlling action of Cretaceous to Tertiary tectonic compression on the reservoir in the southern margin of Junggar Basin:vitrinite reflectance and grain packing density[J].Geology in China, 2010, 37(5):1336-1352.
[13] 高志勇, 崔京钢, 冯佳睿, 等.埋藏压实-侧向挤压过程对库车坳陷深层储层物理性质的改造机理[J].现代地质, 2017, 31(2):302-314.
GAO Zhiyong, CUI Jinggang, FENG Jiarui, et al.Modification mechanism of physical properties of deeply-buried sandstone reservoir due to the burial compaction and lateral extrusion in Kuqa depression[J].Geoscience, 2017, 31(2):302-314.
[14] 高志勇, 马建英, 崔京钢, 等.埋藏(机械)压实-侧向挤压地质过程下深层储层孔隙演化与预测模型[J].沉积学报, 2018, 36(1):176-187.
GAO Zhiyong, MA Jianying, CUI Jinggang, et al.Deep reservoir pore evolution model of a geological process from burial compaction to lateral extrusion[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(1):176-187.
[15] 史超群, 许安明, 魏红兴, 等.构造挤压对碎屑岩储层破坏程度的定量表征——以库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系阿合组为例[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(2):205-215.
SHI Chaoqun, XU Anming, WEI Hongxing, et al.Quantitative characterization on the clastic reservoir destruction by tectonic compression:a case study of the Jurassic Ahe Formation in Yiqikelike structural belt, Kuqa depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(2):205-215.
[16] 杜金虎, 王招明, 胡素云, 等.库车前陆冲断带深层大气区形成条件与地质特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4):385-393.
DU Jinhu, WANG Zhaoming, HU Suyun, et al.Formation and geological characteristics of deep giant gas provinces in the Kuqa foreland thrust belt, Tarim Basin, NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4):385-393.
[17] 王招明, 谢会文, 李勇, 等.库车前陆冲断带深层盐下大气田的勘探和发现[J].中国石油勘探, 2013, 18(3):1-11.
WANG Zhaoming, XIE Huiwen, LI Yong, et al.Exploration and discovery of large and deep subsalt gas fields in Kuqa foreland thrust belt[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2013, 18(3):1-11.
[18] 鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 刘可禹, 等.库车前陆盆地深层高效致密砂岩气藏形成条件与机理[J].石油学报, 2018, 39(4):365-378.
LU Xuesong, ZHAO Mengjun, LIU Keyu, et al.Forming condition and mechanism of highly effective deep tight sandstone gas reservoir in Kuqa foreland basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(4):365-378.
[19] 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 等.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J].沉积学报, 2015, 33(1):160-169.
ZHANG Nini, LIU Luofu, SU Tianxi, et al.Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the Lower Jurassic tight sandstone in eastern Kuqa depression[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1):160-169.
[20] 刘卫红, 高先志, 林畅松, 等.库车坳陷阳霞地区下侏罗统阿合组储层特征及储层发育的主控因素[J].地质科学, 2017, 52(2):390-406.
LIU Weihong, GAO Xianzhi, LIN Changsong, et al.Reservoir characteristics and controlling fractors of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in Yangxia area, Kuqa depression[J].Chinese Journal of Geology, 2017, 52(2):390-406.
[21] 李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10):1506-1517.
LI Guoxin, YI Shiwei, LIN Shiguo, et al.Reservoir characteristics and major factors influencing the reservoir quality of Lower Jurassic in eastern Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(10):1506-1517.
[22] 王华超, 韩登林, 欧阳传湘, 等.库车坳陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):115-123.
WANG Huachao, HAN Denglin, OUYANG Chuanxiang, et al.Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa depression[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):115-123.
[23] 易士威, 李德江, 杨海军, 等.裂缝对阳霞凹陷迪北阿合组致密砂岩气藏形成的作用[J].新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(1):49-51.
YI Shiwei, LI Dejiang, YANG Haijun, et al.Effect of fractures on forming Dibei tight sandstone gas reservoir of Ahe Formation in Yangxia sag of Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(1):49-51.
[24] 魏红兴, 谢亚妮, 莫涛, 等.迪北气藏致密砂岩储集层裂缝发育特征及其对成藏的控制作用[J].新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(6):702-707.
WEI Hongxing, XIE Yani, MO Tao, et al.Fracture characteristic and its contribution to hydrocarbon accumulation in tight sandstone reservoir in Dibei gas pool in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(6):702-707.
[25] 芦慧, 鲁雪松, 范俊佳, 等.裂缝对致密砂岩气成藏富集与高产的控制作用——以库车前陆盆地东部侏罗系迪北气藏为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(6):1047-1056.
LU Hui, LU Xuesong, FAN Junjia, et al.The controlling effects of fractures on gas accumulation and production in tight sandstone:a case of Jurassic Dibei gas reservoir in the east Kuqa foreland basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(6):1047-1056.
[26] 姜振学, 李峰, 杨海军, 等.库车坳陷迪北地区侏罗系致密储层裂缝发育特征及控藏模式[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(S2):102-111.
JIANG Zhenxue, LI Feng, YANG Haijun, et al.Development characteristics of fractures in Jurassic tight reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression and its reservoir-controlling mode[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(S2):102-111.
[27] 余海波, 漆家福, 杨宪彰, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷中生代原型盆地分析[J].新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(6):644-653.
YU Haibo, QI Jiafu, YANG Xianzhang, et al.Analysis of Mesozoic prototype basin in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(6):644-653.
[28] 王招明, 李勇, 谢会文, 等.库车前陆盆地超深层大油气田形成的地质认识[J].中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(1):37-43.
WANG Zhaoming, LI Yong, XIE Huiwen, et al.Geological understanding on the formation of large-scale ultra-deep oil-gas field in Kuqa foreland basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(1):37-43.
[29] 何登发, 袁航, 李涤, 等.吐格尔明背斜核部花岗岩的年代学、地球化学与构造环境及其对塔里木地块北缘古生代伸展聚敛旋回的揭示[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(1):133-146.
HE Dengfa, YUAN Hang, LI Di, et al.Chronology, geochemistry and tectonic setting of granites at the core of Tugerming anticline, Tarim Basin:indications of Paleozoic extensional and compressional cycle at the northern margin of Tarim continental block[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(1):133-146.
[30] 王珂, 张荣虎, 余朝丰, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组储层特征及控制因素[J].天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(5):623-635.
WANG Ke, ZHANG Ronghu, YU Chaofeng, et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of Jurassic Ahe reservoir of the northern tectonic belt, Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(5):623-635.
[31] 李峰, 姜振学, 李卓, 等.库车坳陷迪北地区下侏罗统天然气富集机制[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2015, 40(9):1538-1548.
LI Feng, JIANG Zhenxue, LI Zhuo, et al.Enriched mechanism of natural gas of Lower Jurassic in Dibei area, Kuqa depression[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2015, 40(9):1538-1548.
[32] 卢玉红, 钱玲, 鲁雪松, 等.迪北地区致密气藏地质条件及资源潜力[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2015, 34(4):8-14.
LU Yuhong, QIAN Ling, LU Xuesong, et al.Geological conditions and resource potential of the tight gas reservoirs in Dibei area[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015, 34(4):8-14.
[33] 琚岩, 孙雄伟, 刘立炜, 等.库车坳陷迪北致密砂岩气藏特征[J].新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(3):264-267.
JU Yan, SUN Xiongwei, LIU Liwei, et al.Characteristics of Jurassic tight sandstone gas reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(3):264-267.
[34] 中国石油塔里木油田公司.库车侏罗系湖盆沉积充填特征与潜在有利储集相带[R].中国石油塔里木油田公司, 2021.
PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company.Lake basin sedimentary characteristics and potential favorable facies of Jurassic in Kuqa depression[R].Petrochina Tarim Oilfield Company, 2021.
[35] 王珂, 杨海军, 李勇, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带地质特征与勘探潜力[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(7):885-905.
WANG Ke, YANG Haijun, LI Yong, et al.Geological characteristics and exploration potential of the northern tectonic belt of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):885-905.
[36] ZENG Lianbo.Microfracturing in the Upper Triassic Sichuan Basin tight-gas sandstones:tectonic, overpressure, and diagenetic origins[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(12):1811-1825.
[37] ANDERS M H, LAUBACH S E, SCHOLZ C H.Microfractures:a review[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 2014, 69:377-394.
[38] 孙宝珊, 丁原辰, 邵兆刚, 等.声发射法测量古今应力在油田的应用[J].地质力学学报, 1996, 2(2):11-17.
SUN Baoshan, DING Yuanchen, SHAO Zhaogang, et al.Application of acoustic emission technique in determination of fossil and present-day stresses in oil fields[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 1996, 2(2):11-17.
[39] 曾联波, 谭成轩, 张明利.塔里木盆地库车坳陷中新生代构造应力场及其油气运聚效应[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2004, 34(增刊1):98-106.
ZENG Lianbo, TAN Chengxuan, ZHANG Mingli.Tectonic stress field and its effect on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Mesozoic and Cenozoic in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2004, 34(S1):98-106.
[40] 刘洪涛, 曾联波.喜马拉雅运动在塔里木盆地库车坳陷的表现——来自岩石声发射实验的证据[J].地质通报, 2004, 23(7):676-679.
LIU Hongtao, ZENG Lianbo.Expression of the Himalayan orogeny in the Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin-evidence from the rock acoustic emission experiment[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2004, 23(7):676-679.
[41] 魏红兴, 黄梧桓, 罗海宁, 等.库车坳陷东部断裂特征与构造演化[J].地球科学, 2016, 41(6):1074-1080.
WEI Hongxing, HUANG Wuhuan, LUO Haining, et al.Faults characteristics and evolution in the eastern Kuqa depression[J].Earth Science, 2016, 41(6):1074-1080.
[42] 张玮, 徐振平, 赵凤全, 等.库车坳陷东部构造变形样式及演化特征[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(1):48-53.
ZHANG Wei, XU Zhenping, ZHAO Fengquan, et al.Structural deformation styles and tectonic evolution characteristics in eastern Kuqa depression[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(1):48-53.
[43] 郑淳方, 侯贵廷, 詹彦, 等.库车坳陷新生代构造应力场恢复[J].地质通报, 2016, 35(1):130-139.
ZHENG Chunfang, HOU Guiting, ZHAN Yan, et al.An analysis of Cenozoic tectonic stress fields in the Kuqa depression[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(1):130-139.
[44] 万天丰.古构造应力场[M].北京:地质出版社, 1988.
WAN Tianfeng.Palaeotectonic stress field[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1988.
[45] 丁原辰, 孙宝珊, 汪西海, 等.塔里木盆地北部油田古应力的AE法测量[J].地质力学学报, 1996, 2(2):18-25.
DING Yuanchen, SUN Baoshan, WANG Xihai, et al.Paleostress in northern Tarim oil field estimated by AE[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 1996, 2(2):18-25.
[46] 丁原辰.声发射法古应力测量问题讨论[J].地质力学学报, 2000, 6(2):45-52.
DING Yuanchen.Discussion on paleostress measurement by AE method[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2000, 6(2):45-52.
[47] 李军, 张超谟, 李进福, 等.库车前陆盆地构造压实作用及其对储集层的影响[J].石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(1):47-51.
LI Jun, ZHANG Chaomo, LI Jinfu, et al.Tectonic compaction and its influence on reservoirs in the Kuqa foreland basin, Tarim[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(1):47-51.
[48] 张惠良, 张荣虎, 杨海军, 等.构造裂缝发育型砂岩储层定量评价方法及应用——以库车前陆盆地白垩系为例[J].岩石学报, 2012, 28(3):827-835.
ZHANG Huiliang, ZHANG Ronghu, YANG Haijun, et al.Quantitative evaluation methods and applications of tectonic fracture developed sand reservoir:a Cretaceous example from Kuqa foreland basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(3):827-835.
[49] 王珂, 张惠良, 张荣虎, 等.塔里木盆地大北气田构造应力场解析与数值模拟[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(11):2557-2572.
WANG Ke, ZHANG Huiliang, ZHANG Ronghu, et al.Analysis and numerical simulation of tectonic stress field in the Dabei gas field, Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(11):2557-2572.
[50] 毛亚昆, 钟大康, 李勇, 等.构造挤压背景下深层砂岩压实分异特征——以塔里木盆地库车前陆冲断带白垩系储层为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6):1113-1122.
MAO Yakun, ZHONG Dakang, LI Yong, et al.Differential compaction of deep sandstones in compressive tectonic setting:a case study of Cretaceous reservoirs in Kuqa foreland thrust belt, Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(6):1113-1122.
[51] 王艳忠, 操应长, 葸克来, 等.碎屑岩储层地质历史时期孔隙度演化恢复方法——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段为例[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(6):1100-1111.
WANG Yanzhong, CAO Yingchang, XI Kelai, et al.A recovery method for porosity evolution of clastic reservoirs with geological time:a case study from the upper submember of Es₄ in the Dongying depression, Jiyang subbasin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6):1100-1111.
[52] 寿建峰, 张惠良, 沈扬, 等.中国油气盆地砂岩储层的成岩压实机制分析[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(8):2165-2170.
SHOU Jianfeng, ZHANG Huiliang, SHEN Yang, et al.Diagenetic mechanisms of sandstone reservoirs in China oil and gas-bearing basins[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(8):2165-2170.
[53] 昌伦杰, 赵力彬, 杨学君, 等.应用ICT技术研究致密砂岩气藏储集层裂缝特征[J].新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(4):471-475.
CHANG Lunjie, ZHAO Libin, YANG Xuejun, et al.Application of industrial computed tomography (ICT) to research of fractured tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(4):471-475.
[54] 巩磊, 高铭泽, 曾联波, 等.影响致密砂岩储层裂缝分布的主控因素分析——以库车前陆盆地侏罗系-新近系为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2):199-208.
GONG Lei, GAO Mingze, ZENG Lianbo, et al.Controlling factors on fracture development in the tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of Jurassic-Neogene in the Kuqa foreland basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(2):199-208.
[55] 赵继龙, 王俊鹏, 刘春, 等.塔里木盆地克深2区块储层裂缝数值模拟研究[J].现代地质, 2014, 28(6):1275-1283.
ZHAO Jilong, WANG Junpeng, LIU Chun, et al.Reservoir fracture numerical simulation of Keshen-2 block in Tarim Basin[J].Geoscience, 2014, 28(6):1275-1283.
[56] 鞠玮, 侯贵廷, 冯胜斌, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地庆城-合水地区延长组长6₃储层构造裂缝定量预测[J].地学前缘, 2014, 21(6):310-320.
JU Wei, HOU Guiting, FENG Shengbin, et al.Quantitative prediction of the Yanchang Formation Chang 6₃ reservoir tectonic fracture in the Qingcheng-Heshui area, Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2014, 21(6):310-320.
[57] 范存辉, 秦启荣, 李虎, 等.四川盆地元坝中部断褶带须家河组储层构造裂缝形成期次[J].石油学报, 2017, 38(10):1135-1143.
FAN Cunhui, QIN Qirong, LI Hu, et al.Formation stages of structural fractures of Xujiahe Formation in the fault-fold belt of central Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10):1135-1143.
[58] 张凤奇, 王震亮, 鲁雪松, 等.库车坳陷现今构造应力场与天然气分布关系[J].新疆石油地质, 2012, 33(4):431-433.
ZHANG Fengqi, WANG Zhenliang, LU Xuesong, et al.Relationship between present tectonic stress field and natural gas distribution in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2012, 33(4):431-433.

库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测

Structural diagenesis and reservoir prediction of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 余朝丰, 徐振平, 周露, 王珂, 张亮. 库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1049-1064.
[2]	王冰, 邱楠生, 王祥, 张海祖, 刘一锋, 常健, 朱传庆. 库车坳陷克拉苏-依奇克里克构造带构造挤压型超压识别与计算[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1107-1121.
[3]	吴林, 朱明, 冯兴强, 冀冬生, 周磊, 刘圣鑫, 张林炎, 谭元隆, 钱竹良, 杨珍. 准噶尔盆地四棵树凹陷构造应力场与构造变形解析[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 494-506.
[4]	魏国齐, 张荣虎, 智凤琴, 王珂, 余朝丰, 董才源. 库车坳陷东部中生界构造-岩性地层油气藏形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1113-1125.
[5]	侯连华, 杨帆, 杨春, 杨海军, 李勇. 常规油气区带与圈闭有效性定量评价原理及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(9): 1126-1141.
[6]	刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 陈戈, 苏洲, 高乔. 远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 307-318.
[7]	冯建伟, 赵力彬, 王焰东. 库车坳陷克深气田超深层致密储层产能控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 478-488.
[8]	张月, 韩登林, 杨铖晔, 袁瑞, 王晨晨, 张娟. 超深层碎屑岩储层裂缝充填流体迁移规律——以库车坳陷克深井区白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 292-300.
[9]	史超群, 许安明, 魏红兴, 胡春雷, 张星, 张文, 莫涛, 张慧芳, 周露, 史玲玲, 朱文慧, 陈维力. 构造挤压对碎屑岩储层破坏程度的定量表征——以库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系阿合组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 205-215.
[10]	曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 高志勇, 巩磊, 吕文雅. 库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1601-1609.
[11]	张荣虎, 曾庆鲁, 王珂, 王俊鹏, 孟广仁, 李娴静. 储层构造动力成岩作用理论技术新进展与超深层油气勘探地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1278-1292.
[12]	张荣虎, 邹伟宏, 陈戈, 赵继龙, 张惠良, 伍劲, 李娴静. 塔里木盆地北部下白垩统大型湖相砂坝特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(8): 845-857.
[13]	高志勇, 王晓琦, 李建明, 崔京钢, 金旭, 周川闽, 冯佳睿, 石雨昕. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层孔喉组合类型定量表征与展布[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 645-659.
[14]	范存辉, 李虎, 钟城, 秦启荣, 胡东风, 张羽, 何顺, 张玮. 川东南丁山构造龙马溪组页岩构造裂缝期次及演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 379-390.
[15]	高志勇, 周川闽, 冯佳睿, 吴昊, 李雯. 库车坳陷白垩系巴什基奇克组泥砾的成因机制与厚层状砂体展布[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(8): 996-1010.